Why make a new Spider-man movie?

I don't mean to be rude, but I've seen many people do this. It's just, what you wrote as an "editorial" was really a paragraph bashing the idea of a new Spider-Man movie. You could have done that in the comment section of any article about the new Spider-Man movie. Why did you have to write it as an editorial. Now if your editorial was on this same topic, but was much longer and more in depth. I wouldn't be complaining. You basically just said "that sucks and that sucks and that sucks". You had almost no examples that proved your main idea.

i have 2 agree with golden its not reali a article jst a comment

i agree. just make spidey 4 and redeem yourself hollywood. ah, well....

i think they should have killed off MJ in the begining of this movie then he moves on to Gwen and then Lizard comes in and blah blah blah..like that...that would be goood

was it supposed to be convincing when you said if it isn't broken dont fix it??
because i have no problem with the suit...i'm not bothered because it still looks like spiderman

It's sad, but the costume in the photo looks better than the reboot suit. And nothing is wrong with this as an editorial or article. Theres a thread every 2 seconds with someone whining about how you shouldn't judge these crappy movies before seeing them. It's the same thing.

Example: "Why we shouldn't bash the suit": http://www.comicbookmovie.com/spider-man_movies/spider-man_4/news/?a=29905

The original movies were too wrong. Tobey Maguire was too old. Spiderman got his powers when he was around 15, Tobey looks 30. Tobey Maguire Spiderman wasn't a wise cracking machine. He also wasn't a genius. They made his webbing natural.

I think this movie will be good, it's fixing all the problems the original movies had.

About the suit, I think it's more to differentiate this from the other movies. And he's not gonna have a pee stain in the movie, that's probably just something they have to do for the stunt guy and will be removed in the special effects.

They got too far off track with Spider-Man 3. In order to continue where they left off for a 4th movie they'd have to fix a lot of stuff and recasting actors was likely inevitable. Sony probably knew a 4th film would have been the last for Raimi, Maguire, etc so they cut bait and got a jump on a new series rather than postponing the issue. They had to know none of us (or the average moviegoer) wanted Dunst as Mary Jane anymore as she was a whiney selfish beeotch all the time (I mean, I thought S2 resolved all this since she found out why Peter was not at her beck and call, and she was worse in S3!). About the only thing S3 had going for it was setting up the Lizard for the future.

It's possible that Sony disucssed with Marvel how they should proceed. They surely felt like they let things turn X-Men on them and didn't want to make movies just because they have the rights, like Fox does. Sony would never give up the rights to the #1 character, but it seems like they want to make a good movie faithful to the comic (other than the suit) and are kind of doing the reboot thing and getting a good director who isn't known for this stuff, like Marvel has done. Fox just brought Singer back which was their issue to start with. I like that this is being reboot even though I love Spider-Man 2.

Too short for an article, and it's a moot point.