X-Men: First Class Review by Jolt17!

X-Men: First Class Review by Jolt17!

After several words regarding the movie, hit the jump to check out my own spoiler free take of Matthew Vaughn's newest mutant flick, X-Men: First Class!

Review Opinion
By Jolt17 - Jun 04, 2011 06:06 PM EST
Filed Under: X-Men: First Class

To be honest and to start off, I actually was initially pissed by the decision of this 'First Class' to not feature the original five, which I was so curious to see. Nevertheless, as things started to come out, I agreed that everything looks great, and so I tried to forget the original five for a while and to accept this movie as what it is. I think of less a loyal adaptation and more as a movie. The result? Let's just begin:


Story and Script:
If asked what makes First Class a good movie, one of them should be the story. From highlighting the relation and development between the characters, the twists, and of course, how the action scenes are presented and how those are featured to be neccessary to the main plot, the parts of the story are very well structured. The writer smartly puts enough twists to avoid the story from being monotone since the main idea in my opinion is pretty simple; on the other hand the twists do not cause any great confusion. Do not forget how they successfully blend real world historical events with the mutant affairs to build a great story.

Don't forget to mention the fun, well-placed cameos. It may feel a little bit unnecessary but in the end it is not completely pointless.

The script isn't bad at all. The dialogues are smart and fit each characters well. There are some dialogues that sound pretty cheap or what, but overall those do not cause much disturbance.


Acting and Characters:
The performances presented by the actors featured in the movie are just solid. It's safe to say and we all know that Michael Fassbender, who is Erik Lensherr in this movie gave the strongest performance overall. Nonetheless, he didn't completely steal the spotlight; James McAvoy who portrays his friend and future rival Charles Xavier, also gave an equal performance. Not as great as Fassbender in my opinion, but there are no much differences in them. And not just their personal performances, but the chemistry between them was also very strong.

I have to say that what kept me interested of this movie is, surprisingly, the lesser-known characters that are presented in this movie. I was pissed indeed that the original five was not used initially, but at the same time I also thought that these new characters are fresh, and their lesser known aspects made them interesting to be seen. Correspondingly, from Lucas Till, Caleb Landry Jones, Jason Flemyng and the other actors who portray those characters have managed to deliver good performances. What is lacking from the movie is the fact that characters like Havok, Banshee, Angel, and Riptide merely got any character treatments. Nevertheless, I thought of it for a second and realized that it should be acceptable since they are new to the franchise, and in this first appearance of theirs it is not the development that becomes the focus, but who they are and what are their powers. Developments can be saved for sequels.

As for the villain, who is Sebastian Shaw...at first you won't be easily convinced of Kevin Bacon portraying him. Physically, there's no striking resemblance between them and as for Bacon himself, it's hard to see him in the movies not as himself. That, for me is the weakness of casting a well-known star in a comic book movie. Despite of that, Bacon managed to show his talent in acting and managed to portray Shaw pretty much very well.


Visuals and Techniques:
The CGI used in the movie was extremely smooth. From the projection of the mutants' powers to the objects that are crafted using CGI were all believable to our eyes. Of course nothing is perfect, but the flaws in the CGI crafting in this movie were nearly not visible.

Vaughn is a great director. He managed to avoid audiences from boredom by not putting the scenes to be shot from one single angle, at the same time the switching angles is not confusing. He also smartly put the camera shots on angles that capture the actors' emotional projection well. In action scenes, which mostly are fast-paced, Vaughn managed to capture them well with still keeping the intensity and enjoyment by not moving the camera too much; a problem that was present in movies like Batman Begins and The Dark Knight, if I may do a comparison.


Weaknesses:
Even with all the good points that have been pointed up above, X-Men: First Class is not flawless. First, for a movie which premise is to set in the 60's, First Class really doesn;t get it. The sets, costumes (except for the X-men's uniforms, which were fairly acceptable), and other minor aspects look pretty much too modern for a 60's era. It may doesn't mean a lot but it disturbs me pretty much.

The second is continuity. Since I won't spoil anything in here so I won't say much words on it, however there are pretty obvious disgrace toward the continuity that has been built. I'm not talking about its loyalty to the comics continuity, but the continuity that has been built by Fox from the previous installments. Even after it being said to be a reboot, but there are some aspects like the cameo (don't tell me you haven't heard of it) that keeps it from being a complete reboot. Or even more obvious, the trailers and promotional stuffs have also featured footages from the previous X-films, which means this should be a prequel. It may be a pre-boot but still, in the end the intention of this movie and how it relates to the others is still not clear.


