BLACK PANTHER: WAKANDA FOREVER Writer And Director Address Claims Val Was "Shoehorned" Into The Sequel

BLACK PANTHER: WAKANDA FOREVER Writer And Director Address Claims Val Was "Shoehorned" Into The Sequel

Black Panther: Wakanda Forever is great, but was Julia Louis-Dreyfus' Valentina Allegra de Fontaine only in there to set the stage for future stories? Not according to the sequel's writer and director...

By JoshWilding - Dec 29, 2022 07:12 AM EST
Source: The New York Times

Black Panther: Wakanda Forever is an emotional, fitting tribute to Chadwick Boseman and T'Challa. As well as introducing Namor and Ironheart, the sequel establishes Shuri as the MCU's new Black Panther. That all worked really well, but a subplot revolving around Valentina Allegra de Fontaine and Everett Ross did not. 

As well as revealing they used to be married, the Black Panther sequel confirms Val is the CIA's new Director and someone who is very interested in acquiring Vibranium.

Beyond that, it was hard to figure out why Val showed up beyond laying the groundwork for movies like Captain America: New World Order and Thunderbolts. During a recent interview with The New York Times, writer Joe Robert Cole and director Ryan Coogler denied that Marvel Studios forced the MCU's mysterious new antagonist on them.

"I've never had a conversation where I was asked to incorporate something that didn’t feel organic," Cole says. "The dynamic of the U.S. being an instigator and Western powers being an instigator, that always existed. It wasn’t, 'Oh, we need to find a reason to make this character exist.' It was, 'Oh, this is already in here and there’s this wonderful actress available.'"

Coogler added, "Yeah, nobody was shoehorned in or asked to be put into the movie or anything like that. Actually, in this version, [Louis-Dreyfus’s role] was pared back in order to make space for dealing with T’Challa’s death. And we had Val in there before she even appeared in any of the other movies, before 'Black Widow' and 'Falcon and the Winter Soldier.'"

"People assume that we were told to put her in," the filmmaker adds, "but she was there from the beginning."

While it's interesting that Val wasn't forced on Black Panther: Wakanda Forever's creative team, we'd still argue that her role in the movie didn't work particularly well.

Yes, we've learned a little more about her, but for anyone who didn't remember her from Black Widow's post-credits scene or that Disney+ appearance, this cameo gave fans few reasons to care about her machinations. We'll see how things play out in the next few years, though. 

Black Panther: Wakanda Forever is currently playing in theaters!

BLACK PANTHER Star Letitia Wright Teases Shuri's MCU Return: There's A Lot Coming Up!
Related:

BLACK PANTHER Star Letitia Wright Teases Shuri's MCU Return: "There's A Lot Coming Up!"

BLACK PANTHER: WAKANDA FOREVER Concept Art Reveals Deleted Scenes And More Ironheart Action
Recommended For You:

BLACK PANTHER: WAKANDA FOREVER Concept Art Reveals Deleted Scenes And More Ironheart Action

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
FireandBlood
FireandBlood - 12/29/2022, 7:43 AM
Nope, the internet knows better. If they say she was shorehorned in because of whatever, then it must be true.
mastakilla39
mastakilla39 - 12/29/2022, 1:16 PM
@PlusUltra - Agree, we can trust somebody on disney's payroll. They will lie just to get you in theaters. Notice how he said I was never asked to "incorporate something that didn’t feel organic". So the useless Riri Williams and Midnight Angels must have felt "organic" to him because its blatantly obvious Disney asked him to set up those characters for "potential" D+ shows.
FireandBlood
FireandBlood - 12/29/2022, 1:41 PM
@mastakilla39 - Coogler is a big fan of Ta-Nehisi Coates run, and the Midnight Angels were a bit part of his run, so just like a lot of elements his introduced from that run, they were always going to be introduced.
bobevanz
bobevanz - 12/29/2022, 7:47 AM
It was a cameo, that's the way I saw it. Although it can feel shoe horned as well
TopBoy
TopBoy - 12/29/2022, 7:50 AM
It was definitely show horned in. Coogler needs to stop making things up and being defensive..
MochaKing
MochaKing - 12/29/2022, 7:53 AM
@TopBoy - Oh no... you know better than Coogler...
Tonic24k
Tonic24k - 12/31/2022, 11:47 AM
@TopBoy - Coogler doesn't have to make anything up. You seem to just want to complain for no good reason.
WarMonkey
WarMonkey - 12/29/2022, 7:52 AM
She was shoehorned in. Disney is pushing her character and they saw this as a good opportunity to show more of her. She added nothing to the movie, she was literally shoe-horned into a story as a side character.
MosquitoFarmer
MosquitoFarmer - 12/29/2022, 11:50 AM
@WarMonkey - Any character in any movie that doesn't add anything is shoehorned in?
Deadinside
Deadinside - 12/29/2022, 1:01 PM
@MosquitoFarmer - 🤷‍♂️ Yeah, it's kinda' like me in most people's lives...!
Tonic24k
Tonic24k - 12/31/2022, 11:48 AM
@WarMonkey - The director literally explained this and you're still on about thinking you know everything. Lol. Her character made plenty of sense being in this film.
FireandBlood
FireandBlood - 12/29/2022, 7:57 AM
“Phase 4 has no connectivity”

