I Watched the Watchmen

I Watched the Watchmen

Yesterday the wait was finally over, after months and months of patient waiting I got to see Watchmen in my local theater. Here's my opinion on Zack Snyder's interpretation!!

Review Opinion
By CBMcontributor - Mar 04, 2009 01:03 AM EST
Filed Under: Watchmen

I'm not going to spend more time on telling you guys the story, just going to compare the movie to the comic and give my opinion about it =)

First of all, I'm going to try to be as objective as possible, so I'm also going to give my girlfriends opinion who hadn't read the comic before the movie and didn't know anything about the story (I know! BLASPHEMY!), and this did put a lot of things in perspective.

Before watching the movie I was kind of scared because all of the fuss about Matthew Goode's acting skills, the squid,… And I think it's best to tell you guys right away that in my humble opinion Matthew Goode IS Adrian Veidt. There is no doubt about that, and the squid… Let's just say that even though it was so awesome in the comic, the movie just didn't need it. It would have been "too much".

The opening is SO strong. The comedian gets murdered and then Bob Dylans first chords just crush you. I have honestly never seen a movie where you just get nailed to your seat in that way. Everyone who saw it agreed on that.

The thing about the movie I liked best is that Snyder really put a lot of effort in adapting the actual images in the comic into movie scenes. It's always a hughe plus when you recognise a lot of the comic into the movie, and not just the story. Then came the real mindblowing part: the cast. MY GOD. These people totally nailed the characters. Especially Rorschach. I was so pleased to see that the physical resemblance was unbelievable, and the acting itself made them picture perfect.

Storywise he didn't alter a lot of things (I hardly noticed anything being different, except for some small stuff), but fans who wanted to see the actual end as depicted in the comic might just be disappointed. And I'm not (just) talking about the squid. The ending was a bit too different for me, felt kind of awkward but it still was a good one.

Now let's get to the things that were less appreciated by the audience…
Some people told me afterwards they found Dr. Manhattan very boring, and that he looked too cartoonish. I don't know what too think about that because… It's Dr. Manhattan… He IS very distant because he doesn't see the importance of human life, and as for the cartoonish aspect… I don't agree.

Then there is the biggest problem of the entire movie. Lots and lots of things remain unexplained. I had to explain to my girlfriend where Rorschach's mask came from (don't see that in the film, and that's such a bummer…), why he gives his journal to the New Frontiersman (that wasn't obvious too since they show the kiosk but once… for about a second), the overall linking was pretty sloppy, lots of people didn't understand a bunch of things.

The thing that made the comic so sweet to me was that there was a hughe focus on the characters psychology… In the movie I kinda missed that sometimes for certain people.

In general this was the best comic book movie I've ever seen. In one word it was EPIC. Even if you know every little detail of the book the movie doesn't allow you to breathe for a second. It's marvelous. This is the only comic book movie I've seen so far that really merits a 9 out of 10, even though I would have loved them to make one with every detail which would be the longest movie ever made.

My last words of this review will be the least important… For some.

Silk Spectre II. YUMMY.

WATCHMEN CHAPTER I Clip Recreates Two Big Scenes From Alan Moore And Dave Gibbons' Iconic Graphic Novel
Related:

WATCHMEN CHAPTER I Clip Recreates Two Big Scenes From Alan Moore And Dave Gibbons' Iconic Graphic Novel

WATCHMEN CHAPTER I Red-Band Trailer Released Along With Full Cast List And Blu-ray Cover Art
Recommended For You:

WATCHMEN CHAPTER I Red-Band Trailer Released Along With Full Cast List And Blu-ray Cover Art

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

FattSmelliott
FattSmelliott - 3/4/2009, 8:31 AM
Wow that is a very positive review, but those little changes annoy me. Altough it will make us nerds more looked for as we will be able to tie up all the loose ends!!!
xaosjerk
xaosjerk - 3/4/2009, 8:36 AM
Sounds about right, directors cut for this should explain characters much better,in reality seeing this version is really a chopped down version of the real film which will be the directors cut and/or the director's cut with the black freighter in it.
SGA
SGA - 3/4/2009, 9:05 AM
awesome review, thanks for the info...

and Silk Spectre II O.O <- oogling eyes
ThunderCougarFalconBird
ThunderCougarFalconBird - 3/4/2009, 9:48 AM
Good review.

