Star Trek 2 May Be Pushed Back Until Holidays Of 2012

Star Trek 2 May Be Pushed Back Until Holidays Of 2012

Paramount had originally wanted to put the Star Trek sequel out on June 29, 2012, but a recent report is saying it is unlikely that it will reach that date and could be pushed back until the holiday season.

By WaylonJones - May 24, 2011 06:05 PM EST
Filed Under: Star Trek
Source: Deadline



JJ Abrams's Super 8 will be released on June 10, 2011 and it is expected that he will announce his intent to direct Star Trek sequel after the movie is released. Paramount was shooting for a June 29, 2012 release date for Star Trek leaving Abrams just 13 months to get the movie made and released. Deadline is reporting that Paramount may push it's intended release date back for the film to sometime in the holiday season of 2012.



Reports Deadline:

Paramount isn't confirming any of this, but I'm told that there soon should be good news and bad news on the Star Trek sequel front. The good news: With his film Super 8 set for release June 10, JJ Abrams is expected to announce shortly his return as director of Star Trek 2. The bad news: Even moving at warp speed, Abrams will be hard pressed to make the June 29, 2012 release date that the studio set for the film. I'm told that the move being considered right now is to push Trek back for a Holiday 2012 release.


Nothing official has been said but it looks like we may not see our friends on the USS Enterprise until Christmas of next year.

free twitter icons
Quentin Tarantino Finally Explains Why His R-Rated STAR TREK Movie Is Never Going To Happen
Related:

Quentin Tarantino Finally Explains Why His R-Rated STAR TREK Movie Is "Never Going To Happen"

STAR TREK: Colm Meaney On Possible Miles O'Brien Return And What He REALLY Thinks About Trekkies (Exclusive)
Recommended For You:

STAR TREK: Colm Meaney On Possible Miles O'Brien Return And What He REALLY Thinks About Trekkies (Exclusive)

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

PaulRom
PaulRom - 5/24/2011, 6:35 PM
I'm honestly not surprised. As much as I wanna see it come out ASAP, pushing it back some would make sense, seeing a script isn't even finalized yet.
But holidays sounds too far back, I was thinking fall or something.
Dynamo
Dynamo - 5/24/2011, 6:47 PM
Oh for [frick]'s sake. I can't handle this, Superman and Hobbit coming out around the same time. One of them is gonna underperform and if it's Superman it may be likely that we won't see the character come back for a long time.
Treebeard
Treebeard - 5/24/2011, 8:25 PM
eff!
Spectre94
Spectre94 - 5/24/2011, 8:42 PM
I love Star Trek. Better to come out later and be good than quickly and suck or not come out at all
LP4
LP4 - 5/24/2011, 10:50 PM
[frick] Abrams.
Gamester76
Gamester76 - 5/25/2011, 6:41 AM
im not saying this is good news in any way, shape, or form for Man of Steel. It's definitely gonna get killed by Star Trek II and The Hobbit, but this may also benefit Star Trek II. the last one was an arguable masterpiece. if Abrams can make lightning strike twice, a December release could increase Star Trek's Oscar chances.
LP4
LP4 - 5/25/2011, 3:26 PM
@GDSuperguy- Sorry dude but NO. Abrams would have killed Supes worse than Singer did. Abrams pitched a script for a Superman film he wanted to make and it sounded [frick]ing terrible.

I mean come on...Jor-El committing suicide while imprisoned ?

WTF?
LP4
LP4 - 5/27/2011, 6:52 PM
@WittySupername- Yep, the lex from krypton thing was just fu*king pathetic.

I don't ever want Abrams anywhere near a Superman film. He'll try to go all Star Wars-esque. He tried to delve too deep into the scifi aspects of Superman. But Supes isn't solely SCIFI. He is a mix of scifi/fantasy and a bit of real-world (his upbringing on a kansas farm and being grounded in Metropolis are examples of his real-world settings)

Abrams seemed to wanna make Superman PURELY Scifi and that's just wrong to do to the guy.

For a superhero in comics, Superman is unique in the sense that he isn't just purely of ONE genre. GL is scifi, Thor is fantasy, Cap is war-genre. Superman is a mixture which is what makes his very character and stories so damn interesting. To take that unique aspect away from the character, will ruin him.
View Recorder