Mitch Conner Reviews: Man of Steel

Mitch Conner Reviews: Man of Steel

As a reviewer that has never enjoyed a Superman film, or even a Superman comic (aside from the death of Superman), what do I think about this Snyder induced trip? Well, I don't agree with half the critics....(some spoilers)

Review Opinion
By MitchConner - Jun 14, 2013 11:06 PM EST
Filed Under: Superman

I'll be honest with you: After all of the talk on this site, and the negative rating on Rotten Tomatoes, I almost bought tickets for "This is the End" tonight. I only bought tickets to Man of Steel out of pure curiosity. I half wanted this film to be great based on the "you are not alone" trailer, and half because I really want to see another Batman film and a Flash film. But despite all of the reviews by "professional critics" I have to say, eat a (explitive) naysayers. Man of Steel was awesome.

What do you want from a man who is completely invincible? In a world of cinema disaster porn, superheroes who are not supposed to be portrayed as super, I'd say Snyder had his work cut out for him. Batman is relatable. Iron Man is believable (albeit in an America 200 years in the future - rocket fueled exoskeletons run out of fuel in under a minute by today's technology).

So Zack Snyder takes the route we can relate to: the unknown. Basing the entire premise of Superman on unknown technology, Snyder gives himself a little breathing room in the "yea, that shiz would happen" department. But not only that, he has enough respect for his audience to try to explain Supes powers when he doesn't even have to. Supes is superpowered because he's an alien from a superior race in outerspace: hey, for me, nuff said, I'm here to have a good time. Instead, he takes it a step further and takes Supes power's away when he's in homeworld territory (Zod's ship). Apparently, no kryptonian is super-powered in their own atmosphere, only in ours, which is weaker. Our sun gives him power because their world is dark. It's easy to deduce Zynder tried to make this as believable as possible by implying that any living being put into a world that gives it more of what it needs would become super. Perhaps bacteria on earth grown in harsh climates would grow into a monster if left on a helium rich Titan?

The point is, Snyder takes a guy who is completely invincible and makes him human. That's a hell of a task considering Nolan only had to take a human with mega-bucks and make him witty, intelligent, and tech savy into a tragically flawed crime fighter.

After seeing this movie, I am truly surprised to see the ratings it has received. There was not one moment of this film that seemed like it could have been done better. I've heard complaints about his relationship with Lane. Huh? Adams is hot, she cares, he cares about her...wtf? That relationship works great. I can't wait to see her another film.

Even one of the villains is smoking! I wish Faora was still around, God knows she isn't hard to look at. Everything about her made me want to destroy earth with her. Zod owned the screen whenever he was around. People have complained about the twist at the end. Why? Zod played his part, he told Superman "I was programmed to do this, I don't stop", so what was Supes supposed to do? Say to Zod "You can change, you don't have to do this bro, come on, let's have a beer"? No, Zod was PROGRAMMED to do it...half the premise of the movie was based on the "programming" component of Krypton.

I like what they did with Supes' parents (both sets), and despite the complaints about the flashbacks, I thought they were perfect. Who in the hell wants to watch Superman get picked on for an hour? Get on with it.

Perhaps for Superman fans this movie was a miss (though I can't imagine all of the negative reviews were from Superman fans). Nevertheless, after watching this movie, I really did walk away baffled as to why its rating is so low. I even left the theatre thinking that maybe DC/Warner just didn't grease the right palms (maybe they thought that a good movie alone would rest on it's own merit).

I really hope that people don't read too much into the ratings and reviews, because this movie is just about as good as it could have been. DC/Warner had to get this out of the way to open the door for a Justice League, and a reboot of their entire film slate, and they totally delivered. It would be an absolute shame to see this vision get wasted on a slew of bad reviews for God knows what reason.

Go see the film. You'll appreciate the direction they are heading in.


--One note: Do not watch the film in IMAX - loud as frick--

SUPERMAN/SUPERGIRL Costume Display Offers Glimpse At What Might Have Been In The DCEU
Related:

SUPERMAN/SUPERGIRL Costume Display Offers Glimpse At What Might Have Been In The DCEU

MAXXXINE Director Ti West Reveals Small Role He Played In PEARL Star David Corenswet Being Cast In SUPERMAN
Recommended For You:

MAXXXINE Director Ti West Reveals Small Role He Played In PEARL Star David Corenswet Being Cast In SUPERMAN

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

MarvelousMarty
MarvelousMarty - 6/15/2013, 3:08 AM
I saw it last night. It was right up there with Avengers for me. Thought it was excellent from start to finish. 10 out of 10.
SamuraiHairMaster
SamuraiHairMaster - 6/15/2013, 2:12 PM
Villains often make superhero movies. . .General Zod and his crew were amazing. They had to be stopped but you understood their motivations. (Unlike the Extremis-Mandarin-Killian Being)

Also, superman wasn't a total milk toast. The way he talked to people was well done. He was polite yet he exuded an air of strength. This is very hard to do (without failing miserably or being cheesy) but the movie did this very well.

Finally, I thought the ending was fine. It didn't bother me. I think people need to remember that some of superman's morals arose because of the comics code. Consequently, I think they need to be re-examined because they were not part of a creative evolution but were really put upon the character in an era of censorship.
Canon108
Canon108 - 6/15/2013, 2:34 PM
Awesome review, couldn't agree more...I don't think it's as good as The Dark Knight, but it's close. Easily the second best comic book movie ever IMO, and that's nothing to frown about. Avengers was a toy commercial brought to cinemas, this felt (like Nolan's Batman films) like it's own thing. It didn't play to an 8 year old audience. The writing was really good, acting was great, and the directing was commendable...everything the Avengers wasn't.
lucio7lopez
lucio7lopez - 6/15/2013, 2:59 PM
@KryptonianAbominationClone

That's right, this movie eclipsed the people with the high level of action, but in really is very deep and emotive! I saw two times and in the second I can look better a lot of amazing details in the script and narrative.

Bad as Transformers????? WTF, is a nonsense. The movie is epic, entertainment and nothing less awesome!
Jer3miah
Jer3miah - 6/15/2013, 3:45 PM
@SamuraiHairMaster:

Wow, brilliantly-said. You are so right. You broughta point to the table that no one else has even considered, myself included. Superman(along with all other CB properties) were severely censored back when the government gave a damn about how its citizens lived.

That censorship changed everything, but we all seemed to have forgotten that crucial factor. I commend your memory. Many kudos, sir.
MitchConner
MitchConner - 6/15/2013, 7:03 PM
@canon many thanks bro! Yea I thought the movie was great, I really don't understand the nasayers
View Recorder