Marvel always intended The Incredible Hulk to become a tv show?

Marvel always intended The Incredible Hulk  to become a tv show?

Has Marvel always planned for 2008's The Incredible Hulk to become a tv show? I think the answer may in fact be yes.

Editorial Opinion
By Paulley - Oct 17, 2010 11:10 AM EST
Filed Under: Hulk

Like several people here and on other sites the news of The Incredible Hulk returning to our screens left us with mixed feelings. Recapturing the success of the original series and giving us more time with Bruce Banner and his green alter ego is great but at the cost of TV show budget CGI and being disconnected from the live-action Marvel Cinematic Universe left people uneasy.

At these thoughts, I found myself becoming very negative toward this idea of a Hulk TV show. However, after reading a few comments from other CBMers (including but not exclusive to "SkylerMystwood") and rereading information given to us by Marvel Studio's president of production, Kevin Feige, and others, I found myself considering whether this wasn't always just part of the plan.

During the development of 2008's The Incredible Hulk, Marvel refereed to Ang Lee's film was like a parallel universe one-shot comic book, and their next film needed to be, in Kevin Feige's words, "really starting the Marvel Hulk franchise". We all just assumed this meant film franchises, or more specifically Avengers film franchise, but what if it was more than that. He later stated that the film met Marvel's expectations and that Hulk will return, but after the crossover.



Tim Roth, who played Emil Blonsky/The Abomination, confirmed that Marvel has made overtures to him about reprising the role in the future, during a group interview at the Television Critics Association summer press tour.

"They have, but in a very different way, I don't want to get into it, but they signed me up for three." what the interviewer took to mean films and when asked what that could include Roth said in response "It could be anything".

Another contributing factor may be in the design of 2008's The Incredible Hulk.

The fact they based the origin around the original TV show, was it just because they believed the general audience knew this origin better, was it because the director and stars were fans of the original or was it more than that, was it because they envisioned this movie to be the first chapter in something alot bigger.

On the subject of The Incredible Hulk's opening credits, it did also leave a large unexplored area where Bruce Banner is on the run from General Ross while trying to find a cure, which has proved to be perfect for television.



Though if it is to feature Tim Roth it would have to be set either between 2008's film and The Avengers or after the team film. Though afterward you'd think Hulk would be too busy with The Avengers unless he doesn't join them.

As for cost, if all the Hulk character designs and animations exist and marvel owns them can it use the pre-existing effects already set up? if so then that would surely lower the cost of the TV show.

And another question would have to be asked of actor Mark Ruffalo, who is set to take the role of Bruce Banner in The Avengers, is he willing to do a TV show or will they get another new Banner. That i cant answer.

Maybe im just looking to much into this but maybe, just maybe there is in fact something in this.

Share your views below.
Wild New Rumor Claims HULK VS. WOLVERINE Movie Is Now In Pre-Production At Marvel Studios
Related:

Wild New Rumor Claims HULK VS. WOLVERINE Movie Is Now In "Pre-Production" At Marvel Studios

8 Comic Book Moments We Need To See Adapted In Marvel Studios Rumored WORLD WAR HULK Movie
Recommended For You:

8 Comic Book Moments We Need To See Adapted In Marvel Studios Rumored WORLD WAR HULK Movie

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Ibz
Ibz - 10/17/2010, 12:19 PM
hmmm interesting
Paulley
Paulley - 10/17/2010, 2:09 PM
Yea my thinking is that they were not sure at the time whether everything was going to pan out with Iron Man.. if both film were flops then the whole thing would be shelved i guess they needed star names in the film to make it viable.

you couldnt have no name TV stars or it would never have made a profit.

I could easily see Roth and Burell making guest spots on the show but yes Liz Tyler and William Hurt will be replaced with people tat are more excepting to do TV shows much like they have already done with Edward Norton.
Paulley
Paulley - 10/18/2010, 2:17 AM
@Anil: oh i agree why stray away from viable street level characters just to redo a tv show way past its prime? i will never know.. but until its proved otherwise im gonna make the best i can out of a bad situation.

On the subject of villains i thnk thats one of the annoying things with the tv show was that they really didnt have any and so none were brought into the mainstream.

I can see The Leader being done easily enough with prostetics along with Ross, Talbot and the US Army but thats pretty much all the enemies you might have.

Cameos of the depowered Blonsky, Samson, and She-Hulk, along with Rick Jones and Betty Ross as supporting characters but thats about it.

I guess they could do Crusher Creel but i cant see it looking that good in TV CGI, i guess they can use enemies within the rest of the Marvel shared universe (picking out of minor Iron Man, Thor, Cap and Avengers villians) but you shouldnt have too.

The only other option is you go the route of the TV show and have his main enemies be reporters, furniture and fake bears.
Orphix
Orphix - 10/18/2010, 2:30 AM
I think, when thinking about Marvel projects, we should remember that Marvel Studios is still a relatively small studio. Admittedly it does have the might of Disney to back it up BUT it still has to pay it's way.

TV shows can make HUGE money for a relatively small production cost (in repect of films) and by the time you start selling Blueray box sets the margins could be massive.

I think, financially speaking, Marvel Studios and their off shoots have to be pretty shrewd in order to keep up the quality and quantity of their output and may explain some of the creative decisions that they make.

When you plan as far ahead as a The Avengers and expanding the Marvel Movie Universe you have to make alot fo money to make it financially viable.

Look at Ironman 2 and how quickly that came out!
Orphix
Orphix - 10/18/2010, 2:33 AM
Anil @ I think if there is a HBO/pay element then a good sized budgets for special effects might not be insurmountable and have excellent production values.

Also if they keep the number of episodes down to something excessible (between 6 - 10) then I think it could fly and look awesome.
Paulley
Paulley - 10/18/2010, 3:11 AM
2008's TIH cost 150,000,000.. which was exactly the budget of HBO Pacific's ten episode run. you still gotta cut alot of corners to get it to be viable.
Suzanne
Suzanne - 10/18/2010, 2:30 PM
The TV show should go back to Ed Norton Much like the Smalllville Superman and Big Screeen Superman are different actors.

The last few years bigger actors have made the transition to TV. If the TV Shows are good they will do them. It all comes down to the writting. While the people in the money were big names at one point. None of them have been doing anything in along time.

It is more affordable to do a show on TV if its on Cable TV like ABC Family.
TheMightyTroy
TheMightyTroy - 10/20/2010, 5:08 AM
Just make more Hulk movies! dont worry about a tv show. thats my opinion
View Recorder