Overall:
Matthew Vaughn is a great director. Even if you don't like the changes Fox has made, you will still enjoy this as an overwhelming movie once you've seen it. Throw in great actors in the line-up of the cast and strong story, X-Men: First Class is exceptional.


And my rating; yes for me it is the same great as Thor:

8.5 /10

Definitely a must see.






By: TwitterButtons.com

By TwitterButtons.com

X-MEN: FIRST CLASS Was Partially Written In Claudia Schiffer's Hospital Room Due To Rushed Production
Related:

X-MEN: FIRST CLASS Was Partially Written In Claudia Schiffer's Hospital Room Due To Rushed Production

Matthew Vaughn Reveals Scrapped Plans For X-MEN: FIRST CLASS Trilogy And Who He Was Going To Cast As Wolverine
Recommended For You:

Matthew Vaughn Reveals Scrapped Plans For X-MEN: FIRST CLASS Trilogy And Who He Was Going To Cast As Wolverine

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

vermillion
vermillion - 6/4/2011, 9:33 PM
Yeah, this movie deserves the good reviews it's getting, IMO.

I preferred this over any of the previous X-Men films... Even more than Thor, actually. It had so many memorable scenes in it. The story was great. Matthew Vaughn & Co did a fantastic job. Hope we get a sequel out of this. :)

I'd also like to say, this is the best theme song EVER!

johnnysnow
johnnysnow - 6/4/2011, 9:48 PM
If Fassbender and McAvoy gave equal performances, how is Fassbender's better?
Ryguy88
Ryguy88 - 6/4/2011, 10:01 PM
Good review! It was definitely better than Thor though. The action actually meant something in this movie and there was more at stake than a deserted town in the middle of New Mexico. The characters all felt real and had real motivations. They are 2 completely different movies, one tries to be a good CBM, the other tries to be a good movie.

GamerKT, don't even acknowledge it, it's probably really sad and lonely and it may cling to whatever you throw at it.
bigcityreporter
bigcityreporter - 6/4/2011, 10:30 PM
I absolutely LOVED this movie, especially Nicholas Hoult as my favorite character BEAST!!! I work at a movie theater so I'll be seeing this movie A LOT MORE OFTEN NOW!

Here's what I hope we'll be able to see in the NEXT CLASS:
1) Cyclops and the Scott/Alex dynamic
2) Hank rebuilding Cerebro, the lab, the X-Jet, and...THE DANGER ROOM!
3) More international roster, whether this be Storm, Colossus, Sunfire, Nightcrawler, Thunderbird (who I think Taylor Lautner was set to play), etc.
4) If not the international roster, then more of the ORIGINAL FIVE if at all possible.
5) Toad, Blob, Mastermind, and the Maximoffs (cuz marvel studios cant get their hands on 'em w/o fox's permission) for the Brotherhood.

Minotauro
Minotauro - 6/4/2011, 10:33 PM
If this movie doesn't get an oscar nom that's not for special effects will be a complete joke. Fassbender, McAvoy, and Bacon blown me away with their performances. It was stunning. I will agree this is one of the best CBMs this year, and will be the best of the marvel line up this year, and that is no joke.
95
95 - 6/4/2011, 10:34 PM
I like the way you categorized your review. I'm looking forward to seeing this film tomorrow.

@ Ryguy88

AGREED!

Both on "don't even acknowledge it" and this film being better than 'Thor', which I'm sure it will be. Good point on your opinion about Thor's setting and such.
BaneNascent
BaneNascent - 6/4/2011, 11:06 PM
I saw it today and it was not as good as Thor! Sad to say not as good as Dare Devil (Directors Cut) Wha?? I know! Raven carries emotion and desire as good as Nicolas Cage and when she has her (True) face on she has the grace and beauty of a flash animated cartoon. Beast runs on the beach like teen wolf when he isn't running like Quicksilver with ape feet. The most emotional part of the film is between two men (prof X and Mag) when they built up Mystique story to just have her stare blindly at the audience.
NightBoyWonder
NightBoyWonder - 6/4/2011, 11:53 PM
@SuspenseSmith How about Astonishing X-Men
thereaper27
thereaper27 - 6/5/2011, 1:04 AM
They nailed magneto's helmet which was great to see, beast was a letdown. The rest of the characters didnt interest me much except for darwin
Wolfie
Wolfie - 6/5/2011, 1:09 AM
Good review. I loved the movie. I haven't gone into any of the X-Men movies expecting them to stay true to the comics. However, I was disappointed at the end that these films are having a hard time staying true to their own continuity. I did love it overall. The best X-Men since X2.
LOL
LOL - 6/5/2011, 1:14 AM


...They pretty much summed it up.
realfh
realfh - 6/5/2011, 1:39 AM
Nice review.

I loved this movie and it's no doubt the best X-men movie out there. Maybe even the best CBM.
zadoc
zadoc - 6/5/2011, 1:53 AM
Great movie, but the greatest? I don't think so. But really, really good.
POLL: Is X-Men: First Class better than The Dark Knight?
LINK: http://www.wepolls.com/r/622478
hannay07
hannay07 - 6/5/2011, 2:35 AM
It wasnt as bad as I thought it would be, but overall I thought it was very bland. They tried way to hard with Mystique and that made the movie a bit akward. Magneto was awesome, but the rest just seemed like fillers. To say this movie was better then Thor, thats just plain freaking nuts!! Not a bad movie, but nothing great. I just cant understand for the life of me why no one can seem to get the xmen movies right. Compared to all of the other comic book movies like Thor, both Iron Mans, The Dark Knight, it just cant measure up one bit. It was at least better then Priest though, that was just a let down.
KilledHal9000
KilledHal9000 - 6/5/2011, 3:09 AM
i love how everybody is praising this flick so much. just great.
Ichaos
Ichaos - 6/5/2011, 4:47 AM
Is it normal that everyones individual movie review goes to main? I dont recall so many Thor reviews going to main
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 6/5/2011, 5:27 AM


Not worth a 8.5 out of 10.

More a 3 out of 5 movie!

THOR's a more 4.5 out of 5!

Fass did own though!

Cool review!
Blackmatter
Blackmatter - 6/5/2011, 5:49 AM
@Vermillion,,best movie theme ever (IMO) has to be the Terminator themes from 1 & 2 or maybe Halloween

@BaneNascent,,great prof pic

Cant wait to see this flick!
RaMan
RaMan - 6/5/2011, 6:30 AM
Best Top Five CBM movies on my list:
1. The Dark Knight
2. Incredible Hulk
3. Spider-Man 2
4. Batman Begins
5. Iron Man 2

Jolt17
Jolt17 - 6/5/2011, 7:03 AM
@TheWorld Cyke, Iceman, Angel, Jean Grey, Beast...that's five right?

@recluse @holme @Wolfie ; )

@RyGuy Thanks dude, THOR and this is pretty different so it's hard to compare, but I enjoy them both on the same level!

So...yeah.

@Ichaos Not really, the reviews on the Main are just the editors' and one or two from lucky regular users like me!

I didn't even expect it to be on Main lol.

@LEEE Cool bud, don't know tho, I guess 3/5 is like 7/10 for me, while 8.5/10 is like 4/5 for me!

Not really far, it's a good movie nonetheless you know!

; D
Ven0m
Ven0m - 6/5/2011, 9:11 AM
Thor was a better CBM. Your not giving its credit due though it had awesome performances from its cast, it had great action, a good story, and good fx.

This was a good movie just not a cbm. Very entertaining because they went with a awesome cast with very well performances and the action was great. For me it was a bit slow at times. As a movie 4 out of 5 as a CBM 2.5 out out of 5.
cbfriend
cbfriend - 6/5/2011, 9:25 AM
Great review @Jolt17!
InFamouslyCool
InFamouslyCool - 6/5/2011, 10:03 AM
Thor took place in a one stop light "town". WHOMP! First Class was by far better.
PetterONE
PetterONE - 6/5/2011, 10:16 AM
Just saw the movie. I don´t know, didn´t love it but didn´t hate it either. But what the frick is up with Xavier beeing all Austin Powers at times?! "Groovy!" Come on!
HeavyHands
HeavyHands - 6/5/2011, 5:30 PM
This movie sucked, I cringed...A LOT. The cgi was god awful aside from the sub being lifted from the water, seems like they spent all all their cg budget on that. Beast was a joke, most the acting was crap. Fassbender and macavoy however were amazing, made me tear up a few times, they made it worth it. Aslo the DP did a superb job, most of the non cgi shots were incredible.
Jolt17
Jolt17 - 6/5/2011, 5:43 PM
@cbfriend ; )

@TheWorld Lol I see, cool dude!
View Recorder