GHOSTBUSTERS (2016) Director Paul Feig On The Reboot's Negative Reception: "So Many Were Trump Supporters"

GHOSTBUSTERS (2016) Director Paul Feig On The Reboot's Negative Reception: "So Many Were Trump Supporters"

Paul Feig has reflected on the overall negative reception to his 2016 Ghostbusters reboot, and he believes a lot of people made their minds up about the movie well before seeing it...

By MarkCassidy - Sep 30, 2024 01:09 PM EST
Filed Under: Ghostbusters
Source: Via FearHQ

When the news first broke that an all-female Ghostbusters reboot was in the works that would completely disregard the previous movies and establish a brand-new continuity without the iconic members of the original team, there was, not too surprisingly, a lot of backlash.

While some of the responses were just flat out misogynistic rants, the biggest issue for a lot of fans was that they weren't getting a direct sequel with Peter Venkman, Ray Stantz, and Winston Zeddemore (Egon Spengler actor Harold Ramis had passed by this stage).

Even so, many people were willing to give the movie a chance... until they saw it.

Ghostbusters 2016 was far from an unmitigated disaster, but a solid first act soon gave way to tired gags, pointless cameos, and a ridiculous ending that really just served as a retread of the original. Reviews were decent all the same (74% on Rotten Tomatoes), and there is a perception that the film's box office underperformance was largely down to the intensely negative reception that greeted it before it even hit theaters.

While speaking to The Guardian, director Paul Feig reflected on the movie's release.

"Bill [Murray] had publicly said he didn’t want to do another Ghostbusters at that point," Feig responded when asked why he decided to make a movie without the original characters. "Harold Ramis had died. Dan [Aykroyd] and Ernie [Hudson] were there, but half the team felt weird. It had been 30 years and Bill and the gang were so iconic; I didn’t want to do anything that hurt the original movies."

"The political climate of the time was really weird, with Hillary Clinton running for office in 2016," he went on. "There were a lot of dudes looking for a fight. When I was getting piled on, on Twitter, I’d go back and see who they were. So many were Trump supporters. Then Trump came out against us. He was like: 'They’re remaking Indiana Jones without Harrison Ford. You can’t do that. And now they’re making Ghostbusters with only women. What’s going on?' and got all upset. Everybody went [frick]ing cannibal. It turned the movie into a political statement, as if to say: “If you’re pro-women, you’re going to go see this. If you’re not, then …” I didn’t think it mattered at all that the main characters were women, but people brought a lot of baggage."

Whether you happen to agree with Feig's perspective or not, it's difficult to argue that the movie did have the odds stacked against it from the start.

 A direct sequel to Ghostbusters 2, Ghostbusters: Afterlife, was released in 2021 and was more successful despite worse reviews. Recent follow-up Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire also performed well at the box office, but has the lowest RT score of the franchise with 44%.

Netflix's Animated GHOSTBUSTERS Series Is Still Moving Forward According To FROZEN EMPIRE Director Gil Kenan
Related:

Netflix's Animated GHOSTBUSTERS Series Is Still Moving Forward According To FROZEN EMPIRE Director Gil Kenan

GHOSTBUSTERS: FROZEN EMPIRE Star Ernie Hudson Questions The Need For 2016's Female-Led Reboot
Recommended For You:

GHOSTBUSTERS: FROZEN EMPIRE Star Ernie Hudson Questions The Need For 2016's Female-Led Reboot

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3
Ha1frican
Ha1frican - 9/30/2024, 1:42 PM
As someone who hates Trump, no they weren’t.
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 9/30/2024, 1:47 PM
@Ha1frican - i mean , there was some of that too I think

Maybe not to the extent he says since I’m sure they were some upset about them rebooting the franchise at all or not continuing the original series but the real vocal and toxic elements were those imo
Malatrova15
Malatrova15 - 9/30/2024, 2:08 PM
@Ha1frican - As somone who loves Trump...hmmm yes they were bro
Goldboink
Goldboink - 9/30/2024, 2:48 PM
@Malatrova15 -
We know better...
Malatrova15
Malatrova15 - 9/30/2024, 4:00 PM
@Goldboink - well see...e joy your cat soup while you can...the party is over pal.
Goldboink
Goldboink - 9/30/2024, 4:07 PM
@Malatrova15 -

Good Dog...

