An Analysis of Captain America: Civil War

An Analysis of Captain America: Civil War

Just my own analysis of Captain America: Civil War. I'll be exploring some of the underlying theme's of the story and why its such a significant addition to the MCU and the genre.

Editorial Opinion
By CrappyNappy - May 07, 2016 10:05 AM EST
Source: ComicBookMovie.com

Authors note: 

Right, so I pretty much decided to take two long-ass comments that I wrote in repsone to some people claiming CA: Civil War was a "no stakes movie" and just another "typical MCU film" and turn it into a fully fledged article. I've edited them so that it makes more sense without the "context" of the original conversation. 

 

Anayway. Time to Begin.....(SPOILERS!!)

 

I could not have been happier with Civil War. As a Marvel fan (and fan of comics in general) I felt this film exceeded my expectations and then some. The movie elevates the genre in the same way that The Avengers once did back in 2012. Just as most people regarded that film as the first "pillar" of the MCU I believe that this movie will be regarded as its second.

It's nothing like a "typical marvel movie" and those who have been complaining about some of the "tropes" in MCU films can finally rejoice in knowing that Civil War is somehow vastly different from what's come before, whilst still retaining the best elements of the those films and feeling like it exists in the same world. There hasn't been a film like Civil War that's been done before. And of course, that has a lot to do with the unique scenario that only the MCU could have achieved at this point

i.e. The idea of an established team of Superhero's fighting against one another.


 

For those that call MCU films "tired" or "repetitive" let me just reiterate this;

- There is no maguffin

- No "physical" 
villainous threat to fight 

- No "world destroying or dominating" plot.

 

In fact, it could be argued that there isn't even a "main villain" in the story at all. The true enemies in this film are the protagonists; Tony and Steve. This is an incredibly personal story. One that focuses on the individual characters and their struggles. It's not about creating a "villain" for them to fight...its about these people creating "villains" in each other.

For those that claim that the MCU has "no stakes " (a phrase is used so many times I don't think the trolls even know what it means) then let me reassure you that the "stakes" are higher than they've ever been. 

The role and function of Superhero's within this world is now being threatened. The idea of there being a force of good against evil....is being replaced with "politics" whereby national security, 
sovereignty, and foreign affairs will dictate how superhero's act in times of crisis. That in itself is a cause worth fighting for...no matter what side you're on. It's a much more relatable conflict than what we're used to seeing, because it presents an interesting question that's been at the heart of controversy for many years

Control vs Rights

This ideology is at the crux of most debates about important issues. Gun ownership is a prime example. Some people want tighter regulations to make it more difficult for criminal minds to get a weapon. Others say it simply prevents or hinders innocent people from being able to get a weapon to defend themselves.


 

Neither side is right or wrong. They both make valid points and both have their fair share of criticisms. But its a conflict that exists in the real world nonetheless...so when you hear superhero's having a similar discussion then the audience becomes more invested in the outcome of the story.

And the beauty of the outcome...is that there wasn't really a definitive "succeeding" side. By the end of the film they still disagree with one another. They're still in separate factions. Just like in real life, there is no easy answer. However it's has still affected them all personally. And that's what this film is. A  personal story. It's about Captain America trying to save his friend. It's about Tony Stark trying to atone for his guilty conscience. Ultimately though...it's a story about family. And how those closest to you, are also the ones who can hurt you the most. 

It's why that final fight was so brutal. Not just visually but emotionally too. I didn't really know who to root for, mostly because its incredibly sad that these allies are fighting each other to begin with. It's not like they were forced to fight....they CHOSE too.
 

On Tony's side, we see a man who (like many other characters in the film) has been consumed by a desire for revenge. It's completely understandable. After splitting the team apart, being forced to fight his former allies and having his closest friend become crippled, he finds out that the person who has been at the centre of this conflict, whom Captain America has been unwaveringly protective of....has turned out to the very person who killed his own parents.

It goes back to the conversation Cap had with Buck early on in the film: 

Cap: "Those things you did, it wasn't your fault"

Bucky: "I know. But I still did them"

It wasn't just that, but Steve knew what he'd done and attempted to lie to Tony. In that moment Tony felt truly betrayed. He's been forced to do things he's not proud of and to be viewed as a villain by his closest friends. But, in his mind Bucky wasn't worth fighting for. In fact he deserves to die for what he's done. All the suffering the Winter Soldier has brought upon the world, whether it was his fault or not, cannot be erased. At that point NOTHING could have stopped Tony from trying to kill him.
 

Cap however has a history with Buck. He's been with him for, pretty much, his whole life. To Cap he'll always be his childhoood friend back in Brooklyn who stood up and looked out for him, even when he was at his weakest. Well now its Steve's turn to do the same for him. There was no in hell that Cap was gonna sit back and watch his friend die.

 
So what's this I hear you say? No stakes? NO STAKES? 
 
- Tony Stark trying to Avenge his mother and fathers death
 
- Steve Rogers trying to save his friend



 
Nothing to do with the the safety of the world. But the loyalty and betrayal between friends. It's heartbreaking.

At the end of that fight, Cap drops his shield. He gives it up. By saving Buck he's also done a great injustice to Tony. He's wronged Tony by using the very shield that his father, Howard Stark, made for him...to basically "avenge" the man who murdered him. It just brings us back to the idea that there was no right or wrong answer. There is no "victor" in this scenario.
 
Both Tony and Steve, by the end, are aware of the terrible things they've done to one another. The team is split apart now and things have changed. However Steve lets Tony know that should they ever be needed, they can go to him for help. Because despite all the bitter feelings and contempt towards one another...they're still superhero's. Above all else they care about the safety and well-being of the world.
 
Whilst it would have been interesting to see Cap die in this film, I can see why they didn't choose to go that route. Firstly, I'd like to point out that this was mostly a corporate decision as opposed to a story one (according to the Russo's themselves) however having a character die...and then come back to life...is a fake emotional stake. In Batman V Superman the latter does die, however they indicate CLEARLY that he isn't ACTUALLY dead.
 
They may as well have just used the classic Marvel studio's end credits mantra 
 
"Superman will Return"
 
It was THAT obvious. My non-comicbook reading cousin, who's only superhero film watched was The Dark Knight Rises, said to me at the end of that movie 
 
"So he didn't really die...right?"
 
At the very least, Marvel are simply being honest about the fact that none of their characters will stay dead. So why fake it? It's such an overused trope in comics anyway. I'm not saying that I WOULDN'T have liked to see Cap die, if only for that extra "emotional punch"....it's just I'm quite happy with the ending we got. Things have still changed. The Status quo has been shaken up. You have the new "Secret" Avengers and the official "Sokovia Accords" Avengers. The conflict isn't over and I'm sure we'll be seeing elements of that in the Infinity War Part 1 movie.

Honestly I really couldn't have asked for a more emotional, action packed, and thrilling superhero film than the one we already got. It nailed EVERYTHING. Its the first film in the MCU, since the Avengers, to take FULL advantage of its shared universe concept. It's the sequel that Age of Ultron SHOULD have been.

Civil War is a new age for the MCU, it's quite possibly a new age for the comicbook genre in general. 


 
Marvel And DC Have Lost A Shared Super Hero Trademark First Registered In 1967
Related:

Marvel And DC Have Lost A Shared "Super Hero" Trademark First Registered In 1967

CAPTAIN AMERICA: CIVIL WAR And TFATWS Actor Daniel Brühl Is Very Confident Zemo Will Return To The MCU
Recommended For You:

CAPTAIN AMERICA: CIVIL WAR And TFATWS Actor Daniel Brühl Is "Very Confident" Zemo Will Return To The MCU

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3
MiopTop
MiopTop - 5/7/2016, 4:19 AM
Civil War and Winter Soldier are the only two films that feel like they don't allow themselves to be restricted by their genre, but still take full advantage of it and aren't ashamed of it either.
CrappyNappy
CrappyNappy - 5/7/2016, 4:44 AM
@MiopTop - Yep. Unlike Zack, the Russo's aren't ashamed of Captain America. And its part of the reason he's so popular.

It just goes to show if you love and understand the character, you can make him/her appeal to anyone
Yaf
Yaf - 5/7/2016, 3:17 PM
@MiopTop @CrappyNappy The problem is, and this isn't bashing on two films I love, the Russos pose these huge issues with us. In The Winter Soldier it was, should you attack an enemy pre-emptively and in this it was, how much control is required. Then in both movies, they summarily ignore those isssues. In Winter Soldier, they do it because it turns out Nazis ar the ones who are attacking pre-emptively and in Civil War, they just flat out ignore it and Steve fights Tony over Bucky. In regards to that, I felt shortchanged but otherwise I loved the films.
CrappyNappy
CrappyNappy - 5/7/2016, 3:37 PM
@Yaf - It wasn't ignored. At the end of the film, Rhodey discuses the Accords and how he still feels that what they did was the right thing (in terms of signing I mean). Cap still disagree's with government regulation, and acknowledges that they both can't see eye to eye on this issue.

It's like real life. There is no such thing as an easy answer. The film can't provide one because it would have to decide for you which one is supposed to be "right" which pretty much nullifies the entire debate. Instead the audience is left to ponder who they agreed with more.

The thing is, this film isn't about a piece of legislation. It's a personal story about Cap and his friend. That story arc links in with why he disagree's with the accords. He doesn't believe in organizations...he believes in people. Individuals.
Yaf
Yaf - 5/7/2016, 6:41 PM
@CrappyNappy - They certainly do touch on it afterwards, but they neutered the point when Tony goes to visit Cap and is like: "They don't know I'm here". That kind of showed that even he didn't fully support his side and that he was fighting for something he didn't believe in.

I do agree that they left the audience to ponder who was right but I wished they hammered that point in more. Made it more definitive. They could have done that by Tony yelling his support for the Accords after Cap beats him instead of crying for the shield.

That's just me being nitpicky though, this movie proved to me that the Russos can handle Infinity War.
MiopTop
MiopTop - 5/8/2016, 12:59 AM
@Yaf - But the fact that Tony betrayed what he believed in because his friend was in danger only adds more impact to the revelation that Cap was keeping such a huge thing from Tony.
CrappyNappy
CrappyNappy - 5/8/2016, 2:14 AM
@Yaf - I do understand how you feel, and I can see where you're coming from. I see CW as more focussed as a personal story, not so much a political one.

It would have felt random if he started yelling about the accords at the end of the fight. They weren't fighting because of government legilsation, they fought because Tony wanted to Avenge his parents death and Cap refused to let him do that.

When he says "that shield doesn't belong to you" its because he's angry and hurt. Cap was given that shield by Howard, and now he just used it to defend Howard's murderer.

Like @MiopTop said bellow me, Tony betrayed the accords so that he could save his friend/ally. He's a not a blind stooge, the conditions of sam giving him that info was for him to 1) go alone 2) go as a friend.

But Cap betrays him. He hid what Bucky had done and tried to pretend he didn't know...

Yaf
Yaf - 5/8/2016, 9:35 AM
@CrappyNappy @MiopTop I feel like he shouldn't have yelled something directly about the accords, but something more like "You're a criminal and you don't deserve that shield!" However, I do agree that in this movie being a personal story of friendship, it certainly hit all cylinders.
CrappyNappy
CrappyNappy - 5/8/2016, 9:59 AM
@Yaf - He wasn't angry at Steve because he wouldn't sign the accords. He was angry that he used it to save Bucky. He was angry that Steve lied to Tony in order to protect this...this...murderer. The man who murdered his parents.

It would have felt disingenuous to the story, to have him start talking about legislation, when the final conflict is about family. Not politics.

I'm sorry if it seems like I have a retort for everything you say haha. I'm not trying to be argumentative, I guess I just really loved this movie and I have a lot of firm opinions about it. I do understand your concerns, and honestly what I'm saying here doesn't make you wrong. We have different viewpoints.
MiopTop
MiopTop - 5/7/2016, 4:19 AM
Nice analysis btw
CrappyNappy
CrappyNappy - 5/7/2016, 4:44 AM
@MiopTop - Thanks :)
TheManWithoutFear
TheManWithoutFear - 5/7/2016, 11:36 AM
This film felt more like a comic book than any film i think i've ever seen. I'm not even sure why exactly, but one thing that keeps sticking out in my memory is when Clint called Tony "the futurist". I don't think that's a term we've heard in the MCU before (i could be wrong). I don't know exactly what it was but it really did feel like a comic book come to life and for me, that was such a treat.
LMdecoy
LMdecoy - 5/7/2016, 11:40 AM
@TheManWithoutFear - That was a great part! I really felt how the characters were treated through their actions and dialogue was so effective because they had to be efficient. Hawkeye shows up late in the game and nails it.
CrappyNappy
CrappyNappy - 5/7/2016, 12:33 PM
@TheManWithoutFear - Omg I freaking LOVE hawkeye. I love Jeremy Renner's rendition of the character he's just...ahhhh...he's so likeable and charismatic! He's snarky and sarcastic, but he's an experienced veteran.

He's not powerful but he's got experience and a gutsy personality. I love how he became Wanda's mentor, guiding her actions. It builds upon the brief relationship they had back in AOU.

When Clint was going on about Tony being a "futurist" I just couldn't help but smile with glee.
LMdecoy
LMdecoy - 5/7/2016, 11:38 AM
Great way of looking at it, although maybe that's just because I agree. Some might complain that side characters didn't really have their motivations explained for which sides they chose, I think it was mentioned and that's enough for a movie that's not supposed to be an Avengers movie. The sides everyone chose seemed fitting for their personalities, and the only complaint I can agree with is that Spider-Man was somewhat Iron Man's lap dog. Hopefully that will be addressed as a conflict in Spider-Man's next appearance.
CrappyNappy
CrappyNappy - 5/7/2016, 12:30 PM
@LMdecoy - I think with Spiderman, he's not necessarily a "lap dog" but he's young and idealistic.

He looks to Tony as a mentor, especially since Peter has likely lost his only father figure in Uncle Ben he can find a new one in Tony.

I do feel like the whole "spiderman joining the team" was brushed over quickly, but it served the story well and its a great way to introduce him. In a film with over 12 characters I can forgive that at the very least.
LMdecoy
LMdecoy - 5/7/2016, 3:38 PM
@CrappyNappy - I just hope he goes off on his own. I liked it best during the 90s when Spider-Man was mostly doing his own thing. It was almost like he had so many of his own enemies to take care of that he couldn't really do much else.

I think his isolation also played into his personality a lot in the comics.
CrappyNappy
CrappyNappy - 5/7/2016, 12:39 PM
@Spock0Clock What do you think?
BaronZemo
BaronZemo - 5/7/2016, 1:39 PM
I loved yor analysis. Great read!
Castiglione
Castiglione - 5/7/2016, 2:17 PM
MileHighRonin
MileHighRonin - 5/7/2016, 2:50 PM
@Castiglione - so you blame Bucky 100% for what he did? Is that how you feel about Jason Bourne? Same thing, murdered people while not in control of their own actions.
Castiglione
Castiglione - 5/7/2016, 3:00 PM
@MileHighRonin -

Hell yes. Bourne was definitely guilty.

The reason the Bourne movies worked so well was that we got to follow him on his journey to finding out who he really was, and the corruption that surrounded Operation Treadstone and the CIA. But, without a doubt, Bourne was still guilty. Although, the Bourne movies aren't a fair comparison because they had the advantage of focussing solely on Jason, and showed his good side the majority of the films. Bourne wasn't pictured as a villain for an entire movie in the way that Bucky was.... We saw Bourne's good side very early on in those movies

I still thought Civil War rocked, but Bucky definitely should have been locked up/frozen earlier, especially due to the fact that Bucky ends up frozen once again at the end of the movie anyway....
Castiglione
Castiglione - 5/7/2016, 2:18 PM

CrappyNappy
CrappyNappy - 5/7/2016, 2:41 PM
@Castiglione - I can't tell if this is just poking fun, or genuine trolling.

I'll respond with a legitimate reply either way haha. Yea, Bucky was under the mind-control of Hydra. Legally in a court of law he wouldn't be held accountable for his actions. Steve protects him because Bucky isn't a bad person...he's just had bad luck. It's understandable why Tony would feel enraged by Bucky, brainwashed or not this man was the one who physically killed his parents.

Bucky is a victim. Steve is the only one who truly understands that.
Castiglione
Castiglione - 5/7/2016, 2:45 PM
@CrappyNappy -

Really? Bad Luck? Haha, What type of blasphemy and nonsense are you spitting?

So, David Berkowitz is innocent and should never have been held accountable or arrested?

I guess we should really be looking for the dog?

CrappyNappy
CrappyNappy - 5/7/2016, 2:51 PM
@Castiglione - Wow, you really were trolling. I don't know who "David Berkowitz" is so I can't comment on it.

Of course Bucky has had bad luck. He gets captured and experimented on. Then he falls to his presumed death, only to survive, and having lost his arm. He's then re-captured by Hyrdra and forcibly brain-washed for decades as he's tortured to the point where he is completely compliant with whatever he's told to do. They turn him into a weapon. Anything he did, he did under the brainwashed mind-set of Hydra. He wasn't manipulated...he literally had no free-will.

