Review: Terminator Fan Finds Salvation with McG

Review: Terminator Fan Finds Salvation with McG

As a regular movie buff (with an admitted affinity for the Terminator franchise), having seen McG's Terminator Salvation tonight I can tell you why you will not be disappointed and why the critics are whining.

Review Opinion
By CBMcontributor - May 22, 2009 11:05 PM EST
Filed Under: Terminator

I remember my teenage cousin and babysitter bringing home The Terminator in the mid 1980's on VHS and forcing me to watch it with her. As an 8-year old I was terrified by the images of the future war and the Terminator machine hunting Kyle and Sarah, but I was captivated watching the movie with a blanket pulled up to just below my eyes. T2 ad T3 of course came later and kept me interested.

Flash forward tonight with TS, I come back from the theatre absolutely captivated and satisfied with McG's creation and faith in the franchise. Why? I will not go into too much detail (or spoilers) and bore you, but I will provide advice for fans and film buffs alone before you head into the theatre to see this movie. I have always been captivated by Terminator franchise because I've always put myself into Sarah and John Connor's head before watching each movie. That is exactly what I believe a film buff and even a fan needs to do to be satisfied with Terminator Salvation. The movie feels real with its war scenes realistically feeling like you are there, but also the confusion John suffers with the circumstances he experiences is felt.

Go into the theatre without expectations, do not purposefully look for references to the old films or analyze every little thing down to smallest thing. Let the confusion and fear seep into your head, like Connor himself, as the movie progresses. I believe the critics are whining about this movie because they failed to empty their heads before the going into the theatre, are upset because it's not an 'All-Arnold' movie and have way over-analyzed everything. The critics and audience opinions are very wide from one another on McG's creation because the critics had way too high expectations. Ladies and Gentlemen, the war against the machines has arrived, it feels real and scary, the actors' performances (all of them...big props to Anton Yelchin) was genuine and the human redemption factor is beautifully played out. McG kept the story and performances of the characters at a well-balanced level - not overly dramatic or cheesy - and enough to keep the engine running. Skynet is one evil biatch you will come to seriously hate as much as Sarah, John and Kyle expressed in the original movies. McG got it right. Give him a chance and enjoy!

TERMINATOR: DARK FATE Producer James Cameron Explains What He Thinks Went Wrong With Tim Miller's Sequel
Related:

TERMINATOR: DARK FATE Producer James Cameron Explains What He Thinks Went Wrong With Tim Miller's Sequel

TERMINATOR Director James Cameron Confirms New Movies Are In Development - But Fans Should Expect Big Changes
Recommended For You:

TERMINATOR Director James Cameron Confirms New Movies Are In Development - But Fans Should Expect Big Changes

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

crappybumbum
crappybumbum - 5/23/2009, 3:11 AM
Man I COMPLETELY agree with you on everything you just said!!!!! AWESOME REVIEW!!!
Aiiwolf
Aiiwolf - 5/23/2009, 3:00 PM
McG did a DECENT job directing it no doubt, but the writing SUCKS and there is TOO MANY PLOT HOLES.

***Spoilers***

If skynet had kyle and he was the primary target, why didnt they kill him there, right than? Conner was going to come after him anyways, thats what the plot was right? Imagine if John conner found his father dead...would he have never existed? Origin change? I mean should there even have been a kyle Reese in this film...if you understand time travel, than you should know that traveling back in time would destroy the CURRENT PRESENT of yourself, meaning kyles life ended in the past. So there would have never been a him, because he could only do it ONCE. [Basically, stating it is impossibly to do that, but in terminator i guess the directors dont quite get the concept]
ReddHotPoker
ReddHotPoker - 5/23/2009, 4:11 PM
I think the important thing for McG and for past directors of the franchise was making a cool movie with compelling characters. I cut them some slack for not graduating with doctorates in quantum physics. The "plot holes" should more or less be taken with a grain of salt and are a part of the fantasy element of the genre. None of the directors set out to show a plausible scenario where time travel and all of the quantum baggage it carries would actually work. I don't think a guy who time travels himself out of existence would make a very good movie. Unless......(?!)
ninja10r
ninja10r - 5/23/2009, 5:01 PM
aiiwolf, that was a funny post. BTW, time-travel is NOT real. You assume that time travel is real and that it works the way you want it too. Well, since it's not real, you just have to go with what the movie tells you. don't think to much about it.
GUNSMITH
GUNSMITH - 5/23/2009, 5:12 PM
HERES A POSSIBLE REASON WHY THEY DIDNT KILL KYLE REESE, STUDY HIM AND REMAKE HIM AS A TERMINATOR LIKE MARKUS, SEND HIM BACK TO JOHN CONNOR, KILL SWITCH GETS TRIGGERED, DEAD CONNOR.ITS A SURE WIN.
TucsonRican
TucsonRican - 5/23/2009, 6:38 PM
Don't understand the complaints on the time setting....one of the best things about the third movie(actually the only thing) is the ending and seeing the missiles launched. With that many W.M.D.'s in the air at one time, the world would be decimated in a matter of minutes.

So, what's the problem with the time setting? Sounds like people are just nitpicking on that one....
BOOK552
BOOK552 - 5/24/2009, 9:07 AM
Aiiwolf if time travel was real, the origional kyle reese would die in the past, but the kyle reese in salvation still had yet to be born during the first film, just because he died in the past dosent meen his parents didnt get down in the future
KingWill
KingWill - 5/26/2009, 1:00 PM
Im with book552 on this one. Think about this logically. If Kyle Reese were to go back in time after the events of Salvation, why wouldn't he still be there during this movie? The way I have theorized time travel is that if he were to go back in time to a time period before or during his life span, it would only effect his current time line. Meaning that anything that were to happen to him during the time travel would only effect him in that he would die then. It wouldn't mean he never existed, it would mean that he died while going back in time. So at that point in every time line, when he goes back in time, he would die again.
Alaba
Alaba - 7/11/2009, 12:39 AM
ive watched this movie again and noticed interesting things:
kyle reese was purposely kept alive for two reasons-1, to lure connor into skynet, 2, to be made a robot. did anyone notice that a terminator had kyle reese strapped on a conveyor sending him into a machine just before connor saves him? and also after marcus threw a chair at the woman on screen, he jumps down into a room and checks out a soldier on another conveyor, then the scene is cut. i believe he discoverd there that the machines were making more of him. the purpose was to turn kyle to a robot and probably have him sent back to kill sarah.
and also on the arguement of john easily entering skynet, did any1 notice that when marcus synchronised with the computer, he shut down the huge sentry guarding skynet(same one that scanned him) so john was able to enter.
View Recorder