John Rhys-Davies Wants a Different Role in The Hobbit

John Rhys-Davies Wants a Different Role in The Hobbit

It seems John Rhys-Davies is tired of playing a dwarf after his portrayal in Lord of the Rings trilogy.

By Whispers68 - Oct 31, 2009 02:10 AM EST
Filed Under: Fantasy
Source: Worst Previews

John Rhys-Davies' character is well known amongst admirers of "Lord of the Rings." He's played a dwarf throughout the entire trilogy and although his direct character doesn't appear in "The Hobbit," Gloin, his father's character will.

When encountered by Empire magazine about whether or not he would take the role of Gloin in "The Hobbit," it appears he is against the idea.

"I've already been asked and to be honest with you, I wouldn't. I have already completely ruled it out," he said. "When you've been 1 of 1, why would you want to be 1 of 13?"

It isn't as if he is completely against the idea of returning to the future franchise, he simply wants a different role this time around.

"I'd really prefer to play something quite different. Maybe an Elf," he said.



Whispers68: If "The Hobbit" continues on a similar format as "Lord of the Rings" did; in the form of good acting, direction, script, etc, this will be a major blockbuster. I enjoyed Davies' portrayal in the franchise so I would love to see him return once again in whatever role he chooses.
GLADIATOR II: Epic New Trailer And Poster Tease A New Legacy...Or Another Rebellion!
Related:

GLADIATOR II: Epic New Trailer And Poster Tease A New Legacy...Or Another Rebellion!

GRENDEL First Look Reveals Creature Design For Jeff Bridges' Take On The Legendary Monster
Recommended For You:

GRENDEL First Look Reveals Creature Design For Jeff Bridges' Take On The Legendary Monster

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

LEEE777
LEEE777 - 10/31/2009, 2:33 AM
Cool article @ WHISPERS!!

Luv the mock poster!!!

I reckon THE HOBBIT gonna be a MUNCHING good flick!



Mmmmmmmmmm
SlaughterHouse
SlaughterHouse - 10/31/2009, 6:39 AM
The Lord of The Rings are some of my favorite movies, and I've read the Hobbit numerous times, so I have high hopes for this film. I love Davies as an actor and hope to see him return. And I can totally understand him not wanting to go through all that make up to not stand apart from any of the other dwarves.

@leee, that poor cat...
Hawksblueyes
Hawksblueyes - 10/31/2009, 8:08 AM
LOL @ LEEE where do you find those clips?
FAD
FAD - 10/31/2009, 9:08 AM
i dont really like this kind of thing normally but the movies were pretty good.....i found them a bit too bum numbing at 3 hours each though lol!!!!
Whispers68
Whispers68 - 10/31/2009, 11:17 AM
Thanks everyone...

As for "The Hobbit," I haven't had the chance to read any of them. How does the action, suspense and overall story compare to the books of "Lord of the Rings?"
I haven't watched tje trilogy in years but as long as they were, the stories played out very well. I know people will disagree but I diliked every Narnia film created
Whispers68
Whispers68 - 10/31/2009, 1:23 PM
I'm trying to understand why my articles are getting deleted this week. I don't have grammatical errors for sure, the content is comic book movie related and yet they're getting deleted. I'm confused. I see articles numerously that aren't suffice for the particular outlet of this site and they're not deleted...they actually make the front page for that matter.

There are times (perhaps twice) where I decided to post something with an actress but not directly related to a comic book movie. For example, I posted an article of Megan Fox winning the new underwear ad campaign of Giorgio Armani from Victoria Beckham. The image used wasn't explicit...guess what, it was deleted. Then I see the next week an article on the front page about Kate Beckinsale winning the "Sexiest Woman Alive" nod from Esquire. LOL. Am I missing something here?

Is there a particular rule for articles being posted that I'm missing here?
Betty
Betty - 10/31/2009, 2:07 PM
Whispers68-- It's all up to their discretion, I wouldn't take it personally. I didn't see your Fox article but maybe it wasn't interesting enough and didn't mention any CBMs. I did see the Kate Beckinsale one and what helped that one was that it had a video and they did mention Underworld, I believe. It isn't a comic but it's close.

As far as the Hobbit... IMO, LOTRs sucks and the Hobbit rocks. I'm talking about the books btw. I think the Hobbit is going to kill it! The Hobbit is more fun and interesting in one book than the rest of the entire LOTR books.
Betty
Betty - 10/31/2009, 2:08 PM
John Rhys-Davies-- Yeah, A big, fat elf.
Whispers68
Whispers68 - 10/31/2009, 2:35 PM
@Betty

I definitely don't take it personal but I was mentioning the matter to see if someone had insight as to whether there are specific "rules" or guidelines to follow when it comes to the content being posted. I've heard from others on here when it comes to articles being posted/deleted/altered, etc so I ws wondering perhaps someone had insight on whether something should be posted or not because there are some articles I post where I feel shouldn't be posted but make the front page. LOL. I then have others i assume should be posted but get deleted.

