Will We Finally Get The Right Superman In Man Of Steel 2?

Will We Finally Get The Right Superman In Man Of Steel 2?

Now that we are getting a proper Sequel for Superman, will it be the Man of Steel we all need?

Editorial Opinion
By SherronWatson82 - Aug 08, 2016 06:08 PM EST
Filed Under: Man of Steel
Source: The Wrap

Warner Bros. has yet to get Superman right in my opinion. So far, in the three Superman films to release in the 21st century, we’ve gotten retread of the Donner films (Superman Returns), a more dour coming of age tale (Man of Steel) and arguably the most cynical of the recent comic book films with some of the Injustice and Dark Knight Returns stories thrown in (Batman v Superman). Now, via The Wrap, it has been made official that Warner and DC will give Supes another solo shot in what many thought was a dead (because he is) franchise. To that I ask, who will be staring back at us from the sky. 

For those that may be asking “wait, I thought BvS was the Man of Steel sequel?” You’re not wrong in that assumption, as the superhero beat em up was poised as the sequel to the 2013 film, but as it became the launching pad for the larger DC Extended Universe, it became less of a Superman movie. WHile it did pick up from where Man of Steel left off, the story wasn’t his alone, and (SPOILERS INCOMING), it’s kind of a dick move to kill a guy off in his own movie. So the powers that be have seen fit to fast-track a proper sequel. No writers or directors have been attached to the film as of yet, nor has a release date been announced, but Warner Bros has two open slots in their schedule; Oct. 5, 2018 and Nov. 1, 2019.

 Now we’re left to wonder how much course correction is going to take place. To say the response to Man of Steel and BvS has been lukewarm would be generous. If anything, the attachment to the character has created some of the most divisive movies out today. WIth lines being firmly drawn by those who condemn the films, and others attachment to the characters despite what is presented on screen. Yes, that last statement was loaded. Still, the leader of the Trinity has yet to enjoy the spoils that should come along with that status, through critical response or even in the films themselves. I may not be the biggest Superman fan, but I still know what that character means, and how he should be received.

We’re still some years off from this sequel, and a slew of DCEU films will have been released by then, including the Justice League movie, which Henry Cavill will also star. Whether we’ll get a more optimistic version of the character, or one furhter burned out by her superheroic exploits, is still up for debate and contemplation. What is clear though, is that Warner Bros. may realize that their biggest asset has also been their own undoing. “But a person close to the project told TheWrap that Superman is a top priority for the studio and getting the character right for audiences is of tantamount importance.” A statement from a source close to Warner said. Let us hope he’s treated as such going forward.

Zack Snyder Shares Never-Before-Seen Photo Of Henry Cavill As Clark Kent In MAN OF STEEL
Related:

Zack Snyder Shares Never-Before-Seen Photo Of Henry Cavill As Clark Kent In MAN OF STEEL

MAN OF STEEL Star Kevin Costner Reflects On Jonathan Kent's Controversial Death Scene
Recommended For You:

MAN OF STEEL Star Kevin Costner Reflects On Jonathan Kent's Controversial Death Scene

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

TwistedKingdom
TwistedKingdom - 8/8/2016, 8:03 PM
In my opinion...

1) It's too late for that.
2) WB shouldn't bother trying.

First of all, Snyder and company called it a "reimagining" of the character when MoS came out, which means it WASN'T a faithful adaptation to begin with. It was a whole new take. Based on the foundation WB and Snyder have laid so far, realistically, he wouldn't become the traditional Superman. The only way he could is if the writers forced it. And that's never a good idea.

I say it's too late because it would've needed to happen in MoS. That was their chance to nail a faithful Clark, Superman, and Martha and Jonathan Kent. If they had adapted the first few issues of "Superman: Birthright", and I mean really captured the essence of why and how Clark chose to become Superman, WB would've had the definitive CBM. Why? Because they would've finally gotten audiences to truly understand the Man of Steel.

