Has Singer bitten off more than he can chew?

Has Singer bitten off more than he can chew?

Can Bryan Singer deliver the Days of Future Past we all want to see or has the franchise simply got too much baggage to exist as a cohesive unit?

Editorial Opinion
By Racker - Feb 18, 2013 03:02 PM EST
Filed Under: Fan Fic

Has Singer bitten off more than he can chew?

Over the last few months, Bryan Singer has delighted fans of the X-Men series with his revealing tweets regarding the cast of his current project. One after another cast announcements poured freely from the director and with those announcements, the outline of Singer's Days of Future Past began to take shape. If successful, the next episode in the X-Men franchise could be the most commercially profitable and critically acclaimed instalment to date. The sheer scope alone promises to give both X-Men fans and the movie-going public in general something they have never seen before. In fact it would be no over-statement to say that this film could be the most definitive film version of the long-running comic book characters to date and could very well set the marker for all X-Men films in the future. With this kind of pressure circling ominously over the production and the director's steep dip in form over the past few years could Bryan Singer have bitten off more than he can chew?

As previously mentioned Singer hasn't seen the best of times since Superman Returns failed to inspire a lasting re-energising of the much-loved superhero and Valkyrie was simply too flat to make any sort of impression at all. There's no doubt that the scrutiny and criticism of these films hit Singer hard, overly critical people might even say he still hasn't recovered from these misses. Currently he is putting the finishing touches on Jack the Giant Slayer and to put it bluntly, Singer needs this project to be a hit. He's already got the job of directing Days of Future Past but the boost of breaking his losing streak would push him forward to do his best possible work and dispel any doubts surrounding this clearly talented director.

Another possible stumbling block for the next instalment is the often debated time-line of the previous films and their impact on a film were time travel is at the very core of the plot. In X-Men: First Class the affiliation with the movies that came before was loose enough that it allowed room to manoeuvre. Unfortunately for Singer and Co., this time round they need to create a film that can be the keystone of the franchise, it must fit perfectly within the series and be capable of handling the weight from the inevitable scrutiny. It must bridge the gap between the original films and the current slate in such a way that both sets of films are better for it. This is asking a lot of any film, it also creates a huge amount of pressure on the people behind the scenes from the very first moment the idea is conceived. To put it in to context, George Lucas was unable to do this to the very high standards of today’s eager audiences and he had a lot longer to get it right.

Another worry for Singer is the abomination that was X-Men 3: The Last Stand. Brett Ratner almost single-handedly destroyed the cinematic future of the X-Men universe and Singer must regret relinquishing control on a project that he had nursed since its infancy. Ratner directed X3 like he had grown up watching Michael Bay films thinking “needs more explosions”, he annihilated any chance of a straight follow up and his negative influence will unfortunately have an impact on Days of Future Past. As much as we would all like to simply disregard X3, my understanding is that it will be a part of the timeline (if this is incorrect please let me know, you’ll be doing me a favour). Obviously because the plot deals with time travel it allows Singer the opportunity to right some of the huge injustices done during that film but Ratner’s free-handed exploits within this universe are sure to be a dead weight hanging around Singer’s neck.

Personally speaking, I’m a huge fan of Bryan Singers and believe that he is most comfortable when dealing with these unique characters in their own unique surroundings. I believe he regretted turning his back on X3 and realised in the following years that it was his opportunity to create a lasting legacy. With the promise of the proper inclusion of the Sentinels (finally) and the introduction of the possibility of time-travel, the X-Men universe could propel itself in to a whole new realm of success and I think both Singer and Fox know this. The popularity of Marvel’s The Avengers, the respective solo outings and the production of the ambitious Guardians of the Galaxy has changed what studios can do. If this film is an undisputed hit, who’s to say what could be the next major storyline; a revised House of M, a Cable solo film (my preferred option and Stephen Lang has to play him), the introduction of Apocalypse? If Singer succeeds then all walls will be broken down, nothing will stand in the way of some of the most popular and most outrageous storylines ever to exist in the comic book world from turning up on our cinema screens to be enjoyed popcorn in-hand. In order for this to happen though, the director needs to jump this final hurdle with confidence and without stumbling.

Racker

DC & Marvel Team Up In Awesome Fan-Created Infinite Crisis Video
Related:

DC & Marvel Team Up In Awesome Fan-Created "Infinite Crisis" Video

Bill Cosby Says He Wants To Be In A Superhero Film
Recommended For You:

Bill Cosby Says He Wants To Be In A Superhero Film

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

BANE5000
BANE5000 - 2/18/2013, 6:40 PM
Singer was recently asked about the X-men films at the moment and continuity issues, which im guessing involves the horridness that is X3, he said himself that with DOFP and the time travel elements that " I'll be able to correct a few things."

