What WB/DC SHOULD DO.

What WB/DC SHOULD DO.

Fanboys need to chillax because their favorite studio can recover.

Editorial Opinion
By sonofsamadams - Jul 22, 2011 05:07 AM EST
Filed Under: DC Comics

Over the past couple of days, I've hit writers block big time; didn't really know what I wanted to write on this site. But after reading a bunch of comments from Marvel and DC fanboys lashing out against each other (which is pointless I might add) it inspired me to write this article. So here, in 3 points...what i think WB/DC should do.



1. Calm the [frick] down, take a breather.

DC/WB indeed bit off a little more than they can chew with GL. They thought they had a real winner on their hands. Well they WOULD have if they didn't enslave Campbell, not allowing him to work his magic. Nolan told DC that if they didn't let him do what he wanted with Batman, he would be out the door and wouldn't come back to them. Campbell should have been the same way with GL. I think the main reason why he's not coming back is because of DC/WB meddling with his business. If a GL director's cut comes out, and its 5 times better than the theatrical version, then hopefully WB would listen to reason instead of turn a deaf ear. I read a comment earlier stating, 'Marvel will always be ahead of DC. Always.' Uhhh okay. Even in the 45th Century, eh? That always? Its shown in Hollywood that these companies have gone through periods. From 78-95 it was all DC. But after a few huge failures (Spawn, Steel, B&R) they freaked out and pressed pause, allowing Marvel to rise up and shoot past them. DC needs to sit back, re-think their universe, and then lay out the drawing boards. They're down, but not out in this battle. Their 'era' will return in time, and possibly pretty soon if they relax and think this through a little harder than do the George Lucas thing and disappoint all of the fans. If they can create pretty awesome animated series/films, then why can't they do the same for live action motion pictures? They need to carefully plan out their movie schedule work on their main JLA character movies and do what Marvel is doing by throwing second tier superhero movies on the side to earn a little cash. DC may be freaking out over GL's flop right now, but they really don't need to. Its a movie. Not an oil industry. You're entertaining people, not curing AIDS.



2. Have someone RESPONSIBLE overseeing their movies.

When Rodger Goodell came to be the NFL commissioner, he laid down the law. He didn't take bullshit from anyone, enforcing strict laws that everyone would have to follow, making the National Football league a little more profitable and suitable for everyone's taste. (in my opinion he should have gotten rid of the steelers...and the vikings. Then we would have world peace). He is a responsible manager. Something DC has to get. Their studio needs a person to come in, look at the damage and say, 'Okay this is what you need to do, this his how you repair it, and this is how you can keep it straight.' Someone to tell them to calm the frick down and take a breather; someone strict, someone who would listen to what directors would say and give them more freedom if what they have to say is interesting, though provoking, and worth their time. If DC wasn't run by a bunch of twelve year olds and instead by people who knew how the hell to run a studio, then this article would not exist. This guy (or gal) would have to be strict in the ways of sticking to the source material. For example, if they wanted to do an Aquaman movie, the new overseer should give the filmmakers all of the information they need them to do from the comics, paint a plausible picture, listen to what the director views this movie should be, then if that view is good enough, let them have their way with it. BUT- keep a close watch over the movie rather than assume its going to be alright. Hire better screenwriters and producers; make sure they're doing their job right; don't bite off more than you can chew. Make sure the cast isn't wooden or bad to make the movie a parody.



3. Better. Marketing. BETTER MARKETING.

While Superman and Batman are the most popular superheroes in the world (believe me, they are. Their symbols are the most recognizable out of any other superhero), other superheroes could have the potential to get the close popularity of Supes and Bats...only if DC/WB marketed them a little better. GL's marketing plan was a total disaster. WB was indeed panicking because their campaign started off late. This is why step #1 listed above so essential. They can't have marketing plans starting off late like this; it just doesn't work that way. If they want to do a GL2, WB/DC needs to think it over a little bit better and NOT SPEND 100 MILLION ON ADVERTISING!!!!!! Have faith in your movie; slowly give your film to develop early on in the year as far as marketing goes. Ask for a Superbowl add; maybe even a world series teaser if you want to start that early. They need a responsible manager that has a degree in Business rather than one who just took Business ED in the 9th grade and didn't look back. Make smarter decisions, and if you don't have faith in your movie a week before it releases, you probably should have thought about that before you started pre-production. With MOS, they better have something damn good in store if they're pushing it back six months. They fail with Superman, then well then this his how they would describe DC studio's life at their funeral:
Smoking! Gif - Smoking!

see more Gifs
FAIL.


In conclusion, DC/WB can and will eventually recover. If they followed points like those listed above, that recovery would come much sooner. But unfortunately since they're run by a bunch of stubborn imbeciles, WB/DC won't fully recover for another five to ten years. Fanboys, don't freak out. They have plenty of time here. I know I'll get chewed out by die hard Marvelites by this article who seemingly think a lot like Steeler fans (since Steeler fans retort to comebacks like, 'oh, how many superbowl rings does your team have?'). Let that comparison sink in for a bit critique me for it. And as for the many DC fanboys that think its a lost cause...they need to calm down and not freak out over the fact that their favorite superheroes outside of Bats, supes and GL, are not entirely endager of having a movie deal. Wonder Woman is a very doable movie; if they make her more of a warrior than a hooker...and the Flash is doable as well. Hawkman? Give it a chance. Aquaman? Yes and no in my opinion.

Personally, I would prefer it if both Marvel and DC were run by the same studio. Then that way all of this DC vs Marvel bickering nonsense would be silenced.