User Comment Image
Malatrova15
Malatrova15 - 9/30/2024, 4:08 PM
@Goldboink - indeed..dogs will be safe again
Goldboink
Goldboink - 9/30/2024, 4:28 PM
@Malatrova15 -

Make Tacos Safe Again!
HermanM
HermanM - 9/30/2024, 1:43 PM
Cope. Your movie was trash. Trump or not.
JFerguson
JFerguson - 9/30/2024, 1:45 PM
I’m not a trump supporter but this is an asinine, out-of-touch take. Grasping for straws at why his movie failed. Doesn’t recognize that he tarnished a beloved franchise and is willing to do it again.
SATW42
SATW42 - 9/30/2024, 1:46 PM
I mean, I know the obvious responses that are gunna come here, but he's just stating a fact of his personal experience. In my own personal experience, every person I knew who disliked the very idea of the movie also happened to be Trump guys.

If you don't think the Venn Diagram of Trump Supporters to People who didn't ask for a female lead Ghostbusters reboot is essentially a circle, I think you're being disineguous.

Also, that's not saying all Trump supporters didn't want this movie. It's saying that the people who didn't want it, also happened to be Trump supporters. There is a distinction there that shouldn't be seen as an attack.

Also, where's this Indiana Jones movie without Harrison Ford? Even doing an admittedly quick google search, all I'm seeing is Trumps comments. I don't remember any rumors about a Harrison Ford-less Indy movie.
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 9/30/2024, 1:48 PM
@SATW42 - there were rumors going around with them rebooting Indy with Chris Pratt at the time.
Deklipz
Deklipz - 9/30/2024, 1:51 PM
@SATW42 - It was rumored for a bit at the time that Chris Pratt was going to be the new Indiana Jones.
SATW42
SATW42 - 9/30/2024, 2:15 PM
@TheVisionary25 - that was all fan casting, I can't find a single studio rumor or anything, just fans saying they thought hed be good for the role if they ever rebooted it, and Ford said absolutely not, he's Indy.
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 9/30/2024, 2:19 PM
@SATW42 - I thought it was a rumor but I could be wrong

However some rumors are birn as that or wishful thinking so I’m not surprised someone like Trump though it would be real lol
Fogs
Fogs - 9/30/2024, 3:38 PM
@SATW42 - But that's what you and some people just don't get. Ot was never about a female Ghostbusters team, ffs. The movie was just baaaad.

Please don't call me a trump supporter, I'm not even american.
dracula
dracula - 9/30/2024, 1:46 PM
I dont like trump but the movie sucked

Also a lot of them liked Ghost Busters Afterlife which had a female lead and a more diverse cast than this crap fest
JackBurton1
JackBurton1 - 9/30/2024, 1:46 PM
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111
dracula
dracula - 9/30/2024, 1:50 PM
Wonder Woman and Captain Marvel came out around the time

Both successful

Both’s sequels bombed

But one was simultaneously released on streaming

And the orher has multiple reasons
Malatrova15
Malatrova15 - 9/30/2024, 4:09 PM
@dracula - yes the reasons are mysogyny and backwards hatred
Keja
Keja - 9/30/2024, 1:50 PM
Just admit you made a bad movie. Elizabeth Banks finally admitted she made a horrible movie with the Charley angel’s reboot. Paul Feig needs to understand you’re not going to make a good movie every single time. Just say that and move on.
dracula
dracula - 9/30/2024, 1:52 PM
@Keja - finally admit it after failing to throw wonder woman and captain marvel under the bus
SonOfAGif
SonOfAGif - 9/30/2024, 1:51 PM
The movie was awful. I'm not a Trump Supporter but the movie was awful. There is a reason movies perform poorly and it isn't always about politics.
dracula
dracula - 9/30/2024, 1:51 PM
Yet all the previous cast came back for 2 movies
mountainman
mountainman - 9/30/2024, 1:51 PM
Hollywood hacks blaming large chunks of the population for their products failing will never cease to amaze. This non-Trump supporter found the movie atrocious, like most who saw it.
SATW42
SATW42 - 9/30/2024, 2:21 PM
@mountainman - like I said earlier, he's not really saying that. He's saying the movie got a lot of hate when it was even just announced, before anyone could dislike it outside of the premise, which was simply "female ghostbusters"

He's also simply speaking to his personal experience. He's not even blaming them, he's saying 2016 was very politically charged, and he noticed most of the people attacking him were also posting pro trump stuff. He is drawing a line between Trump complaining about it, and then him receiving more hate for it. I mean, again, that was also easily observable thing that happened.