So i guess i should check out "the Hobbit" books it seems Betty?
Betty
Betty - 11/1/2009, 1:19 AM
Whispers68-- lol, you never can tell. I've posted plenty of stuff thinking maybe just Leee will comment on it and it turns into a 50 to a 100 poster. Leee was first of course. Other stuff I get excited about like my first article I did a casting for the Invincible movie. I thought it was the best article ever. The responses I got were like, "What's Invincible?" or "I don't read this but I hear it's good." This site is a microcosm of main stream media. Even here most people are more interested in what's main stream.

Yes, read the Hobbit. The pace is WAY better. Smaug is hella cool.
Tonx
Tonx - 11/1/2009, 4:52 PM
You are all idiots. Just let me start there. Narnia is a childrens story based loosly on the bible. How can you possibly put them in the same genrea as LOTR? Or the Hobbit for matter, which is also NOT a childrens story. I have read all of the books including all of the Narnia stories, and if you haven't even read the book, don't bother dishing about it. I have never read Green Lantern, so I don't comment about that which I don't understand. Yes, the movies can stand alone, but they are only a small part of the story.
Tonx
Tonx - 11/1/2009, 5:18 PM
Also, not a comic book...
thwhtGuardian
thwhtGuardian - 11/1/2009, 6:06 PM
It's easy Tonx, the genre is fantasy which includes many novels such as The Chronicles of Narnia, lotr, the hobbit, and even Harry Potter and those crappy sparkly vampire books. Genre deals with themes not quality.

Also, in comparison the LOTR the Hobbit is a children's novel, it is a much simpler story thematically, linguistically, tone wise, and structurally.
Thematically it's straight up adventure fantasy it has none the ethical or emotional complications of the LOTR, it's all about leaving home and doing fantastic things. Linguistically speaking it's hooked on phonics comared to Tolkien's other works, The hobbit employs much simpler sentence structure and more modern words. Structurally it's a simple hero's tale following all the basic plot points that Cambell would later identify, it is as Bilbo say's, "there and back again...". And as for tone it's fairly light hearted, up until the final battle and even the death there is handled with relative kid gloves. It's not with out its darkness but it hardly matches the utter despair that LOTR has.

Now perhaps all those points could be chalked up to taste or over analysis but the fact is Tolkien intended The Hobbit as a fairy story and wrote it in a tone suited to addressing children, he declares it as such in all of his writings about the book. However that doesn't mean it isn't a great read, nor does it mean it should be taken any less seriously than LOTR, but it is what it is.

And just as an aside, there are many topics here that deal with properties outside the world of comic book movies. It's sort of a nerd haven, as long as it's closely related to the subject it's usually accepted. But on the count of the hobbit not being a comic you are mistaken as a three-part comic-book adaptation with script by Chuck Dixon and Sean Deming and illustrated by David Wenzel was published by Eclipse Comics in 1989! It's a good read by the way, and I highly suggest it to anyone with a love of things Tolkien.
Whispers68
Whispers68 - 11/2/2009, 12:13 AM
@thwhthuardian

Thanks for the wise words but I've noticed people on blogs such as this individual "Tonx" enjoy hearing/seeing his or herself speak/write, etc. To say there's no comparison to the Narnia fantasy films and LOTR...yeah, that's pretty much saying since there are different segments of a music genre, they are completely different entities. Secondly, when we mentioned Narnia/LOTR, we were mentioning the appeal of LOTR films being "better," not the books. Betty then mentioned I should read the books but he found one book to be more interesting than the other. The last I checked, people are entitled to their opinion.

Betty
Betty - 11/2/2009, 5:24 PM
Damn, Tonx just popped up out of nowhere with sand in her vagina.
thwhtGuardian
thwhtGuardian - 11/2/2009, 8:44 PM
And disappeared just as quickly.
I wish there was more news about the hobbit, I want this movie so bad.
Betty
Betty - 11/2/2009, 9:02 PM
you and me both brova.

thwhtGuardian
thwhtGuardian - 11/2/2009, 10:47 PM
I mean, I understand That Del Torro has wanted to make his troll movie for a while but I'd really like him, as a personal favor to me, to put that aside and do the hobbit first.
slimybug
slimybug - 11/4/2009, 10:12 PM
This isn't Star Trek, and I'm not keen on the idea of actors playing multiple roles in the franchise.
View Recorder