Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige Refuses To Answer Question About Kang's MCU Future Ahead Of SDCC Panel

Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige Refuses To Answer Question About Kang's MCU Future Ahead Of SDCC Panel

Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige has refused to comment on future plans for Kang the Conqueror in the MCU but does weigh in on James Gunn's Superman and the perceived rivalry between Marvel and DC.

By JoshWilding - Jul 26, 2024 04:07 AM EST

Jonathan Majors received widespread praise for his work as Kang in the MCU, impressing fans and critics alike in Loki and Ant-Man and The Wasp: Quantumania.

The stage was being set for the time-travelling villain to be the MCU's new big bad; however, when Majors found himself caught up in a trial which ended with him being found guilty of assault and harassment of his ex-girlfriend, his time as Kang understandably reached an abrupt end.

Throw in the fact the Ant-Man threequel wasted the "Conqueror" Variant and it's been obvious for a while that Marvel Studios will pivot away from the character in the remainder of the Multiverse Saga. 

Talking to Screen Rant, Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige completely dodged the question of whether Kang - played by a new actor - will still factor into Avengers 5 (formerly known as Avengers: The Kang Dynasty).

"I've done a number of interviews in the last couple of days, and you're the first person to [ask]," he replied. "I give you credit for just outright asking the question, and I'll give myself credit for trying to invade it and avoid it entirely."

With any luck, Feige's Multiverse Saga plans will be revealed during Marvel Studios' Hall H panel at the San Diego Comic-Con tomorrow. 

In a separate conversation with CinemaBlend, the executive broke his silence on James Gunn's Superman (it's no secret Feige is a huge fan of Superman: The Movie) and clearly likes what he sees. 

"I've seen the paparazzi shots that I'm sure everybody else has seen," he noted. "It looks great to me. James is the best."

Feige then went on to address the seemingly endless "Marvel vs. DC" debate and pointed out that the majority of moviegoers likely don't care about which company makes these movies; they just want great superhero content. 

"I've always said yes. Because number one, I want to see great movies. And number two, I want there to be great movies in theaters for audiences to go to," he explained. "And in between our movies, be reminded that going to the movies is an incredible and singular emotional activity."

So the more great movies there are...Twisters this weekend is overperforming. I haven't seen it yet, but I can't wait to. So that's exciting," Feige continued. "And then when it comes to the distinguished competition, as they say, a lot of people don't know the difference. Somebody just said, ‘Congrats on Blue Beetle’ to me! [Laughs] People don't know."

DC Studios producing quality content won't be bad news for Marvel Studios. Instead, it's going to help a genre which many are attempting to sign a death warrant for due to so-called "superhero fatigue."

Let us know your thoughts on Feige's comments in the usual place.

RUMOR: AVENGERS: THE KANG DYNASTY Would Have Effectively Served As SHANG-CHI 2
Related:

RUMOR: AVENGERS: THE KANG DYNASTY Would Have "Effectively Served" As SHANG-CHI 2

Simu Liu's SHANG-CHI Was Reportedly Going To Be A Major Focus Of AVENGERS: THE KANG DYNASTY
Recommended For You:

Simu Liu's SHANG-CHI Was Reportedly Going To Be A Major Focus Of AVENGERS: THE KANG DYNASTY

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Superheromoviefan
Superheromoviefan - 7/26/2024, 4:15 AM
just recast, he was a bad actor anyway
Fogs
Fogs - 7/26/2024, 4:36 AM
@Superheromoviefan - Exactly, so easy to recast given the whole variant thing.
Fogs
Fogs - 7/26/2024, 4:37 AM
Just get a major black star like Denzel and people will forget about this kid pronto.
EskimoJ
EskimoJ - 7/26/2024, 5:08 AM
@Superheromoviefan - Well, he certainly wasn't a bad actor, but definitely recast though.
Malatrova15
Malatrova15 - 7/26/2024, 5:36 AM
@Superheromoviefan - ok budinthats enoug
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 7/26/2024, 8:47 AM
@Superheromoviefan - kate mara.

no fr
dragon316
dragon316 - 7/26/2024, 1:57 PM
@Superheromoviefan - people didn’t say that when post picture of himself play as kang befor eloki episode
TheManWithoutFear
TheManWithoutFear - 7/26/2024, 4:33 AM
Kevin said 'invade'?
Omario
Omario - 7/26/2024, 4:41 AM
@TheManWithoutFear - evade*
TheManWithoutFear
TheManWithoutFear - 7/26/2024, 4:42 AM
In the comics Kang is one of the great Avengers villains. So I'm hoping for some redemption for the character and for the GA to see him in his real glory.
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 7/26/2024, 5:20 AM
@TheManWithoutFear - I agree, but like Ultron I would've preferred him as an intermediate villain. I don't think he can carry a saga
TMW1987ProudProWrestlingFan
TMW1987ProudProWrestlingFan - 7/26/2024, 4:59 AM
I really hope they don't just dump Kang. He's here now, just recast & finish him up.

