The Director of Terminator Salvation Speaks

The Director of Terminator Salvation Speaks

Wanna know if Terminator Salvation pays any tribute to the Terminator films before it? Check out this interview with Director MCG.

By jman1977 - Mar 27, 2009 09:03 AM EST
Filed Under: Terminator
Source: iesb.net

On the payoffs fans can expect from the first film -

McG: Certainly. We pay off a great many things that are established -- particularly with Kyle Reese. We talk about the mythology of his shotgun strap, his proficiency for stealing cars, and we see where he learned a lot of these skills. And it wasn't from Connor, it was from the Marcus character, which is one of the joys of the picture. We cite "Pain can be controlled, you just disconnect it," you know, and we realize where he got that, and there's a great many tidbits for the hard-core fans out there. But it's designed as well for people who don't know that much about the ins and outs of the first films.

On shooting complicated scenes -

McG: Well a lot of the scenes take place in one shot, and figuring out places to hide the cuts... Again, I go to Children of Men -- the car sequence, where the motorbikes come, and Julianne Moore is shot, and the whole thing plays in one shot. Figuring that out is very difficult, and you've got to figure out exactly where you're going to have your blend points; you need to measure everything off, and consult with the visual effects people.

There's a big gas station sequence that had that, and that was very, very tedious, and very, very technical filmmaking. And that's why I love this film -- one day we're shooting a very intimate, character-driven scene, and there's nothing going on but Connor and his wife in a room, and she's the only one he can talk to about what's on his mind. And then the next day we're, you know, blowing up half of New Mexico, and going to a place of extraordinary action. So those are decidedly different hats to wear, day in, day out.

How he has dealt with injecting humor into the film -

McG: I don't. There's not a great deal of humor and warmth in this universe. It's very largely influenced by the Cormac McCarthy novel The Road. It's designed to feel that way -- detached and existential, it's got a great deal of Camus' The Stranger in it. But there's a gallows humor. We could all be in a bunker somewhere, and every now and again, you elbow the guy next to you and you make a wisecrack -- what else are you going to do? It's one of the defining characteristics of being human, even in the face of death. But the movie is designed to be very serious and very credible.

It is very nice to hear that a Director of a major motion movie picture is going to consider and follow up on the work that others have done before MCG got the directors chair. After all it was the work done on the previous films that have put MCG in the position that he is currently in.

TERMINATOR: DARK FATE Producer James Cameron Explains What He Thinks Went Wrong With Tim Miller's Sequel
Related:

TERMINATOR: DARK FATE Producer James Cameron Explains What He Thinks Went Wrong With Tim Miller's Sequel

TERMINATOR Director James Cameron Confirms New Movies Are In Development - But Fans Should Expect Big Changes
Recommended For You:

TERMINATOR Director James Cameron Confirms New Movies Are In Development - But Fans Should Expect Big Changes

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

answer
answer - 3/27/2009, 11:31 AM
Connor has a wife?
slimybug
slimybug - 3/27/2009, 11:39 AM
Why shouldthe film pay any tribute to the films before it? It's mere existenceis a complete slap in the face to the first two films. It's not respecting them at all. If it wanted to respect them, it would not exist. The only reason it does exist is to cash in on thebankablename of those films. To actually act like they respect them for what they are is disgusting.
slimybug
slimybug - 3/27/2009, 11:39 AM
Why shouldthe film pay any tribute to the films before it? It's mere existenceis a complete slap in the face to the first two films. It's not respecting them at all. If it wanted to respect them, it would not exist. The only reason it does exist is to cash in on thebankablename of those films. To actually act like they respect them for what they are is disgusting.
dizzle716
dizzle716 - 3/27/2009, 11:46 AM
Wow....tell us what you really think.

If he was disrespecting the films that came before, he would make no reference to them in this film. He would have completely re-wrote the history of the film and just put his own ideas into the story. He plainly states that he makes references to the prior films, not that he doesn't care anything about them.

Ok....now close your eyes, take a deep breath, and calm down.
answer
answer - 3/27/2009, 11:48 AM
Slimybug - Why is this film a slap in the face? this film could be the best of the lot, i'm not saying it will be i'm just saying it might be.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 3/27/2009, 11:55 AM
Wow! Mcg is really bigging up this movie..when you reference "The Road" and Albert Camus your movie would want to be damn good!
Pumchavas28
Pumchavas28 - 3/27/2009, 12:16 PM
@ TheAnswer


Yes
TucsonRican
TucsonRican - 3/27/2009, 12:39 PM
I found it funny that at the Comic-Con panel, he mentioned Batman Begins around 10-15 times. Saying they took the approach that BB did, in re-starting a franchise.

