UPDATED: More on What Brett Ratner Thinks of "Comic Book Geeks"

RATNER!

KISS IT lol!!! ; D

Shouldn't this bloated ignoramus be making another Rush Hour flick that no one cares about? As for the future of the franchise, there's a reason why all the "new" projects are PREquels...Brett.

Actually they made Wolverine to keep the X-men rights in their possession. What an arrogant [frick]er.

Man, I was a little annoyed after reading the last article, but this guy is a major squa-dousch! I followed the source link and the guy just talks about himself like he's the be all and end all. It's funny that they even mention that Russel Simmons asked him why he was hosting a DVD filmography about himself.

Great pic Brent! His ass-ness is written all over his smug face!

@Bamf

Ha! Then at least he's running his own franchise into the ground...

I laughed when i seen the title!!!!

The Rat should let it go and accept his movie was not that great. It wasnt the worst movie I've seen but it was not the best in the X-Men series. I still fail to see where his movie made more sense then the other two.

Its true that some of the things that he had in his movie actually happened in the books but there really was no need to kill off some of the characters like Scott.

[frick] him

@ bamf

you hit it right on the head! there were two very successful movies already in place, of course this one made the most money. and let me add to your brilliance by saying that profits of a movie do not mean a movie is good!

ghost rider proved that

He admits to his own wrong doing, non intellectual. And he thinks that's good lol! And since when movies earnings determine quality? Plllease!!!

BTW, I only payed to see it once...there're billions of people out there you dumb ass...

You know what... i'll let you guys in on a little secret. The first time i ever saw X-3 was when i bought the trilogy for 35$ at Wal-Mart. That was it. Naturally i liked it concidering the small price i paid for it. But it's exactly how he described it. X1 and X2 was very very smart. The last one was litterally a michael bay film. No thought, just action. Now i don't know how he ever got his film making degree but last i heard a story was a story. Whether it's a comic, a play, a film or a book. IT NEEDS DEPTH!!! Ratner just admitted his didn't have any!!! And now he's saying that it's because X3 did so great that Wolverine got his own??? Riiiiiiiiight, cause it's because Superman 3 was so great that we had the fourth one right? Or better yet, Batman and Robin was sooooo FANTASTIC that they made Batman Begins!!! Yeah, that makes a shitload of sense. Now, had the first two x-films been brainless pieces of Rat-shit, no one would have even gone to see your sorry excuse for a film. You're riding on someone else's accomplishment and even calling it you're own!!! Dude, not only should you appologise, you could also say a HUGE "THANK YOU" to Singer as well as ALL US CBFANS that paid you for the shit you spoon fed us!!!

haha this guy is a mutant himself, though of a degenerate nature.

You know, if I were only an eye, I would say he's an incredible moviemaker - BUT WAIT, I'M NOT JUST AN EYE!

I did NOT go to see it in the theatre, mostly because of the reviews - I waited until it came out on dvd and rented it. Where as I did see X2 in the theatre, and bought X1 and X2 at $20.00 each. Then I bought this dvd when it was $7.50 at Walmart lol.

Like I said before, the movie (X3) did incredibly well because X2 got extremely great reviews and after having two sequels in a trilogy that are great movies most anybody is gonna go see the third, no matter what, out of curiosity and expectation. It probably would've done pretty well no matter who made it, thanks to Singer's previous efforts.

To those of you who were defending his earlier statements, what do you think now??

I only saw it once, and I haven't seen it since then. In fact, I do my best to pretend it just doesn't exist.
It's been awhile since someone pissed me off this much, actually. I think it'd be pretty awesome if some extremist murdered him. I wouldn't do it, but I wouldn't mind if someone else would. ^_^

Wow, I think the Webster company just decided to publish a picture of him next to the entry for the phrase "douche bag".

As some one said there is a reason why the next xmen movies are planned to be prequels... and if he takes a look at the film he made he might find out why that was. Deep down, he knows he [frick]ed up,he just misplacing that pent up rage and directing it at the audience instead of himself.

Secondly, what xmen cartoon was on when he was a kid? I know of only the 90's one, and the failed late 80's pilot, were there other cartoons?

Phoenix9109 - I am for hire ;)


**Notice to all law enforcement that may be looking at this. I am NOT a hitman, just a joker!**

LOOK, BRETT, YEAH PEOPLE SAW IT..2 COOL MOVIES AND YOUR BASICALLY GETTING HIT WITH THE MOMENTUM OF WHAT SINGER STARTED,SO YA THEYRE GONNA WATCH IT.PEOPLE CATCH ON LATER THAT IT WASNT PERFECT, IT WAS OK.YOU DID NOT SAVE THE FRANCHISE, IT WOULD BE THERE STILL EVEN IF YOU DIDNT DIRECT X MEN, WOLVERINE, THAT MOVIE WAS GOING TO BE MADE ONE WAY OR ANOTHER REGARDLESS, XMEN IS NOT LIKE THE DAM CARTOON YOU RETARD, READ THE BOOKS AND DO YOUR HOMEWORK..JUGGERNAUGT WASNT A MUTANT.YEAH YOU PUT SCENES FROM COMICS DIRECTLY INTO THE MOVIE BUT YOU WERE INCONSISTENT WITH ALL THE CHARACTERS,WE CARE ABOUT IT BECAUSE ITS WHAT WE LOVE..STAY AWAY FROM SUPERHERO MOVIES,(OR AT LEAST THE COOL WELL KNOWN CHARACTERS)

No worries he will probly be strangled and smashed by giant thighs while directing Youngblood lol. Karma's a bitch.