MOS Broken Down

1- The chemistry between Supes & Lois:
•This movie is not about their love story.
•How much chemistry should an alien have growing up f$@ked up, due to how he had to live his life in isolation? I doubt Clark had many relationships growing up.
•When Lois kisses Supes for the first time, why should it always be the obvious (perfect "love @ first sight) when it finally happens (remember he's an alien with crazy powers) There should be some slight hesitation. Both characters should feel some discomfort.

2-The flash backs (confusing?)
•Just imagine living your life with memories only being in chronological order. That would be weird. The flash backs are representing certain situations as they relate to what we might hear, see, or smell in our environment. In the case of Clark's flash backs, his memories were triggered by natural things existing around him during the moment (ex. the school bus/ oil rig explosion= X-ray @ classroom)

3-The "Nostalgia" comment
•I saw the original in the movie theater as kid. Loved it during that era.
•Get over it, why watch a movie or anything else and expect the same ol' thing.
•Christopher Reeve did his thing well on parts I &II
•Henry Cavill also did quite well, considering all the baggage surrounding the franchise.
•Why would Clark/Kal/Supes' become a light hearted joke cracking person when the world around him is being destroyed because of his existence, and his father died to protect his abilities
•There were some humorous parts in MOS, and Cavill did smile more than "twice" according to one reviewer

4-What is the story about?
•Remember all the interviews with comments coming from the the director, and the producers.
•First and foremost the story is about two fathers/ first contact/ alien invasion / sacrifice / self-discovery.......
•It's not about Clark employed as a news reporter

5-Was the MOS perfect?
• No. How can any movie ever be perfect. Everyone will always have there own interpretation on how a character should be represent
•There are small problems with how some of scenes are executed, but not enough to say the movies sucks. It's funny how some of the reviews claim how MOS did not work, but some of them still say to check it out.
•If you can't have fun with MOS, maybe we have reached a consensus of how all future fantastical CBM should be like, by comparison all of the comedic and very bright cartoony feel of Marvel movies. Clam down, I like both companies. Marvel is not, and shouldn't be the complete version of the bible when it comes to how CBM should be made, and the same goes for DC. Both sides need one another, especially for a franchise to be successful. Hollywood can be just like modern day viewers of media. Just like the sheep follow the back sides of every other sheep. They may not know where they're goin, but they follow non-the less. Open your eyes, and notice how executed trends are planted. Currently their seems to be a push towards stronger more independent women figures (maybe the WB will sit back and try to ride this wave and find a way to fit Wonder Women in). See the movie, and form your OWN ideas. Not the idea of your "daddies Superman"; "this will be a masterpiece", or whatever preconceptions (bad/good).
Superman has a 75 year anniversary, lets hope all our heroes can celebrate a similar feet. It's not about Marvel/ DC being the winners, it's the loyal fans, and I just want to say thank you to all CBM fans for keeping the magic alive for such a long time. Stop whining so much, and looking for attention based on being negative for some sort of attention. Go watch it already.

If you would like to watch a good discussion about MOS on YouTube
Go to AMC movie talk. John Campea (might of misspelled) brought up certain views which are interesting.