Why are you even trying to dispute this? Even the most hardcore of trolls can't dispute these facts. This isn't a matter of opinion, everything I just told you happened in the film as is.
MileHighRonin
MileHighRonin - 5/7/2016, 2:55 PM
@Castiglione - really? You make Jollem look good. Stupid Troll.
CrappyNappy
CrappyNappy - 5/7/2016, 3:03 PM
@Castiglione - I looked up David Berkowitz.

Quote

"Despite his explanation, Berkowitz was found mentally competent "

So the one example you gave wasn't even legit. It was f*cking pointles
Castiglione
Castiglione - 5/7/2016, 3:05 PM
@CrappyNappy @MileHighRonin

I'm trolling and you don't even know who the Son of Sam is?

Haha, whatever.

If you guys can't have an educated conversation without calling someone a troll, it's not my problem.

Berkowitz confessed to being controlled by voices that were coming from a Dog, voices that told him t murder and torture.

He is currently serving life in prison.

Your the one that brought the legal system into this.... if you think that Bucky would be deemed innocent in a court of law after all of the assassinations and innocent civilians he murdered your truly lost.
Castiglione
Castiglione - 5/7/2016, 3:06 PM
@MileHighRonin

Look at the shit that @CrappyNappy is saying about Berkowitz, look at his extensive google research, haha, and your calling me a troll??

Haha, you guys should be [frick]ing embarrassed.
Castiglione
Castiglione - 5/7/2016, 3:13 PM
@CrappyNappy -

Dude, you really need to do some more research beyond Wikipedia....

Another example is Charles Manson, is he "mentally competent", should his family and followers be deemed innocent and free because they were under the control of Manson and his cult?
CrappyNappy
CrappyNappy - 5/7/2016, 3:14 PM
@Castiglione - Why would I know who the "son of sam" is? Should I know? I'm not from the US and I'm only 19.

We can have educated converstation. But that would mean your argument would be over instantly.

Buck had no free-will. He was not in his right mind to make an informed decision thanks to Hydra Brainwashing. Morally you wouldn't consider that person a murderer. Since he never pre-mediated the killings. Blame his handlers who conditioned him and order him to kill those people.

Berkowitz "claimed" to be have been controlled by voices coming from a dog. But the court deemed that he was mentally competent. If they could have proven he had a serious mental illness then he wouldn't have been charged with murder and instead he probably would have been sent to a mental asylum where he'd probably live for the rest of his life (as someone like him is never gonna be released).

I don't understand your problem here. Why should anyone punish him? Petty vengeance? Bucky wasn't evil. He was not...I repeat...WAS NOT in control. I can understand why people would hate him, but it really isn't his fault. He can genuinely say that.

I'm calling you a troll because I don't understand your "agenda" here. This is such an obvious point, why try and dispute facts? I figured its because you're another DC troll and that's why I called you one. Maybe you're not, I'd like an explanation at the very least.
CrappyNappy
CrappyNappy - 5/7/2016, 3:15 PM
@Castiglione - They willingly followed him. Bucky did not willingly follow anyone. He literally had no free-will.
Castiglione
Castiglione - 5/7/2016, 3:17 PM
@CrappyNappy -

Again, so you fell like Charles Manson and the Manson Family and Followers should not be serving life in prison and held responsible for their crimes? Because the followers were good people before they were brainwashed by Manson??

And, I already said below that Civil War rocked, a film can be good and still have flaws

Jesus, you guys are defensive, hahaha
Castiglione
Castiglione - 5/7/2016, 3:20 PM
@CrappyNappy -

They willingly followed Manson??

There were plenty of drugs involved within the Manson Family and his Followers.

Manson brainwashed them, Manson is known for being extremely manipulative and insane.
Castiglione
Castiglione - 5/7/2016, 3:21 PM
@CrappyNappy -

My agenda??

Haha, I'm talking about a comic book movie on a comic book movie site, lmao
Castiglione
Castiglione - 5/7/2016, 3:22 PM
@CrappyNappy -

What facts??

Bucky even agreed that he should be locked up until there is a cure at the end of the movie??

Haha, yeah, I'm a troll.

Get a grip dude
1 2 3
View Recorder