But that's my opinion.
ABSOLUTE WONDER WOMAN First Look And Details Reveal That Diana Prince Is The World's First Public Superhero
Related:

ABSOLUTE WONDER WOMAN First Look And Details Reveal That Diana Prince Is The World's First Public Superhero

SUPERMAN Director James Gunn Rumored To Be Writing His First DC Comics Series For Release Next Year
Recommended For You:

SUPERMAN Director James Gunn Rumored To Be Writing His First DC Comics Series For Release Next Year

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

djohnpi
djohnpi - 7/22/2011, 5:37 AM
I do SOOO MUCH AGREE WITH YOU ITS TIME FOR WB to get its act togeather and do a good damm CMB out side of the TDK. THANKS MAN
LP4
LP4 - 7/22/2011, 5:38 AM
I agree with all of your points.

Here's another- IF WB screw up Batman or Superman next, they should just give up on films.

They messed up on Superman already in 2006...now GL.

What next???

I am starting to really think DC is better just in comics not in films...unless it's Batman of course.
kong
kong - 7/22/2011, 8:42 AM

i agree with everything you said especially that
DC and MARVEL movies should be owned by the same studio.
then Marvel could have even better animated movies and DC could od better with liveaction ones.
SCOURGE
SCOURGE - 7/22/2011, 8:54 AM
WB needs to sell DC and let someone else figure out how to bring GOOD DC related movies to life.

How is the Superman rights lawsuit going affect the release of MOS in 2014?
golden123
golden123 - 7/22/2011, 11:51 AM
1) Give me an example of how DC is freaking out. I'm not aware that they're freaking out.
2) I agree with you there
3) There marketing was fine. It's just one of the things people try to blame for it's failure. The real reason for failure was the script.
WarnerBrother
WarnerBrother - 7/22/2011, 11:51 AM
I agree with your point that people need to get a little perspective.I'm a bit older then a lot of fans here,having seen Superman the Movie in 1978 when I had turned 11.In the years after that(as you posted 1978-1995)all the talk in the fan magazines (before the internet took off) was about how Marvel could never get it's act together and catch up with DC/WB. Here are some of the Marvel misses from that era.Howard the Duck 1986,The Punisher 1989(straight to video) Captain America 1990(also straight to video) Fantastic Four 1994 (never released in any form) In that 17 year period,DC had twice started the process of building a shared cinematic universe, (Supergirl spinning off from the Christopher Reeve Superman films in 1985 and Batman Forever's Metropolis mention in 1995) but backed off when Batman Forever and Steel stopped the WB/DC machine.The problem as I see it, is not that DC is run by idiots,It's that DC,unlike Marvel does not have it's own studio.This is because Marvel,up until a year ago,was it's own private company and had at one point,been bankrupt.The only source of cash Marvel had was selling the movie right's to it's character's to Fox,Sony,Universal and Lionsgate.It was this arraignment,(now hated by Marvel fans who bash FOX)that allowed Marvel to dominate the CBM field by flooding the market place with Marvel product from several studios.It was the success of the X-Men and Spider-Man films that allowed Marvel to set up it's own studio to make films that could be distributed by still another studio (Paramount) prior to Disney picking them up.DC on the other hand, has been in the WB family for 40 years and is seen as just one source out of many (like Harry Potter,Tolkien,The Matrix,etc) for tent pole films.Nobody in Hollywood wants to take big risks with event films if they don't have too, which explains WB's wanting for the most part, to stay in it's comfort zone with Batman and Superman. About the only way this may change, is if WB is willing to give up control of some properties as they have done with RED which was a hit with Summit Studios last year.Maybe they should allow Summit (an up and coming studio that takes chances) to make Deadman,Lobo,Sgt Rock,The Doom Patrol,The Metal Men and other "B" level DC characters to raise market awareness for DC product and pave the way for WB to put out JLA character films.

@SCOURGE
The Superman rights lawsuit means nothing as far as a MOS release date is concerned.It only matters that MOS is in production by the end of 2011.If not,the Shuster and Siegal estates could sue for lost profits due to the lack of a Superman film.The rights issue would be an issue for any sequels to MOS.This brings up an interesting situation.If WB/DC was doing a Superman film to keep the Shusters and Siegals off their back,It would have been easier to just make a sequel to Superman Returns with more action,anytime over the last few years and keep the budget under control (say about 140/150 mil) Superman Returns made 200 mil without 3D prices,so a punched up sequel,shot in 3D, should be in the same ballpark profit wise.By going with MOS, which is clearly being set up as the start of a new series of Superman films, WB/DC is saying it feels confident that some kind of payoff deal will be worked out allowing them to continue using the character(played by Henry Cavill) for several solo films and maybe a JLA too boot.
WarnerBrother
WarnerBrother - 7/22/2011, 11:53 AM
I ment to say Batman and Robin stopped the WB/DC machine.Sorry
sonofsamadams
sonofsamadams - 7/22/2011, 6:50 PM
@Hailtothekingbaby

I know! Harry Potter could have been as bad as twilight, but no! WB dedicated a lot of time in making it the most successful franchise to date. So why can't they be committed to doing the same with DC? Makes no sense what so ever.
Jefferys
Jefferys - 7/23/2011, 5:29 AM
@Justsomeawesomeguy - Warner Bros. just don't want to put their energy into something that they 'know' isn't good. Harry Potter was going to be a hit from day one since it had so many die hard fans from the books. Green Lantern, a name that every comic nerd knows, is not a purely likeable guy in the general audience and possibly more obscure then Ghost Rider.

Though, in the end it's Warner Bros. and I have no idea how they're going play there cards. While I just say what I think. Possibly.
naterator
naterator - 7/25/2011, 9:39 AM
DC will recover... WB might not. ANd Peter Jackson for JLA


sonofsamadams
sonofsamadams - 8/6/2011, 8:04 PM
WB already recovered with the money brought in by Potter and Hangover.

Your argument is invalid.
View Recorder