MADAME WEB Director Talks Rumors Of Scrapped 1990s Setting And Why There's No Post-Credits Scene

MADAME WEB Director Talks Rumors Of Scrapped 1990s Setting And Why There's No Post-Credits Scene

Madame Web director SJ Clarkson addresses rumours that the movie was originally set during the 1990s and explains why there's nothing extra waiting after the credits for comic book fans. Check it out...

By JoshWilding - Feb 15, 2024 09:02 AM EST
Filed Under: Madame Web
Source: The Hollywood Reporter

It's not often we see comic book fans and critics agree, but in the case of Madame Web, it seems everyone has reached the conclusion that it's yet another crummy Marvel movie from Sony Pictures. 

Lead star Dakota Johnson recently revealed the version of Madame Web she signed up for differed greatly from the one seen in theaters this week. There have also been rumblings about reshoots shifting the action from the 1990s to the early 2000s after plans to make this a prequel to The Amazing Spider-Man were scrapped.

Talking to The Hollywood Reporter, director SJ Clarkson confirmed that 2003 was always the planned setting for Madame Web.

"Well, I was sent the script with 2003 in it, and like you, I remember someone saying to me, 'Hey, 2003 is vintage.' And I was like, 'What do you mean? I remember 2003. I lived 2003. Does that make me vintage?' So, apparently, yes, we are vintage, but it’s back in. We should run with it."

Asked specifically about those '90s rumours, the filmmaker added, "I don’t know, maybe, although some of [the needle drops] are on the edge of 2003. So I think it’s about the mix. When you look at making something in a specific year, I always think it’s dangerous to just have all the music, costumes and cars that came out that year. If you look out there now, not everybody is driving something from 2024 or wearing the latest fashion."

"I know my wardrobe is dated in parts. It’s now vintage. So I was looking to get this timeless quality to the film across the board to where you weren’t sure when it was," she continued. "For example, Cassie’s jacket. We found that at the last minute, and it was actually based on a vintage 1970s jacket, which felt really cool. [1973] is where the movie starts, and it’s the story that connects to Cassie’s mother."

"I have to give all credit and props to our tailoring department, who turned that vintage red jacket around overnight. So it was nice to get a timeless feel to it."

Is it us, or did she just dodge the question? There must have been a specific reason for Madame Web being set in 2003 and the most obvious is that original plans called for the baby Peter Parker born in this movie to grow up and become Tom Holland's Spider-Man. However, the math doesn't work, something Sony likely didn't figure out until it was too late. 

Clarkson was also asked about the decision for Madame Web to not include a post-credits scene. 

"It was about telling a great story," she explains. "My father always used to say, 'If you have to say something, stand up, speak up and then shut up.' So when I got to the end credits, I felt that we’d said everything we needed to say in the film. It’s up to whatever is next to take on the button."

Madame Web is now playing in theaters. Check out our interview with Clarkson in the player below.

MADAME WEB Star Isabela Merced Reflects On The Movie's Failings: It Does [Leave] A Sad Taste In My Mouth
Related:

MADAME WEB Star Isabela Merced Reflects On The Movie's Failings: "It Does [Leave] A Sad Taste In My Mouth"

MADAME WEB Star Sydney Sweeney Reportedly Being Eyed For Female Lead In THE RUNNING MAN
Recommended For You:

MADAME WEB Star Sydney Sweeney Reportedly Being Eyed For Female Lead In THE RUNNING MAN

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

bobevanz
bobevanz - 2/15/2024, 9:06 AM
?si=X2Vz2frmenQnSKpp
bobevanz
bobevanz - 2/15/2024, 9:10 AM
TO ME MY X-MEN
HashTagSwagg
HashTagSwagg - 2/15/2024, 9:12 AM
@bobevanz - Same music, NGL, but it looks like it was made by a small group of newgrounds animators.
kider2
kider2 - 2/15/2024, 9:12 AM
@bobevanz - Is it me or does it look cheap and stiff?
WhatIfRickJames
WhatIfRickJames - 2/15/2024, 9:12 AM
@bobevanz - looks like they kept the 2d characters but added 3d elements
bobevanz
bobevanz - 2/15/2024, 9:13 AM
@kider2 - it looks like cgi and hand drawn blend. It's ugly but I'll let this one pass lol
WhatIfRickJames
WhatIfRickJames - 2/15/2024, 9:14 AM
@kider2 - its like your talking about the original series
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 2/15/2024, 9:15 AM
@bobevanz - I was about to post this!

Am so done with the Madame Web sh1t; give us an article on this!

