EDITORIAL: Could Superman Have Prevented The Destruction In MAN OF STEEL?

EDITORIAL: Could Superman Have Prevented The Destruction In MAN OF STEEL?

While rewatching one of only few recent DC property films I actually enjoyed, Man Of Steel, I noticed one key flaw in almost everybody's defence of all the destruction that was caused in the fictional cities that were levelled. Hit that tall-building jump for more!

Editorial Opinion
By imthedoctor - May 10, 2015 11:05 PM EST
Filed Under: Superman
Before I get too far into this, I want to assure everybody: I'm not a DC-hater, or a Marvelite. I am a comic book nerd, who enjoys spending time watching comic book movies. There are good ones and bad ones on both DC and Marvel sides. What I am a hater of, is the "ites". Those who blindly praise a property or company, even through their faults, and blindly trash on the other, even through their successes, cause they like their's more. But I can assure you, if you are a DC/Snyder/Nolan/WB-ite, you will be pissed off at this editorial, because I'm going to blow a defense/excuse you guys use too often WIDE OPEN.

Above GIF is DC-ites expression after reading the last paragraph

Shortly before taking to my keyboard this evening, I was rewatching a movie I quite enjoy, despite not being totally keen on the Superman character. 2013's blockbuster Superman reboot: Man Of Steel. Now, as everyone can agree on, there is quite a bit of mass destruction taking place in the cities in the film. Not to worry gents, the destruction that occurs in the fictional towns of Smallville and Metropolis. No actual cities were leveled in the making of this film.

One thing the Marvelites attack the movie for is the destruction. "There was too much desctruction! Why didn't Superman try to save anybody! Blergy-blah-blerg!" To which, the DC-ites try to defend with "Superman had no chance to prevent it! Zod was bent on destorying the Earth! Zod would have kept the fight in populated area's to distract Superman! Rabblerabblerabble!" Valid points, DC-ites. I almost agreed with you entirely. That was, until I just rewatched this movie and noticed something... Superman struck first. In a populated area.

Some jimmies have been rustled

Yessirreebob, you read that right! Lemme set up the scene for ya if you don't fancy going back and watching the movie: Zod is at Kent Farm looking for the Kodex. Faora grabs Ma Kent by the neck as they interrogate her. Faora looks for the Kodex once Ma Kent eyes at the barn. It's not there. "WHERE IS THE KODEX!?", screams Zod, standing menacingly over Ma Kent. Just before SUPERMAN flies in, super-tackles Zod through 2 silos, then across the cornfields, and continues to punch him repeatedly in the face whilst saying "You think *punch* you can threaten *punch* my mother?! *punch*" until finally continuing to super-tackle him through a 7-Eleven convenience store (which no doubt people are inside of) and then subsequentially going through the building, crashing into and blowing up the gas pumps in front, where civilians can be seen standing near. Zod scrambles, just having the shit punched out of him (and being weakened by the rush of super-powers from Earth's atmosphere (being weakened by getting super-powers, lol)), and retreats to his ship. Then, behind Superman, comes walking up the street (like a boss) Faora and Blaster from Mad Max: Beyond Thunderdome. Superman then approaches his rivals, seeing innocent civilians fleeing to (what they think is) safety. And the only thing Superman does to try and prevent civilian harm, was say to one man: "Get inside, it's not safe." Later on a bit, to prevent Faora into completely owning a military jet, Superman yet again super-tackles her away from it. And then chooses to slam her not in any of the free space between them and an IHOP full of unsuspecting pancake eaters, but RIGHT INTO the IHOP full of unsuspecting pancake eaters. Faora then mentions Kal-El's "sense of morality", which he has barely shown since he started this fight.


That was blown open as much as this building

So, the whole community of DC-ites arguments fall right apart. Superman was in a reasonably non-populated area to start off with (Kent Farm), and then TOOK Zod to Smallville to battle him, right in the middle of civilian population. It's not just that Zod had no regard for the human life in the area (which he didn't, that is correct), but Superman didn't either, or he wouldn't have taken Zod to the middle of the city to do battle. And, even if he didn't have the chance to MOVE the fight away from the population, he never even tried to KEEP the fight away from them, when he STARTED IT.

To finish this off, I just wanna say that none of this even really matters, guys. Every single one of you's are worried about fake people fake dying in fake cities that are being fake blown apart by fake superheroes and fake supervillains.



TL;DR - You can't say Superman had no chance to take the fight against Zod to a remote area BECAUSE the fight DID start in a fairly remote area, BY Superman, and then was TAKEN INTO the densly populated areas, CAUSING the absolute leveling of Smallville, and roughly a quarter to half of Metropolis. So to answer the question in the article title: YES, Superman could have prevented at least some of the destruction in the movie by not taking Zod into the middle Smallville in the first place.

Have fun in the comments, guys!


