IRONHEART Will Serve As A "Direct Sequel" To BLACK PANTHER: WAKANDA FOREVER - Mild SPOILERS

@GhostDog - I had a talk with some friends the other day about how I didn’t want to watch this because I don’t want someone who was, well, evil essentially being shown off. Like I know we can’t and shouldn’t hide parts of history and people aren’t going to suddenly become evil from watching it but doing more series similar to this is turning shit like this “normal” and audiences can see famous people portray these figures and their dark thoughts play out on screen…

Obviously this was a rant but this kind of crap is just so depressing to me…

@GhostDog - I bet it will be another Ted Bundy project.

@GhostDog - Don't think they're trying to follow marvel and build a shared universe. Its going to be an anthology series so no will have to do with the other. They just want to tell the stories of these monstrous figures that had an impact on society.

@TyrantBossMedia - and obviously she will be 20 times smarter than Tony Stark ever was !
With none of the charisma.

@madhombre - Of course she will. That’s the Disney/Marvel blue print.

@Vigor - You are using the goodwill earned by others unjustly instead of creating new characters whose provenance is uniquely their own and who are better tailored to them.

@Brand0n - "Let's Go Brandon"

@TyrantBossMedia - I actually didn't realize incel would be offensive to you. Your comments come off like the textbook definition of one, so I thought perhaps it would be a badge of honor for you. I truly wanted a mature explanation. I guess using the word intelligence derailed that (?)

Since you didn't respond in kind, I'll address someone who did give an explanation @JDL
It's pretty clear that most of these fictional characters were created by white men FOR white men. There was very little diversity in color, race, religions, or even gender. It didn't represent the world we live in. Diversifying now is an attempt to correct the wrongs of the past.

In some instances I agree rhat swapping in any way can be detrimental to the original vision of the character however

@TyrantBossMedia - follow up
My question is WHAT IS THE AGENDA and why does it scare you?
A dentist has an agenda to keep people's mouths clean and make money while doing it. Is that a bad thing to have an agenda? I need to understand.

@Vigor - See, You can't even resist attempting insults. When you can't adequately formulate an argument you resort to childishness just like others of your similar ilk on this site.

@Vigor -

@Vigor - In addition to your vocabulary your comprehension too is clearly lacking. I clearly said you are "attempting" to insult me....which means you are failing.

Clearly your comprehension also prohibited you from noticing or understand what I already wrote:

"We (myself and others) have made our points explicitly clear regarding Disney/Marvel's Agenda....as have Disney/Marvel. We have posted numerous examples and cited their own internal communications as supporting documentation."

It's either a comprehension issue or that you are intentionally trying to be obtuse.
Either way it's not working for you.

@Vigor - Nope, I’m not peeved at all. Clearly you are projecting your own anger onto me.

Disney’s agenda was already revealed via the leak of their internal zoom call and reported in numerous articles.
And I have already explained what is wrong with overtly injecting your political agenda into movie making.

I have mentioned it numerous times on this site.

@Vigor - Oh I never once said it offends me. That’s something else that you have errantly implied.

And yes, Disney admitted that they are politicizing diversity.
Perhaps you should look up their leaked zoom call and what they themselves call their “gay agenda” for starters.

@TyrantBossMedia - Have you seen some of the clips released? They aren't great to say the least.

@UncleHarm1 - Nope, That has nothing to do with it.
It’s actually disrespectful to minorities to tokenize characters instead of Marvel actually taking the time to develop new and current minority characters that are truly unique.
Stop and ask why Marvel does that? Why they tokenize or gender swap?
The answer is because they don’t, for some reason, believe that a organically minority or female character can carry a movie or show on their own.
And that is disrespectful and I would find it insulting.

Look at Sam Wilson. He was a truly organic character in the MCU and the comics. He was fleshed out and developed. And we loved his character, but then Marvel couldn’t just further develop Falcon, an organically black hero. They had to tokenize Captain America temporarily because they couldn’t think of how else to further develop Falcon.
Not only that then they make him an “angry black man” in FATWS which is totally opposite the character that had been developed for nearly 10 years on the MCU. It’s stereotyping and insulting to the character that Mackie and the filmmakers had worked so hard to develop.

Marvel is using minorities and women to also create critical armor. Once they feature someone from those groups they can write a substandard product as they have throughout Phase 4, and ANY criticism of that product featuring someone from those groups Marvel can cry racism or sexism or homophobia. Then use that to deflect away from the fact that their product is simply bad.

I have explained this countless times here as have others and for some reason certain people just don’t get it or don’t want to see it for some reason.
Perhaps they don’t want to and prefer to be blind to how Marvel is using women and minorities instead of growing and developing their characters.

There are SO many just black heroes and they are nowhere to be found In the MCU. Why? Why introduce Ironheart whose comic was cancelled after only 12 issues yet we don’t see Doctor Voodoo or we still don’t have a proper MCU Luke Cage who is amazing, or Bishop or Blue Marvel or Night Thrasher or so many others?

Why are those of you who love to imply that others are racist also don’t care that so many great black and minority heroes are shelved while white characters are continually tokenized?
But we “racists” want to see those characters developed.

And don’t get me started on the great female characters who are given a similar treatment.


Now I’ll wait as you try to twist what I wrote to spin it into some closeted form of racism…that’s inevitable from you who bow to Marvel.

@TyrantBossMedia - absolutely agree. They seem to think that the character will be popular mainstream if they insert them into the existing shell of a major character such as Captain America or Ironman rather than use existing characters yet to be introduced like as you say Luke Cage. And to me at least moderating one of the biggest MCU Facebook group it seems nobody is fooled by it or actually likes. Just weird. I guess one of the issues is that despite trying the current or more recent writers have failed to introduce new characters that stand the test of sales like as you say Ironheart. Let’s face it Stan, Jack and Steve had amazing imaginations.