INDIANA JONES AND THE TEMPLE OF DOOM: Short Round Actor Ke Huy Quan Hits Back At Claims The Movie Is Racist

INDIANA JONES AND THE TEMPLE OF DOOM: Short Round Actor Ke Huy Quan Hits Back At Claims The Movie Is Racist

There are those who argue that Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom should be considered a problematic movie, but Short Round actor Ke Huy Quan has now hit back at those claims by praising its diversity.

By JoshWilding - Nov 19, 2022 10:11 AM EST
Filed Under: Indiana Jones
Source: The Guardian (via ActioNewz.com)

Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom remains one of the most beloved movies ever made. However, in recent years, the 1984 movie has frequently come under fire for including what some perceive to be racist stereotypes and the white saviour trope. 

With the latter point, it's easy to see where they're coming from, as Indy is shown helping "primitive" Indian villagers retrieve a sacred stone and later being served chilled monkey brains as a local delicacy. These days, that doesn't fly. There are also some sexist undertones, but to call the movie problematic...well, an argument could be made that it's a little over-the-top. 

After all, the world, for better or worse, was much different when Temple of Doom was released. That was something Short Round actor Ke Huy Quan argued during a recent interview with The Guardian (via ActioNewz.com).

"We’re talking about something that was done almost 40 years ago. It was a different time," the actor says. "It’s so hard to judge something so many years later. I have nothing but fond memories. I really don’t have anything negative to say about it."

"Spielberg was the first person to put an Asian face in a Hollywood blockbuster. Short Round is funny, he’s courageous, he saves Indy’s ass," Quan added, praising the representation his iconic character brought to the table. "That was a rarity then. For many years after that, we were back to square one."

He also talked more about reuniting with Harrison Ford at D23 earlier this year (a photo of them together again quickly went viral), and it sounds like it was a very special moment for the actor. 

"I hadn’t seen him for 38 years. As I got closer, my heart started pounding because I didn’t know if he was going to recognise me. He looked at me and said: ‘Are you Short Round?’ I was immediately transported back to when I was a little kid. I said: ‘Yes, Indy.’ He said: ‘Come here,’ and gave me a big hug."

Indiana Jones 5 is set to be released in theaters on June 30, 2023.

INDIANA JONES AND THE DIAL OF DESTINY Resulted In A Huge Financial Loss For Disney
Related:

INDIANA JONES AND THE DIAL OF DESTINY Resulted In A Huge Financial Loss For Disney

INDIANA JONES AND THE GREAT CIRCLE Xbox FPS Unveils Action-Packed Gameplay Trailer
Recommended For You:

INDIANA JONES AND THE GREAT CIRCLE Xbox FPS Unveils Action-Packed Gameplay Trailer

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
WEAPONXOXOXO
WEAPONXOXOXO - 11/19/2022, 10:05 AM
why is this an article?
Matchesz
Matchesz - 11/19/2022, 10:10 AM
This same soft azz crap is why the MCU is overcompensating in phase 4 by introducing all these “strong independent female characters.” And why we wont get comedies like tropic thunder anymore. Everyone searching for things that makes them offended, its digusting 🤢
Scarilian
Scarilian - 11/19/2022, 11:10 AM
@Matchesz -
The core underlying concept is to promote a sense of Nihilism, they produce terrible material currently as a way of insulting you for liking the material and they tell you everything prior related to that material is bad.

Then next step they rip the franchise from any established characters and hand it over entirely to replacement characters who fit the ideology they are trying to push, which is focused primarily around virtue signalling without actually developing the characters.

In terms of Indiana Jones:
• Indiana Jones 5 is going to kill off Indiana Jones
• Indiana Jones 5 is going to set-up a female lead who will take over from him
• Anyone who dislikes Indiana Jones 5 will be labelled sexist
• Prior Indiana Jones media is going to be labelled racist/sexist
• A prequel is being planned to strip Indiana Jones of his manhood via having every single thing he ever did be because of a female mentor and he just copied her and took credit.

I'm stating all this because it's factual, either announced or the result of test screenings that have been proven. It also serves as a marketing technique similar to 'no news is good news' - it's designed to promote anger and piss people off because they know nobody will discuss this if they don't.

Heck, look at these comments as an example. This site used to thrive with discussion about potential cameos, how awesome something was and now a majority of comments are just either remarking on the ideology or claiming the ideology does not exist or attacking each other.
Twenty23Three
Twenty23Three - 11/19/2022, 11:19 AM
@Matchesz - most of those female characters you have a problem with are probably older than you. Feels like you are the one searching to be offended
dagenspear
dagenspear - 11/19/2022, 2:00 PM
@Scarilian - These are basically assumptions that you can't possibly prove, all by yourself.
Shmokey20
Shmokey20 - 11/19/2022, 9:20 PM
@Scarilian - You do know all that news was Bullshit right? There was no public or private test screening with a general audience, maybe film execs but thats it, and by the looks of the leaked trailer it a beautiful sight to behold and looks to be an epic ride, also were talking about James Mangold here... dude gave us Logan & Ford vs Ferrari, by all accounts this looks to be One Hell of an installment, all the Indy Films with Salah in them were the best 🤠
Slotherin
Slotherin - 11/20/2022, 6:49 AM
@Shmokey20 - Logan featured Logan's death and the introduction of Laura... I hate to say you're giving him fuel inadvertently.
OmegaDaGrodd
OmegaDaGrodd - 11/19/2022, 10:14 AM
"It was a different time"

Yes, a more racist time. A lot of us used to be more racist, sexist and homophobic than we (hopefully) are now, or at the very least we used to be more comfortable with those things than we are now. That's just the natural curve of civilization here. A lot of us used to be cool owning slaves, segregating schools and fairly blatant sexual harassment, and society just slowly pushed those behaviors out of acceptable norms because some people fought to push those things out, and others slowly accepted it

People gotta be mature and honest enough to recognize that a lot of stuff we liked years ago was [frick]ed up, because denying that isn't gonna make life any easier or us as people any more comfortable in our own skin
IvanBadski
IvanBadski - 11/19/2022, 11:15 AM
@OmegaDaGrodd - i dont deny it, i miss it
Drace24
Drace24 - 11/19/2022, 11:39 AM
@OmegaDaGrodd - People also gotta be mature and honest enough to realize that noone [frick]ing knows what is and isn't offensive or racist, as these things are not at all carved in stone and there is no universally accepted consensus nor could there ever be one. Sensibilities are wildly different, highly controversial and ALWAYS change. They change from person to person, from place to place and obviously they change over time. Even just today people can't make up their minds whether words like "queer" or "latinx" are highly offensive or super progressive, because obviously there is no universal truth to it.

That's why I think it's important to ALWAYS view things in context, including the time it's from, and to go by intention rather than tropes or stereotypes. And no, I don't think that Temple of Doom was intended to express the belief that ethnicity decides a persons traits or superiority/inferiority to others, which is the actual definition of racism.

Treating racism as some convenient throwaway buzzword to condemn people doesn't do anything to fix the issue, but instead ensures that society will continue to give power to labels such as ethnicity. And that effectively stops us from ever coming to terms with our past and ourselves.
GeneralZod
GeneralZod - 11/19/2022, 1:17 PM
@OmegaDaGrodd - As to your opinion that 1984 was a "more racist time," being a minority that grew up in that era, I disagree. At least in the United States, I believe we are more racist today than we were in 1984. 2021 FBI hate crime statistics support my opinion. That said, i won't disagree on the sexism or homophobia (i.e., discrimination based on sexual orientation) being worse in 1984. The latter indeed was pretty bad back then versus today.

There is nothing wrong with Temple of Doom, in any sense. The only reason it wouldn't be made today is that Hollywood producers are scared of being called out by PC social media bullies.
Shmokey20
Shmokey20 - 11/19/2022, 9:24 PM
@OmegaDaGrodd - No one cares about your self righteous stance, as a half black half Egyptian minority get over yourself, I love all that old shit, they don't offend me because I know it's a different time and I'm able to understand that it's just a movie filmed & written within the parameters of its time 🤷🏾‍♂️
OmegaDaGrodd
OmegaDaGrodd - 11/20/2022, 10:31 AM
@GeneralZod -

"As to your opinion that 1984 was a "more racist time," being a minority that grew up in that era, I disagree. At least in the United States, I believe we are more racist today than we were in 1984......The only reason it wouldn't be made today is that Hollywood producers are scared of being called out by PC social media bullies"

Yea, so at some point in typing the end of your comment you should have realized how wrong the first comment was in retrospect. There is no FBI Statistic for the societal understanding, recognition, and pushback on racism. What there is today is - as you yourself stated - a far greater understanding of what racism is, which has become so widespread that if you do something even kinda racist, an entire widespread and diverse group of people will immediately call you out for it via social media. You cannot do the same stuff you did in the 80s in this current climate because current society largely k ows more about racism, is much more vocal about pushing back on it, and the consequences of racism are much greater today than they were in the 80s. That's not really debatable at this point
OmegaDaGrodd
OmegaDaGrodd - 11/20/2022, 10:35 AM
@Shmokey20 -

1. You cared enough about my stance to write an entire paragraph about it, so maybe investigate that contradiction

2. Nothing about my comment has anything to do with being "offended" or even loving stuff with racism in it, and funny enough, you seem to be fully aware that the stuff had racism in it, but you don't want to use the word so you tip toe around that by calling it "a movie filmed & written within the parameters of its time"

Own it, brother
OmegaDaGrodd
OmegaDaGrodd - 11/20/2022, 10:37 AM
@IvanBadski -

I said "A lot of us used to be more racist..." specifically because I didn't want to leave out those of us who are just as much if not more racist (or comfortable with the continuance of racism) than we were before

Don't worry, I know representation matters
OmegaDaGrodd
OmegaDaGrodd - 11/20/2022, 10:44 AM
@Drace24 -

"People also gotta be mature and honest enough to realize that noone [frick]ing knows what is and isn't offensive or racist"

Bud, PLENTY of people understand what is and isn't racist in many many different forms of context. More importantly, we as a society have progressed to the point where you can consult countless sources to understand the implications and effects of how different races are portrayed. All anyone has to do is do the work, hope for the best and most importantly, be ready to apologize if they miss the mark

And that last bit is the kicker, because all you have to do is glance around this very comment section to see that most people you're likely to label as "not knowing" what's racist are the very people who don't like to acknowledge racism, and are far more interested in broadly dismissing claims of its existence than actively doing the work to understand it, because if they acknowledged and understood it they would feel compelled to apologize for enjoying it or things with it, as well as perhaps even feeling the need to apologize for furthering it in some way shape or form. No one wants to admit they were wrong or that they were ignorant of something
GeneralZod
GeneralZod - 11/20/2022, 12:00 PM
@OmegaDaGrodd - First, I appreciate your insult-free and well-thought response. The so-called "widespread and diverse group of people" you reference are a vocal minority that espouse single-think on Twitter and other platforms to bully non-conformists to behave a certain way. Ironically, they have become the Hollywood censorship board run by conservatives of the 1940s and 1950s that 1960s liberals fought hard to successfully repel and win artistic freedom. Please indulge me: are you 48 years old or older? I ask because I wonder whether you experienced, as I did, racism in 1984 America so that you can compare it to racism in 2022 America.
Drace24
Drace24 - 11/20/2022, 2:39 PM
@OmegaDaGrodd - "Bud, PLENTY of people understand what is and isn't racist in many many different forms of context."

And who exactly are these enlightened beings that possess impossible knowledge? And why have they not yet managed to publish a guideline for political correctness that everyone, even within minorities, can agree with?

"More importantly, we as a society have progressed to the point where you can consult countless sources to understand the implications and effects of how different races are portrayed."

Yeah, sources written by individuals. That are always contradicted by other individuals who all have their own opinions. And of course they do. That's how people work! By nature we don't agree on anything because no matter what label you attach to us, we'll never be one and the same. That's what diversity means! All people are different people. No group is a hive-mind. And no one person, even if it's some professor with a book deal or a self-appointed "ally" with a social media following gets to speak for an entire group. Not even individual members of that group get to speak for their entire group.

"All anyone has to do is do the work, hope for the best and most importantly, be ready to apologize if they miss the mark"

*sigh* ...Okay. As a member of several minorities who has frequently been on the receiving end of abuse from my own supposed allies who talk just like this, can I just say what complete and utter self-indulgent horseshit that is?
Sure, fixing a world with 8 billion people, each with their own opinions and unique emotional baggage, is that easy! Navigating the increasingly complex minefield of social interactions is such a breeze, really! You just need to follow these 10 simple steps and you too can be all!

