"[Everything] You Say Is Always Misconstrued": Tom Holland Clarifies His Comments About Retiring As Spider-Man

"[Everything] You Say Is Always Misconstrued": Tom Holland Clarifies His Comments About Retiring As Spider-Man

Spider-Man: No Way Home star Tom Holland has now clarified recent comments he made to GQ that appeared to suggest he was ready to leave Peter Parker behind. Find out what he had to say here.

By DanielKlissmman - Dec 07, 2021 05:12 PM EST
Filed Under: No Way Home
Source: Extra

It's been five years since Tom Holland debuted as Spider-Man in Captain America: Civil War. In an era of seemingly never-ending superhero tenures, five years doesn't seem that long, and fans have been eager to see where Holland's version of the Wall-Crawler will go after Spider-Man: No Way Home.

Recently, however, it sounded as though the actor might be ready to hang up the tights. 

While being interviewed for a GQ profile, Holland stated that, if he were to keep playing Spider-Man in his 30s, he'd be doing something wrong. The statement led people to believe that the actor's time as Peter Parker was coming to an end, but that doesn't appear to be the case.

Holland, Jacob Batalon and Zendaya sat down for an interview with Extra to promote No Way Home. During their talk, Holland was asked about his statement to GQ regarding his Spider-Man future. The actor revealed that his comments had been misconstrued, and expressed his willingness to return to the role if Sony and Marvel Studios were to want him back: 

"[That's] just a perfect example of how everything you say is always misconstrued, and no one actually speaks the truth. I don't know what the future of Spider-Man looks like. I don't know whether I'm going to be a part of it. Spider-Man will always live on in me, and I know that [Spider-Man producer Amy Pascal] and the studio are keen to figure out what the next chapter of Spider-Man looks like. If that happens to be with me, then that's very exciting. But if it's time for me to walk away, then I'll do so proudly."  

Holland further clarified what he meant by his statement, explaining that he was referring to giving other people the opportunity to reinvent the Wall-Crawler for the big screen. 

"[What] I was referring to in that interview where I said 'If I was playing Spider-Man when I'm 30, I've done something wrong,' is [that] I'd be taking up an opportunity [for] someone to come in and change what being Spider-Man means. Spider-Man could be more diverse; it could be a female character — it could be anything. So that's what I was saying, and thanks to that journalist for changing that. I really appreciate it." 

Holland then played around with ideas for the future of the Spider-Man franchise, stating he would like to see live-action versions of Miles Morales and Silk, as well as a Jackpot movie.

Funnilly enough, it was revealed last year that Sony had tapped Arrow's Marc Guggenheim to develop a Jackpot film, based on the superhero of the same name created for Spider-Man comic books by Dan Slott and Phil Jimenez. For those unaware, Jackpot is a superhero identity that was taken up by two characters, Sara Ehret and Alana Jobson. Ehret, the most prominent of the two, is a mother who gets super-strength after being exposed to a gene-therapy experiment she was working on.

As for Holland, it appears the actor is willing to continue playing Spider-Man as long as Sony wants him to. Producer Amy Pascal told GQ that she was eager to make more Spider-Man films with the actor, so, for now, it seems that Holland's tenure as the Wall-Crawler is far from over. 

Spider-Man: No Way Home is coming to theaters on December 17, 2021. 

New MCU Rumors Tease Henry Cavill's Future And Who Marvel Studios Has Cast As Amadeus Cho
Related:

New MCU Rumors Tease Henry Cavill's Future And Who Marvel Studios Has Cast As Amadeus Cho

SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME Star Charlie Cox Recalls Cut Reference To 2003's DAREDEVIL During His MCU Debut
Recommended For You:

SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME Star Charlie Cox Recalls Cut Reference To 2003's DAREDEVIL During His MCU Debut

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
bobevanz
bobevanz - 12/7/2021, 5:46 PM
Easy paycheck and all the Fandom you could want, he'll stick around
SoBeKing
SoBeKing - 12/7/2021, 5:47 PM
Poor Tom, everything he says is a headline lol
Origame
Origame - 12/7/2021, 5:53 PM
In other words, the marvel snipers aren't just out dealing with spoilers.
PantherKing
PantherKing - 12/7/2021, 5:55 PM
Poor dude probably got yelled at
KWilly
KWilly - 12/7/2021, 6:23 PM
@PantherKing - Tom: "If I'm still Spider-Man by the time I'm 30, I've done something wrong."

Feige and Pascal:

JFerguson
JFerguson - 12/7/2021, 5:59 PM
If I recall, RDJ said basically the same thing with how if Tom was playing the character into his 30s then he was doing something wrong.

Was probably just echoing his mentor since he is iron boy jr :)
Thing94
Thing94 - 12/7/2021, 5:59 PM
Nah Tom, Spider-Man is a man, he's Peter Parker. Got it?
bkmeijer2
bkmeijer2 - 12/7/2021, 6:00 PM
That's a good enough safe. Would also have believed him if he said it was contract talk though
GhostDog
GhostDog - 12/7/2021, 6:39 PM
@THEDARKKNIGHT1939 -

ElricReturns
ElricReturns - 12/7/2021, 8:57 PM
@THEDARKKNIGHT1939 - what are we looking at?
ModHaterSLADE
ModHaterSLADE - 12/7/2021, 6:09 PM
Meh. Just ready to move onto the College years with Spidey.
JosephCronos92
JosephCronos92 - 12/7/2021, 6:16 PM
Tommy chill,I want you to grow and mature as Spiderman in the MCU,now go back drink some tea and make cute babies with Zendaya.
WruceBayne
WruceBayne - 12/7/2021, 6:17 PM
C’mon now. That’s not what he meant and he knows it. He said it because he was at the end of his contract. It’s the same thing Scarlet Johansson did.
HeraldNumber7
HeraldNumber7 - 12/7/2021, 6:18 PM
he could have said what he meant without the part about having "done something wrong", but whatever. as others have said, this is probably just open contract negotiating. they all say similar things.

i'm really burnt out on these kinds of stories. they're so cyclical. i know how the sausage is made. so, i'm far less invested in the day-to-day headlines. i'll just take what they're gonna give me and hope i like it.
KWilly
KWilly - 12/7/2021, 6:26 PM
I just hope we can squeeze one more solo film out of him before he's officially done with this.

Oh, and Venom 3. Gotta be in that.
LeonNova
LeonNova - 12/7/2021, 6:30 PM
The real reason is his contract ended with this movie and throwing little statements like that out there will incentivize Marvel to offer him a a nice check to stay around longer.
4thMaster
4thMaster - 12/7/2021, 6:34 PM
Eh, I thought he was just angling for a pay increase in his new contract, making a little public uproar for leverage. He probably got it too.
JonC
JonC - 12/7/2021, 6:52 PM
@4thMaster - Neither Feige or Holland has officially said any new contract exists... and i would think that is the most likely truth more-so than what Amy Pascal spits out of her mouth about the only franchise she is connected to. I don't think they have signed Tom on until they have come up with an idea for the next 3 movies... and i don't think that has happened so far... Amy is just excited because Spidey, and the buzz around this particular spidey movie, is big and means potentially a fat paycheck for her... so of course she will say the 'future is bright' and Tom will make lots of unsure statements because he has signed no new deal for the next 3 movies. Tom coming out to clarify the old report and still yet not say a contract exists is further proof no contract exists.
TheClungerine
TheClungerine - 12/7/2021, 7:04 PM
@Battabingg - noooo he's such a sweet dude, got to meet him at the last comic con I went to before covid.
1 2
View Recorder