Producer Emma Thomas Says Chris Nolan Will Be Too Busy With Batman To Worry About Superman!

Producer Emma Thomas Says Chris Nolan Will Be Too Busy With Batman To Worry About Superman!

At a gathering to celebrate Inception's DVD release, Chris Nolan's producer wife Emma Thomas said that he would be far too busy with The Dark Knight Rises to play an active part in Superman's production. Its all in Zack Snyder's hands..

By MarkCassidy - Dec 01, 2010 01:12 AM EST
Filed Under: Man of Steel
Source: Hitfix

When Chris Nolan was announced as "Godfathering" WB's Superman reboot, many felt that meant he would be playing some type of role in the actual production of the film. Well, if that is the case it looks like it will be a very small one. At an Inception gala held on Tuesday night, GregoryEllwood from Hitfix spoke to the various stars in attendance, and producer Emma Stone made it clear that this new Superman movie will be all Snyder..



From Hitfix..

Thomas said Nolan is so single minded when making a picture it's hard to get him to work on anything else. And she made it clear that in the case of "Superman," Nolan and David Goyer just had an idea they couldn't believe wasn't being explored by Warner Bros. And with Zack Snyder now on board as director, Nolan will be busy making "The Dark Knight Rises" and "we are handing it off to him." So, take note anyone out there thinking this will be a strange Nolan/Snyder partnership. Thomas reiterated that they brought it to an appropriate screenplay and it's now Snyder's picture.


At the same event, Chris Nolan also made it clear that there is nothing set in stone for TDKR. He hasn't finished writing or casting the picture. For the full article, including more from Nolan as well as Ellen Page click the link below.


BANE And DEATHSTROKE Live-Action Movie In Development At DC Studios
Related:

BANE And DEATHSTROKE Live-Action Movie In Development At DC Studios

Zack Snyder Shares Never-Before-Seen Photo Of Henry Cavill As Clark Kent In MAN OF STEEL
Recommended For You:

Zack Snyder Shares Never-Before-Seen Photo Of Henry Cavill As Clark Kent In MAN OF STEEL

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3
Ethic
Ethic - 12/1/2010, 2:02 AM
Hmmm, reading this gave me an anxious feeling.
Was really liking the idea of Nolan having input during filming.

I love everything about 300, and i still rewatch Watchmen even though it was very underwhelming on my initial viewing in cinema.
But I just don't have confidence in Snyder for this.
More and more I'm doubting this will be the definitive Superman film I've been waiting for.

But I guess we gotta wait a while before we can judge.
TheNameIsBetty
TheNameIsBetty - 12/1/2010, 2:25 AM
Yup.
Thought so.
Still cryptic. Still weird.

Come on come on, make a dang movie!!!
hovis5818
hovis5818 - 12/1/2010, 2:57 AM
I don't think this is true - there is no way that Nolan will let Snyder produce something below par. The only way Nolan won't get involved is if Snyder is producing what he wants.

If its below par - Nolan will step in, he has a reputation to protect!
superotherside
superotherside - 12/1/2010, 3:49 AM
hope man of steel is good!
TheActionAce
TheActionAce - 12/1/2010, 3:54 AM
me two otherside me two
ThunderCougarFalconBird
ThunderCougarFalconBird - 12/1/2010, 3:56 AM
Doesn't bother me at all. Nolan has overseen the main plot outline and has helped pick out a director who can do it justice, now the baton has been passed. I'm sure Nolan will have a look at rough cuts to make sure things are in line but I doubt it'll be needed.
BobGarlen
BobGarlen - 12/1/2010, 4:02 AM
As long as Nolan is doing another Batman and MOS is decent then I'm fine. I'm sure Nolan only chose Snyder because he is good enough as a Director to carry the film Goyer and Nolan put together.
AlexDeLarge87
AlexDeLarge87 - 12/1/2010, 4:23 AM
Hope Snyder doesnt make it too dark. Little bit more serious is great, but not too dark.
TheDarqueOne
TheDarqueOne - 12/1/2010, 4:43 AM
Nolan picked the Story and got everything going. Snyder has obviously agreeded to go with that. So sure the actual filming will be under Snyder's control.

If Nolan was just the Producer than that is what he would be called. He was given the 'Godfather' title because what he is doing is much more than that.
Protonite
Protonite - 12/1/2010, 4:48 AM
Not good. It's a very big risk to let Snyder go solo, especially on a Superman movie. Huge explosions and slo-mo does not automatically mean a good CBM.