Val and variants keep showing up

“They’re forcing Val and this multiverse shit”

Vigor
Vigor - 12/29/2022, 7:59 AM
@PlusUltra - lmfao
soberchimera
soberchimera - 12/29/2022, 2:01 PM
@PlusUltra - Who is saying that there's no connectivity?!? It's just been bad.
Tonic24k
Tonic24k - 12/31/2022, 11:50 AM
@soberchimera - Not at all. Most of Phase 4 is excellent and based on reviews and box office performance, it's the second best phase. All this "Phase 4 is bad" talk is utter nonsense.
soberchimera
soberchimera - 12/31/2022, 12:16 PM
@Tonic24k - Black Widow, Eternals, and Shang-Chi all made less money than the first Ant-Man film. The only MCU films that were BO hits were sequels, and if BO were a barometer for quality, then the Transformers and F&F films would be part of the Criterion Collection. Thor 4, Doctor Strange 2, and Eternals all got Mixed to Average reviews on Metacritic which is more than average for previous phases.
Tonic24k
Tonic24k - 12/31/2022, 1:17 PM
@soberchimera - Those were all films released during the pandemic era of theaters. So kind of a bad argument. But also, that's hardly my entire argument. But it does lend to it. Based on aggregated reviews--not just from one source so there is no bias--Phase 4 collectively reviewed better than Phase 1 & 2. That is a fact. (Using Audience and Critic RT scores, Metacritic, IMDb, and IGN.) And this doesn't rely on BO figures at all so we don't even need to consider that aspect.
soberchimera
soberchimera - 12/31/2022, 3:13 PM
@Tonic24k - Not a bad argument since most COVID restrictions were lifted by mid-2021, the time those films came out. F9 came out before Black Widow and it made over 700m. And not really sure where you're drawing your conclusion on the reviews aspect, but even the most die-hard Marvel fans on this site and thoughout the internet have been vocal that Phase 4 has been the weakest even on RT, Metacritic, and IMDb.

https://www.mediaplaynews.com/study-phase-4-of-marvel-cinematic-universe-least-favorite/

https://www.top10films.co.uk/72170-study-reveals-marvels-phase-4-features-its-weakest-films-tv-shows/
Tonic24k
Tonic24k - 1/3/2023, 4:39 PM
@soberchimera - Sure, restrictions were lifted but that still doesn't mean every person on the planet was suddenly comfortable going to the movies. There are correlated stats to this and box office numbers reflect it. It's a bad argument.

As for your disbelief, here you go:

DATA


SUMMARY
soberchimera
soberchimera - 1/3/2023, 5:28 PM
@Tonic24k - And yet Godzilla vs Kong came out 3 months before Black Widow and made 100m more. No Time to Die came out a month before Eternals and made 300m more, so I'm still failing to see how it's a bad argument because clearly people were going out to the movies at this time.

A tv rating on RT is not the same as a movie rating on RT, for example Falcon and Winter Soldier has only 40 critic ratings whereas Black Widow has 452 critic ratings, so judging their scores the same when there is a mismatch in data is of course going to hyperinflate the overall RT score for Phase 4. If the chart was judging the same amount of data as Phase 1, 2, 3, of course it would be lower. Phase 1 & 2 have only 6 movies each and Phase 3 has only 11 compared to Phase 4's 18 movies and tv shows! You don't need to be a data scientist to see that the Phases are not being judged equally on that chart.
Tonic24k
Tonic24k - 1/5/2023, 9:24 PM
@soberchimera - And you don't need to be a data analyst to know how averages work. Or how aggregated data works. Is RT the only review site I listed? Nope. Yet here you are harping on RT like it's the only source I provided. To be unbiased I included multiple sources. The outcome is that Phase 4 is reviewed as the second best phase. And again, regardless of how many entries each phase has, averages tell us what we need to know here. And I mean, what else are you going to go by??

