Alan Moore Should Grow Up

Alan Moore Should Grow Up

With his reaction to the Watchmen prequels titled Before Watchmen, Alan Moore has reminded me why I don't extend the same affection for him as I do his creations.

Editorial Opinion
By ironpool007 - Feb 01, 2012 06:02 PM EST
Filed Under: Comics

I'm gonna come right out and say it. Alan Moore is a tool. He is miserable, egotistical, mean spirited asshole, who really does not not how to act.

Today we all found out that DC Comics would be moving forward with an initiative called Before Watchmen. It would consist of several prequel mini series about different characters from the original story. It was pretty cool seeing who would be handling the comics and what they all had to say about getting to work with huge characters. Even David Gibbons came out and gave the projects his blessing.

And then Alan Moore came out.

In typical Moore fashion, he once again proved himself to be ignorant and immature. He talked about about how he did not want the project to happen, and that he thought it was pathetic that DC was still using his ideas to make a buck. Now I'm not saying Moore is not entitled to have his own opinion, but every time he has come out and condemned an attempt to expand or adapt one of his works, he always comes off as having no credibility. Alan Moore never sat in on meetings with these creators to see what they are conjuring up. He does not know not what they have in store for his characters. Who knows, maybe he may have liked what he he heard, and even helped out. The same can be said for how he blasted Zack Snyder's film adaption of Watchmen. The man is close minded, and does not even consider that an adaption of his could be executed in a positive manner. It's like these people who make them are beneath him in his eyes. Who knows maybe if he popped Watchmen into his DVD player one night, he might actually see the love and care that Zack Snyder put into the movie. Sure, he may hate it too, but at least he would have watched it through, and would not come off as someone talking out of their ass. Hell, even V For Vendetta, which altered the story from the comic, still was respectful to the story from the comics, and kept the book's central themes. Sure, League of Extraordinary Gentlemen did not pan out so well, but that's just one movie. The others did pretty decent jobs of remaining true to the source.

It should also be noted that Alan Moore signed a contract along with David Gibbons that stated the rights to Watchmen would only revert back to them if DC did not use the property in some way for a year's time. DC has held up their end of the bargain and used the property with reprints, the movie, games, and now with prequels, so Moore is not owed anything more than the royalties he initially got for writing the comic in the first place. Also, if Moore really wanted to to have control over what happened with Watchmen, then he really should had a little more common sense than to publish the series at DC. He should have self published it with Gibbons. I mean what did he think would happen? DC and Marvel exist to create characters that will last for years and develop into franchises. Moore has written characters that were created by other writers himself.

I just wish Moore would have a more open mind to people doing adaptions and expansions of his work. Sure there is money to made from these projects, but the creators involved come at these projects from a place of love and respect, and it's disheartening and frankly a little troubling that Alan Moore can not understand that.
ASTONISHING X-MEN And PLANETARY Artist John Cassaday Has Passed Away Aged 52
Related:

ASTONISHING X-MEN And PLANETARY Artist John Cassaday Has Passed Away Aged 52

X-MEN: GRAND DESIGN & RED ROOM Writer/Artist Ed Piskor Passes Away From Apparent Suicide
Recommended For You:

X-MEN: GRAND DESIGN & RED ROOM Writer/Artist Ed Piskor Passes Away From Apparent Suicide

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4
BIGBMH
BIGBMH - 2/1/2012, 7:40 PM
The guys needs to get a good talk from Stan Lee.
CraptainAmerica
CraptainAmerica - 2/2/2012, 2:59 AM
I, almost, agree with what he says. If somebody makes a great movie I HATE it when they churn out a sequel/prequel just to make more bucks...regardless of whether it's any good or does it's predecessor any justice.

However, he signed to rights over so he must have known DC's intention. He was most probably paid a tidy sum for the pleasure.

My issue with Alan Moore is that he has no tact.Because he's such an artsy fartsy kinda guy he thinks it's clever to be rude and snobby. It doesn't wash with me. I hate to compare but Stan Lee has had some of his beloved work made into some seriously shitty comics AND movies but understands the evolution of the market.

He's humble and proud but never a bighead or sourpuss. Alan Moore is in danger, from most of us, of losing his legendary status. I just don't get why he has to be such a c**t all the time...ALL OF THE TIME!
Orphix
Orphix - 2/2/2012, 3:28 AM
Alan Moore's main beef is always with the, original, fact that both DC and Marvel busted his balls and fleeced him when he was working for them.

Then they take his ideas and profit from them considerably in ways that, creatively, Moore is either not interested in or downright appalled by.

Do we need more Watchmen? Do we need films, prequels, sequels, etc? It was meant to be a standalone, one off story told in the format of the comicbook. It was his story, his characters, an exploration of those ideas - so without his imput doesn't anything else lack any credibilty?

