REVIEW: Harry Potter and the Death Hallows: Part One by JoshW

REVIEW: Harry Potter and the Death Hallows: Part One by JoshW

Hit the jump for my spoiler free take on whether this movie manages to finally live up to the brilliant novels or whether it falls as flat as the last few mediocre movies...

Review Opinion
By JoshWilding - Nov 27, 2010 12:11 PM EST
Filed Under: Fantasy
Source: Josh Wilding




To say I was pleasantly surprised by this movie would be an understatement. While I enjoyed the first three (and most of the fourth) it's seemed to me that the longer the books have gotten, the worse the movies have as well. As a big fan of the novels, it's hard to be pleased that they removed so many great moments in exchange for a lot of stuff that wasn’t there, and also failed to translate some things as well as they could have. While I was sort of pleased to hear that they would be splitting the final book into two movies, it's pretty obvious that there's a big financial motivation behind that decision, and so I was worried that many reviewers would be right and that this would actually be a little boring.

I'm pleased to say that at just under two and a half hours, it surprisingly wasn’t! Considering it's the second part of the novel where pretty much all the exciting set pieces and big moments happen, director David Yates did a great job of making this an interesting movie. The best part of the past six movies has always been the adult actors and it's a pity that you don’t see that much of them here. When you do though, it's a real treat. Despite the fact many of them have no more than a few lines, everyone from Ralph Fiennes to Alan Rickman and Helena Bonham Carter steal the scenes they're in with the quality performances you'd expect. In this movie though, it's left up to Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint and
Emma Watson to hold the movie. Once again, I was very pleasantly surprised.

I've got to admit that I've never really liked Radcliffe and Grint (Watson has always been pretty good as Hermione) but they both did very well here and enough to put aside my previous feelings about them. Are they great actors? No. I do however look forward to them stretching their acting chops in the next, and final, movie as well as other projects in the future though. It's hard to pick any faults with the supporting cast. As I've said above, compared to the three leads, everyone else doesn’t really get much screen time but new cast members like Rhys Ifans and Bill Nighy do well with what they're given to work with.

This really is the "darkest" Harry Potter movie to date and Yates does a good job of keeping that tone throughout. While fans of the past movies and the novels will surely enjoy it more, I think it would also be fairly easy for anyone to get some pleasure from this movie. With some truly amazing action sequences (the CGI is tremendous throughout, never suffering from any weak moments) and a fantastic animated scene near the end of the movie, it's hard to fault the director. The main problem with The Death Hallows though is the fact it's only half a story. Maybe it's because I already know how it all ends, but I found it incredibly frustrating throughout knowing that there would be no
proper conclusion. And there wasn’t! The cliff-hanger wasn’t really that gripping, and the eight month wait for the next instalment almost makes me wish I had watched this on blu-ray the day before I see that.

Overall, I think it's fair to say this is a great movie. With a great mix of action and emotion, it's hard not to find something to like, especially with such strong performances all round. The problem for me however is the fact that this all feels a bit dull and flat when I know what's coming next. It's great that they've decided to tell the story properly, but with the majority of the movie set in the woods and limited screen time for the best cast members, I can’t help but shake the feeling that this could have been better. However, it would be unfair for me to mark it down for actually faithfully adapting the book and while it's really only the starter, it's a tasty way to get ready for the main course next year.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic





Image and video hosting by TinyPic



BETTER MAN: Robbie Williams Is A CGI Ape In First Trailer For Michael Gracey's Bizarre Biopic
Related:

BETTER MAN: Robbie Williams Is A CGI Ape In First Trailer For Michael Gracey's Bizarre Biopic

GLADIATOR II: Epic New Trailer And Poster Tease A New Legacy...Or Another Rebellion!
Recommended For You:

GLADIATOR II: Epic New Trailer And Poster Tease A New Legacy...Or Another Rebellion!