@Superkalkixass - I'm guessing you think Transformers 2 was a masterpiece as well. Thus, your future arguments and/or posts will be null and void to me, and hence, ignored.
marvel72
marvel72 - 12/1/2010, 5:35 AM
good,its zack snyder film not nolans.
rolanddeschain
rolanddeschain - 12/1/2010, 5:40 AM
Okay, so what's the big deal? It's not like Snyder is unproven in the cbm genre, he's on par with Nolan in terms of succesful cbm's. Would it be more formidable if the two were working more closely with superman, sure, but I'm sure Snyder will do more than fine with it, and it's not like he can't pitch ideas back and forth with Nolan, they just won't be working on the same set. I just hope he doesn't try to make Superman all dark, and gothic, that's not the Superman look.
spiderneil
spiderneil - 12/1/2010, 5:45 AM
in a way I'm glad. nolan's batman works in the batman universe but I would hate that style applied to superman or spider-man or any colourful (metaphorically and literally speaking) hero.
RoscoeFolgers
RoscoeFolgers - 12/1/2010, 6:36 AM
@rolanddeschain-He's not really on par with Nolan in terms of success. Batman Begins and Dark Knight were both much more well-received than either of Snyder's comic book movies. Batman Begins also made much more than it's budget, and Dark Knight made a billion dollars. 300 was successful but Watchmen... Not so much. I loved Watchmen. But it wasn't as successful as the Batman movies.
superdog
superdog - 12/1/2010, 6:42 AM
im fine with this. they never would have picked snyder if he hadnt agreed to thier vision.
TDKR11
TDKR11 - 12/1/2010, 7:22 AM
The way I see it from Emma Stone's comments is Snyder is using Nolan and Guyer's Superman script/story and do whatever direction he likes to make it into a Superman movie, but I really believe Christopher Nolan has Final Cut/ the last word over the Superman Movie, because I believe Christopher Nolan is one of the people from WB who hired Zack Snyder in the first place.
theangrytroll
theangrytroll - 12/1/2010, 7:25 AM
Less Nolan can only mean a better movie.
BruceWayneNewton
BruceWayneNewton - 12/1/2010, 7:27 AM
if it is a Goyer/Nolan story (which it is), I trust Zach to runaway with it and make the great Supes movie since Superman 2. Great script+budget+great action director = A good Superman movie. The one thing that would put this movie over the top would be the casting...and by that I mean...ROUTH OR BUST!!!!
xmentheeight
xmentheeight - 12/1/2010, 7:28 AM
It amazes me that people on here seem to be so closed minded or just flat out stupid to think or just pigeonhole a good director such as Nolan. Okay...weve seen Begins & Dark Knight....so is that to imply that he cant direct any other way. His approach worked for Batman and that world, it would asinine and idiotic for him to attempt to take the same approach for Superman. Nolan is at least a high school graduate, so Im sure he has already figured this out. Not too mention, Im sure he is well aware of the disdain for Superman Returns and the complaints of that being boring. Again...reasonably educated man probably wont repeat past mistakes.

While some praise the fact that he may not be totally involved in the film, do understand that him and Goyer have provided the story and template, now its Snyder's job to bring it to fruition...which I believe he will. Its a great collaboration...U will have depth and scope in the script from Nolan/Goyer, and action and imagery from Snyder. I dont get the beefs with Nolan...this is the man that gave us Batman back after Shumachers Batman & Robin disaster! Anyone that had a problem with Nolan, I would like to hear ur argument, if any as to why his Batman movies were bad? Im curious.
Shaman
Shaman - 12/1/2010, 7:46 AM
YES!!!! It's EXACTLY what i wanted!!! THANK YOU SANTA!!! 8))

As much as i appreciate nolan, Snyder on his own is WAY better suited to handle an epic VISUAL film like Superman NEEDS! True, Nolan's films are way more cerebral but that's right up Batman's alley. Superman needs a visual master and there are no better than Snyder at the moment!!!

THIS IS GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOD NEWS!!!

Bigbywolf
Bigbywolf - 12/1/2010, 7:48 AM
Snyder really impresses me as a visual director. I'm not sure if he is as good at telling a story though. WB really needed Superman to go into a new direction and I think Snyder will do that. At the very least Snyder will show the cinema world how powerful Superman really is by having him fight a villian that is on par with him.
Shaman
Shaman - 12/1/2010, 7:54 AM
Bigbywolf- At least Snyder has proven to be extremely capable of telling the story he was handed, like in the case of 300 and Watchmen being both greatly filmed stories, regardless of the money they made or not. Which is exactly what's happening here. Sucker Punch will tell us more about his own story telling talents ;)

Intruder- True, it really depends on the eye of the beholder. But for my money, this news couldn't get any better! Maybe it won't make as much money as TDK, which hardly any other film does so i really can't understand why people have that expectation. But whether it breaks records or not, i'll be one happy paying customer, multiple times over!!! :)
KeithM
KeithM - 12/1/2010, 8:06 AM
What does "retraded" and "uNCHarasimatic" mean and who or what is a heath ledher?

I really do try to lower my intellect as much as I can to follow the conversations here, but sometimes you guys just lose me.

Also, who is Daniel Snyder and what does he have to do with any of this?
Shaman
Shaman - 12/1/2010, 8:12 AM
Superkalkixass- ABSOLUTELY!!!

Intruder- Yes i'll agree, 300 was definitely his best yet. Watchmen was brilliantly shot IMO, but the story of the very book lacks, in eye eyes. So the film just followed it's lead. Telling the story any better would have been disrespectful to the source. Just like the (IMO) improvement of removing the squid. Plenty fans were pissed yet the outcome was way better than the books in my eyes.
Bigbywolf
Bigbywolf - 12/1/2010, 8:13 AM
@ Shaman

Very good point. 300 and Watchmen were based on comicbooks where as Sucker Punch comes from Snyder's imagination. For me, Sucker Punch is going to be Snyder's first real movie. I think it will be a good test to see how good he is at putting together a story without adapting it from somewhere else.