Maybe he can leave out the events of X3 all together by interupting the X-men films timeline before X3 and steer its outcome into a different direction and make the Phoenix Saga he was planning to make before leaving to do Superman Returns... i know its a fanboys hopes, but heres to hoping :]
Tainted87
Tainted87 - 2/18/2013, 6:57 PM
You really can't blame Ratner for The Last Stand. The movie had three directors attached to it, the cast was complete, the script had gone through a bunch of revisions and Fox had just then decided on one when Ratner was finally brought aboard.

All things considered, it's actually amazing it ended up as well as it did. Does that make it any less disappointing? Of course not, but assign blame where it belongs.
Tainted87
Tainted87 - 2/18/2013, 7:14 PM
You likely won't watch it (unless you already have), but there was a Brett Ratner movie that came out in 2002, one of the more exciting thrillers of that year (and we all know what a big year 2002 was)... called Red Dragon.

Of the entire Hannibal Lecter series, his movie is the most faithful adaptation.


You can tell that he had a lot of love for the book, as well as the Michael Mann movie from the 80s. Even when he had the ability to deliver, as you call them "free-handed exploits", Ratner stuck to the material.

For X3, Ratner had about ZERO control over production. It was already behind schedule and the cast was already given their parts before the director walked on the set. Again, it just boggles the mind.
sikwon
sikwon - 2/18/2013, 8:27 PM
I will never, ever understand how fans of the X-Men comics can love the X movies, any of them, that we have been given. I LOVED momments in First class. Mostly the stuff with Magneto and Shaw. They are 2 of my favorite bad guys. But even that, the change in Shaws powers was very cool but they were like "frick it, well change what ever we want." Thats my biggest problem with the movies, they have shown ZERO respect to the characters. Part of Wolverines appeal is that hes a little badass dude, knee high to the Hulk but will go at any one. We got 6'2 and soft. Cyclops, who is literaly second only to Captain America in terms of leadership and fortitude (he damn near WILLED his species from extinction) was reduced to a whiney 3rd stringer that was so unimportant to the plot that he was pretty much non existant in the 2 movie and killed in the 3rd. It was so bad i was happy to see him die. Storm was a travesty. Really, at what point did Haley Berry come acrossed as even attempting to care (or have any acting ability)? It goes on and on. Sabertooth couldent even speak!! They made him a cave man! It was just terrible. Singer gets love because he gave us 1 halfway decent movie and really, X2 wasnt good. Maybe its just me because i always seem to be the only one that was completely let down by every X movie so far. The best one has been First Class and that was, with the exception of Prof. X, Magneto and Beast, a completely raped origin story. I honestely belive that it was a different version of the movie they had planned for the next X-Men origins Magneto. The changed up a few things and boom First Class. I really despise the total lack of care they showed to any X history. I have ZERO faith in Singer, none. And Days is my second favorite story arc. I just cant see him pulling it off. As much as i would love it, love Apocalypse, Sinister, Inferno, hell ANY OF THEM. Its all on Singer to fix it. He cant.
Jamesx51
Jamesx51 - 2/18/2013, 10:36 PM
Totally agree with the above 2 comments... Every X-Movie has dissapointed me too - from the stories to the costumes, to the relations between characters! I can see the sentinels looking and being nothing like the giant mutant killing machine we all love :(
LP4
LP4 - 2/18/2013, 11:51 PM
Funny ass article "clearly talented director" LMAO

Tell THAT to the multitude of Superman fans who got thrown under the bus by this hack in 2006. Or the multitude of X-Men fans who got stuck with X3 due to Singer being a bitch and jumping ship for WB only to...yep- [frick] UP SUPERMAN.

[frick] Singer
Happy11
Happy11 - 2/19/2013, 3:38 AM
I think if the time machine is in the 70s then theyll go to the timeline after x2 and before x3, so that x3 never happens.
TheSuperguy
TheSuperguy - 2/19/2013, 6:11 PM
@Tainted
X3 should have been given another year in production. It was just to rushed. Fox just wanted to get it out in 2006 to compete with SUPERMAN RETURNS, when it turns out they didn't have to compete. All they had to do was sit back and watch the train wreck happen.
LegendaryOutlaw
LegendaryOutlaw - 2/19/2013, 6:16 PM
As a wise man once said (me), "YYYYYEEEEESSSSS!!!!!" Some of the movies were good, others were okay, and the rest sucked. When I heard about first class I flipped and got so excited, but when I saw it I was very let down. Not saying it was a bad movie, but I was so let down. I don't want to see anymore after The Wolverine. Except for Deadpool if they can actually get that right.
LegendaryOutlaw
LegendaryOutlaw - 2/19/2013, 6:18 PM
P.S. When I say good I mean about a 6 out of 10. The best one was Origins and I'm gonna say that is the only one that did better than a 6 out of 10. Not much better though.
View Recorder