He would let the rest of the cast talk much. Seemed like a real douche. And the whole Bale episode confirmed it to me. He should have never let that happen.
vonstallin
vonstallin - 3/27/2009, 12:42 PM
good stuff McG..
what the hell is a McG anyway...whats his real name.
MetalHead
MetalHead - 3/27/2009, 12:49 PM
I'm with Peter Griffin (Dizzle). Slimy, I agree that "T3" is guilty of EXACTLY what you are saying. But this film looks and feels different. Even from what I've already seen in trailers and stills and read in articles this film appears to be the film that the hardcore fans have been waiting for.

I also think that Christian Bale brings this movie a lot of credibility. The guy doesn't make many bad things. If they weren't serious then I think we'd be seeing Nick Stahl back as John Connor and the film's tone would resemble that cheesy-looking "T3" future that had a kiddie/cartoonie feel to it. (SOOO lame in that scene where John is in the future with everyone cheering that they'd won.)

There seems to be a lot of concepts in this that touch on the questions that we've all had about the future for years-- and now including stuff on Kyle Reese, according to this interview. And that still with John at the Terminator factory looks f'ing badass. I also like how we're going to see the humans trapped in the camps and being rounded up by the HKs.

I guess to me, from everything that I've seen thus far, this future that they've created really does seem to capture the feel that I've always imagined it would have. And I say that with the exception of so much happening in daylight, but that makes sense from the business side of it cause I don't think a 2-hour+ movie in the dessert in the dark would capture the audience very well.

It doesn't seem like they tried to overthink everything, either. They already had the groundwork layed down for them with the first 2 films and it appears that they just drew out the rest of the picture with the pieces that they had. There was no reason for them to come up with some super-creative future for the sake of adding to the "Terminator" story and I'm happy that they have apparently realized that as well.

I think this movie is gonna be great. I have yet to see ANYTHING to make me think otherwise. Not to mention adding NIN's "The Day The World Went Away" over the most recent trailer-- how appropriate. Even that shows me that these writers are in touch with their fanbase. And I do have complete trust in them that they'll do this right. I'll admit-- I wouldn't like the idea of John's flesh on a hybrid machine if not for what I've already seen that these writers have done so far. For anyone hating on this movie I think you should give it a chance first.
MetalHead
MetalHead - 3/27/2009, 12:55 PM
**I am aware that the ending involving John's flesh has been changed but I'd be willing to bet that it'll still end up happening at some point in the 3 films. It makes perfect sense introducing a part man/part machine to help to end the war. We now have a character who can see the war from both sides and I'm sure that is the exact reasoning for bringing Marcus into the story.**
CrookedJaw
CrookedJaw - 3/27/2009, 1:13 PM
This man knows his stuff...It's nice to hear that, I'm really looking forward to this movie
GUNSMITH
GUNSMITH - 3/27/2009, 1:35 PM
MCG =MACGRUBER
vonstallin
vonstallin - 3/27/2009, 1:58 PM
GUNSMITH

thanks...sounds like McBurger lol
when i see his name i keep thinking of a McDonalds sandwich...
adamrich81
adamrich81 - 3/27/2009, 2:15 PM
Why would the interviewer ask about injecting humor into the movie? That seems like a stupid question. Not every movie has to have comic relief. A lot of the time the comic relief is the most annoying part (see: jar jar binks, trash talking transformers) He's right, terminator is set in a dark place. Not so much room for mclovin in the post apocalyptic wasteland.
xmentheeight
xmentheeight - 3/27/2009, 2:41 PM
There's no need to go out of the way to pay "tribute" to the other films..3 included if U will. Im would be okay if I never heard Linda Hamilton's voice at some point in the movie,...although I understand and can appreciate it, nor would anyone serve to see the governor somewhere in the movie. The "tribute" lies in using the pieces set before U,...acknowledging the history/future blueprint and churning a hunk of movie that would no only stand strong along side the previous installments, but one that could potentially blow them away. I only hope McG has made it to that level...and I cant wait to see it.
xmentheeight
xmentheeight - 3/27/2009, 2:41 PM
There's no need to go out of the way to pay "tribute" to the other films..3 included if U will. Im would be okay if I never heard Linda Hamilton's voice at some point in the movie,...although I understand and can appreciate it, nor would anyone serve to see the governor somewhere in the movie. The "tribute" lies in using the pieces set before U,...acknowledging the history/future blueprint and churning a hunk of movie that would no only stand strong along side the previous installments, but one that could potentially blow them away. I only hope McG has made it to that level...and I cant wait to see it.
answer
answer - 3/27/2009, 3:45 PM
@Grif That i a cool teaser, nice find.
Betty
Betty - 3/27/2009, 4:33 PM
I member dat trailer. It wa kewl. "Ah'll be bach." dang dat arnold he know jus what ta say all spooky like. He a dang oll robocop talkin bout pachew pachew wid a gun leg an a chicken skin on is face. He mad cause dey kilt is fambly an is partna an red forman shot his belly fulla lead an blowd off is arm. lead poisonin man lead poisonin. An in he go back in time ta da sixties ta save dat bug eye boy an is gir frin so dey gibbm back his hand. he mad boy, he mad!
MetalHead
MetalHead - 3/27/2009, 4:41 PM
Grif, what's up with you stealing my reference?!? I might have to sue you for that.
rawshark
rawshark - 3/27/2009, 5:06 PM
@ the answer:
Yeah, Bryce Dallas Howard(Ron Howard's daughter) plays John Connor's wife in this.
just go to imdb, of terminatorsalvation.com
Check it out.
Looks pretty good.