I say we should unite as a community and on every MW article from here out we talk about ANY other subject and never mention a word of this film on every thread this is about it!
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 2/15/2024, 9:15 AM
@kider2 - voices sound off to me
WhatIfRickJames
WhatIfRickJames - 2/15/2024, 9:15 AM
@bobevanz - everyone was complaining that it was going to look like What If, now everyone is going to complain that it’ll look like X-men 97
EarlChai
EarlChai - 2/15/2024, 9:16 AM
@bobevanz - Oh, of COURSE the first thing they do is kill the disabled guy… 😜
GhostDog
GhostDog - 2/15/2024, 9:18 AM
@kider2 - the original series looked cheap and stiff
HashTagSwagg
HashTagSwagg - 2/15/2024, 9:19 AM
@WhatIfRickJames - Lets be real, it looks more x-men season 5 than the early seasons of the show but it's not the art style they're complaining about, it's the animation or rather the lack of animation.
Fogs
Fogs - 2/15/2024, 9:27 AM
@bobevanz - EVERY MW ARTICLE MUST BE TURNED INTO AN X-MEN ARTICLE.
Fogs
Fogs - 2/15/2024, 9:28 AM
@bobevanz - Looks waaay better than I thought it would TBH.

Looks like they managed to reduce the framerates and the characters don't look 3D.
DrReedRichards
DrReedRichards - 2/15/2024, 9:35 AM
@bobevanz -

Lol, I just posted it without seeing you already had. Mybad.
JonAwesome
JonAwesome - 2/15/2024, 9:40 AM
@bobevanz - I don’t like the way Wolverine sounds. I miss the way he used to do the voice.
harryba11zack
harryba11zack - 2/15/2024, 9:10 AM
Josh right now
supermanrex
supermanrex - 2/15/2024, 9:14 AM
sony just needs to put down the attempts to make a universe. they are stuck in the 90s and early 2000s corporate formula for superhero flicks. it isnt working hand over the rest of those characters Feige so they can be properly tied to the scenarios and stories that made them awesome from the books. we are robbed of kravens last hunt and any great venom vs spidey story before venom became the anti hero he is now. its a shame.
HammerLegFoot
HammerLegFoot - 2/15/2024, 9:15 AM
Hello
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 2/15/2024, 9:17 AM
No more Sony Spider-verse talk from here on! Let's unite and revolt!!

Every Madame Web article's talk back we never mention a word of this garbage film and we talk about ANYTHING else we want to.
DrReedRichards
DrReedRichards - 2/15/2024, 9:27 AM
@Doomsday8888 -

HOOOOOLYYYYY SHIIIIIIIIIIT!!!!!

Fogs
Fogs - 2/15/2024, 9:29 AM
@DrReedRichards - I really liked it!
DrReedRichards
DrReedRichards - 2/15/2024, 9:31 AM
@Fogs -

Just now responded to your other comment in that earlier thread, lol. Love the retro vibe!
AmazingFILMporg
AmazingFILMporg - 2/15/2024, 9:31 AM
@DrReedRichards -


Looks incredible 🥲
DrReedRichards
DrReedRichards - 2/15/2024, 9:33 AM
@AmazingFILMporg -

I know, right? Love the whole retro feel with the thick outlines and the dropped framerate!
Doomsday8888
Doomsday8888 - 2/15/2024, 9:43 AM
@DrReedRichards
X-Men bros eating goooooood!
RockerTodd
RockerTodd - 2/15/2024, 11:54 AM
@DrReedRichards - TO ME, MY X-MEN!
BillyBatson1000
BillyBatson1000 - 2/15/2024, 9:56 AM
Another "MADAME WEB article, Josh?

You SPOIL us.
TheFinestSmack
TheFinestSmack - 2/15/2024, 10:43 AM
This is the perfect example of, "Just because a CBM comes out doesn't mean we need articles about it multiple times a day." Seriously, nobody cares about this movie or any of these news bits.
SheepishOne
SheepishOne - 2/15/2024, 10:49 AM
At this point, Sony should just pay Marvel's creative team make these movies, and give them a cut of the profits. They'll end up with more in their pockets than whatever they're losing on the Spider-Verse movies.
LSHF
LSHF - 2/15/2024, 11:07 AM
So, unless these characters don't age, they can't be used in a current year, so, what was the point of introducing them?

I mean, "besides" a cash grab.
NoAssemblyReqd
NoAssemblyReqd - 2/15/2024, 11:40 AM
Isn’t it weird when a movie lives up (down?) to exactly how bad it would be the moment you first heard of it?
dagenspear
dagenspear - 2/15/2024, 3:19 PM
I maintain this movie would've been more entertaining if it was about Madame Web stopping Eziekel Sims from trying to kill Peter Parker before he's born. Shift the movie's time to 2001 for MCU Peter. I'd have more fun with that type of kooky story.
NinnesMBC
NinnesMBC - 2/16/2024, 12:30 AM
Where did the banner in this article came from? Art-wise speaking it looks really good.

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder