STAR TREK EXCLUSIVE: Unpublished Interview with Chris Hemsworth on George Kirk

STAR TREK EXCLUSIVE: Unpublished Interview with Chris Hemsworth on George Kirk

Before he became the god of thunder, Chris Hemsworth was temporarily captain of the U.S.S. Kelvin in J.J. Abrams' Star Trek, and in this unpublished interview conducted by CBM's Ed Gross shortly before that film's release, he discussed his character of George Kirk and working with Abrams.

By EdGross - May 05, 2011 03:05 AM EST
Filed Under: Star Trek

Q: How did you get involved with the film?

CHRIS HEMSWORTH: I'm from Australia and I was shooting something in Chicago, when my manager called and said, “You have to drop everything you're doing and go meet J.J. Abrams in his offices, he's doing auditions.” So I rushed over there to his office, and he' sitting behind his desk, and … the guy's, like, “Fantastic, you start work next week.” It really happened that fast.

Q: Were you into Star Trek?

CHRIS HEMSWORTH: It's one of those things where I feel like it's something I knew about, most people do whether you're a fan or not. It's been around long enough. But consciously, I didn't watch it much growing up, but I think it just wasn't in the circles that I was involved in. I'd always had an admirations and respect for it, though.

Q: Talk to me about George Kirk as a character.

CHRIS HEMSWORTH: I think he's the commander of the ship, and at such a young age, the position he's in speaks volumes about him. He has a strong sense of justice and right and wrong, and strong morals, and I think he's a real stand up, classic, good guy who puts other people before himself.

Q: While you were filming, did you have James T. Kirk in mind at all?

CHRIS HEMSWORTH: I think the image of Kirk was in our heads when we were shooting as far as where he'd come from and what kind of father he might have had. I also think that while we were shooting J.J.’s attitude was to make these characters as real as possible and as human as we could, and play to the truth of what was on the page. One thing he loves to do is to take these larger than life characters and make them accessible to the audience.

Q: How would you describe filming itself?

CHRIS HEMSWORTH: It was all pretty mind blowing – I'd only been in the states for four months or something, and then to find myself on the Paramount studios lot, and I'm on one of the biggest films in history, and there was so much build up, you know, talk about this film, so I just kept thinking, “What am I doing here?” But I guess any insecurity I felt must have been put to rest by J.J.’s confidence and assurance, and he does instill that in all the cast and the crew; he has such a strong vision of what he wants and he's so creative – also, he gives you the assurance to experiment and try things as well. It was certainly an enjoyable experience working with someone like that.

Q: You said he was striving for realism. Did the set itself that that realistic feel to it?

CHRIS HEMSWORTH: Absolutely, yeah. It certainly was – it wasn't on a blue screen, it was a real set, and I remember at one point a bunch of us were to just busying ourselves with different controls and things, and we were thinking that could be a problem because there are so many buttons and joysticks to press and interact with. I just kept thinking, “Wow, the work that has gone into this thing” – you almost believe maybe this thing could fly!

Q: From what I understand, the look of the Kelvin is a bit more beat-up?

CHRIS HEMSWORTH: Definitely. I remember seeing both sets – the Kelvin and the Enterprise – and being equally impressed with both of them. There was certainly a period feel to the Kelvin as opposed to the chic, fresh look of the Enterprise.

Q: Is yours a relatively small role?

CHRIS HEMSWORTH: I can't really talk about it too much, because I've been told so much what NOT to say. I think it's significant in the sense that it certainly, what's the word, it sets a lot of stuff up, and builds the history to it, so it's significant in that sense.

Q: Is there anything else you want to share with me about the film?

CHRIS HEMSWORTH: Just that it was one of the most enjoyable experiences I’ve ever had working in the industry. J.J. and the crew had shot a few films together, but – and I think I’ve said this before – you could feel the weight of what was behind this project. As far as setting up shots and working with actors and his creativity, J.J. was such a great person. To be a part of it, and to be a part of the Star Trek legacy, was incredible.

Quentin Tarantino Finally Explains Why His R-Rated STAR TREK Movie Is Never Going To Happen
Related:

Quentin Tarantino Finally Explains Why His R-Rated STAR TREK Movie Is "Never Going To Happen"

STAR TREK: Colm Meaney On Possible Miles O'Brien Return And What He REALLY Thinks About Trekkies (Exclusive)
Recommended For You:

STAR TREK: Colm Meaney On Possible Miles O'Brien Return And What He REALLY Thinks About Trekkies (Exclusive)

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

poseidon
poseidon - 5/5/2011, 3:27 AM
Fist!
poseidon
poseidon - 5/5/2011, 3:28 AM
Thor rocked on....Captain America hopefullz will follow suit. The Avengers will rock on!
Coachella
Coachella - 5/5/2011, 3:37 AM
He was good in Star Trek,but ya he was not in the film that long.
MaddMonkk
MaddMonkk - 5/5/2011, 3:37 AM
He pulled it off very well. Hell, he would have been a great James T. even.I was very surprised how great Star Trek was.
Growler
Growler - 5/5/2011, 4:13 AM
I have to ask why this has been pulled from the archives and aired now, instead of being published when it was current?

Slow news day?
Alastair
Alastair - 5/5/2011, 4:15 AM
Thor Rocks,Seeing it Friday
EdGross
EdGross - 5/5/2011, 4:18 AM
It was posted because Chris Hemsworth's big starring role in Thor opens in America tomorrow, and since it was never published I thought it would be interesting to present his views on the film that introduced him to the world.

And I have to ask: why do I need to justify this to you, Growler? You didn't have to click in and read it -- it was clear from the headline what this article was.
EdGross
EdGross - 5/5/2011, 4:58 AM
Grif, are you saying by implication that you didn't like the rest of the Str Trek movie? If so, c'mon, now!
reverendjonnynemo
reverendjonnynemo - 5/5/2011, 4:59 AM
The rest of the movie from about the logo onward sucked.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Image and video hosting by TinyPic
Dechiriko
Dechiriko - 5/5/2011, 5:00 AM
Wow, I feel like watching it again :]
TheNameIsBetty
TheNameIsBetty - 5/5/2011, 6:07 AM
Wow very interesting. I never realized that this movie introduced him. Star Trek was an excellent homage to the original series, while making it feel new. Of course, it IS new because it's in the future technically lol.

I can't wait for the sequel. I guess Chris Hemsworth knew that this movie was going to be big. He's a smart man
VictorHugo
VictorHugo - 5/5/2011, 6:25 AM
It´s a divergent timeline, like Doc Brown explained.

Nero attack on the Kelvin was like giving the Sports Almanac to young Biff.

But elder Spock can still fix the timeline for good, using the Guardian of Forever.
reverendjonnynemo
reverendjonnynemo - 5/5/2011, 6:43 AM
@ VictorHugo
Divergent timelines are fine, but bad writing is bad writing. The writers dumbed down the story to appeal to the masses.

In the words of Harry Plinkett: "A better title would'a prolly been 'A Space Adventure That Sort of Was Like A 60's TV Show".

"But elder Spock can still fix the timeline for good, using the Guardian of Forever."
Yes he could, and this is why Florida-Spock fails as a character. He evidently (thx, again, Orci)chose not to and allows this timeline to unfold with a destroyed Vulcan and a juvenile douchebag delinquent who never *earned* his place in history in command of what's basically the most modern weapon of it's day.

Star Trek '09 doesn't just fail as a franchise, it fails as a developed story and is a testament to modern movie goers in that intelligent film-making is extinct.
Fogs
Fogs - 5/5/2011, 6:56 AM
"this guy had the best scene in the star trek movie." - Grif.... ALSO AGREED

And I really enjoyed the movie, BTW.
Kalabog
Kalabog - 5/5/2011, 8:53 AM
@Grif-- I also concur.

One of the best opening of any movie.

Whoa! Grif's negativism sometimes do wonders.
His positive comments become so significant it even has a sage-like feel.

VictorHugo
VictorHugo - 5/5/2011, 11:02 AM
TheReverendJonnyNemo: Just think it could be worse, it could have been directed by Michael Bay or Joel Schumacher, written by Akiva Goldsman.
reverendjonnynemo
reverendjonnynemo - 5/5/2011, 11:46 AM
I take it by your choice of nicks, yer an above average fan of quality story telling. Jar Jar Abrams' "Douche Trek" insults the intelligence of the film fan, never mind Trek nerds.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Image and video hosting by TinyPic
Jackwagon
Jackwagon - 5/5/2011, 3:26 PM
I still say he should have played Jim Kirk instead of George. Just looked the part IMO.
View Recorder