I heard there will be a 3hour 10min directors cut DVD that will tie up some of those loose ends (news stand, etc.) To be honest, that pisses me off! 3hour 10mins! That could have EASILY been the original version released! It's not that long anymore! LOTR3? Ti-f*cking-tanic? I'm seriously considering passing on seeing this version and just getting the extended DVD.
spanky
spanky - 3/4/2009, 10:04 AM
Great Review.

if there is a dvd like that in the works, good or another worthless gimmick cover that only work for little kids then im in. i can't wait to see this movie at rave motion thearter dlp screen and projectors with dynamic sounds. CAN U SAY PLUG!
crappybumbum
crappybumbum - 3/4/2009, 10:39 AM
I KNEW IT
SLIK SPECTRE II YUMMY
ahaha yes she is
great review btw
You think it's better than The Dark Knight???
xaosjerk
xaosjerk - 3/4/2009, 10:49 AM
If its not better than TDK to me than it will have failed for me.
DarkAvengers
DarkAvengers - 3/4/2009, 11:00 AM
I dont think its going to do as well as people think it is. Sounds like Snyder made it for the fanboys, which is awesome, but there really arent enough of us to make a blockbuster. Not anymore at least. I picked up the motion comic yesterday on bluray. Thats fun.Its like mom or dad reading you a bedtime story. A 5 and a half hour bedtime story.
TinyTim
TinyTim - 3/4/2009, 11:11 AM
@crappybumbum; that's a tough question… I loved TDK so much that I wouldn't state that this movie is "better". To me they're so different since in TDK no one has any super powers, while here we have Dr. Manhattan… I wouldn't say it's better, they're 2 different players on the same level to me ;)

@Mattlask; yeah, that's the feeling my gf had at the and of the movie… It really is made for the people who have read the comic , but my guess is that so many people are gonna fall in love with it just because of the film…

@ everyone, I'm very pleased you all like it!!!
xaosjerk
xaosjerk - 3/4/2009, 12:09 PM
RE: mattlask

I don't think you're analyzing the way social systems work in a balanced way. The truth is that you would rather have 1 diehard fan happy with something that 5 or even 10 avg joes.

Now you might think that sounds rediculous but let's look at how the social influence is going to operate. The 1 diehard is going to see and purchase related material enough to make up for 3 avg joes by himself. He's then going to try to get other people to go with his because he's so exited that nets you 1 more person on avg (he's a geek after all) he lobbys everyone he knows to see it and that causes the largest benefit of all.

Most movies I've gone to see are because someone without me asking them about it went out of their way to say "You should see this movie" If diehards are going out of their way to tell people that the movie sucked, well yeah, gg profits.

Also generally appealing to diehards just makes objectively better movies. Most people may want a dumb movie, but there are so many dumb movies soaking up those group's revenue that the smaller group (not tiny) of people who want something smart and unusual are eagerly chasing after the even smaller number of such films out there.
bones86
bones86 - 3/4/2009, 12:30 PM
For anyone worried about the movie not having enough detail, didn't Snyder say that the director's cut would be over 3 hours long? Thats about an extra 20 minutes tomaybe squeeze some of these little details in......
ThunderCougarFalconBird
ThunderCougarFalconBird - 3/4/2009, 1:32 PM
@xaosjerk

You make an excellent point and I couldn't agree with you more or have put it better myself! However, I don't think that hollywood has grasped this. I hate (with a passion!) watching films that have clearly been made to sell to a mainstreem audience when it would have been better to make it for the fans.

TDK is (imo) a great example of how these movies should be made. Those guys must have sat around the table and said "lets make this movie as good as we possibly can and screw all the cliches hollywood wants to put in." The result is one of the highest grossing films of all time!

In short Hollywood wrongly wants to make every film appeal to as wide a market as possible. Every film has to have a set formular and a pg13 max rating! It doesn't work! You can never please everybody! Like you said (in a much less winded way!) make a film for the true fans and it will do well.
deaditeminion
deaditeminion - 3/4/2009, 1:52 PM
FYI, the world's longest movie is "The Cure for Insomnia" which is over 87 hours long
redrum010
redrum010 - 3/4/2009, 3:50 PM
watching this movie tonite!!!! Wohoooooo!!! Friend works at the theater and he can bring a +1 to their private screening. I'm so pumped!!
potatosacker71
potatosacker71 - 3/4/2009, 4:08 PM
i saw the movie yesterday as well. i do agree with much he said about the movie. the cast was amazing, could not have been better. but they dumbed the whole story down.the ending did not work at all. it was clumsy and lacked depth. they added a graphic sex scene with the silk specter 2 and night owl that took up time they needed to explain Rorschach's mask. it left loose end that needed to be tied up. it was good but could have been great.
Pierce_Highmen
Pierce_Highmen - 3/4/2009, 5:22 PM
"The opening is SO strong. The comedian gets murdered and then Bob Dylans first chords just crush you. I have honestly never seen a movie where you just get nailed to your seat in that way. Everyone who saw it agreed on that."