As for Black Widow did you account for the fact that it was given a home release simultaneous to the theatrical release?
soberchimera
soberchimera - 1/6/2023, 9:48 AM
@Tonic24k - There were more critic reviews for the Phase 4 films than Phase 4 tv shows on Metacritic too. You're putting quantity sampling over quality sampling, not all the datasets (Phases 1-4) are being judged the same, so saying that Phase 4 is the second most successful Phase from a chart that's using stale and incomplete data isn't reflecting the reality of the situation.

Godzilla vs Kong was given a home release on HBO Max simultaneous to the theatrical release and it still broke several pandemic box office records.
Tonic24k
Tonic24k - 1/7/2023, 6:14 PM
@soberchimera - I'm using all available data. What else can you do? Guess? How would you gauge it more accurately? And who's to say if there were "more critics" involved in the Phase 1 & 2 era that they wouldn't be lower? Again, you'd have to just guess.

Black Widow made an additional $125M on Disney+ with it's simultaneous home release. GvK made what on HBO Max home release? I couldn't find it. And btw, Black Widow broke pandemic box office records, too.

Domestic Opening
Godzilla vs Kong - $31.6M
Black Widow - $80.3M

Domestic Gross
Godzilla vs Kong - $100.9M
Black Widow - $183.6M

Domestically, BW crushed GvK. And the only reason worldwide box office is $100M more is because BW wasn't released in China where GvK made nearly $200M. So take that huge communist market out of the equation for an even comparison and BW made more. Or we can just look at domestically and see BW performed better.
soberchimera
soberchimera - 1/7/2023, 7:31 PM
@Tonic24k - How would you gauge it more accurately?
As I've already said, have the same number of critic reviews for each and every tv show and movie in Phase 4 for starters.

That $125M was not from streaming on Disney+ alone, that took digital downloads into account also, and it was released digitally on August 10.
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/disney-makes-first-move-in-scarlett-johanssons-black-widow-suit-1235001093/

Godzilla vs Kong was watched by 5.8 million US households on HBO Max after 30 days compared to 2.8 million US households for Black Widow's first 30 days. So BW hardly crushed GvK domestically.

So take that huge communist market out of the equation for an even comparison and BW made more.
If you're so keen to remove data from the equation for an even comparison, remove all the Phase 4 tv shows with far fewer reviews from your chart and see if Phase 4 is still as great as you proport it to be.
Tonic24k
Tonic24k - 1/8/2023, 10:35 AM
@soberchimera - "As I've already said, have the same number of critic reviews for each and every tv show and movie in Phase 4 for starters."

Okay, right. But can you accomplish this? If so, bring that data to the table and we'll reevaluate. But I'm pretty sure this is an impossible task and we have no way to leverage such hypothetical data. So we're stuck with what we've got. This is to say, I don't necessarily disagree that the assessment of all phases are equal and fair. But honestly, it's anyone's guess which direction it would swing if it were. But with what we do have, that is the most accurate info we have to go by without guessing. And it's really not hard to see how Phase 4 is considered better than Phase 1 and 2 overall. Sure, there were some disappointments. But they don't overshadow where P4 shined. For example, even being a huge Iron Man fan, I easily put WandaVision over Iron Man 2. If given the option, I'm watching Moon Knight over Hulk, Thor 1 and 2. I'm watching Loki over Iron Man 3. Shang-Chi over Etc...

As for the BW streaming...maybe you're right. I could be conflating the data I found. But as you can see from my previous response, I'm looking for as accurate as info as I can and being honest when I can't find it. And it seems you couldn't find GvK figures either since we're now talking household viewership instead of dollars. BW still out performed GvK in the box office markets they were both released in tho. Point being, the only thing that matters is we get all the same exact data for each film. And as I write this I realize how ridiculous this is getting...but being a science nerd I guess drives me to such depths of informational digging.

I also think we got a bit off topic. Because the point was pandemic era box office performances. And I believe the fact remains, these performances were still hindered quite significantly by the regulations in place at the time of their releases.

As for your removing the shows bit. I obliged and found that critic scores decreased while audience scores increased. 76% and 89% respectively. However, this just renders the data skewed because the shows are part of Phase 4 and the level of quality it brought to the table. Just because there are fewer reviews doesn't mean those reviews are somehow inaccurate data.

At the end of they day, we can conclude that Phase 4 isn't anything like the dramatic naysayers claim it to be.
soberchimera
soberchimera - 1/8/2023, 1:02 PM
@Tonic24k -
But I'm pretty sure this is an impossible task and we have no way to leverage such hypothetical data. This is to say, I don't necessarily disagree that the assessment of all phases are equal and fair.
Then you should at least concede that saying most of Phase 4 is excellent and the second best phase is a bit hyperbolic since the data reflecing this is incomplete and the general consensus online says otherwise. And I'll rip the band-aid off here, the only Phase 4 offerings I thought were above average were No Way Home, Loki and Werewolf By Night.

Because the point was pandemic era box office performances.
The point was that Black Widow just wasn't a very good film and that other films during the time that were released before it performed better.

Point being, the only thing that matters is we get all the same exact data for each film.
And I've shown that there were more eyeballs watching GvK on streaming than Black Widow if we're holding each film to the same standards, GvK was clearly the more popular film with more than double the viewership of BW. GvK even had a higher Home Market Performance than Black Widow with 36M in domestic video sales compared to BW's 23M.
https://www.the-numbers.com/movie/Godzilla-vs-Kong-(2020)#tab=more
https://www.the-numbers.com/movie/Black-Widow-(2021)#tab=summary

And again if you're so keen to have the same exact data for each film, you can see why I take issue with Phase 4 tv shows having less available review data and being held to the same standard as the Phase 4 films with more available data.

I obliged and found that critic scores decreased while audience scores increased.
All the critic scores decreased, the IMDb score remained the same, and Phase 4 was the lowest of all the phases except the RT audience score, and let's be honest audience reviews today aren't as trustworthy as they once were, as many people contend that IMDb is the least accurate of all the review platforms since it's made up entirely of audience reviews, users can create multiple accounts to rig scores, etc.

However, this just renders the data skewed because the shows are part of Phase 4 and the level of quality it brought to the table.
The level of data quality is ALREADY poor and imcomplete data DOES result in inaccurate data. For example, in medical studies if participants drop out of the study because they're feeling unwell, then the final dataset will include only the healthy individuals and the data will not a paint the full picture of the selected population.
Tonic24k
Tonic24k - 1/8/2023, 7:04 PM
@soberchimera - You want me to concede something that doesn't warrant conceding. Phase 4 was legitimately better than Phase 1 and 2. I think that myself and reviews reflect that.

And no, BW did not underperform considering pandemic regulations in theaters, just as GvK didn't underperform. And yes, BW out performed GvK market for market. I've already pointed this out. Better overall domestic and significantly better opening weekend. It also reviewed just fine. So YOU may not have liked it very much but according to consensus it was a good movie. Definitely not the best MCU installment, but it was still good. And for the record, GvK reviewed slightly lower than BW. Audience score at 91% (the one you think is worthless), same as BW. Critic score at 75%, a bit lower than BW.

As far all this data back-and-forth...you seem to be trying to skew everything in your favor. "Audience scores don't mean as much, IMDb can be easily rigged, TV shows have much less reviews, I'm ignoring domestic stats other than the ones that go in my favor which is home release views..."

Dude, how do you not see the fallacy of your argument? YOU didn't like Phase 4 as much as many others did so you're trying to align anything you can with how you feel. "The data isn't perfect so it must align with my opinion." That's how you're treating this.
soberchimera
soberchimera - 1/9/2023, 8:21 PM
@Tonic24k -And yes, BW out performed GvK market for market.

