A Tense Confrontation Is Teased In This New SPIDER-MAN: HOMECOMING "Iron Man VS. Peter" TV Spot

A Tense Confrontation Is Teased In This New SPIDER-MAN: HOMECOMING "Iron Man VS. Peter" TV Spot

Yet another new TV spot for Spider-Man: Homecoming has been released online, and this one teases a war of words between Peter Parker and his mentor, Tony Stark. Click on to check it out...

By MarkCassidy - Jun 02, 2017 06:06 PM EST
Filed Under: Homecoming
This latest TV promo for Jon Watts' Spider-Man: Homecoming is titled "Iron Man Vs. Peter", and although the pair don't actually come to blows, a tense confrontation is teased.

Previous glimpses of this scene have focused on The Armored Avenger scolding Peter for putting lives in danger by going it alone against The Vulture before he was ready, but here we see that Spidey is just as pissed at Stark for not listening to him about the severity of the threat. Could we actually see things get physical at some point, perhaps?

Check out the TV spot below and let us know what you think.



A young Peter Parker/Spider-Man (Tom Holland), who made his sensational debut in Captain America: Civil War, begins to navigate his newfound identity as the web-slinging super hero in Spider-Man: Homecoming. Thrilled by his experience with the Avengers, Peter returns home, where he lives with his Aunt May (Marisa Tomei), under the watchful eye of his new mentor Tony Stark (Robert Downey, Jr.). Peter tries to fall back into his normal daily routine – distracted by thoughts of proving himself to be more than just your friendly neighborhood Spider-Man – but when the Vulture (Michael Keaton) emerges as a new villain, everything that Peter holds most important will be threatened.
SPIDER-MAN: HOMECOMING Nets Lowest Re-Release Box Office Yet As Spidey's First MCU Movie Returns To Theaters
Related:

SPIDER-MAN: HOMECOMING Nets Lowest Re-Release Box Office Yet As Spidey's First MCU Movie Returns To Theaters

John Leguizamo On Missing Out On Vulture Role In SPIDER-MAN: HOMECOMING: Another Actor Would Have Sued
Recommended For You:

John Leguizamo On Missing Out On Vulture Role In SPIDER-MAN: HOMECOMING: "Another Actor Would Have Sued"

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
LordHarryLatts
LordHarryLatts - 6/2/2017, 6:46 PM
I'm not gonna watch any more of these and just wait until I see it in a theater.
Scarilian
Scarilian - 6/2/2017, 6:51 PM
"None of this would have happened if you had just listened to me" - Peter to Tony



Really does feel like this entire movie is going to be another 'Tony messes up again' scenario. As the trailers show if he'd listened to Peter then Vulture would have been defeated earlier and it seems silly that Tony dismisses the threat of the Vulture.
SonOfAGif
SonOfAGif - 6/3/2017, 12:31 AM
@Scarilian - Well Tony cannot go into attack mode with the Sokovia Accords approving it. Give Tony a break. He is limited on what he can and can't do now. Peter isn't.
BloodyBed
BloodyBed - 6/3/2017, 5:39 AM
@SonOfAGif - well shouldn't Peter also be affected by the accords?

You see, this is the problem with that [frick]ing movie. After they are introduced, nobody talks about the accords. It's just an excuse for everyone to join teams, they ignore the whole superhuman registration bit. Isn't the whole point of NOT signing it supposed to mean you wouldn't have to work for the government? That all gets brushed over, someone's just like: go get cap or we will. Didn't need accords for that, cap broke the law in other ways. Not: go get cap, and follow our rules, because he supports superhuman freedom.

Hell you don't even need them for teams to form, without the accords, the movie would still be the same. They don't need them to bring in assassin, and then to hunt down the guy that broke him out. People joined cap because he is cap and he needed help, not because they were against registration.

Really, it makes the people who didn't sign look over-dramatic because nothing changed for the people that did. Comic handled it so much better, and I have no idea why the movie gets a pass in that regard. As a movie, civil war is awesome. As a proper adaptation of its source, it [frick]ing fails miserably.

End rant.
SonOfAGif
SonOfAGif - 6/3/2017, 7:43 AM
@ALostCause - Well for starters the only film post Civil War that took place on Earth was Doctor Strange. And in that film the concept of accords would be ignored because sorcerors are operating in the shadows. Nobody outside of sorcerors know about sorcerors.

And in the Homecoming trailer Tony discourages Peter from being an Avenger by telling him that there are people (Accords) who handle supervillains. And tells him to be a friendly neighborhood Spiderman.

Daredevil Season 2 very heavily implied the existence of the Accords by introducing a law to stop vigilantes in NY and to arrest and prosecute them on site.