Very bold statement. It will be tough to top the TDK opening, or even the opening of Memento. Those are my 2 favorite openings of a movie. It will be tough to beat both of them. Funny, both are Nolan films.

Great review thou, best I've read on the site. For all the faults you mentioned, to still give it a 9, is strange.
Inohaku
Inohaku - 3/4/2009, 11:19 PM
Excellent review, thanks since I'll have to wait till next week for it's release in my country.
iNsaneMilesy
iNsaneMilesy - 3/5/2009, 1:57 AM
Its a case of studios cutting the crap outta longer films to fit more viewings during a day. Take the LOTR. When I finally got a hold of the extended version they flowed much better, filled in alot of missing information and was way more entertaining for a fan of the novels. Seeing as Wathcmen has headed down the same path and Snyder has promised it to be all put back together for the DVD. I have high hopes that all of us fans will be satisfied.
iNsaneMilesy
iNsaneMilesy - 3/5/2009, 1:57 AM
Its a case of studios cutting the crap outta longer films to fit more viewings during a day. Take the LOTR. When I finally got a hold of the extended version they flowed much better, filled in alot of missing information and was way more entertaining for a fan of the novels. Seeing as Wathcmen has headed down the same path and Snyder has promised it to be all put back together for the DVD. I have high hopes that all of us fans will be satisfied.
moviemaker
moviemaker - 3/5/2009, 3:36 AM
Just previewed Watchmen and I have to agree that this is better than TDK. The fight scenes were a lot better and, although the characters didn't flow as well as i would have liked, I think the actors nailed each part. Way to go Snyder!
Nubnuts
Nubnuts - 3/5/2009, 9:24 AM
Nice comment on the Silk Spectre 2, lol!
darkcrow
darkcrow - 3/6/2009, 11:06 AM
I went to the midnight showing last night, was a lineup 2 sold out shows at midnight in one theater kind of gave me a bit of an idea that it will be a massive movie.
I was waiting on this movie for years, I love Snyders work on Dawn of the Dead and 300 so i was definitely going to make this a do-or-die movie.
To begin with....fitting this whole movie into roughly 3 hours was an incredible task and it took some cutting and sklicing, i am positive there will be a directors cut that will floor us all on DVD.
I read a review on CNN today, well ok i read 1/2 of it mainly scanning through it and i think reviewers miss alot of what actually went on, now wether or not they just didn't care and the movie was another item to trash or love was how it seemed. The consistent argument i hear from movie critics is "overhyped". Was it? really? i don't see that.
The othermain argument is how critics seem to think Snyder is not a true "Visionary", but i beg to differ, i think he is, because he makes a movie simple, the way WE want to see it, that's a vision alot of Directors miss....especially in the comic realm.
The movie was simply put, wonderful. The actors, all of them made such strides to nail the characters, Wilson and Haley by far stole the show, Haley especially who in my opinion gave a truly memorable performance.
I think every minor change Snyder made to the film that deviated from the comic was done to make the film a better or updated version. The giant squid was omitted, but what he gave us in return was just as good, he kept the truly vital parts and in many cases played them scene for scene with almost amazing precision to detail.
I liked it more than TDK. TDK seemed to drag, the acting was between Ledger and Oldman in TDK. Ledger and the writers made you want to see Joker more and forget everyone else.
Watchmen was balanced and well acted by everyone. Even people who did not read the comic loved the movie for what it was.
Snyder has upped himself again.
Juicerules
Juicerules - 3/6/2009, 11:15 AM
I thought it was very good, but at times I felt it seemed rushed. A couple very key moments from the book were removed. I did like the changed ending though. I would give it a 7.5 out of 10. Good flick, but I did like TDK better
Pierce_Highmen
Pierce_Highmen - 3/6/2009, 12:56 PM
@ Darkcrow

"The consistent argument i hear from movie critics is "overhyped". Was it? really? i don't see that."

