RUMOR: X-Men: First Class To Feature Classic Blue And Yellow 1960's Costumes?

This would be awesome...
Nice stuff Josh!


Guys, check out the NEXT Sub-chapter of WHITE FIRE!

"White Fire"

@what Zer00 said, beast being furry isnt new either, maybe the material there using is the only new thing i have heard. but this is a rumour

mystique wearing that costume.. and she is not blue.. hum! (morph)

@Jay no they havent changed angels gender its a different character known as angel salvatore who shouldnt be there but its fox so you know

I would NOT like the see the original X-men oufits on anyone other than the REAL FIRST CLASS...

Further more this is FOX!


A BIG BS from me!

straight gaaaaarrrbaaagggeee

Of course it's not the original five, you dumb morons. This is a PREQUEL to the existing films and obviously characters like Jean, Cyclops, Iceman aren't old enough to have been around in the 1960s.

The mainstream audiences aren't protesting in their thousands on the streets for a reboot so therefore this isn't one. It's a PREQUEL. Only in your obsessive bubble is a reboot required. The rest of the world isn't in that fanboy bubble.

And why would we want to see Jean, Cyclops and Iceman again when we saw them already in three films. Let's see some new students for a change. Let's see something that isn't a predictable retread of the comics. I don't want to be able to sit there and watch a comic translated frame by frame. Even the comics have varied - the First Class comic series adds a lot of things that weren't seen in the original 60s X-Men comics.

Stop being so anal about everything. Nolan's Batman films changed things, redesigned the costume and the Batmobile, created and destroyed Two Face in one film, and yet you love that. Seriously, guys, get a grip on reality.

angels a girl?....have they mentioned this before, how have i missed this?

^^^ Of course they mentioned it before. Wake up!

Zoe Kravitz was announced as being cast as the comic book character called Angel Salvadore.

Do your homework.

bleedthefreak: Those 'complaints' still don't make this a bad movie. Firstly, you haven't seen it yet. Secondly, those are minor quibbles from a fanboy. And, yes, i do run that blog - what does that have to do with anything? Why are you focusing on things that have nothing to do with the big picture.

why cant you fanboys still not understand why the original five cant be in this it is simple freaking logic

set in 1960's

cyclops and jean would not be born in 1960's


marsden(Scott) was born in in 73 so he would not be born

and janssen(Jean) was actually born in in 64 so in essence she would not even be born as well

this is a prequel not a reboot

if they were in that would make the continuity problems even worse then they are

it would do more harm than good

intruder you [frick] off all you do is bitch on something you know nothing about

ohh nooooooooo i need by cyclops and jean

go cry me a river

there is logical reason for them not to be in the movie you just choose not to listen to them

TheGeekFiles: SuperDude001 has a good point.

TheGeekFiles: If the two Fantastic Four movies Fox made arent explanation enough as to why fans react negatively to the changes they make in films like this one, then I have no idea what is. After turning Doctor Doom into a complete and utter shadow of his comic book self and Galactus into a cloud, why do you think people are upset to see them making more extreme changes to the comic books they love? X-Men Origins: Wolverine is another perfect example of that.

There's no need to translate the comic books "frame by frame" (if Marvel Studios were doing that there would be no Captain America in the first team of Avengers after all!) but when it comes to the X-Men, I know that myself and many others, want to see the original five and the classic origins that Stan Lee came up with. Some changes and a few extra characters wouldnt be a big deal, but completely IGNORING the source material and instead going for the likes of Angel Salvadore and Havok is a big deal IMO especially as Fox have done that before leading to pretty awful movies.

I have faith that Matthew Vaughn will deliver the best movie he can, but Fox have done absolutely nothing to give me any faith in them at all.

I'm likely to see it.

@ Josh: The Fantastic Four movies were not poorly received because they weren't true to the comics. They were, on the whole, pretty accurate. Those movies were too cartoonish and flimsy, that was the problem. Would they have done better if we saw the actual Galactus as a 50ft man with a food blender on his head? I would argue not. Wolverine did fairly well but it was not solid/deep enough as a movie, that's why it had a mixed reception.

Wanting the original five is pointless at this stage. Sometime in the future I'm sure there'll be a reboot, but for now there is an established and currently existing movie continuity. So, there is no point in screaming for the original five, it's utterly pointless.

Even if they did have the original five, what story would they tell? They'd have to change the comic book version of events to create a satisfying two-hour movie. There's no way it would or could follow the comics issue by issue. And whatever story you say they should tell won't be the same as what someone else says they should do. The problem is you are already making the movie in your mind - but this film isn't your vision, it's not your movie, it's the vision of the writers/director who are making it. You are creating unreasonable expectations.