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

mechanix619
mechanix619 - 11/27/2010, 12:55 PM
Its funny that ever since GOF everyone was saying they should split each book into two movies but when they finally do no one seems to be happy.
WolvieCBM
WolvieCBM - 11/27/2010, 12:57 PM
I actually thought this was one of the worst movies of this year...I hope that part 2 will be a lot better. But great write up @Josh!
golden123
golden123 - 11/27/2010, 1:07 PM
Well stated review Josh.
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 11/27/2010, 1:26 PM
mechanix619 @ If you like to SPEND your money on two parts instead of one...

ALL THE POWER TO YOU lol! : D

Not a POTTER fan myself... BOOKS OF MAGIC should have been the franchise! : P
TheNameIsBetty
TheNameIsBetty - 11/27/2010, 1:52 PM
*Clap clap
pollix22
pollix22 - 11/27/2010, 3:13 PM
God I could not disagree more, the acting seemed half-hearted, the script was choppy, the directing and editing seemed to have very little flow, and if you didn't know the novels very well, I think you would be completely lost. There were plot details that were essential that were just overlooked and they fell short on some of the set pieces. All together a miss in my mind.
CaptainAmerica
CaptainAmerica - 11/27/2010, 3:35 PM
^your not alone my friend, wait, yea you are. Everything you just said was a lie.
Hawksblueyes
Hawksblueyes - 11/27/2010, 4:16 PM
I am looking forward to seeing this. I have njoyed the Potter movies
48and2
48and2 - 11/27/2010, 5:25 PM
Good review Josh - nice job on not spoiling it. But if you thought it "could be better," how'd you give it a perfect score? I thought that was for the movies that are "perfect?" =)

In my eyes, it's not the perfect balance we find in movies like The Godfather or Amadeus OR Inception, but it's right close. And if they'd been doing them like this all along, they'd have been some of the best movies ever made.

The one complaint I have is that it's obvious Yates and the writers looked at the best movies ever made and pulled most of the scenes from them. Which can be a great thing, and it is, but it's just not original enough for me to call perfection.
deathoncredit
deathoncredit - 11/27/2010, 5:58 PM
Great review, Josh.

I thought that the movie was alright. It didn't really measure up to the incredible ending of the last movie, but it was good. I do think it would have been better as one movie, though. About half of the movie was completely unnecessary in terms of furthering the plot, character development, and providing an interesting story. There was literally an entire hour in which NOTHING happened.

The next movie is going to be insane, though.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 11/28/2010, 2:31 AM
Good stuff Josh. I think the kids have really become fairly strong actors and didn't mid their big chunks of screen time in this one where as it annoyed me in past movies. I think 5 stars is a bit generous myself! But glad you enjoyed it.
pulpfiction16
pulpfiction16 - 11/28/2010, 3:35 AM
Lay off Pollix. It's just an opinion.

I know that personally, I enjoyed the other Potter movies, but this movie really lost momentum. The whole jealousy subplot seemed really unnecessary; if it were one movie, that is the thing that would've gotten the ax in editing (and rightfully so). The friends have been together for 7 years, it's past that point.

Another thing that dragged me out of it was the number of similarities to Lord of the Rings (carrying the locket around their neck, and getting pissed off because of it). Really? Couldn't they just set it inside their tent?

But, there were some plot issues. I've read all the books minus the last, but remember the mirror being in the 5th book, and I assumed it'd come back at some point in the series, but, the filmmakers didn't. So, they just start Potter off with a random mirror shard. If I remember right, they didn't even just have him pick it up in Sirius' bedroom, or something like that. Instead, they choose to just have him have it, and give absolutely no explanation for it's existence. It's sloppy writing. We're following the movie from Harry Potter's perspective, and that just doesn't fit.

In addition, there were really no stakes in the movie (and I guess the blame can be laid on Rowling for this); every battle or action has the speedy resolution of just teleporting away. It takes any threat away, since there really is no threat. In addition to the utter passiveness of the characters, it makes for a boring watch. The main characters are unable to do anything through out the entire movie, and for the most part don't try. When they do (breaking into the ministry), it's interesting. It's writing 101. You need motivation, stakes, and action (not in the physical sense of the word).