Have you been living under a rock for the last 3 months? They have hyped the hell out of this film. Last night is a good example, I flipped between, NBC-USA-ESPN, and you know what I saw, 3 differnt Watchmen ads, runing at excatlly the same time on 3 networks. If that is not OVERHYPE, I dont know what is.
Pockets713
Pockets713 - 3/6/2009, 2:28 PM
OK, I saw the Midnight showing last night. Right off the bat I want to admit that I am indeed a blasphemer... I have yet to finish the graphic novel. It's directly related to my shortcomings in reading attention span. Though I did get most of the way done. The first thing I must say about the movie... the cast was absolutely TOP NOTCH. From Rorschach to the Night Owl, even Moloch... all just spot on. The only parts that were a little bit drawn out for me were scenes from the novel like Dan and Laurie's sex scenes... the one in Archie i thought was almost ripped from stock footage of that sex scene in 300 lol. Though, don't get me wrong, Silk Spectre II looks incredible, but it just gets a little awkward to me almost. It's almost like he wanted to go more in depth with the sex scene than in the comic just to get some nudity in there.

All in all, I thought the movie was amazing... and I will be writing a letter to my local newspaper movie critic, who had the balls to give it 1 out of 4 stars... What do these ancient old pricks know about movies these days anyways?

Hope everyone else liked it as much as me. I'm gonna see it again!


This is Pockets and I approve this message
HarrisonBergeron
HarrisonBergeron - 3/6/2009, 7:22 PM
I loved it. Personally, I think it edged out TDK by a decent margin, but I think that officially it should be ranked at least equally. I have yet to read the novel, I read -I Am Legend- after watching the movie and it worked well, that is what I plan to do again. I really don't see how a giant squid would have fit in, the weird tiger thing was strange enough. I do agree that the hero back stories (how they got their powers) not being included was a bit strange, but I chalked that up to time constraints. I loved it, and I may even see it again, which would be unprecedented for me.

I can't remember what movie holds the record currently, but I think that "Watchmen" will break the opening weekend, or overall gross, record for a rated R flick.
Betty
Betty - 3/6/2009, 10:25 PM
It aint gonna break any records because it's a mediocre movie.
The changed ending was better though. Rorschach was the only real character development,excellent performance. Patrick Wilson as night owl was spot on down to facial expression. Matthew Goode did a great job as Veidt! Music choices and their placement and intended use in the film was not cohesive at all.
InFamouslyCool
InFamouslyCool - 3/6/2009, 10:55 PM
if you thought this snoozefest was better than the dark knight then you are absolutely outta your damn mind. all thing's mr manhattan was horrible. four people (not together) got up and left around the middle of the movie.
JeremyBentham
JeremyBentham - 3/7/2009, 10:12 AM
The ending was fine, I thought, it still got across the same idea/message that the squid would have. only this way, we don't have the noobs who didnt read the book leave the movie like, "what the [frick] was that?"
I liked the casting. I would have picked someone other than the guy they had for Veidt, but he did pull off the role fine in his style. Rorschach was amazing, perfect book-movie adaption. The Comedian was great too, I wish we could have seen even more of him through the flashbacks. Everyone else was good too.
Sometimes the music was amazingly perfect, but other times I felt some of the choices were iffy for their scenes.
Overall, awesome. I'm going to see it again. I wouldn't put it as high a caliber as TDK, but it was still great, and enormously entertaining. Probably like 8.5/10 for me, which is great.
thisisvik
thisisvik - 3/8/2009, 9:21 AM
The ending was not fine.
Don't you guys realize that the brutal physical death, the bloody bodies everywhere, sends a huge message. Whereas the simply vaporization of the city and its people, doesn't say anything. Instead of feeling any terror, being gripped with the shocking images of dead mothers and children and innocent people, all we were given was an empty crater that used to be New Jork (lol, sorry i thought that would be funny)
And look at this major screw up:
Dr.Manhattan said that he could see himself back on Earth but the streets were filled with dead bodies, well when he returned to Earth, there were no streets at all. Come on!

And another thing, What's the deal with the rated R??? Truly there were some brutal scenes, not that they looked good, imo they were pretty lame, like when Nite Owl snapped that guys arm. Truly the only reason this was a rated R movie was because they intended to show Dr. Manhattan's junk so much. Hey did ya realize the most powerful man on Earth was Jewish, lol
View Recorder