SUPERMAN Director James Gunn Confirms Frank Grillo's Role: This Isn't Just A Good Guy
Related:

SUPERMAN Director James Gunn Confirms Frank Grillo's Role: "This Isn't Just A Good Guy"

SUPERMAN Star David Corenswet Details His Intense Weight Gain To Become The DCU's New Man Of Steel
Recommended For You:

SUPERMAN Star David Corenswet Details His Intense Weight Gain To Become The DCU's New Man Of Steel

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4 5
TheGambitFreak
TheGambitFreak - 5/11/2015, 1:22 AM
Puppets, tangled in... Strings.

Brainiac13
Brainiac13 - 5/11/2015, 1:39 AM
I love these type of articles......I'm also writing something similar....about AoU.....

Both movies are great but can be shredded to bits.

imthedoctor
imthedoctor - 5/11/2015, 1:41 AM
@Pending You're right, it's never dramatized. They just don't care. But I think the main point I tried to get across to everyone is: Superman endangered the public's lives by starting the fight in massively populated areas when he full well had the opportunity to start it away from them.
imthedoctor
imthedoctor - 5/11/2015, 1:42 AM
@Brainiac13 I'd love to read it! I had plenty of gripes with AoU as well. I think they spent too much time trying to save people, and that detracted away from the story.
TheGambitFreak
TheGambitFreak - 5/11/2015, 2:00 AM
Off Topic-ish. (And we need to do our discussion badly) but after my 4th viewing of AoU, I noticed something. The Bruce/Natasha romance is so weird and out of place cause it's completely new. In the previous movies, there's not even a shred of flirtatious dialogue between the two. But aside from the bizarreness of the relationship, the reason I really hate it is cause of Avengers Assemble. In that film, the only love interest is that of Pepper & Tonys. And that's only like 2 minutes, to set up Coulson. I remember when reviews starting flooding the web. People praised it for not having the cliche love interest. It simply set up the characters and threat, then jumped right into the action. It might just be me, but I think the Hulk/Widow dynamic in AoU really hurt the pacing and seriousness of certain situations in the film. After the team takes out the Hydra forces outside of the castle, and Widow does the lullaby, it just gets quiet and ruins the high octane feeling I had from watching the introduction. I think, would they of scrapped their scenes, we could've gotten more insight to the main plot. Kinda weird that I wanted less romance, considering I regularly watch the crappiest romcoms ever produced.
Sigma9
Sigma9 - 5/11/2015, 3:04 AM
Not true, i dont agree this

imthedoctor
imthedoctor - 5/11/2015, 3:16 AM
@Sigma9 I knew some DC-cockhard would get here eventually...

Okay, Sigma... State your case. Explain how you think I'm wrong.
imthedoctor
imthedoctor - 5/11/2015, 3:23 AM
"85% of the people on this site are the biggest idiots that I am so glad to never have to meet in my life." - @dethpillow

BigFoster
BigFoster - 5/11/2015, 5:19 AM
Your right superman screwed up on the furst couple of punches not realizing he was punching zod or whoever 100s if not 1000s of meters away into the i hop and gas station. However once the fight goes to metropolis where the real damage was done every building was destroyed by either the world engine or zod. Not a single skyscraper was taken down because of superman.
Pasto
Pasto - 5/11/2015, 5:54 AM
Isn't there a scene where Superman flies through a building? I mean yeah, he really did cause a bunch of destruction in this movie. He really did [frick]-up on his first day on the job. He really could've done something more NOT to destroy a bunch of stuff.

But does that mean you can't enjoy the film? THAT is where the true question lies.
MercwithMouth
MercwithMouth - 5/11/2015, 8:09 AM
I think we all need to move on from this movie. It's a flawed film, just like almost every other film in the world. It's problems have little to nothing to do with the so-called "destruction-porn" involved in the DBZ fights. It's problems are much worse.

But, seriously, it's been 2 years. We stopped talking about Green Lantern like 2 days after it came out, why must we incessantly talk about Man of Steel?
Peel
Peel - 5/11/2015, 8:37 AM
Superman had a choice; evacuate the people of Metropolis first or destroy the world engine. He could either leave the few thousand of people in Metropolis to die, or destroy the world engine before it kills millions in India. Superman made the right decision.

As for this 'fight'...the people WERE actually evacuated. Those who were in the buildings shut the doors and remained clear from the streets, and when the army came in, they had the people evacuated before they fought the Kryptonians. That evacuation was on the same level as the one in Thor when he fought the Destroyer in terms of how quick the reaction was and how far they could get.

The fact is, if two big aliens crashed into your hometown and tore into each other regardless of the damage, where could you actually go? Where could you deem safe enough? And as for Superman, he couldn't have took Zod that far into space because 1.) he would have fought back and 2.) Zod's ship was stationed on earth before Superman handed himself over, of course Zod won't want to fight elsewhere.

