ANT-MAN AND THE WASP: QUANTUMANIA Post-Credit Scene Photos Include A Terrifying Kang Variant (SPOILERS)

@MosquitoFarmer - I still don’t understand this scene. They’re all screaming excitedly, super hyped; but for what? The original comic panel seemed to convey “uproar,” like a senator scene. I’ve asked my friends and each one has a different thought as to why they’re jumping around screaming; which tells me the intention isn’t clear.

@MG0019 - maybe watch the movie. that may help.

@slyrax - we need more Star Trek news in this site.

@Vanillain - The Dominion doth agree

@Steel86 - also, and not to intrude upon your point:

it was actually four, and possibly a fifth, eyewitness who were in direct proximity to the alleged ‘fight,’ and each of them is apparently prepared to testify that Majors REPEATEDLY attempted to get out of the cab to which Jabbari apparently kept violently clawing at him (apparently he took one of these to the face and, when showing to the on-scene responding ’officers,’ got laughed at (body-cam evidence is gonna get REAL interesting’round here)).

Apparently Jabbari also tore up his $1000 jacket in the process AND robbed his apartment of jewelry and 3 rolexes (in addition to the $800+ she fraudulently charged to HIS card, ALL while supposedly nursing excruciating pain on a broken finger) on her way out as he was being arrested.

But…..you know…..not as worthy of a journalistic nod as, say, yet another list thread about why Ezra failed 🤷‍♂️

@SauronthePower - Can't find this corroborated by a single reputable news source.

@SauronthePower - Oh, I've seen all this. This is all from the same lawyer who released the "exonerating texts" that made Majors look even more guilty, yeah? I've a funny feeling the rest of this evidence might go the same way, even it even materializes at all.

Tell me more about my "uniformed" opinion.

@SauronthePower - Can you point me to the part were Majors himself said or blamed racism for the arrest?I mean I know his lawyer said that from a letter age wrote.Also great source.

@SauronthePower - Yeah, you get that the summary of the evidence was given by his lawyers, right? Again, according to them it exonerates him, just like they said the texts did. The actual evidence hasn't been shown to the public or reviewed during the trial - which is a month and a half away - so its effectiveness in providing any kind of alibi or rebuttal is open to interpretation. The fact that I know that and you don't tells me who's actually uninformed here.

Incidentally, you deciding he's innocent when you've just heard the defence without hearing the prosecution is just as stupid as anyone who decided he was guilty before hearing any evidence in his favour.

@SauronthePower - my bad misunderstood your post lol.Kids don't do drugs again my bad.

@pitbull76 - no problem. Sometimes I can get a bit convoluted 🤷‍♂️

@FrenchSauce - character witnesses are a tell on a weak case. If you don’t have the concrete, you go for the illustration, to frame a narrative. Classic deflection maneuver.

While it is not atypical to call character witnesses in, since they are not germane to the incident on March 25, all that does is portray a narrative supportive of a picture that the prosecution is attempting to paint of Majors’ character as a person, yet it does ABSOLUTELY ZERO to concretely address the reams of evidence dumped by Majors’ legal team. Obviously the state has more to their case than just this, but it IS tellingly curious that they choose to go the route of employing this strategy when NOT ONE of those ‘character witnesses’ can actually speak with any authority about the specific charges Majors is facing related to March 25

Majors’ team has released hours of security footage that clearly shows Jabbari with full use of her supposedly broken hand.

It has become comically entertaining at this point watching the already predecided attempt to spin what their eyes VERY clearly see 🤔

As far as the other evidence that supposedly doesn’t exist…..either the $800 in fraudulent credit card charges exist or they don’t.

Pretty easy to track down a paper trail replete with timestamps and match it up against the released video footage to either confirm or deny that said charges were made (without the cardholders consent). But yeah….you keep banking that the nefarious lawyer is manipulating process with semantics and is aggressively pushing to gamble her license and reputation on something so easily proveable/disproveable 🙄

The only valid point you have brought up is in regards to dropping the case in the face of such supposed concrete evidence.

While I DO find it interesting that the prosecution continues to pursue this case, perhaps (and this is complete 1000% conjecture), the moment Chaudrhey went ‘All-In’ on the racist NY p d claims, that sealed the deal on this being a no backdown battle.

If you don’t think that the prosecution and the PD Union aren’t constantly communicating over the allegations here, than you really are dumber than I thought. Majors and Chaudhrey threw down a massive gauntlet w those claims, one that HAS to be answered. The days of deal-cutting are almost certainly LONG gone (you WILL have noticed that Majors has apparently moved out of NYC as most of his sitings have been in Los Angeles and he HAD to be compelled to physically appear in Manhattan (figure it out)

If it weren’t so personally entertaining perpetually exposing guys like you and “the bullfighter” for their personal prejudices masquerading as forum intellectual thought, I’d actually be bored right about now.

Also: been six days since all this went down and not a peep from Josh or Mark. I usually defend Josh and don’t know Mark at all but this is beyond baffling.

Update it for good or ill guys.

Hiding it looks agenda-driven whether that is true or not

@Steel86 - just keep expanding your blocked user list, there is no such thing as due process among these plebs. Ezra Miller? yeah, that is christ on the lips of the children here.