Whispers68 Review of Astro Boy

Whispers68 Review of Astro Boy

Do I place Astro Boy in the ranks of the top animated features released or does his adventure fall short?

Review Opinion
By Whispers68 - Oct 25, 2009 10:10 PM EST
Filed Under: Astro Boy
Source: Whispers68

“Astro Boy,” a film produced and financed by Imagi Entertainment but distributed by Summit Entertainment created a rather small dent during this weekend’s box office. That’s perhaps an understatement because on a budget of $65 million, the film earned $7 million but does this financial matter suggest the animated feature was a bad movie?

Sunday’s are usually left for sitting in front of my LCD, surround sound and enjoying as many NFL games as possible but I decided to spend some time viewing this movie since I admire animated features. The amount of money a film generates at the box office in my opinion shouldn’t be the determining factor as to whether it was good or not, but with Astro Boy, what caused the film to suffer was based on one main factor. We won’t get into source material or how true David Bowers was to Osamu Tezuka. I’ll simply judge the film based on it strictly being an animated feature released theatrically.

Astro Boy is about a scientist who lost his son during a demonstration of new technology discovered that could be used for military purposes for President Stone. Dr. Tenma then decides with the memories of his son along with DNA saved, he could create an exact replica of Toby. When he concludes with the creation, his son is now "reborn" as a powerful robot by the name of Astro Boy. Dr. Tenma wanted his son back severely but didn't take into account regardless how bad you want something, you won't necessarily attain it. Astro Boy soon learns that he isn't a real boy but is instead a creation of the son Dr. Tenma lost...a creation he no longer wants. With President Stone learning that the technology he once thought was destroyed is now powered inside Astro Boy, he will stop at nothing until it's acquired.

The voice acting isn’t a concern in this movie…in fact; Freddy Highmore did a great job voicing Astro Boy/Toby. Each scene with Highmore was believable…whether he was happy while playing with the other children he encounters after falling out of Metro City or disappointed when his father/inventor Dr. Tenma played by Nicholas Cage said, “You’re not my son…I’m not your dad. You’re not Toby. You’re a copy of Toby. You’re not my son, okay? You’re a robot and I don’t want you…anymore.” Nicholas Cage was okay in portraying Dr. Tenma. I rather enjoyed Eugene Levy who played the robot helper Orrin, created by Dr. Tenma. His every now and again comments were humorous. Donald Sutherland played President Stone who comes off as a heartless and cutthroat politician so Sutherland didn’t have any difficulty persuading you with his voice of this. Bill Nighy played Dr. Elefun who is also head of the Ministry of Science along with Dr. Tenma. In the film, he’s portrayed as the more compassionate and against using technology for weapons. Weirdly, Samuel L. Jackson played Zog, a robot brought back to life by Astro Boy…he had perhaps two lines in the film.

The animation is on par with others in the genre such as “TMNT” released in 2007 by Imagi Entertainment or “The Incredibles” released in 2004 by Disney/Pixar. Both of those animated films earned well over their production budget so the computer graphics used was never an issue.

So what makes an animated feature go wrong? It’s simple; the story telling method is just completely off. I found myself lacking interest for the film but simply watching because of watching sake. The film’s visuals are somewhat eye catching, especially when Astro Boy experiences his “abilities” for the very first time by accidently falling out of his bedroom window. He flies throughout and above Metro City, which reminds me of Peter Parker in “Spider-Man” when he is shown web slinging all over the city. Yes there’s destruction in the second half of the film where Astro Boy is placed in a gladiator-like coliseum where he fights against several other robot creations by the manipulative inventor banished from Metro City, Hamegg. The ending with Astro Boy going toe-to-toe with a robot by the name of the “Peacekeeper” was also okay. But when it comes to telling the story in a matter as other successful animated features, I feel Astro Boy fell short. It was ordinary…sort of telling the audience, “here’s the story just enjoy it.”

Would I recommend this film to others? Not really! I feel if you have history with the character then you’d more than likely want to watch this live action version.



2.5/5 stars
Related:

Astro Boy: Behind the Tech

Recommended For You:

First "Astro Boy" Movie Review Hits You Tube!

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 10/26/2009, 10:15 AM
Greta review, I haven't seen it but I haven't heard any good reviews yet...On a different note, I watched Paranormal Activity yesterday, Its seriously a creepy movie..not as pant wettingly scary as I had heard, but a great Halloween watch.
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 10/26/2009, 10:20 AM
Cool!

Cant wait to see it!!!! ; D

You gotta admit though, the CGI looks [frick]ing amazing, but i wont go in expecting anything more than that!

Thanx @ WHISPERS!!
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 10/26/2009, 10:22 AM
DARHORSE HORSE Entertaiment should make a live action BIG GUY and RUSTY movie!!

Never read the comic book but the animated series was kinda cool!!!

Damn, pity ASTRO aint all that!
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 10/26/2009, 10:27 AM
Whispers68
Whispers68 - 10/26/2009, 10:34 AM
@Ror

First, thanks...secondly, I saw three movies in the last three days, this one, Saw VI and Paranormal Activity. I'm not saying I'm a ghost expert or anything but I'm used to the idea of "paranormal activity" taking place but the film was definitely one "horror" film that preys on the psyche. I enjoyed every moment because even if you don't believe in ghost or paranormal situations, this film pushes the envelope and tells you to keep your ideas open from now on about the matter. Ror, the last encounter with the ghost was classic...not the ending scene but the last encounter the couple had with the ghost. My sister screamed louder than I thought a human possibly could. She is basically paranoid now because any sound she heard afterwards, she's questioning it. LoL

@Teabag and LEEE777

Thanks....I didn't expect anything from the film so I went in completely unbias. I'm not denouncing someone may enjoy it, because everyone has different opinions of course so if you check it out LEEE, let me know your thoughts. During the film, I just became a bit disappointed with the direction taken. It was as if those involved had everything to make a successful animation but was one scene away from doing so. Throughout the film you get that notion...that they had all of the ideas but with each scene it seemed as if they would get there but by the end of the scene, you realized they didn't, so you hope by the next one, they will.

But only $7 million? Where were the children this weekend? With parents watching Paranormal Activity? Watching Saw VI?
Whispers68
Whispers68 - 10/26/2009, 11:05 AM
@Sirprize

I think people like me were disappointed due to the overwhelming amount of coverage of how this is the scariest movie of all time, you won't sleep at night, etc. I wasn't on the edge of my seat afraid so that's perhaps why some were let down. Nonetheless, I enjoyed it because I feel it has been on the short list of "horror" films that is actually meant to frighten you and not throw cliche deaths of teenagers caused by a mass murderer. I also enjoy the level of fear others depicted while watching it. But I can see why you disliked it

They now want to do a sequel. The director actually said he has material to create it. My thing is, why? You saw what happened with Blair Witch 2. Besides, what's the point of creating a sequel? This is the kind of story that is best told once, not twice. But Hollywood saw the film was made with $11 thousand but has made over $65 million thus far...that's Hollywood talk for sequel ideas.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 10/26/2009, 12:07 PM
You no like Sirprize? I'm surprized! I really enjoyed it. It put the hairs on my neck up.. something most "horror"(if i can steal Whispers coma's!)movies these days never do. It was slow moving but the build up worked for me. It was refreshing not to see screen fulls of gore and splatter with absolutely no tension behind it(Friday, Halloween(remakes), Saw) Plus, I really lost myself in the plot, it was filmed so well you kind of forget that your not watching a real home video. Anyway, it creeped me out!
Stumblin
Stumblin - 10/26/2009, 12:47 PM
Good review, I was wondering how this movie played out. Probably wait until it's out on DVD.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 10/26/2009, 12:51 PM
hah, yes Tea, the X rated directors cut! We get to find out exactly where those ass guns go to!
Shaman
Shaman - 10/26/2009, 1:15 PM
This kinda sucks cause it means that the best ever animation studio will close their doors. I really hope that Nickelodeon buys IMAGI and keep them for their newly acquired TMNT franchise ;)

Budget doesn't permit me to see this at the theaters but i sure will get the DVD!
Whispers68
Whispers68 - 10/26/2009, 1:45 PM
@shaman

That's my biggest fear...well, not fear but concern due to the first weekend's box office domestically. Other outlets have also mentioned how this financial matter could mean the end of Imagi. I really don't blame them but in this current economy, you can't afford a lackluster opening for a film with a budget of tens of millions. I loved TMNT but perhaps overseas the film will do better and with the DVD/Blu-ray release.

@Ror

The filming is what allows the movie in my opinion to be as successful as it has been, along with word of mouth and the marketing/buzz (tons of emails sent to me about the movie, front page Yahoo news article on how scary it is). While watching it, as you said, you get the idea that it isn't just a theatrical film with huge effects but it seems reality based. No gore, no boobs and no cliché characters found in slasher films. I just hope he leaves the story at this and forget this sequel idea he has in mind.
shibazz
shibazz - 10/26/2009, 1:47 PM
Yeah Paranormal Activity was pretty cool.... i tricked my GF into thinking it was actual footage that i found online. She was totally freaked afterwards and i had to prove that it was not real so she could sleep ;)
Shaman
Shaman - 10/26/2009, 1:59 PM
Man, i really really wanna see Paranormal Activity... Sounds better everytime i hear about it. I actually liked The First Blair Witch Project. After so many people telling me it was shit, i watched it and thought it was actually awesome. It's like midget porn, you hear so much shit about it but when you actually see it, you can truly marvel at it's magnificence :P
Betty
Betty - 10/26/2009, 2:53 PM
shibazz--Ha! That's great.

Shaman-- I liked Blaire Witch also. It was the first of its kind I believe.
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 10/26/2009, 5:58 PM
Thats cool man, great article!!
shibazz
shibazz - 10/26/2009, 11:37 PM
@Shaman- i have never seen true midget porn. enlighten me :)
Imran
Imran - 10/27/2009, 4:10 AM
lol @Shaman
Shaman
Shaman - 10/27/2009, 6:02 AM
Well shibz, i guess you have to witness it to marvel at it. It has it's own charm, an acquired taste you might say ;P
Related Headlines
Shieldofpower
Aug 07, 2011 06:08 AM
legionbecks
Nov 17, 2009 12:11 AM
Whispers68
Oct 25, 2009 10:10 PM
bsprecher
Oct 21, 2009 03:10 PM
View Recorder