And I gave you two examples of markets where GvK outperformed BW, 5.8 million > 2.3 million on steaming and 36M > 23M domestic video sales. And bear in mind covid restrictions in the US were not as lax in late March/early April of 2021 as they were in July 2021, so a 83M lead over a film that came out 3 months prior and which is also responsible for getting people to return to theaters is hardly a massive victory for BW over GvK.

you seem to be trying to skew everything in your favor

The data in your chart is far more distorted in your favor. And I never said that RT audience scores were worthless, I said they were less trustworthy. Especially since they added the Verified Audience score in 2019 (the year Phase 3 ended) which is inferior to the previous audience ratings system since the dataset is different and the Verified Audience score is almost always higher than the original score, so the All Audience scores should have been used for the chart instead of the Verified Audience scores since they’re being compared to the All Audience scores in Phases 1-3 which don’t have Verified Audience scores prior to Far From Home. So, going by the RT All Audience Scores, which is the fair thing to do so the data won’t be skewed, Phase 4 drops down to 81%. So that average drops down from #1 to #3

Movie/TV Show - All Audience
WandaVision 88%
The Falcon and Winter Soldier 83%
Loki 93%
Black Widow 79%
What If…? 93%
Shang-Chi 93%
Eternals 73%
Hawkeye 89%
Spider-Man: No Way Home 96%
Moon Knight 89%
Doctor Strange: MoM 76%
Ms. Marvel 80%
I Am Groot 73%
Thor: Love and Thunder 61%
She-Hulk 33%
Werewolf by Night 90%
Black Panther: Wakanda Forever 84%
Guardians of the Galaxy Holiday Special 80%
Average 81%

And if you really want to the most accurate data possible and love audience scores, then the Metacritic user score should’ve been included in the chart as well. This average drops Phase 4 to 4th place.

Phase 1: 7.3
Phase 2: 7.45
Phase 3: 7.2
Phase 4: 6.2

Also, the box office numbers weren’t adjusted for 2022 inflation (I adjusted the 2021 films to 2022 too). This drops Phase 4 to 3rd place and also remember Phase 1 had one less film than Phase 4 to generate revenue and one of Phase 4’s films had frickin’ Spider-Man. And even Phase 1’s average isn’t that far behind Phase 4’s at least not as much as Phase 4 is from 1 & 2.

Phase 1 Total: $5,081,957,032.56
Phase 1 Average: $846,992,838.76
Phase 2 Total: $6,661,795,268.60
Phase 2 Average: $1,110,299,211.43
Phase 3 Total: $16,122,112,218.09
Phase 3 Average: $1,465,646,565.28
Phase 4 Total: $5,987,219,678.61
Phase 4 Average: $855,317,096.94
thewanderer
thewanderer - 12/29/2022, 7:58 AM
I didn't feel like any of the Val or Everett stuff was shoehorned at all. It felt natural as part of the United Nations plot line.

Val was basically what everyone expected Doctor Doom to be in the movie.
EMagnusPhoenix
EMagnusPhoenix - 12/29/2022, 7:59 AM
Her being in the movie didn't bother me one bit,for the little time she was in it,how is that such a big deal to some ppl?
DCfan84
DCfan84 - 12/29/2022, 8:05 AM
You don't just shoehorn in the likes of Ms. Julia Louis-Dreyfus

TheHumanSpider2
TheHumanSpider2 - 12/29/2022, 8:17 AM
Riiiiiiiiiiigh, she was totally in the script since day one.
The CGi rhinos were also completely necesary for the story in the first movie.
Toonstrack
Toonstrack - 12/29/2022, 9:33 AM
@TheHumanSpider2 - yes?

Did you think this was a gotcha or something?
HopediahPlanter
HopediahPlanter - 12/29/2022, 7:45 PM
@Toonstrack -
GhostDog
GhostDog - 12/29/2022, 8:19 AM
I don’t think she was shoehorned but I think her showing up in TFATWS and Widow prior to this HANDICAPPED the character. The way she was used in those put a light on the character that I think impacted Coogler’s tale. In TFATWS and Widow she felt incredibly inorganic in and I think that stench followed her here. I think there’s a balancing act in trying to make a character a tool of connectivity whilst also making it feel organic.

I think her inclusion definitely changed once Chad passed and the script was redone but also this not being her debut as initially intended, must’ve also led to tweaks. Had this been her MCU debut, I think the character would’ve been vastly different. She would’ve had to have been established here. She was the least organic character in the movie at times though. The concept of her makes sense but the execution feels off. I think some of that is how JLD plays it; although I did like how aroused and glib she was about “dreaming of the U.S. having Vibranium” and what we would do with it.

I think had they made Val a Pamela Landy type, it would’ve sold better
SteelGunZ
SteelGunZ - 12/29/2022, 8:26 AM
Controlled Responses!
Tonic24k
Tonic24k - 12/31/2022, 11:54 AM
@SteelGunZ - Not at all. Everything Coogler said makes sense.
1 2
View Recorder