Colman Domingo please!
MarvelousMarty
MarvelousMarty - 7/26/2024, 5:04 AM
Did he get wide praise for his Kang? I thought it was overall pretty sh*t.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 7/26/2024, 6:06 AM
@MarvelousMarty - One of the only things that did get praise in Antman 3 was his performance in the role and certainly did for He Who Remains in Loki. Sure folk took issue with how he was defeated but in terms of his acting performance in those two roles there was near universal praise at the time (more mixed reception for his role as Victor Timely).
TheyDont
TheyDont - 7/26/2024, 7:06 AM
@Apophis71 - Who praised his pouty face? He was lame af
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 7/26/2024, 7:20 AM
@TheyDont -

User Comment Image
TheyDont
TheyDont - 7/26/2024, 7:22 AM
@Apophis71 - That's, like, the common opinion after seeing him.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 7/26/2024, 7:59 AM
Specificaly for Antman 3 from the top critics

FilmWeek : Jonathan Majors is just outstanding

Dwight Brown Ink : It’s rare that an antagonist outshines the hero, but Majors’ brooding, blasé villainy gives the film some cred

News.com.au : Kang the Conqueror (an intimidating Jonathan Majors) is a fierce, megalomaniac and powerful figure

Screendaily : ...the sinister Kang The Conqueror, brought to life compellingly by Jonathan Majors...Majors is the picture’s greatest asset, however, playing the slowly simmering Kang whose soft-spoken style belies the depth of his wickedness

The Observer : Magnetic Jonathan Majors is the saving grace of Marvel’s baffling, illogical latest outing...The film’s main asset is Jonathan Majors as Kang the Conqueror: his performance, with its velvet-soft line deliveries and unfathomable, boundless rage, is the magnetic core of this

Movie Freak : Ant-Man’s return is notable for the villain and not a lot more...There are a handful of undeniably strong moments, most of them involving Majors...Majors knows when to speak softly, understands exactly when to twist the volume dial up to 11, and showcases a menacing physicality that’s terrifying.

Reader : ...the universe-threatening Kang The Conqueror (a terrifyingly excellent Jonathan Majors)

CTV's Your Morning : Jonathan Majors is giving an emotionally acrobatic performance that this franchise does not deserve.

Minneapolis Star Tribune : [Majors] is so quietly charismatic that, no matter how many civilizations Kang destroys, you kinda want him to win.

I could keep going, most the reviews are terrible but almost all pick out Majors as Kang as one of if not the only good thing about the film.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 7/26/2024, 8:01 AM
@TheyDont - It realy isn't in regard to critics, users opinions here are not generaly reflective of critics views and vice versa.
bobevanz
bobevanz - 7/26/2024, 10:26 AM
@MarvelousMarty - I liked him in Loki, barely
DEVWoulf
DEVWoulf - 7/26/2024, 5:23 AM
...Hear me out.

User Comment Image
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 7/26/2024, 5:26 AM
I wouldn't mind it if they recast Kang, have Kang's son take over, or replace him with Beyonder, as long as I get that incredible emotional activity Feige's talking about.

And yeah, he's right the general audience doesn't mind. Fans have a much closer relationship with an IP and thus might expect more from it, but the normal audience goer just wants a good time. Same reason I'm going to see Twisters.
Malatrova15
Malatrova15 - 7/26/2024, 5:37 AM
KANG BROS ..WE NEVER LEFT!!!
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 7/26/2024, 6:10 AM
Given this avoidance of the question , I have a feeling we’ll definitely be getting clarification of Kang’s status on Saturday and likely in the form of a new actor….

Colman Domingo please!!.

User Comment Image
Scarilian
Scarilian - 7/26/2024, 8:36 AM
It's not just the actor, the character is completely fricked. It's impossible to take him seriously, he's not intimidating, he's been beaten every time we see him and giving him a generic 'my entire reality was wiped out and I want to remake it' storyline that they cut from Ant-Man 3 to include later won't magically fix things. They have an entire council of these incompetent characters and there's no way to handle them without it turning into even more of a joke.
dragon316
dragon316 - 7/26/2024, 8:37 AM
Of course he is he have no idea at himself
Order66
Order66 - 7/26/2024, 10:08 AM
Bad storytelling will be to completely ignore Kang. They need to finish his story whether he gets wiped out completely by Doom or the Beyonder, or they follow thru and recast him. Regardless, you can’t introduce an army of Kangs and never talk about it again. Like Deadpool said, that’s just lazy writing.
bobevanz
bobevanz - 7/26/2024, 10:27 AM
@Order66 - they shouldn't have done it in the first place. Like Deadpool said, the multiverse didn't work

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder