The Dark Knight Trilogy Reviews Part 1: BATMAN BEGINS

The Dark Knight Trilogy Reviews Part 1: BATMAN BEGINS

A seven year journey from the depths of a Bhutanese prison to the Batcave. The first in a series of reviews of Christopher Nolan's The Dark Knight Trilogy.

Review Opinion
By TheGothamKnight1939 - Aug 01, 2012 11:08 PM EST
Filed Under: Batman

The Dark Knight Trilogy. A seven year journey from the depths of a Bhutanese prison to the Batcave. A journey showcasing the triumph of good over evil and the consequences that arise from trying to stop it. It’s a story about fear, chaos, pain, love, corruption, the consequences of your actions, power and overcoming obstacles. So, now that the trilogy has wrapped up, I thought it’d be a good time to give my own reviews of each film. This is the first of three reviews coming for the trilogy.

Batman Begins


Batman Begins introduced a radically new interpretation (for film) of the Batman story, grounds him in a heightened reality similar to our own and shows what it truly means for someone to take on the duty as a city’s protector.

Batman Begins was no doubt going to be an improvement on the previous instalment, I don’t think there was a possibility that it could be worse than Batman and Robin, but no one knew if it was going to be better than Burton’s Batman and Batman Returns or Schumacher’s Batman Forever. For a lot of fans, this was the best thing to happen to the Batman franchise. It brought more weight to the character, and even started a whole new era of comic book movies. Without Begins, we wouldn’t have Iron Man, The Incredible Hulk or the rest of the MCU. Begins was, and is, the template for origin stories. In fact, it is widely regarded as the best on screen origin story (it’s major competition being Iron Man).



Story:
The story of Batman Begins is the journey of Bruce Wayne. Taking inspiration from Year One and The Man Who Falls, Nolan and Goyer crafted one of the best stories of a man becoming a legend that has been told. Bruce Wayne is lost after the death of his parents and travels the world to learn how to fight injustice in Gotham City. On his travels, he meets Ra’s al Ghul and trains under him for years. Though, this apprenticeship is broken when Bruce is asked to kill a man. Instead, he burns down the temple and escapes. He travels back to Gotham and begins his mission to become a legend. With access to the Wayne Enterprises Applied Sciences Department, courtesy of Lucius Fox, and help from the James Gordon, he takes on both the Scarecrow and Ra’s al Ghul. The story, for me, gets an 8/10. The first and second acts were some of the best Batman moments on screen and it crafts a wonderful origin story that will likely be used as a model for years to come. But, around the third act, it begins to kind of fall a bit flat. It was just a little predictable. 8/10


Acting:


Another major component to this film was the acting. The acting in this film is simply phenomenal from most of the actors and actresses in this movie. Christian Bale plays the best on screen interpretation of Batman to date, playing his three personalities with ease. He plays the billionaire playboy, which was missing in most of the older movies for me, Batman and the more casual Bruce Wayne. Each personality feels like a real person.


Every other actor plays their role extremely well. But, the standout performance from the supporting cast, in my eyes, is Gary Oldman. He absolutely nails James Gordon to a T. His looks, his characterizations, everything. The character was one of my favourite parts of this movie. In this trilogy, Jim Gordon is the heart and soul. Well, him and…

Michael Caine as Alfred. Michael Caine, in everything I’ve seen him in, has never had a bad performance. He gives it his all each and every time. And his role as Alfred is no exception. He plays the role with a heart and soul, bringing more emotional weight to the franchise.

Liam Neeson as Ra’s al Ghul/Henri Ducard. Liam Neeson is a fantastic actor, even when in one of the worst pieces of garbage imaginable (Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace). His acting was one of the few positives in that movie. He’s often seen as a protagonist, or as another heroic role. Ra’s/Ducard, to my knowledge, was his first villain role and he did it amazingly. Liam brought the character to life on screen and did it perfectly.

One of the threads in every film of the trilogy, Scarecrow, is played by Cillian Murphy. And this portrayal of Crane is absolutely perfect. He looked and acted as I imagined Scarecrow would, given the circumstances. He was always a pleasure to see on screen.

Now, for my biggest gripe in the movie, Katie Holmes as Rachel Dawes. I don’t know, something about me just didn’t like her. Maybe it was the writing? Maybe it was her acting? I don’t know, there was just something about her that just put me off. Possibly the fact she was too self-righteous to seem a real person. She was just too one dimensional for me.

Morgan Freeman brought an excellent performance as Lucius Fox, seeming to leap right off the pages of the comic books and graphic novels. There is simply no one I can see surpassing him as Lucius Fox in a future film, he just is the character.
The acting for this film gets: 9/10.



Villains:
Let’s start off with the major villain in the movie, Ra’s al Ghul (Ducard). Ra’s is a great villain. He’s an eco-terrorist, he (in this interpretation, I’m not sure about if this is done in any comics) trains Bruce, he’s his physical equal. The two of them are fighting for the same cause, to purge the world (and Gotham City, specifically here) from crime. But, while Bruce does this without killing and keeping to a moral code, Ra’s has no moral code. He will drive a city insane to have it destroy itself in order to achieve his goals. One interesting question that isn’t answered is this: Is Ducard always Ra’s? Or is Ra’s al Ghul a title? Did Ducard just inherit that title after Bruce accidently killed the other Ra’s? Or was he Ra’s the whole time? I’m going to assume he was Ra’s the whole time, because of certain events in the third. But, it could have been a name change. He could have changed his name to Ra’s al Ghul from Ducard. Seeing as this trilogy is over, we’ll never know. Ra’s is a fantastic villain, but he is one of this franchise’s weakest. Liam portrayed him perfectly and he was written spot on but he just doesn’t match up to the likes of The Joker and Bane. So, for that, I give Ra’s 4/5.


Scarecrow is a thread that runs through the entire series but this is when he has a major starring role. He’s clever, cunning and sneaky. To me, this was Scarecrow right out of the comics (albeit with costume changes). He, like Batman, used fear as a weapon. But, unlike Batman, he had not embraced his fears. He was still afraid of bats, and Batman, as shown when Batman is his worst nightmare after he got gassed with fear toxin. But, Crane really is a minor villain in the grand scheme of things. He is taken out rather quickly and besides getting the toxin into the water supply, he doesn’t do too much. He’s a great character but out of the villains in this series, he’s probably the second weakest. I love him, but I’m going to give him a 3.5/5.


Soundtrack:


Hans Zimmer and James Newton Howard, as with everyone involved with this film, bring their A game to this film. They crafts one of my all-time favourite scores, with themes of it echoes in both follow up soundtracks for the sequel films. Music is an often overlooked element of storytelling. Music can set a mood without words and without pictures. Fast paced music implies an action sequence and gets us in the mood for that even without a visual aid. Hans Zimmer and James Newton Howard perfectly set the tone in this film with their score. And that is why the score gets a 10/10.

Direction:

The proper director is crucial for a film. It can make a film (Whedon and Avengers) or it can break a film (Schumacher and Batman). Christopher Nolan seemed like an odd choice, given his previous picture, Memento. But, this gamble paid off in the end with one of the greatest comic book films and the greatest origin film yet. The cinematography by Wally Pfister is simply amazing. The production design is perfect. Gotham, for the first time, feels like a real, breathing city. It was nice to see Batman return to his darker roots after the campy Batman and Robin. It was also and interesting decision to base Batman in a heightened reality based on the real world. The fight scenes in this film are often criticized for being too distracting and making it unable to figure out what's going on in the scene, though I never actually felt that way. The direction for this film gets a 10/10.


Issues:
Now, I love this film, as you can probably guess, but does it have its flaws? Yes. First of all, Bruce Wayne has a no kill policy. I can understand Ra’s because Ra’s killed himself by destroying the controls of the train. But, he did burn down the temple in the mountains. That at least killed the farmer he refused to murder. Then there had to casualties from the amount of ninjas inside. I can understand a lot escaping, but at least some had to die. Then there’s the biggest casting mistake in this franchise: Katie Holmes as Rachel Dawes. Chalk this up to poor writing for her character or Katie’s acting (or both) but I never could really buy Rachel in this movie. She was too good to be real. She was too clean cut. She barely had any personality to her. Also, how did Scarecrow survive the concentrated dosage that Rachel got when he didn’t get an antidote? For this one, I’m going to assume that he got an antidote off screen, but it still bothers me.


Act 1 Notes:
-After the scene with the death of Bruce’s parents, I didn’t notice until this viewing that when he’s sitting in the GCPD, he has his father’s jacket on. It’s way too big for him and hangs around him like a cape, Batman’s cape. It occurred to me that maybe the cape is more than just a glider, maybe it’s a tribute to his father’s murder. Maybe it’s to remind him of his father’s embrace and as a tribute to the protective blanket that Thomas Wayne tried to cover Gotham with.


Act 2 Notes:
-It occurred to me while watching this time that the mention of the civil war ties into the themes of the film. It’s a small beat but it ties into the larger picture of the series, that right and wrong are a constant flow and is being fought every day on every level of society.


Act 3 Notes:
-I find it funny that Bruce finds a stethoscope in the ashes of Wayne Manor. His father was a doctor, so it makes sense but what I find funny about it is its usage. A stethoscope is used to listen to one’s heart. Not only does Bruce learn to listen to his own heart in this movie, but the heart of Gotham. As we are reminded by Thomas Wayne, Wayne Tower is in the heart of Gotham City. Bruce is the heart of Gotham City.





The revival of the Batman franchise gets a 44.5/50.

Do you agree with my review? Do you disagree? Let me know in the comments down below. Thanks for reading.
BANE And DEATHSTROKE Live-Action Movie In Development At DC Studios
Related:

BANE And DEATHSTROKE Live-Action Movie In Development At DC Studios

Hayden Christensen Responds To BATMAN Rumors And Explains Why Darth Vader Would Beat Thanos
Recommended For You:

Hayden Christensen Responds To BATMAN Rumors And Explains Why Darth Vader Would Beat Thanos

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

TheGothamKnight1939
TheGothamKnight1939 - 8/2/2012, 12:20 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p3XXZMD4q78

I'm pretty sure that's Ra's hand but I suppose it could be Batman's too, they're both wearing black gloves.

To the MCU thing, I'm more referring to the success of the MCU. Jon Favreau even said that an inspiration for Iron Man was Batman Begins. I mean that it launched a new, successful style to Superhero films (that started with X Men and Spiderman but really came in full storm after Begins).

Also, prepare to disagree loads in the future.
TheGothamKnight1939
TheGothamKnight1939 - 8/2/2012, 12:25 AM
Alright, I'll take that explanation. I redact my statement then about Ra's sealing his own fate.
Mime
Mime - 8/2/2012, 12:47 AM
GK@ Thumbs up :)
TheGothamKnight1939
TheGothamKnight1939 - 8/2/2012, 3:34 AM
And I redact my redaction. I thought I might have been the only one thinking it was Ra's, hence my redaction in the first place. Thank you, itbegins2005, for also saying it's Ra's, I thought I might just be seeing things since it's pretty early in the morning.
marvel72
marvel72 - 8/2/2012, 3:37 AM
batman begins & the dark knight are equal too me but if i had to pick one in would be batman begins.

-best batman costume
-best villains(two we've never seen before)
-best chase sequence(in the tumbler)
-best origin(from death of parents to ra's al ghul training)
-best bat-cave(he actually had one unlike the dark knight)
-best rachel dawes
-best batman voice(not too over the top)
-best soundtrack

batman begins 4/5
CPBuff22
CPBuff22 - 8/2/2012, 4:25 AM
Best Movie Of The Trilogy.
TheBigBoss917
TheBigBoss917 - 8/2/2012, 4:28 AM
@Spidey23 TASM is still better?

Coachella
Coachella - 8/2/2012, 5:21 AM
I love this film so much. It started it all for me. I got my first job at a movie theather. This was the first film I saw multiple times. The first time I saw it i knew right there that Batman was my favorite Charachter of Alltime!!!
KingEmperor
KingEmperor - 8/2/2012, 5:45 AM
Great review. Can't wait to read about the sequels.
BillyM67
BillyM67 - 8/2/2012, 6:21 AM
My only issue with the review is the score, which I believe is too low and here's why: Ra’s al Ghul, based on your own review, should have gotten a 5/5 and I believe you missed the point of the Scarecrow, even though your own description said it. He was not supposed to be a major character as Ra’s al Ghul had used him as a decoy. If he did some damage, great, but the main plan really didn't include him. He was suppose to poison people with his gas and get the mental patience out to keep the cops busy while Ra’s al Ghul released the toxin to the city as a whole. I would give Scarecrow 4.5/5. I had a couple of other small issues with the scoring. My score: 48.5/50
comicb00kguy
comicb00kguy - 8/2/2012, 6:43 AM
This film is brilliantly summarized here. Funny as hell, but a bit profane, so keep it down at work.

batmanmovie2012
batmanmovie2012 - 8/2/2012, 6:56 AM
Nice review look forward to your next 2
cself85
cself85 - 8/2/2012, 8:33 AM
@TDK98 and itbegins2005-I urge you both to watch the train scene again. It is SO CLEARLY Batman who takes out the controls. His whole plan involved crashing the train so that the machine would be destroyed. He is not responsible for Ra's death because he didn't put Ra's on the train. But SaintSpidey is right, Ra's is CLEARLY surprised that the controls are busted. Why the hell would Ra's say "that's why you can't stop this train" when he already made it so it couldn't be stopped?! Batman says "who said anything about stopping it?" because HE destroyed the controls. Sheesh. It isn't open to interpretation. Sorry to come off as rude, but if you're going to have a front page article, then get your facts right. Way too much bullshit gets put up on the front page if you ask me.
GoILL
GoILL - 8/2/2012, 9:03 AM
Good review GK.
WorldsGreatestdetective
WorldsGreatestdetective - 8/2/2012, 9:04 AM
I remember being 12 years old and no one would take me to the theatre to see this movie. I was always upset about it and I was stuck watching it one day over my uncle's house on a recorded (bootleg bought) version after a month it had been in cinema. Before watching it my cousin (who is two years younger) had said he still enjoyed Batman 89' more and he had seen it in theatres. But just watching this handheld recorded terrible quality DVD I knew it was not only the best version of Batman on the big screen but the best Comicbookfilm to that date. And that is why after this movie I became a nolanite (saw prestige in theatres) and was thrilled with the first image of the Joker released in the build up for TDK while a lot of others didn't like it. Once TDK came around, I saw it 10 times in theatres in tribute for not seeing Begins in Theatres. Will always remember Batman Begins that made me the hardcore Batman fan that I am
WorldsGreatestdetective
WorldsGreatestdetective - 8/2/2012, 9:04 AM
And good Review Gotham Knight
SpiderFan35
SpiderFan35 - 8/2/2012, 9:27 AM
Very nice review GK. I look forward to the next ones.

Best film of the trilogy, BB batsuit ftw!

And Spidey23, let's just agree that TASM was the best Spider-man movie to come out since 2007 :P But best CBM of this year? Umm, no.
TheGothamKnight1939
TheGothamKnight1939 - 8/2/2012, 11:02 AM
@BillyM67

I understand that but the point I'm trying to make is he just doesn't hold up as much as some of the trilogies other villains (Two Face, Joker and even Ra's). I loved the character but I really didn't feel I could give him any more simply for the fact that he just doesn't hold up as well as some of the others. But alas, it's like trying to pick your favourite child. Even when you do, you're not sure if you made the right decision.
TheGothamKnight1939
TheGothamKnight1939 - 8/2/2012, 11:03 AM
@Godzillafart

Ah, yes, I'll be honest, I expected that you'd come and put in your opinion after you saw a Begins review up. Though we highly disagree in our opinions over the film, thank you for the compliment and I hope you enjoy the others a bit more.
mrknowitall
mrknowitall - 8/2/2012, 11:13 AM
Personally, I don't understand how someone over the age of 12 can enjoy a marvel movie. Saying that Thor is better than Batman Begins is BLASPHEMY and it seriously makes me lose faith in humanity. It certainly dissolves any credibility that rotten tomatoes may have had. It is silly to compare Batman Begins with any other superhero movie (aside from TDK and TDKR ofcourse) because BB actually gives us a story with believebale characters and zero camp. The problem with marvel movies is they try to appeal to a really wide range of age groups which always results in a cliche, campy, predictable waste of time.
On another note I have seen this movie over a million times and have, until reading these comments, believed that it was Batman who destroyed the controls on the train. I made this assumption based on Ra's al-Ghoul's surprised face. But upon close examination, it is clear that the person who destroyed the controls is wearing a black jacket rather than a batsuit, so it must be Ra's. He was only surprised to see the rails ahead falling down as a result of Gordon taking them down.
I
mrknowitall
mrknowitall - 8/2/2012, 2:17 PM
Godzillafart, you are obviously a hater. Saying Iron Man is better than Batman Begins in any way makes me want to put my life on an indefinite hold so that I could puke for my remaining years.

@TheGothamKnight98
It never really says that what Batman gave the Scarecrow was the same concentrated formula that the Scarecrow had given to Rachel. You can just easily assume that it was just the same stuff from the earlier segments of the movie like what was given to Falcone for instance.
TheGothamKnight1939
TheGothamKnight1939 - 8/2/2012, 2:19 PM
@mrknowitall

It seems that it was, since it was fired from the same (whatever he fires it out of) hidden up his sleeve.
TheGothamKnight1939
TheGothamKnight1939 - 8/2/2012, 3:53 PM
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/gothamnewsandreviews/news/?a=65024
CapitanAmerika2
CapitanAmerika2 - 8/3/2012, 11:01 PM
Actually I would say this is my fave yet (I havent seen The Dark Knight Rises yet), but Liam Neeson is my fave actor of all time so yes I consider his Ra's al Ghul better than Heath Ledger's Joker, and unlike most of you people I loved Katie Holmes as Rachel Dawes- waaaayyy better than Maggie's.
View Recorder