Those who say he based his Watchmen on various other characters that originally existed are missing the point. Remember he turned the whole comicbook world on its head. The whole concept was only loosely based on what had happened before. DC want to actually take the Watchmen and explore the characters Moore came up with and take them some place else, without his blessing, after a film has comeout to make lots of money.
ironpool007
ironpool007 - 2/2/2012, 7:02 AM
@CraptainAmerica: what you said is exactly what I'm getting at. Alan Moore acts like a snobish douchebag, and that is why he lost my respect. If he were to take a different less assonine tone in his statements, then I'd respect him more. But he is a judgemental guy who thinks people are beneath him, so from now on when I read his stuff, I ignore thar he even wrote it.
comicoverlord
comicoverlord - 2/2/2012, 7:49 AM
Alan Moore's intelligence dwarfs most of the people who are going to comment on this article. You may not like him, but he is responsible for most of the comics that my generation considers canon today. He is smarter than you. Better educated. If he sees no reason for his original (albeit derived) graphic novel to be expanded upon then at least give him the benefit of being the source and not a dumb, uninformed opinion.
comicoverlord
comicoverlord - 2/2/2012, 7:51 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iH7gSkuNBzc
comicoverlord
comicoverlord - 2/2/2012, 7:52 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CuaWu2uhmRQ&feature=related
RaleighAntrobus
RaleighAntrobus - 2/2/2012, 7:53 AM
... Yet, it's his idea. His creation.

Although I truly don't care what DC does with the "Watchmen" characters at this point, I pretty much back Moore 110%.

All people seem to care about is pumping this stuff out however possible. There's such a thing called "letting sleeping dogs lay" and some of this stuff becomes less creative/interesting when it's constantly being retooled, rebooted, rewritten, reimagined, etc.

For example, why do we need an American adaptation of "Akira"!??!!

"Alan Moore acts like a snobish douchebag..."

Newsflash people: This is how most artists behave and it's understandable that they'd have strong feelings towards their work. Their craft. It's a primary extension of who they are.

Moore made "Watchmen", not DC Comics. He shouldn't have to shut the f*ck up; especially when they're making money off his idea.
australiancomicbookmoviefan
australiancomicbookmoviefan - 2/2/2012, 7:53 AM
@Orphix

I do see what you're saying, but really he wrote for both publishers and not only created his own characters, but wrote on series about characters created by other people.

So I ask you what's the difference?
StrangerX
StrangerX - 2/2/2012, 7:57 AM
I don't blame him.
WaylonJones
WaylonJones - 2/2/2012, 7:59 AM
I understand what he is saying, because he created the characters and only wants what he thinks is best for them. But like the article pointed out if he wanted to ensure that he should have made sure that he kept the rights to the series......oh well though.....
......what ya gonna do?
hoodedjester
hoodedjester - 2/2/2012, 8:01 AM
I find the man interesting but he does need to quit his whiney bitching every time someone in the industry mentions his books and doing something with it. Take it as a compliment that someone turns your work into a movie or decides to tell more stories with your characters.

I for one would love to see more books about Ror and Night Owl and their old adventures.
comicoverlord
comicoverlord - 2/2/2012, 8:02 AM
I can't speak for everyone here, nor would I care to, but the culture in the US is growing more anti-intellectual, anti-integrity and when we see someone holding on to those things, we seem to bash the sh!t out of them.
Rodimus9
Rodimus9 - 2/2/2012, 8:04 AM
Nobody cares about substance anymore and it's all about profit. They're going to create these prequels to suck every last drop outa this franchise because the new "52" isn't working out as well as they thought and they need to generate the projected numbers too keep their jobs. I could care less either way. But don't give the man sh!t for speaking his mind on his created property.
JoshWilding
JoshWilding - 2/2/2012, 8:05 AM
ellispart3
ellispart3 - 2/2/2012, 8:07 AM
Moore has a point. He deserves to be mad and pissed at the big two. He isn't going to lose his legend status because he hated that his projects (cut the BS about being rightful owned by the publisher, Moore created the series). As stated in the article, he is entitled to his opinion. He has expressed his opinion very passionately. For some reason we keep asking him or shoving a mic in his face when something he was apart of is adapted or expanded and expecting the his opinion to change.

In all honesty, I don't mind the expansion of the Watchmen. You can't ruin the original story (figuratively speaking). Regardless if the new series has Rorschach singing in the streets with a bedazzled trench coat, it doesn't change the words that Moore wrote and the panels that Gibbons drew. If this new series is good, then all the better.
TheBigBoss917
TheBigBoss917 - 2/2/2012, 8:12 AM
It's really ridiculous, Alan Moore created Watchmen and its a great book, Bob Kane created Batman, so is he the only person in the world who can make anything related to batman? Absolutely not, some of the best stories come from people who didn't create him and that goes for pretty much every Marvel and DC Superhero. Zack Snyder made his film adaption and perhaps made the best comic book adaption ever and Moore didn't even bother to watch and discredited it without even watching it. He's really ignorant and he needs to see not everybody are money grubbing bastards. the writers for the new stories will have heart and respect for the source material.
ADrockDO
ADrockDO - 2/2/2012, 8:27 AM
I understand where Alan Moore is coming from ... it's his brain-child. That being said, however, if he is/was so emphatic about noone EVER touching his work, he should have never published it with a major company. Last time I checked, being intelligent and imaginative does not give you the right to snub everyone else's work.
Let's take this in another direction ... Anyone ever hear a little song called "All Along the Watchtower"? I'm sure you're hearing Jimi Hendrix's voice in your head right now ... but you might not know that the song was originally written and performed by Bob Dylan. Anyone think Bob Dylan today would say that he didn't want his song to be covered by Hendrix? Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery people ... Alan Moore should know that by now. Plus, a true artist would really invite the idea of other artists interpreting his/her work through their own processes. In short, Alan Moore just is not embracing the artistic creativity of his fellow community.
Sure, it very well may be that someone is trying to make an extra buck off another's work, but we do live in a capitalist country. If you're so displeased with it, I suggest you move to North Korea.
Hawksblueyes
Hawksblueyes - 2/2/2012, 8:31 AM
comicoverlorythingd: Everything you said may be true. However, that in no way excuses him for or gives him the right to be the moron he so often makes of himself.

As good as his work is, every time I see something this goofball has to say, it taints the way I think about it.
Spartan11
Spartan11 - 2/2/2012, 8:35 AM
In comics most characters and ideas get re-imagined and played with by other writers. What makes Watchmen or any of any of Alan Moore's work any different? Wasn't Watchmen created to make money in the first place?
BlindLemonShemp
BlindLemonShemp - 2/2/2012, 8:36 AM
Alan Moore is a badass... maybe instead of going on an e-rant you should just grow up and respect the brilliant Alan Moore and his feelings and decisions regarding HIS work...

i tell ya, these new teenybopper fanboys aint got no respect...
PapaEmeritus
PapaEmeritus - 2/2/2012, 8:38 AM
Alan Moore is a genius, and who wrote this editorial is an idiot. Grow up? Don't you know his body of work? So shut up.
Spartan11
Spartan11 - 2/2/2012, 8:38 AM
Hasn't Alan Moore done work on charaters that weren't his creations?
PartyHard
PartyHard - 2/2/2012, 8:40 AM
The story of Watchmen is done. There is no reason to continue it. There is nothing to add to it. This really does just take comics one step farther away from being legitimate literature.
Ancar
Ancar - 2/2/2012, 8:40 AM
The characters rights are DC's, end of question. Moore didn't create any of them, just made his interpretation alongside Gibbons.

He's not the Watchmen owner, but DC Comics.
Hawksblueyes
Hawksblueyes - 2/2/2012, 8:43 AM
Spartan11: Excellent statement. As much as it pisses Moore off to have someone even suggest continuing his work, he has no problem whatsoever continuing someone elses.
Spartan11
Spartan11 - 2/2/2012, 8:48 AM
Exactly Hawksblueyes. Even the league of Extraordinary Gentlemen was built upon and expanded others people ideas.
Shellac
Shellac - 2/2/2012, 8:58 AM
I love DC comics, but I am with Moore on this. If Watchmen is considered a piece of art the creator(s) of that piece of art should have their opinion respected. Comics is an odd medium in that monster size business' show little regard for the opinion of artists whose creations are now the cornerstone of their existence.
Minstrik
Minstrik - 2/2/2012, 9:13 AM
What would Spider-Man, Superman, Batman, X-Men, etc. be without the plethora of writers and artists giving us their interpretation of the characters? I enjoyed Watchmen (both graphic novel and movie, despite some petty complaints) but the characters and story aren't THAT unique and special. Same goes for Moore's other characters/creations. I dig 'em but am more interested to see where they go now (or, with the prequals, where they have been).
fanboy03191
fanboy03191 - 2/2/2012, 9:19 AM
Moore needs to realize that he's not the only one with ideas. Look at characters like Spider-Man, and the Fantastic Four. They've thrived with different talent coming in to take the reins at one point in time. Moore needs to relax, and take some notes from Stan Lee. He needs to enjoy the royalties he's making off one of the greatest graphic novels ever published, and just keep his damned mouth shut. You don't see Stan the man coming out and bashing the clone saga or BND.
1 2 3 4
View Recorder