Iron Man 2 is a Close Second to the Original

Iron Man 2 is a Close Second to the Original

Robert Downey, Jr and Gwyneth Paltrow return in this excellent follow-up to the original. This comes in as one of the Top Ten comic book movies in our members rankings and definitely a superhero action film you will want to see.

Review Opinion
By Rankogaphy - Feb 04, 2012 07:02 AM EST
Filed Under: Iron Man
Source: Top Ten Movies

Following the very successful first installment of Iron Man, the sequel was released to very positive response from viewers. This comic book film is packed with action and an upgraded list of big name stars including Samuel L. Jackson, Scarlett Johansson and Mickey Rourke. Of course, we were all a bit disappointed by the replacement of Terrence Howard as Lt. Colonel James Rhodes, which is a very significant role. But we have to give it up to Don Cheadle for playing the part with just enough gusto that you almost do not remember how Iron Man’s best friend looks like in the first movie. One of the top action movies, Iron Man 2 did not disappoint and may actually be one of those few sequels that is better than the original.

In the story, Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.) remains to be the genius playboy, owner of Stark Industries by day and Iron Man by night. It is about six months after the first movie ended and Stark has gone public that he is in fact Iron Man, but he refuses repeated government demands to hand over all of the Iron Man technology. He has also learned that his arc reactor technology (powering his weak heart from injuries sustained in the first movie) is actually poisoning his body and he has a limited time to find a solution before it kills him. As a result, he turns over the CEO role of Stark Industries to his long-time assistant and confidant, Pepper Potts (Gwyneth Paltrow). Potts then hires a replacement to be Stark’s secretary, the curvatious Natalie Rushman (Scarlett Johansson).

Meanwhile, Ivan Vanko (Mickey Rourke) is a disenfranchised scientist who is freed from prison by Stark’s rival, Justin Hammer (Sam Rockwell). Hammer hires Vanko to copy Stark’s arc reactor designs because his deceased father actually worked on the first arc reactor with Tony’s father. However, Vanko has other plans – killing Stark as revenge for his father’s exile and subsequent death. The character, Ivan Vanko, is a rather witty incorporation of Iron Man comic book villains Crimson Dynamo and Whiplash.

If you’re expecting for it to be bigger, bolder, even better, well I’m just going to be blunt about it: you might be a little let down on this. After all, it did have huge shoes to fill. It’s just that people expect more in sequels and are therefore sometimes dissatisfied. It is a very good film but not quite as good as the Original.

Iron Man 2 generates a bit more compassion and empathy for the Tony Stark character than the first because of his battle to find a cure for his arc reactor poisoning. We don’t quite experience the empathy we might in a drama dealing with a life threatening illness, but we at least feel the clock ticking on Tony’s existence which provides the film with a sense of urgency.

While this film does not have that same level of impact as the completely original Iron Man, it carries the torch of brilliance and kick-butt action that we have come to expect from Marvel comic book movies. All in all, Iron Man 2 was awesome and therefore definitely worth your time. 4 of 5 stars!

Jeff Bridges On Being So Frustrated With IRON MAN's Unfinished Script & Original Plan For Obadiah Stane
Related:

Jeff Bridges On Being "So Frustrated" With IRON MAN's Unfinished Script & Original Plan For Obadiah Stane

THE 4:30 MOVIE Interview: Filmmaker Kevin Smith On How His Passion For The Theater Shaped New Film (Exclusive)
Recommended For You:

THE 4:30 MOVIE Interview: Filmmaker Kevin Smith On How His Passion For The Theater Shaped New Film (Exclusive)

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

KoonEl
KoonEl - 2/4/2012, 12:05 PM
I agree. I think this movie received a lot of hate that it didn't deserve. It was not an "up the stakes" kind of sequel. It felt to me that they just kept the cameras rolling after the first one. It matched the first in quality and tone, which I liked a lot.
marvelguy
marvelguy - 2/4/2012, 12:51 PM
It was fun to watch in the theater. The lack of character development and feeling very much like a re-hash makes me want to leave the experience in the theater. I didn't feel this way with other exciting and better character progressin in "Spider-Man 2," "Hellboy 2," and "The Dark Knight."
Boyle360
Boyle360 - 2/5/2012, 3:03 AM
Not a very good movie. And nowhere near as good as the first one. Let's hope The Avengers and Iron Man 3 are really good!
Paulley
Paulley - 2/5/2012, 8:24 AM
Yea the movie is not as bad as people made it out to be but yea it was dissapointing compared to the original.
Viltrumite
Viltrumite - 2/5/2012, 10:48 AM
I had a lot of disdain for this movie, but I re-watched it yesterday for the first time since I saw it in theaters, and I enjoyed it much more. I think viewing it in the context of Thor and Captain America: The First Avenger helped make it more enjoyable.
marvel72
marvel72 - 2/5/2012, 4:34 PM
i enjoyed the movie more when i watched it on blu-ray than when i first saw it at the cinema.

i think it was i was expecting it to be as good as iron man & it wasn't.

its a good film but marvel studio's worse to date.

1st iron man 4/5
2nd captain america 4/5
3rd thor 4/5
4th the incredible hulk 3/5
5th iron man 2 3/5

i believe the avengers will take the top spot.

Rankogaphy
Rankogaphy - 2/8/2012, 6:03 PM
Great comments everyone. I was really hoping for more out of Mickey Rourke, but they did not develop his character much at all. His character really could have been a game-changer but they dropped the ball on that one.
Bearjew
Bearjew - 2/21/2012, 5:16 AM
I agree that it didn't deserve most of the criticism received
FriendlyNeighborhoodSpidey
FriendlyNeighborhoodSpidey - 3/4/2012, 4:43 PM
I liked it.
KStyles
KStyles - 3/12/2012, 4:01 PM
I think after The Dark Knight, comic book fans thought every sequel would reach that level of improvement from the original. I think that is unrealistic, so when the sequel is just as good as the first one, they feel like its a failure. I think Iron Man 2 was pretty good sequel, it was an evolution to the series, not a revolution that The Dark Knight was compared to Batman Begins.
shreen2008
shreen2008 - 1/27/2013, 4:03 AM
Avengers was a good movie. Also Iron Man was like Super Man. http://www.softreadwrite.com/604/download-instagram-photos.html
View Recorder