EDITORIAL: Are MARVEL Events Even Events Anymore?

EDITORIAL: Are MARVEL Events Even Events Anymore?

Ask yourself were you ever bemused to read a comic in which your favorite hero was turned into a major antagonist or read a comic "Event" that had heroes fighting heroes? Yes....No....Maybe?

Editorial Opinion
By SuperiorMrGod - Jan 12, 2014 06:01 PM EST
Filed Under: Marvel Comics

I love Marvel, I really do but I hate the direction they've been going in with there events for quite some time. Now don't misinterpret me as a DC fan boy because I'm really impartial, like very. I just think these events every year are getting quite mundane. Especially because very few of these events have been consequential in anyway at all. There is no weight to them. Everything that happens in any of those events gets reconnected before the next event is even out.

Starting with Avengers Disassembled all the way up to Avenger vs X-men there have been to many occasions where heroes fight each other. Not to mention most Marvel events seem to end up turning a hero into a villain:
Scarlet Witch in Avenger Disassemble, Iron Man and Reed Richards in Civil War, The Illuminati(Doctor Strange,Iron Man,Black Bolt,etc)in World War Hulk, and Cyclops and his X-Men in Avenger vs X-Men. Is it just me or am I the only one getting sick and tired of that cycle? I think story wise it would be a much more compelling to read an event that has been building up for a minimum of two years. Similar to the way they set up Civil War except with story arcs not Events(i.e. Avengers Disassembled, Secret Invasion, and House of M all in a way were apart of a grander scheme that lead to Civil War).




With new Marvel events already coming out or being planned such as "Inhumanity" and "Original Sin" I highly doubt they will refine this cash cow gimmick but it doesn't hurt to be vocal about your complaints. So please be vocal in the comment section and if you disagree with the editorial try to give actual constructive criticism.
WOLVERINE: REVENGE Variant Covers Tease Logan's Bloody Mission In New Jonathan Hickman/Greg Capullo Series
Related:

WOLVERINE: REVENGE Variant Covers Tease Logan's Bloody Mission In New Jonathan Hickman/Greg Capullo Series

Rogue Reassembles The UNCANNY X-MEN In New Trailer And Preview For Upcoming Comic Relaunch
Recommended For You:

Rogue Reassembles The UNCANNY X-MEN In New Trailer And Preview For Upcoming Comic Relaunch

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
NovaCorpsFan
NovaCorpsFan - 1/12/2014, 6:11 PM
I agree totally. I prefer to read old events to the new ones, because the old events have an actual story and meaning to them. They were a once a year thing and now they happen in every major title at least three times a year, plus at least two crossovers. It really isn't great anymore.
Darkknight2149
Darkknight2149 - 1/12/2014, 6:30 PM
Totally agree. I mean a lot of them are great stories (I loved Civil War and AvX was a better read than what you'd expect from a gimmick like it is. Hell, there was already an AvX in the 1980s called X-Men Vs Avengers) but they don't even feel like events anymore.
MrCBM56
MrCBM56 - 1/12/2014, 7:13 PM
Agreed!!! I think Marvel need to pull a "New 52".
MrCBM56
MrCBM56 - 1/12/2014, 7:20 PM
Almight

I get what your saying, but the whole point of the New 52 was to introduce these heroes and comics to a new generation of readers. Plus, Forever Evil is better than a lot of Marvel Comics right now. Forever Evil, now that is an event.
Pedrito
Pedrito - 1/12/2014, 8:09 PM
It's true that events have become no more than glorified arcs. But just like arcs, they vary in quality. I was surprised how good Infinity turned out, given the recent track record for events.
While events are better if built over years, like Civil War, they also have to be self contained.
Also, hero showing a darker side is not necessarily detrimental, much on the contrary actually, as long as it's not contrived. They did it well in the case of Stark, but not so well with Cyclops.
MrCBM56
MrCBM56 - 1/12/2014, 8:11 PM
Almight

Understood.
MoonDoggyX
MoonDoggyX - 1/12/2014, 11:12 PM
I think Annihilation was the last Marvel good event. I think the problem with Marvel whether its Comics, movies or tv is that they are just strying to sell/promote their heroes instead of concentrating on giving us a good story. They really need to build up their villains, I think. To marvel's credit, they really know how to do their heroes justice, bu I really don't think any of the movies had a great villain yet. The closest one was Abomination. I really like the character Loki, just not as a main villain. Agents of Shield hasn't had any good villais yet. And I definitely agree with Superior that the comics are too much hero on hero, especially the events. An event should consist a villain, or villains, wrecking shop across multiple titles, not heroes getting into slapfights...