Everyone who thinks that has either not grasped the true nature of the issue at hand or is only in it for the self-patting or both. It is a gross oversimplification designed not to achieve social progress, but to provide a solution that seems easy and convenient and to make you feel better/superior to others who don't use it. It's like these "as seen on TV ads" but for white guilt.
I'm disabled. Do you think I know how to fix ableism? Do you think I could objectively identify what is and isn't ableism? Of course not! I only know that I disagree quite often with people who claim that they do. The things I've read that are supposedly politically correct ways to talk to disabled people are honestly just patronizing and merely a different way to be insulting. And I know not everyone will agree with me - and that's the point!

"all you have to do is glance around this very comment section to see that most people you're likely to label as "not knowing" what's racist are the very people who don't like to acknowledge racism"

Nice of you to assume what I'm "likely" to argue. But the strawmanning aside, I'm not arguing that racism isn't real. I'm arguing that there is no *objective* truth to what is and isn't racist, which is a fundamentally subjective question. And people who treat it as if it weren't are very much part of the problem. They may not be racist, but they sure as shit aren't tolerant either.
McMurdo
McMurdo - 11/20/2022, 3:08 PM
@Shmokey20 - lol your skin color only matters if you agree with Omega didn't you know????
McMurdo
McMurdo - 11/20/2022, 3:10 PM
@GeneralZod - he's a faux progressive keyboard warrior. Spare yourself.
GeneralZod
GeneralZod - 11/20/2022, 8:06 PM
@Shmokey20 - True, but even for a movie 'filmed and written within the parameters of its time," I can't think of a single scene in Temple that is racist. Enough socialist Wokesters here declare Temple is a racist film because it has a white male lead fighting Indian baddies, filmed 38 years ago. And that's just bullshit. The director had family members who were liquidated by Nazis in the 1940s -- why in the world would Steven Spielberg make Temple a racist film?
AnthonyVonGeek
AnthonyVonGeek - 11/19/2022, 10:18 AM
What’s with this popular trend where people like to watch old movies and tv shows purposely looking for reasons to be offended? Seems like a sad life. 🤷‍♂️
Kyos
Kyos - 11/19/2022, 10:33 AM
@AnthonyVonGeek - Or maybe people are just more aware of certain things today, and they sometimes happen to watch old movies?
OrgasmicPotatoe
OrgasmicPotatoe - 11/19/2022, 11:00 AM
@AnthonyVonGeek - Cultists live to be offended, the movie's age has nothing to do with it.
TanukiTrooper
TanukiTrooper - 11/19/2022, 11:34 AM
@AnthonyVonGeek - Temple of Doom was banned in India back in the 80s due to the very obvious racism. The film being called out for it's racist view of non white American cultures is definitely nothing new.

I love Indiana Jones, but it's definitely a product of its time. Highly sexist and racist.
Nightwing1015
Nightwing1015 - 11/19/2022, 12:01 PM
@TanukiTrooper - What was racist in Temple of Doom? It's been a long time since I've seen it.
Matchesz
Matchesz - 11/19/2022, 2:37 PM
@TanukiTrooper - im curious if it will it be called racist and offensive if they protrayed japenese people eating dolphin in a movie or chinese people eating bat…
MosquitoFarmer
MosquitoFarmer - 11/19/2022, 10:21 AM
Good grief, just enjoy the picture.
Lem1
Lem1 - 11/19/2022, 10:23 AM
"I hadn’t seen him for 38 years. As I got closer, my heart started pounding because I didn’t know if he was going to recognise me. He looked at me and said: ‘Are you Short Round?’ I was immediately transported back to when I was a little kid. I said: ‘Yes, Indy.’ He said: ‘Come here,’ and gave me a big hug."
-☺️🥹🥲💖😎
Supercat6376
Supercat6376 - 11/19/2022, 10:44 AM
There still are primitive cultures all over the world. Cultures who don’t know technology and don’t want to know it. Culture who don’t know of the existence of the outside world. So what he helped them, who cares? There’s nothing remotely wrong with that . Quan should actually be mad that Ford didn’t know his real name and only knew him as short round lmao.
1 2
View Recorder