Also, this article is just flamebait. Jimmies have been rustled.
MarkyMarkRises
MarkyMarkRises - 5/11/2015, 8:55 AM
No, especially not having been superman for like, less than a day. People give this movie way too much shit
MercwithMouth
MercwithMouth - 5/11/2015, 9:00 AM
@MexicanSuperman

I got no problem about debating old movies. Doesn't bother me in the least. With Man of Steel, it's two things. Superman didn't save anyone, and he killed. The horse is dead. This topic has been beaten over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over. It's tiresome.
MarkyMarkRises
MarkyMarkRises - 5/11/2015, 9:02 AM
my god i just realized this was posted in 2015...2015

this movie came out 2 years ago
MisterSuperior
MisterSuperior - 5/11/2015, 9:14 AM
Superman struck first because of emotion, but he did go right back at protecting humanity by telling everyone to get to safety when Faora and that other Kryptonian headed his way. And because of this, Superman was not at fault for any deaths in the Smallville battle. Watch the rest of the Smallville battle and you'll see.

Wait....why am I talking about this....it's been two years. Let's all get over this crap and pay more attention.
blackandyellow
blackandyellow - 5/11/2015, 9:16 AM
the
the - 5/11/2015, 9:28 AM
Well, I'm pretty bad at this. Heil Singer & Vaughn's X-men.

The sensory overload was intended to take Zod out of temporary commission. eg: Smallville, a populated town to do just that in one and only assault
(those people that we didn't see in that 7/11 before those 2 crash into it...dead..oh well...one guy running on the sidewalk lives!) The Kryptonians are retreating by carrying him back to the ship! "I guess my job here is done"..."Ahh, FML" face & sound upon the arrival of Faora & "Blaster"
...Clark maybe wasn't expecting a retaliation so soon.
It is at this point he should have flown away and expect those 2 AND the army to follow.
What if Faora + "Blaster" + army don't and they just duke it out regardless of Superman being miles away?...*shrug shoulders*

-Army Gatling attack ensues.
Damn, "Blaster from Mad Max: Beyond Thunderdome"!

Coincidentally, Faora gets tackled into IHOP through a wall above a window.
Everyone in that place is conveniently seated/squatted at opposite ends. So, when they do their fist de cuffs and Faora throws Supes out the same window, everyone in that place is unharmed yet surrounded by property damage.
That thing about morality would've worked better if Faora was about to strike a civilian within the IHOP and Clark quickly swooped in to block or shield him/her.

Finally, "he never even tried to KEEP the fight away from them, when he STARTED IT"
In the subsequent fist fight against the two on a civ-free street he attempted to drag one or the other out and attempted to scurry himself; he failed each time.
In any case, it didn't seem like either Zod's men or the army were planning on taking the fight elsewhere with the army's presence ever so making the situation worse.

I don't recall an official evac for Smallville.

And that's all I got. I find joy in doing one of these.
HulkOnion
HulkOnion - 5/11/2015, 9:56 AM
@dethpillow I'm sorry for my idiocy
HulkOnion
HulkOnion - 5/11/2015, 9:59 AM
I haven't watched this movie is a while, but I thought Zod's soldiers had landed in the middle of Smallville... Superman could've have took them away, sure, but I guess that's pretty hard when you got super troopers on your ass
HulkOnion
HulkOnion - 5/11/2015, 10:02 AM
Every time Clark attempted to fly, Faora or that other dude would grab his cape or whatever and smash em. He wasn't going anywhere no matter what
A2K
A2K - 5/11/2015, 10:59 AM


That being said, Man of Steel was flawed, more so unfortunately than fans would've liked it to have been, here's hoping Batman v Superman is better.
JosephKing
JosephKing - 5/11/2015, 11:33 AM
"And then chooses to slam her not in any of the free space between them and an IHOP full of unsuspecting pancake eaters"

Here's the mistake: "HE CHOOSES".

He doesn't. It's clear in the movie that crashing both the IHOP and the gas station were accidental. He stumbles with Zod and then hits the gas station, and with Faora he simply falls on the IHOP. We can easily distinguish someone falling into from someone jumping into. And the hole in your argument is that you don't make that distinction.
Batnut92
Batnut92 - 5/11/2015, 11:35 AM
The one thing that really bugged me about the smallville scene was how Clark just tackled Zod and left his mother behind with two dangerous super-powered kryptonians. I mean...what the hell? What was to stop them from just snatching her up and using her as a bargaining chip to get Clark to stand down?

I mean what better way to bring down someone more super-powered than you than threatening the one they love most? That part just always puzzled me.
BarKells
BarKells - 5/11/2015, 11:37 AM
Come on guys would the fight really have been cooler if it was in the middle of nowhere. Smashing into buildings is just so much more awesome than smashing into grass
1 2 3 4 5
View Recorder