So the accords aren't ignored. We just haven't seen an catastrophic event post Civil War that called upon the panel.
Scarilian
Scarilian - 6/3/2017, 8:40 AM
@SonOfAGif -

"Well Tony cannot go into attack mode with the Sokovia Accords approving it."

If this were true he would'nt have been able to almost instantly get to the boat scene that we see in the trailers - even if we're missing most of that fight, Vulture almost immediately splits the boat in half - and then Tony is there less than a minute or two later.

Meanwhile, Tony was probably informed about the Vulture several hours or days prior - yet seemingly did nothing. If the accords prevent him from taking down actual supervillains that are attacking New York then it's idiotic.

While the main heroes sign it, anyone who did not was then an enemy (Such as Captain America, Bucky, Etc...) Peter would then be an enemy.

@ALostCause -
Comics had the same issue in that the Accords were never really defined.
BloodyBed
BloodyBed - 6/3/2017, 8:51 AM
@SonOfAGif - I am not talking about any of that. in the movie titled "civil war" the registration act is pointless.
BloodyBed
BloodyBed - 6/3/2017, 8:56 AM
@Scarilian - yeah they were never really defined (who wants to read a legal document), but they were still the focal point of the event. that is not the case in civil war, the focal point is the cap/bucky and cap/tony relationships.

I say they should have removed the accords all together, just have them split into a team that wants to help cap, and a team that thinks he has gone too far. that would set the stage for civil war to come later down the line. they team back up for infinity war, but afterwards a superhuman-related tragedy takes place that makes the registration act a necessity.
Origame
Origame - 6/3/2017, 3:46 PM
@ALostCause - EXACTLY!!! That would be such an easy fix. The situation with Bucky and the hunt for him could easily segue into the heroes splitting up into teams and fighting each other, one side treating Bucky like any other villain since he's clearly dangerous and the other trying to help someone who's obviously under the control of an evil mastermind. And best of all it wouldn't force them to pretend that the Avengers involvement in events like the battle of New York did anything other than save lives (seriously, an invasion in New York city leads to not even 100 people dying and that's used against the Avengers as a sign they need to be put under control? Count your blessings there, you ungrateful punks).
TheScatman
TheScatman - 6/4/2017, 6:00 PM
@Scarilian - im prrtty sure the point of this clip is to show how immature peter is at this point, not Tony..
TheScatman
TheScatman - 6/4/2017, 6:01 PM
@ALostCause - no, because no one knows who peter is yet. I bet stark is hiding it from the governemt which is half the reason he wants it back.
BloodyBed
BloodyBed - 6/5/2017, 3:45 AM
@TheScatman - well that makes sense
BloodyBed
BloodyBed - 6/5/2017, 4:56 AM
@Origame - huh, I hadn't even considered that it would erase Ross's dubious reasoning behind the accords.

What a waste of the registration act, they better do a good job with it going forward and not just sweep it under the rug.

But then again, do we really want civil war in the beginning of infinity war? They only have so much time to focus on Thanos. Idk, they really [frick]ed up with CW, and it amazes me how few people (that aren't irrational DC fanatics) see it that way.
LordZero
LordZero - 6/2/2017, 6:51 PM
ConnorHawkeye
ConnorHawkeye - 6/2/2017, 6:52 PM
Golden year of cb media!!!!

CBM's be slayin
Jaspion
Jaspion - 6/2/2017, 6:54 PM
Only a month away.

MarDCel
MarDCel - 6/2/2017, 7:09 PM
@Jaspion - Hey, that's my avatar! Cool looking AF!
TexasAvenger
TexasAvenger - 6/2/2017, 7:15 PM
@Jaspion - I love that costume so much.
DashParr
DashParr - 6/2/2017, 6:56 PM
"TOO MUCH IRON MAN THIS MOVIE IS RUINED!!!! BOYCOTTING!!!!!" ... am I doing it right?
MarDCel
MarDCel - 6/2/2017, 7:10 PM
@DashParr -
SonOfAGif
SonOfAGif - 6/3/2017, 3:45 AM
@DashParr -
FormulaOne
FormulaOne - 6/3/2017, 11:54 AM
@DashParr -

If Iron Man or an Avenger didnt show up in the movie everyone would be saying "Where the hell were any of the Avengers??" haha internets are never happy
DashParr
DashParr - 6/2/2017, 6:56 PM
In all seriousness, I can't wait for this movie.
DENNISsystem
DENNISsystem - 6/2/2017, 6:59 PM
Wonder if Pete and Tony will have an actual falling out.......with Cap coming to recruit him in the post-credits?
Scarilian
Scarilian - 6/2/2017, 7:08 PM
@DENNISsystem -

Still fairly sure that the shot of Spider-man swinging next to Iron Man is the ending shot. Though i must admit it would be more interesting to have Captain America recruit him, mirroring Nick Fury recruiting Tony.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
View Recorder