MoonDoggyX
MoonDoggyX - 1/12/2014, 11:13 PM
And New 52 Justice league is an awesome read...
orpheus
orpheus - 1/12/2014, 11:14 PM
I love Marvel Events. Some are done better than others, some are utterly forgettable (Fear Itself, AvsX), and some are incredible (Infinity, Civil War).

I'm not against this "hero against hero" thing that people seem so upset about. "Hero" and "Villain", especially as they're used in a comic book context, are exclusive comic book concepts - the kind of clear morality doesn't exist in any other medium (it's completely *childish*, too - there needs to be drama, character development, real choice and real risk rather than re-hashes of the same stale "Cap fights Skull, Cap almost loses, then comes back and wins! Status quo preserved!") so explicitly.

If you work with a group of people, if you function in the real world, if you have a group of friends, people in those groups fight, argue, disagree and see the world fundamentally differently...

If you have being with the power and capability to alter the world, whether they identify as selfish or selfless, they're going to conflict and someone's going to think they know the solution, have the right answer. They'll fight. "Heroes" will fight each other - you're not going to get someone to dress up and risk their lives unless they have a vision or ideal that means something to them.

And Marvel characters live in an especially complex world, where most marvel characters have a few serious personality defects - they're going to fight each other.

I love when an event happens and a character you care about has to make a REAL choice, not the choice we "know" they're going to make, as in the case when aliens invade or someone robs a bank - what do you do in the case of Super-person registration? What do you do if the Phoenix returns to inhabit your friend? I really appreciated in Uncanny Avengers were Cap's stubbornness came to bite him in the ass with the fragmenting of the group - these characters of great power and great willpower need that kind of drama to make them interesting and new.


johndawg
johndawg - 1/12/2014, 11:52 PM
Last great Marvel comic event = ONSLAUGHT
Tevii
Tevii - 1/13/2014, 12:01 AM
No... Marvel is where DC was in the early 80's. at that time DC had a mess of a continuity. Readers were confused everywhere. That's WHY they did Crisis on Infinite Earths. DC needed to streamline and adapt to bring in a younger audience.
Marvel is a freakin mess. 616, The Ultimates, Marvel Now. New readers have NO IDEA where to start.
This is a natural occurrence for something that has been around as long as they have. But Marvel needs a massive event like DC did with Crisis and even more so with the New 52.
DC had a solid plan with the new 52 and Marvel did a half ass job with Marvel Now.... marvel is in DIRE need of a "Crisis" or "New 52"
There is just too much confusion and the company relies too much on their crappy event comics.
Old readers will hate it, but you HAVE to do that in order to excite a new, younger audience. Because as of now, they are turned off by the confusion.
Tevii
Tevii - 1/13/2014, 12:03 AM
And with the confusion, the events mean nothing
Foolkiller
Foolkiller - 1/13/2014, 12:08 AM
The events are done to death, but reboots are not the answer, anywhere, ever. A change of direction id all that is needed as opposed to messing with decades of mythology.
BeyondTheGrave
BeyondTheGrave - 1/13/2014, 12:21 AM
I was honestly done after siege, that was the point I determined there were too many. The last event I enjoyed was world war hulk. I still have yet to finish fear itself just because it's too big, soooo many tie ins.
Equivocal
Equivocal - 1/13/2014, 12:38 AM
honestly the only book I'm reading right now is 'New Avengers' & 'Avengers' just because they've been written by Johnathan Hickman.

he's is by FAR, one of the best writers I've read in a long time, ever since I read his run of Fantastic Four and later on Avengers, I'm a truly fan !

'Infinity' is such a great read !!!
staypuffed
staypuffed - 1/13/2014, 1:33 AM
I would say AvX had an affect on the Marvel U.
Cyclops killing Professor X has changed the entire line of X-books. Teams have been torn apart, mutants have taken sides and everything's different. And the Avengers have branched out a lot more, involving the X-Men and other, lesser known characters. It's not like Infinity, or Battle of the Atom which, while fun, had NO impact on the MU whatsoever.
Vortigar
Vortigar - 1/13/2014, 2:02 AM
Currently there are only two titles I'm reading. Wonder Woman and Batwoman. Why? Because they stand as far away from the over-arching continuity as possible.

Marvel is pulling out a new Iron Fist title which will probably go on my buy-list and She-Hulk might end up there. Still waiting for a Doc Strange ongoing, he does not work like he should when he's on a team.

You can always see it, once they start with cross-overs the quality of the writing goes down. There's nothing that I dislike more in comics than this whole "look at how high the stakes are this time" nonsense. Its meaningless if there's no plot, characterization, pathos, an idea other than what you'd find in some fan's "what-if" discussion. You know, an actual story?

And event comics are exemplifying this meaningless type of story writing of late. I had high hopes for Hickman, but by what I've heard Infinity is just more mindless chatter.
gurugeorge
gurugeorge - 1/13/2014, 3:27 AM
"Retconned", not "reconnected". But yeah, it's all getting a bit cliched.
kong
kong - 1/13/2014, 3:33 AM
I never got around to reading "Spider-Men" and I love Miles Morales and Peter Parker. I just read the collection yesterday...the most underwhelming graphic novel I've read in a long time. It wasn't...bad, but i expected so much more.
LordHuck
LordHuck - 1/13/2014, 4:02 AM
You know you don't have to read every event, or even every comic right?

It's like you're complaining about too many flavors of soda or beer.

Pick a few of your favorites and enjoy them.

Don't begrudge the existence of the others simply because you don't have to time or inclination to consume them personally.
Cass
Cass - 1/13/2014, 4:11 AM
I never actually read comics before New 52.

I was just wondering if anyone could tell me: When they rebooted with New 52, did they just cut off story arcs halfway through that were going on before? or did they wrap up every single storyline or what?

I was just curious how they handled that sort of situation. Hope that question even makes sense.
QuestiontheAnswer
QuestiontheAnswer - 1/13/2014, 4:11 AM
That's why I read DC's Animal Man, Swamp Thing and similar characters of lesser renown, all of them are decent. Vertigo is not bad as well.
MoonDoggyX
MoonDoggyX - 1/13/2014, 4:15 AM
@orpheus - what??? There aren't heroes and villans in other mediums???
Sith
Borg
Decepticons
The Smoking Man
Lord Voldamort
Sauron
Davey Jones
The agents in the Matrix
Reapers in Mass Effect
And so on.
Darkknight23
Darkknight23 - 1/13/2014, 4:53 AM
They keep printing it because you keep buying it
BaronZemo
BaronZemo - 1/13/2014, 5:21 AM
My favourite time of Marvel comics was the time of the major dissasters, before leading up to the heroic age. You know, the part wich includes Civil War, Secret Invasion and Siege, that was my favourite. I also think that the Heroic Age is very fun, i love it. I really like the dissaster time when the Winter Soldier storyline took place, aswell as World War Hulk, Osborn's Thunderbolts... And death of Captain America. Dark Reign is also awesome.
Shadowelfz
Shadowelfz - 1/13/2014, 6:10 AM
Agree 100%. These events are what made me stop reading Marvel comics, and I dont plan on picking up another Marvel book until this greed and stupidity is over.
ComradeGrey
ComradeGrey - 1/13/2014, 6:46 AM
Comic books are fetish items. The Silver Age Is Dead.
Tetrahedron
Tetrahedron - 1/13/2014, 6:49 AM
I totally disagree with these sheep. The month titles are like weekly episodes of a TV show and the events are like annual big budget blockbusters. Haven't any of you whiners read Infinity? It was amazing. Marvel's events have been a mainstay since Secret War they should keep doing them as long as they sell comics.

Also to the morons who say they should pull a New 52; Marvel would never $#!t on their fans or their characters in some soulless attempt to try to appeal to little 7 year olds. Leave the unscrupulous cash grabs to DC, thx.
MsDarkPhoenix
MsDarkPhoenix - 1/13/2014, 6:53 AM
Well, I didn't really like AvX, it made the X-Men look like villains. I also hated House of M, Scarlet Witch was acting like a crazy bitch, which she isn't. But Civil War?? Civil War was great!

@darkknight2149 I'm glad someone remembers the original!!
1 2
View Recorder