Also, I could be wrong, but there is one still photo I saw for this film that looked like Summer Glau(from Firefly/Serenity/Terminator TV Series) is in this also.....


MetalHead
MetalHead - 3/27/2009, 5:36 PM
Rawshark,
It wouldn't surprise me if Summer Glau makes an appearance because I swear I've seen Stephanie Jacobson (Jesse from "The Sarah Connor Chronicles"-- I HATE her, by the way) in one of the first full-length trailers and there is no reference of her on imdb.com.

Personally I'd prefer that they keep the movie and show seperate, mainly because of all the flaws with the show, but it is yet another thing that makes sense from the business side.

I like "The Sarah Connor Chronicles" because it has a ton of cool concepts and interesting theories, but you really have to just enjoy it for what it is and try not to think about it because it totally ruins the entire timeline-- even worse than "T3" did. If you can just watch it without ripping it apart and enjoy the ideas then it's ok. I like the concept that Skynet has been sending terminators back to build the terminator factories and that sort of stuff, but again, this totally screws up the timeline. I'm ready to see what the hell is going on with the T-1000 (Shirley Manson) but I think I know because the T-1000 part of the story seems very loosely based on the involvment of the T-1000 in the comic miniseries "Terminator 2 Judgment Day Cybernetic Dawn."
MetalHead
MetalHead - 3/27/2009, 5:46 PM
I just watched the trailers again and in one I'm pretty sure that it is Stephanie Jacobson but in another there's someone who slightly resembles her that may be who the girl was from the other trailer. I don't know.
MetalHead
MetalHead - 3/27/2009, 6:54 PM
Just messing with you but you know I put a link to that trailer in the comments of one of the last "Terminator: Salvation" posts.
GameAnime45
GameAnime45 - 3/27/2009, 9:05 PM
Good, He's showing respect to the other movies. He can talk shit about the 3rd one tho, because that was crap.
MCMLXXXII
MCMLXXXII - 3/28/2009, 11:33 AM
when i saw the the scenes of the future from the first
movie with the terminators walking on skulls, i remember thinking THAT would make a great movie, they should make
that one..

and i think that we're gonna see a scene of arnold as a terminator, its too much of an obvious reference to pass
up..

TucsonRican
TucsonRican - 3/28/2009, 11:59 AM
They are going to super-impose his face on Roland Kickinger's body. He played Arnold in a made-for-tv movie about his run for governor.
TucsonRican
TucsonRican - 3/29/2009, 10:25 AM
I'm not too happy about it. But McG hinted at it at the panel. And he is listed as the T-800 while the T-600 is played by another guy.
MetalHead
MetalHead - 3/29/2009, 12:21 PM
I do like the idea of CGI'ing Arnold's face on a T-800 and I don't see why people don't. I think a lot of the reason I like it is because I have faith in these writers to do it right. It would be a cool way to link this film to the first TWO films (I don't acknowledge the existence of "T3") in the same way that having Linda Hamilton do the narrating will, which I think is another excellent idea.
Galvatron
Galvatron - 3/29/2009, 4:30 PM
They are taking alot of risks with this movie so nothing would suprise me, but a cameo from Ahhnold Swatsanagger is not neccesary. I wish they hadn't killed off Linda in 3 cause she woulda been awesome in this, even if she was sick and not able to fight. Damn that cancer!
View Recorder