We all know he says something in a speech, and a large chunk of his audience takes it as fact and then just ruuuuuns with it.Recent example being cats and dogs being eaten in ohio by Haitians, and no matter how much it's debunked, he's still saying it, and people are STILL believing it.
mountainman
mountainman - 9/30/2024, 2:27 PM
@SATW42 - Every politician says untrue things and every political party’s members believe the things their party says. Not looking to get into details as political discussions on this site aren’t fruitful.

But as an independent who has never voted for Trump, it just gets tiring when Hollywood wants to blame the bad reception to their bad products on him or Republicans. It’s just lazy and avoids the core of the issue - which is bad products.
SATW42
SATW42 - 9/30/2024, 2:44 PM
@mountainman - i really don't think he's blaming, but I've argued this so much here that it's got to be getting annoying. I think he's simply pointing out an odd correlation he noticed.
SATW42
SATW42 - 9/30/2024, 2:44 PM
@mountainman - remember, correlation is not causation, and I truly believe he knows that.
mountainman
mountainman - 9/30/2024, 3:01 PM
@SATW42 - Could be. And it could be the article written is intended to make it more inflammatory than the original comment was intended as.

I’ll just go back to a comment I’ve been making for years. If you make a product that large portions of the population won’t like, even if you think their reasons for not liking it are wrong, you should probably spend less on it since it’ll have less broad appeal.

An interesting recent example is Budweiser. After the Dylan Mulvaney partnership resulted in tons of backlash and sales/the stock tanking, they pivoted back to their “good old boy” marketing approach. Their current spokesperson is Shane Gillis, who seems more in line with their target demographic.

I’ve never liked Budweiser and have always found their marketing to be completely fake, but they at least made the right business decisions so they can appeal to their customer base.

Bigger budget movies used to be called four quadrant, meaning they should appeal to all types of people. The problem I am identifying here is that the studios will make movies/shows that don’t fit that requirement of appealing to all people, then get mad when the people it didn’t appeal to either don’t watch or give it bad reviews.

You can think these folks are the worst people in the world and the only reason they don’t like something is because they are bigots. But the fact is, if they are expected to pay for a product, it has to appeal to them. Either make something that appeals to everyone, or spend less money on a product that will have more limited appeal.

I’m strictly looking at this from a business standpoint. And speaking ill of your customers or potential customers is a bad business strategy.
WruceBayne
WruceBayne - 9/30/2024, 1:51 PM
Political leanings had no bearing on the success of this movie. Cut it out.
SATW42
SATW42 - 9/30/2024, 2:24 PM
@WruceBayne - he's simply saying he noticed a trend that the people attacking him on twitter, also happened to be posting pro Trump stuff.

This isn't a confrontational take, but because it's Trump, and Feige isn't kissing the ring and buying a commemorative watch (true story, his latest griff) than it's automatically assumed to be political baiting when all he did was make an observation.

If you said "Wow, it seems alot of the people who like the Acolyte also tweet about Harris" No one would be offended or say it was bullshit.
The1st
The1st - 9/30/2024, 1:51 PM
...it wasn't goood.

User Comment Image

I'm not a Trump supporter.
TheJester187
TheJester187 - 9/30/2024, 1:52 PM
What a goofy! Sad excuse. Mixing politics with films let alone your failed film! These woke goofs will blame Trump for The Crow reboot I bet also lol People aren’t falling for that cash grab shit like they used too especially after Covid.
LukeCage2155
LukeCage2155 - 9/30/2024, 1:57 PM
@TheJester187 - Define Woke.
SATW42
SATW42 - 9/30/2024, 2:25 PM
@TheJester187 - "These woke goofs will blame Trump for The Crow reboot I bet also" I'm gunna need you to explan on this take please
Ikusa
Ikusa - 9/30/2024, 2:36 PM
@LukeCage2155 - Why? They could give you several different definitions and you wouldn't accept any of them since you most likely already have your own definition.

Stop wasting people's time.
LukeCage2155
LukeCage2155 - 9/30/2024, 3:32 PM
@Ikusa - The most recent information indicates that these individuals have not defined woke, which raises several questions about their understanding of the term and its meaning.
Ikusa
Ikusa - 9/30/2024, 4:04 PM
@LukeCage2155 - It's well defined. Words migrate and this is one of those words. Again, several definitions.

One would be that wokeness is a state of awareness seen by ignorant people stupid enough to find injustice in everything except their own actions.

philinterrupted
philinterrupted - 9/30/2024, 1:55 PM
What a bullshit way to disregard criticism.

The movie was terrible and it wasn’t any of the women’s fault.

Paul Feig made a bad movie. He doesn’t understand the tone of Ghostbusters.

Also, F**k Trump.
1 2 3

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder