F*** RT! Why is Cap Getting Mixed Reviews?

F*** RT! Why is Cap Getting Mixed Reviews?

Much to the charging of Marvel fanboys (myself included), "Captain America: The First Avenger" has been on the receiving end of many-a-harsh review. I have three reasons why. Hit the jump for my hypotheses.

Editorial Opinion
By keytarhero - Jul 21, 2011 02:07 PM EST
Filed Under: Captain America
Source: RottenTomatoes.com

For many months many of us have trolled the interwebs for snippets of information on Captain America. The anticipation was (and still is) palpable in the various chat rooms and comment sections littered across this site. So, it's completely understandable that when one of our own, in this case Steve Rogers, gets trashed by a bunch of snooty critics that we raise our fists and demand their heads be skewered on a stake.

I myself am a diehard Cap fan. I've obsessed over Brubaker's run, so clearly I have a bit of a bias. That said, the rumors that Rotten Tomatoes (under ownership of Warner Bros) is somehow sabotaging CA: TFA in a personal vendetta against Marvel seems a bit farfetched. Instead, for my own cathartic reasons, I've come up with some theories of my own which I think might explain the mixed reviews.

1) Superhero [origin] fatigue: This is something that's being brought up more and more as the number of superhero films continue to fill our theater screens. I'm a true believer that a "good movie is a good movie" regardless of it's resemblance to past pictures (see James Cameron's Avatar). However, I think the eyes of critics, especially with CA: TFA being the fourth origin story of the summer, it was just another "normal guy gets powers" story. Looking at a superhero film this way, it's easy to see why they'd dismiss it.

2)Critics don't get Cap: I read a number of reviews complaining that Evans' portrayal of Cap was bland, boring, etc. Personally, I think Evans' past roles influenced these opinions. I think a lot of critics failed to realize who Captain America is, therefore missing the point of his strait forward portrayal. He's not John McClane, or, dare I say it, Johnny Storm. He's a man of purpose and principle, a "good man." He's a hero we're supposed to admire and strive towards, not appreciate for his one-liners. Evans played the hell out of the role and IS Steve Rogers. I think some critics just failed to see the meaning behind his performance.

3) It's "The Avengers" Fault: Before you flip out, let me explain. Since Iron Man, I think this has been the Critic's problem with Marvel Studios' films. Whether they just hate great Marketing, or truly feel that it drags on the plot (which I really don't see), critics always say that these films are just another lead-in to the greatness that will be "The Avengers". Of course, these films build the anticipation for next May, but it's pretty hard to ignore these films as individual stories. What will the excuse be when it IS "The Avengers"?

...it's just another ramp-up to "The Avengers II: Electric Boogaloo"!

I think looking at any of these reasons, with maybe the of exception of #2, it's really easy to dismiss CA: TFA before even viewing it, and honestly, I believe this is what a lot of critics did. They bumbled into the theater with their minds made up, and filled in the blanks from there, which is a shame.

But, we know better (and so do most critics)! Like I have to mention it, but check out "Captain America: The First Avenger" in theaters tomorrow!

Humbly submitted, Keytarhero.

MCU Rumor Roundup: CAPTAIN AMERICA TV Series, Liam Neeson's Secret MCU Role, And Plans For Donald Glover
Related:

MCU Rumor Roundup: CAPTAIN AMERICA TV Series, Liam Neeson's Secret MCU Role, And Plans For Donald Glover

PREY Star Ryan Phillippe Confirms He Met With Marvel About Captain America AND Iron Fist (Exclusive)
Recommended For You:

PREY Star Ryan Phillippe Confirms He Met With Marvel About Captain America AND Iron Fist (Exclusive)

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

xBlaze96x
xBlaze96x - 7/21/2011, 2:39 PM
Ehhh..It happens dude. Just have to deal with it......I'm going to see it! But it doesn't matter it is just a movie.
CommanderCool
CommanderCool - 7/21/2011, 3:17 PM
@Xenix IGN gave it 3.5 stars.. That's not exactly loving it
superbatspiderman
superbatspiderman - 7/21/2011, 3:18 PM
It will be great. I gave up on critucs a long time ago. They only seem to like Oscar winning movies these days.
TheMyth
TheMyth - 7/21/2011, 4:55 PM
lol, I vote they make that the official title of Avengers 2.

It's critics is all I got to say, and I don't give a shit what they have to say. Hell, I don't care what anyone has to say including (and not disrespectfully) anyone here on CBM, I'm going to see it and find out for myself. Anyone who would let someone else dictate whether or not they should see something is a tool that needs to get a mind of their own.
RunDTC
RunDTC - 7/21/2011, 5:09 PM
I'm going in 14 hours!!!!!!!!!! CAN'T WAIT!!!!!!!!
golden123
golden123 - 7/21/2011, 5:46 PM
If the critics or the average joes "don't get cap" then the movie didn't do it's job. If your second point is true then it's the own movies fault and should be treated as such; however, I do realize these are just theoris. As for number one, I'm a strong beleiver in the idea that films should have originality. Ironman suffered easily from number three. It's not that hard to imagine another Marvel film having the same fate.

@xenix: because those aren't biased fanboy sites at all.
BooYah
BooYah - 7/21/2011, 6:00 PM
73% on Rotten Tomatoes. I expect it to get in the low 80's.
BooYah
BooYah - 7/21/2011, 6:00 PM
I just hope once this movie goes over seas the critics dont bash it.
KALel3412
KALel3412 - 7/21/2011, 6:30 PM
maybe its bc its not that good
marvel72
marvel72 - 7/21/2011, 7:28 PM
its at 72% at the moment,thor was a very good film & that only scored 77%.
ironpool007
ironpool007 - 7/21/2011, 8:00 PM
@keytarhero: I'm not quite sure waht your talking about. Almost every review I've read has been positive. It goes without saying, that some critics will not like it, but so I've seen good reactions.
Inbrightestday
Inbrightestday - 7/21/2011, 8:25 PM
i saw the movie today. it is freakin awesome! if you love cap and marvel films then you will love this movie. i was in shock at the end because i thought it was so good. i guarantee this movie will do great at the box office and people are going to love it! it also sets up very good for the avengers!
sonofsamadams
sonofsamadams - 7/21/2011, 10:47 PM
uh..because Johnston brings two types of movies to the big screen...

Solid/mixed movies

shit/disappointing movies.

Hasn't really given a movie that the mainstream audience will go, '[frick]ing awesome movie! shall remember it forever!'

Won't be as good as Thor or GL in my opinion. Might top X-men though. I'll wait and see. Takin' my pops to it tomorrow. He used to read the comics as a kid, and I promised I take him.
mk
mk - 7/22/2011, 3:27 AM
capt america is the best cbm of the summer 2011!!!
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 7/22/2011, 4:34 AM
Its MARVEL STUDIOS

I have faith its gonna be amazing!

This ain't FOX... Marvel respects the characters more, well they have too lol.

THOR so far the best cbm this year... since WATCHMEN even... if you don't count Kick Ass of course.

HEllz yeah to CAP!
vespasian13
vespasian13 - 7/22/2011, 4:55 AM
you guys really need to check the reviews on cinemablend!!
a great review!! and there are lots of them so no worries...
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 7/22/2011, 5:28 AM
com one now, RT has it at a 70% with 63 good reviews and 26 bad.

come on, the good far outweighs the bad. a 70% is a good score.
apag101
apag101 - 7/22/2011, 7:12 AM
I would say its getting better than mixed reviews i feel like mixed score is around 50% on RT also metacritic is a much better site for reviews cuz RT makes mistakes and sometimes make fresh reviews rotten. metacritic says its at 67 which sounds low but for metacritic thats really good for instance thor only got a 58 on metacritic.

also @CommanderCool i would say 3.5 is above average so that ign reviews pretty good .
sonofsamadams
sonofsamadams - 7/22/2011, 8:07 AM
@Corndog

But has an average rating of 6.8/10.

Usually means B-

which is pretty mixed.
apag101
apag101 - 7/22/2011, 8:27 AM
@Justsomeawesomeguy 6.8 cant be compared to a B- wHich anyway isnt that mixed. for instance thor has a 6.8 average and even movies people call great like forrest gump has a only a 7 thats what makes RT a little confusing its score that seem low r actually very good but then ther r movies higher that are amazing
apag101
apag101 - 7/22/2011, 8:28 AM
i must say this article does give some good points as to why this movie isnt higher though, it does seem critics arent giving movies a fair chance lately.
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 7/22/2011, 9:36 AM
@ justsomeawesomeguy

how is a B- mixed? thats above average.
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 7/22/2011, 9:37 AM
AND, the positive reviews DOUBLE the negative reviews.

i can't see how anyone can see that as a bad thing...
keytarhero
keytarhero - 7/22/2011, 11:13 AM
It's definitely climbed a bit (when I posted the article it was at 66%).

However, Iron Man sits at 94% and I really imagined Cap getting or even surpassing that aggregate score.

I think there's still some weight to my points, even though Cap sits at a commendable 70%.

fearlessmontano
fearlessmontano - 7/22/2011, 11:39 AM
just saw captain america the first avengers and it takes the place of iron man in my eyes as the most dominating marvel comics movie ever made....and iron man set a high bar to reach...
Jackwagon
Jackwagon - 7/22/2011, 1:00 PM
First of all? who gives a shit what the critics think! Theyre mostly douchebags anyway. I put more faith in the people from here that have viewed it (even marvel haters) such as myself. Joe Johnston hit an out of the park home [frick]ing run! The CGI makes xmfc look like stop motion animation!

@xenix: IDK what reviews youre talking about but most of the ones that I have read were pretty positive. Ebert liked it and he hatres superhero movies so thats good enough for me as far as "professional" critics go.

@commandercool: 3.5 out of 5 is bad?

Be smart people, go see it for yourselves. You'll definitely enjoy the ride.
Jackwagon
Jackwagon - 7/22/2011, 1:03 PM
BTW: Stan "The Man"'s cameo is hilarious!
Ghostt
Ghostt - 7/22/2011, 6:22 PM
very insightful, dude. It's rough being the 4th superhero movie of the summer.
View Recorder