But, again, it's too late for that unless they reboot. And that's not happening any time soon. So, WB shouldn't bother trying to fit this interpretation into the traditional mode. They should run with what they have and let him evolve into whatever he becomes after he's eventually resurrected.
AC1
AC1 - 8/9/2016, 9:52 AM
I think the events of MoS and BvS could easily lead to us getting a more faithful Superman when he returns. Bare in mind, the mission statement with MoS was Superman in a more realistic world, and him trying to find his place in it. Given the events of that film and its destructive finale, it was obvious he'd be a polarising figure (much like the film itself was polarising).

BvS addressed that issue by confronting the ramifications of those events head on; it metaphysically references the divide between audiences and their opinions on MoS by launching off from the destruction of Metropolis and showing its wider ramifications on the world and humanity's perception of Superman, making Batman the figurehead for all those who hated and feared him.

Of course by the end of that film, Batman learns Superman is actually a well-meaning hero who simply lacks experience, and accepts him. Superman then sacrifices himself to save humanity, and humanity embraces him and his memory.

Now lets put this into perspective by bringing the Justice League into the mix. Obviously we know Superman will return in that movie, and will likely join forces with the League. We can also assume that the League will win whatever conflict they find themselves in. As such, by the end of that movie, we'll have Superman, alive and well, now accepted by humanity as a heroic figure rather than a potential menace, and having a sense of belonging in the Justice League among other unique metahumans after thinking of himself at least partially as the Last Son of Krypton. We don't know how or if his Clark Kent persona will be restored, but even if it isn't, we know he'll maintain his relationships with Lois and his mother, and potentially even a friendship with Bruce and other human JL members, giving him a link to humanity as well on a personal level.

All in all, that'll effectively complete the character arc started in MoS, where the character will finally have a better sense of his own identity, his place in the world and a sense of belonging with both humanity and with those who protect it. As such, that sense of harmony would likely result in the character being in a much more positive head-space, and becoming a much more faithful version of the character in a very natural way. Hopefully, this will lead to Superman appearing in the eventual Man of Steel sequel as a much more optimistic, less dour character.

I don't have a problem with how serious and somber this version of the character has been presented thus far. Having said that, I agree that we now need a shift in attitude, and a bit more positivity and hopefulness to come forward from him.
Shield23
Shield23 - 8/9/2016, 8:11 PM
@AC1 Couldn't have said it any better myself. We were introduced to a Superman in turmoil. A Superman whom is struggling to be Superman. But now that that time is over, he can become the one we're more familiar with. The fact that people say that he wasn't done right without stating it as their own opinion (unlike Sherron Waston here) means they don't really know the comics character and many of the things he has gone through throughout his publications. DCEU Superman tried to be the Superman we expect him to be, but the dark, cruel, and cynical world just wouldn't let him. They refused to welcome him due to his heritage, abilities, and role in the BZE. Similar themes like this have been explored in the comics as was his behavior and attitude. People just don't understand the importance of modernizing.

There's a reason why so many people looked down on Superman for so long. It's not just because of his power. It's also his very character. He represents the kind of things many do not give a hunch for in this century (unless you're a fan of his character). Superman represents absolute goodness, black-and-white morality, and unshakable righteousness. Not only do many consider such characteristics boring and corny, like I said, they also consider them outdated. In today's world, no one believes in an individual whom is good ALL of the time. Morality is and always has been gray; there isn't always a fine line between the good and the bad. And doing the right thing, as proven in BVS, can be very subjective. Having good intentions can lead to undesirable outcomes and serious consequences. We can't pretend that things like this do not exist. Even the comics explore things like these. Superman needs to fit with the times he's in. There's no going back to the days of sunshine-rainbow escapism.

However, I am quite certain that the JL film will give us a taste of a more upbeat, optimistic, but hopefully still grounded Superman while MOS2 gives him an entire film to shine in with no Amazon or Bat in sight...
monsterswin
monsterswin - 8/9/2016, 11:11 AM
WB's has not done anything to earn my trust so for now I would say no. Waiting for WW...

The trailer looks like it may actually be enjoyable.
View Recorder