I'm hoping the second part makes up for this. And I also wonder where and when the filmmakers plan on truly indicating that these three kids can hold their own against death eaters. It seems ridiculous, since the only spells they ever use are 'stupify', which they've been using since the second movie (and thus must equate to a punch in the face, seeing as they wouldn't teach children a spell that is equal to a gunshot).
OptimusPrime114
OptimusPrime114 - 11/28/2010, 5:15 AM
HP > Twilight
jshark
jshark - 11/28/2010, 8:41 AM
Man, I guess we're just a bunch of ungrateful whiny b*tches on this site. This movie was about as close to the source material as we could ever hope for and yet it's those exact details people are bitching about.

Blame the writer, she wrote that the locket increases your feelings of hate and jealousy. The fact that they are in the woods most of the movie is because they are in the first half of the book. One thing that is missed is the fact that Ron starts showing his true feelings more openly for Hermione in the book and the movie glosses that over, it's the main reason for Ron's jealousy since Harry has shown his feelings for Ginny. Harry gets all the girls, lucky. But seriously.

I will concede the point that they completely neglect the mirror shard, but part of the blame is the previous movies and part is introducing it without a little explination. This movie makes no attempt to hide though that it's part of a greater whole, it's not meant to stand by itself.

My wife, who has never read the books, only watched the movies, thought it was the best of the series, the same goes for my mom, dad, and aunt (all over 50 years old) and each one has completely different tastes in movies. For one movie to be loved by each one of them the way this one was, it was a good movie.

I will add that I wouldn't say 5 stars, more like 4.
kyle
kyle - 11/28/2010, 8:51 AM
the first 3 were HORRIBLE. imo, 4-6 have been the best. I haven't seen 7, but hopefully will today.
Weeton
Weeton - 11/28/2010, 9:13 AM
I'm w/ SirPrize and Pollix. 3 1/2 at best. Slow plot development, rushed character introduction. It had good scenes, but 30 minutes of the movie could have been done away with.

@Kyle, 3 was not awful. It has one of the most tight knit story progressions and character development of all the films. It should easily be in the top 3 of the HP franchise.
Set2Fallfirst
Set2Fallfirst - 11/28/2010, 10:57 AM
@JOSH ill tell u what i told my friends I think the cliffhanger SHOULD have been them talking about the 3 Brothers and harmonie saying its a myth and Ron going but seriously think about it harry's invisibility cloak is an actual cloak of invisibility and then cut to harrys grandpa handing over his cloak to harry's dad (that wasnt in the book but they add other crap anyway) then it ends....and the AFTER credits would be Voldemort taking the wand from dumbledore
Shaman
Shaman - 11/29/2010, 5:18 AM
Brilliant write-up, Josh! I haven't seen it yet, myself. But i can't wait 'til i get the chance to go! I really hope it's better than the worst of the series which IMO was Half Blood Prince. I don't care which film of the series is MEANT to stand on its own, THEY ALL SHOULD! They are FILMS, not half-films. Even this most recent one which is in fact only half of the last book, SHOULD be filmed as a whole film in itself to stand on it's own or else it fails, regardless how faithful to the source it actually is. So yes, my expectations are a tad high, but since the last one left me screaming bloody murder, they are not as high as they seem. I just hope i'll get a good FILM this time around like all the rest of the series were with the exception of the last one alone, IMHO of course :)

And for anybody that wonders what i thought of the LOTR films, by reading my comment, i hated Two Towers passionately. The Fellowship of the Ring was astonishing and The Return of the King was decent. Two Towers felt like it was definitely missing a leg to stand on. The first and third chapters felt like crutches for the second, to me. As a solo film, it sucked ass, regardless if it was meant to be viewed as a simple "chapter".
View Recorder