JJ Abrams Preparing to Direct Star Trek 2, Film Delayed

JJ Abrams Preparing to Direct Star Trek 2, Film Delayed

Deadline an exclusive report that J.J. Abrams will be stepping behind the camera to direct the sequel to his 2009 film, Star Trek, but that the film will be delayed to either the end of 2012 or the summer of 2013. G.I. Joe 2 will get Trek's original release date of June 29, 2012.

By EdGross - Jul 27, 2011 12:07 PM EST
Filed Under: Star Trek
Source: Deadline

While it isn't a done deal in terms of Abrams as director, the site does note, "Abrams has just returned from vacation and is hunkering down with writers Roberto Orci, Alex Kurtzman and Damon Lindelof to work on the Trek script and beginning prep for a Trek sequel that will likely begin production in January... Abrams hasn't formally committed and hasn't approved a script yet, but the studio has exercised its option on the cast and they will be ready when Abrams is."

The story goes on to state that the shift in Trek production schedule will mean a delay for Chris Pine's reboot of Tom Clancy's Jack Ryan adventures.

If Star Trek gets delayed until 2013, that would mean four years between films -- that's like half a century in Hollywood years!

Quentin Tarantino Finally Explains Why His R-Rated STAR TREK Movie Is Never Going To Happen
Related:

Quentin Tarantino Finally Explains Why His R-Rated STAR TREK Movie Is "Never Going To Happen"

STAR TREK: Colm Meaney On Possible Miles O'Brien Return And What He REALLY Thinks About Trekkies (Exclusive)
Recommended For You:

STAR TREK: Colm Meaney On Possible Miles O'Brien Return And What He REALLY Thinks About Trekkies (Exclusive)

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

BooYah
BooYah - 7/27/2011, 12:34 PM
All this is good news. Well, except that its getting delayed.
Hellsing
Hellsing - 7/27/2011, 12:41 PM
getting delayed is a good thing, it means they can take there time and make a good movie, instead of a crappy rushed one
LP4
LP4 - 7/27/2011, 12:55 PM
Yeah this isn't at all surprising. Orci, Kurtzman and Abrams were prioritizing so many other things over the Trek sequel that it isn't surprising the film will get delayed.

canvilella
canvilella - 7/27/2011, 1:01 PM
JJ should have been done Star Trek 2 instead of that piece of shit Super 8!!!!
EastcoastAvenger
EastcoastAvenger - 7/27/2011, 1:04 PM
If we are going to wait more than 3 years between Trek Movies cant we get Trek back on TV yet? Has it been enough time? I bet the Bad Robot crew could put together a bad ass TV series. I would love to see how Abram-verse would deal with Next Generation characters such as Picard or the likes of Q.
WarnerBrother
WarnerBrother - 7/27/2011, 1:08 PM
December 2012 is filling up fast and has only good weekend left.(Dec 7th)It's a good chance that date will get taken by The Wolverine which starts filming in October with a December 2012 release date in mind. I could see Star Trek 2 coming out on May 10th 2013,a week after Ironman 3 much the same way Star Trek came out a week after
X-Men Origins Wolverine in the second week of May in 2009.
optimus69
optimus69 - 7/27/2011, 1:25 PM
what the fu** g it blowers getting star treks date well that sucks
reverendjonnynemo
reverendjonnynemo - 7/27/2011, 1:27 PM
I challenge everyone here to examine the last movie analytically.

Orci's an idiot
Kurtzman's a lousy writer
Does anyone know what a Lindelhof is???
marvel72
marvel72 - 7/27/2011, 1:30 PM
i'm gutted about the delay,but pleased that we're still getting a sequel to one of the best star trek films.
SuperGeek1990
SuperGeek1990 - 7/27/2011, 1:30 PM
But the world ends next year!
commanderhulk
commanderhulk - 7/27/2011, 1:30 PM
No! Star Trek was like my favroite movie of summer 2009 and it was supposed to come out on my birthday. It was supposed to be J.J Abrams birthday gift to me.

Well, I guess anytime is better then never.
JackBauer
JackBauer - 7/27/2011, 2:41 PM
Damnit! No Trek on tv for the past 6 years and now we have to wait 4 years inbetween movies?
BellHorneKing
BellHorneKing - 7/27/2011, 2:59 PM
BellHorneKing
BellHorneKing - 7/27/2011, 3:00 PM
naterator
naterator - 7/27/2011, 3:14 PM
GOOD ...get him started on GL2
naterator
naterator - 7/27/2011, 3:16 PM
@supergeek1990....your world ends next year?
ComicsCommando
ComicsCommando - 7/27/2011, 3:26 PM
Saw this coming.
mawilli4
mawilli4 - 7/27/2011, 3:26 PM
[frick] GI Joe. give us the Star Trek sequel first! Trekkies Unite! it's been delayed 2 or 3 times now.
LP4
LP4 - 7/27/2011, 3:35 PM
@naterator- No, Abrams needs to stay with Trek. [frick] GL. Had his chance and failed at it.


JWStubner
JWStubner - 7/27/2011, 4:10 PM
lol C'mon 4 years isn't THAT long. It's about to be 4 years between Batman sequels. However, it does feel like half a century though since Dark Knight.
cosmicstranger
cosmicstranger - 7/27/2011, 10:59 PM
@Hellsing- Agreed. Too many summer movies are made in what seems like a rush for the finished products.
JYCowboy
JYCowboy - 7/28/2011, 12:29 AM
@wolverinesfury
3 years 1977-1980
naterator
naterator - 7/28/2011, 11:31 AM
@LP4...LOL you just hate anything i say ...no matter the topic huh? your such a:



Im pretty sure that some time ago i heard you say to someone how JJ would be perfect for GL. Thats right it was in a comment to MARVEL72 in one of your own articles.
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/LP4/news/?a=39820

But sorry my bad. Guess if you see that we might agree on something you just have to troll it up. You are certainly keeping it real. To each their own.
LP4
LP4 - 7/31/2011, 1:39 PM
@naterator- Yes i said that some time ago but i'm saying IF Abrams had to choose one of them to save- I rather he saved Star Trek rather than GL.

Oh and if you even remember correctly my most recent article i said that NOLAN should resurrect GL.

You're an idiot naterator.
LP4
LP4 - 7/31/2011, 1:40 PM
furthermore @naterator- YOU'RE the one who loves [frick]ing with me on here constantly responding to all of my comment whether directed at you or not.

You need to seriously back off dude.
View Recorder