@ SuperKalkixass

Thanks, ;)
rolanddeschain
rolanddeschain - 12/1/2010, 8:14 AM
RoscoeFolgers@ I don't think it's a fair comparison the way you describe, since Nolan took over arguably the most popular cbm character ever, and Snyder took 2 niche comics and made them into big-time commercial successes. 300 was, at that time, a cinematical joy to watch, and the biggest criticism I hear about watchmen is Snyder leaving out the squid. All Nolan had to do was do a competent job making a Batman movie, it's just- to our benefit- he did a terrific job of it.
steelrocks
steelrocks - 12/1/2010, 8:24 AM
Im liking the way this is going!

Win win!
Knightstalker
Knightstalker - 12/1/2010, 8:25 AM
KeithM, Once in a while an adult conversation pops up on this site, with people who have at least a few literary skills. Not often, but once in a while.
LP4
LP4 - 12/1/2010, 8:29 AM
Thank god!!! Supes is better suited for someone like Snyder. I dont want this to be like the batman films. Snyder does best in his comfort zone rather than having nolan there to 'babysit' him. This is a SNYDER film people, NOT nolan. Let Snyder do his thing and he will give us MAGIC on the big screen! GO SNYDER!!
Frogman
Frogman - 12/1/2010, 8:51 AM
@Superkalkixass: chill man, so you didn't like Nolan's take on Batman. Big deal, a lot of people like them, it doesn't make you better than them, everyone is titled to their own opinion so please stop insulting everyone who enjoys these films.
Shaman
Shaman - 12/1/2010, 9:00 AM
rolanddeschain- I highly agree!

Intruder- In the book, Manhattan left to explore new worlds which unless were filled with tachyons, he would already know what they are without having to see them. And in my book, that's INCREDIBLY flawed because it goes against the concept of omniscience. You are either omniscient or you are not. There are no half-ways. Moore wrote Manhattan as not being fully omniscient, meaning that he needed to go places in his future and physically experience events for him to know about them in the past. But that makes him a whole contradiction in itself and it would evidently mean that he could never know anything in advance. Think about "free will" for a minute. He deliberately leaves to explore a place he already knows about. Why leave in the first place then, if you already know what awaits you? But if through his free will he chooses not to go, then it would be imposible for him to know what awaits him in the first place. The whole character's concept is one huge flaw! My theory would also indicate that there are PLENTY of futures depending on the choices we make which means that if he knows in advance what the result of every choice he can make could be, he wouldn't need to go anywhere to explore the entire universe. So the book's ending is one huge epic fail. The film's ending, leaving humanity to deal with it's own godless self, is much MUCH more brilliant. Snyder single handedly fixed the book in my eyes.
xmentheeight
xmentheeight - 12/1/2010, 9:15 AM
@SuperKal- Thanx kid...that explains everything. GTFOH! Haha! If U truly believe that in ur heart, aint nothing gonna change ur mind and Im not wasting my keystrokes. But why is the man a douchebag?!....he suckerpunch somebody U know!?

For the rest of the Nolan haters, again...as much as I like Snyder to deliver the visuals of the movie, U need a good written script, and Snyder aint a writer last I checked. Whether its from Nolan or Shakespeare. Slow mo, explosions, CGI colors do not a movie make...as much as some people want to believe. With Nolans input SCRIPT wise(he's not the director U idgits!) and Snyder pointing the camera...we may be in for something pretty damn special.
Frogman
Frogman - 12/1/2010, 9:27 AM
@ Superkal, I know there are people that didn't enjoy it I'm just saying you shouldn't think them wrong, everyone likes different things. Now you get a life and let people have their own opinions and stop dicking on people that differ from yours.
Shaman
Shaman - 12/1/2010, 9:29 AM
xmentheeight- Then what are you complaining about? He'll be filming Nolan's & Goyer's story. And last time i checked, Snyder wasn't a writer because he hasn't done any yet so at least he hasn't failed. Suckerpunch will be his first shot at filming his own story. So wait till it comes out before labeling Snyder "not" a writer. But you are right about "Slow mo, explosions, CGI colors do not a movie make", which is why he had to improve watchmen from it's source ;)
Frogman
Frogman - 12/1/2010, 9:31 AM
@Superkal from you're comments i'm going to place you at around 12 years old. You're so childish its unbelievable. I do like the Nolan films, doesn't mean I should be penalised by a little jerk who thinks they are the be all and end all and that their opinion is the definitive so anyone else is wrong.
Shaman
Shaman - 12/1/2010, 9:36 AM
Superkalkixass- I agree with you that Snyder is the man for the job and that Nolan is a tad over rated as a Batman film maker. But as a director, the man does have talent and Frogman has a point. No one is attacking you for prefering Snyder over Nolan, just take it easy. We all have our own opinions on here.
1 2 3
View Recorder