MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE - DEAD RECKONING Director Christopher McQuarrie Explains PART ONE And PART TWO Titles

MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE - DEAD RECKONING Director Christopher McQuarrie Explains PART ONE And PART TWO Titles

There's a lot of excitement for the next two Mission: Impossible movies, and filmmaker Christopher McQuarrie has now revealed why they each share the same title, albeit with Part One and Part Two added.

By JoshWilding - Aug 10, 2022 10:08 AM EST
Filed Under: Mission: Impossible
Source: Light The Fuse (via ActioNewz.com)

The pandemic caused some significant delays, but we're now less than a year away from Mission: Impossible - Dead Reckoning Part One arriving in theaters. Production on the action movie wrapped last September, but cameras are already rolling on the sequel, Dead Reckoning Part Two

Christopher McQuarrie, who helmed Rogue Nation and Fallout, returns to the director's chair, and has now explained why he went with Dead Reckoning for both of the franchise's next chapters. 

"When I came up with the title, I knew it applied more to Part Two than it did to Part One, which is why it eventually settled on being Part One and Part Two," McQuarrie tells Light The Fuse (via ActioNewz.com). "The title for the first movie was nearly a title that referred to something like a Ghost Protocol kind of thing, it was a government policy – It wasn't a government policy, it was a government, what would you call it? A government measure of last resort, with catastrophic consequences."

"By the time we got to the end of Part One, that had distilled down into an entirely different set of circumstances that appear in Part Two and not in Part One," the filmmaker continued. "So, the word would no longer have been appropriate for the title of Part One."

"And yet, Dead Reckoning didn't really apply as well to Part One as well as it did to Part Two until we started to play with the beginning of the movie, and kind of recognize that Dead Reckoning, while it sounded cool, what did it really have to do with the movie?"

"And over the course of our, really starting to dig down into the arc of the character journey for Ethan [Hunt], it took on deeper and deeper meanings as we went," McQuarrie concludes. "And you'll see just how thematic and how it represents, how it's conceptually represented in every character's journey in this film we're in."

It's previously been reported that these movies will bring a close to Tom Cruise's time as Ethan Hunt, so all eyes will be on what looks set to be an epic conclusion to this iteration of the Mission: Impossible franchise.

The actor, clearly still concerned about pandemic-related delays, is said to want production on Part Two to be completed before Part One is released to make the connection between them feel seamless. That makes sense after the past few years, and we know from leaked audio recorded on the set of the first movie that Cruise took COVID protocols very seriously.

Ving Rhames, Simon Pegg, Rebecca Ferguson, and Vanessa Kirby are all set to return, though they'll be joined by franchise newcomers Hayley Atwell, Pom Klementieff, Rob Delaney, Charles Parnell, Indira Varma, and Mark Gatiss.

Mission Impossible: Dead Reckoning Part One is set to be released on July 14, 2023, while Mission: Impossible - Dead Reckoning Part Two will follow on June 28, 2024.

MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE Star Jeremy Renner Left Franchise After Clashing With Director Over Plans To Kill Brandt
Related:

MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE Star Jeremy Renner Left Franchise After Clashing With Director Over Plans To Kill Brandt

HAWKEYE Star Jeremy Renner Explains Why He Chose To Exit The MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE Franchise
Recommended For You:

HAWKEYE Star Jeremy Renner Explains Why He Chose To Exit The MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE Franchise

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Deadinside
Deadinside - 8/10/2022, 10:33 AM
I want the main villain to be Les Grossman. Tom Cruise in a dual role!
Origame
Origame - 8/10/2022, 10:41 AM
@Deadinside - it'll be a dance off

thewanderer
thewanderer - 8/10/2022, 10:37 AM
This has turned into such a great franchise over the last 3 movies.
TheManWithoutFear
TheManWithoutFear - 8/10/2022, 10:51 AM
I am so hyped for this movie. The trailer gives me chills (i admit the theme tune does a lot of the heavy lifting)
GhostDog
GhostDog - 8/10/2022, 10:55 AM
The title feels very "an algorithm made it up" I hate to say it. Hyped nonetheless.
QuietStorm
QuietStorm - 8/10/2022, 10:58 AM
Can't wait! I wish they could just release both films together and we sit for a 4 hour epic conclusion for our favorite pals
Conquistador
Conquistador - 8/10/2022, 11:01 AM
I may a bit stupid as i didn't really understand the explantation. None the less this franchise has been consistently good. Even part two for all it's over stylised doves and shit. Oh Woo.
LSHF
LSHF - 8/10/2022, 11:34 AM
I have seen most of the them and, as action/spy/espionage/etc films, I enjoy them more than the James Bond films (but then I've always liked the "team work" aspect better than the "solo" aspect of these films).

So, "No", I wasn't real happy with the first one. I grew up watching the original series, and I recently watched the first episode and it drew me in, kept me at the screen, and had a great ending. The series was awesome, and I wanted the films to be like that.

It took a few tries, but they finally came around and made them more like the series. I "do" love the teamwork.

So, I'm 100% looking forward to these next two "Dead Reckoning" movies, but my big question to myself is will I see the first one at the theater and then "wait" on for the next one, or will I just wait until they are both out, rent the first one, and then see the second one at the theater.

I've done this several times, and I usually enjoy binging the films/sequels. I did this with the three Back to the Future films, and it was f#cking blast! I also did this with the Lord of the Rings films.
ThorArms
ThorArms - 8/10/2022, 11:45 AM
Not a fan of the Part One monicker.
TheLobster
TheLobster - 8/10/2022, 12:00 PM
One of the best franchises of all time. Easily, the best action franchise of all time.

I also don’t mind the “part one” shtick as long ad the films feel very closely woven together as one story. However, I would rather they do what the Russos did with the last two Avengers films having each title standing on its own despite being essentially one big story.
BobGarlen
BobGarlen - 8/10/2022, 12:30 PM
With the Magic McQuarrie had done with Mission: Impossible it's hard to imagine he hasn't had 1 phone call with EON about rebooting Bond.
bl0odwerk
bl0odwerk - 8/10/2022, 12:55 PM
The Mission franchise is easily the best one left. Everything else is now releasing sub-par offerings, from James Bond all the way to Star Wars. The only hiccup Mission Impossible has had is 2, and that can be ignored based on how good the rest of the films are.
AnungUnRama
AnungUnRama - 8/10/2022, 2:52 PM
So they actually specific titles for both movies as stand alone entried in mind and thought it would be a better idea to use the same title adding the “Part One/Two“ so that every audience spontaniously considering to go to the movies will think: “No not MI: … Part Two, I haven‘t seen Part One“? Did the frachise not skip the numbering After MI3 to avoid exactly this? So did Star Wars E7 - 9, Screem 5/6 etc.
View Recorder