SPIDER-MAN 3 Reportedly Adds Academy Award-Nominated AVENGERS Cinematographer Seamus McGarvey

SPIDER-MAN 3 Reportedly Adds Academy Award-Nominated AVENGERS Cinematographer Seamus McGarvey

Well, there's a good chance Spider-Man 3 will look great at the very least! Sony's Far From Home follow-up has reportedly signed Academy Award-nominated cinematographer Seamus McGarvey to lens the film...

By MarkCassidy - Mar 30, 2020 04:03 PM EST
Filed Under: No Way Home

Academy Award-nominated cinematographer Seamus McGarvey is reportedly set to return to the Marvel Cinematic Universe to led his considerable talents behind the camera to Sony's Spider-Man franchise.

According to Discussing Film, McGarvey has signed on to lens the still untitled follow-up to Spider-Man: Far From Home, which will once again be directed by Jon Watts. The Irish cinematographer previously worked on Joss Whedon's Avengers and the post-credits scene of the first Thor movie, as well as Godzilla, Bad Times At The El Royale, Fifty Shades Of Grey, The Accountant, Nocturnal Animals, and more.

Spider-Man 3 was scheduled to commence production this July, but given the current climate, it seems highly unlikely that cameras will begin rolling that soon. The movie is still set for its July 16, 2021 release date (for now).

Tom Holland will reprise the role of Peter Parker, and Zendaya has been confirmed to return as MJ. No other cast members have been officially announced, but it's assumed that the supporting characters from the previous movies (Peter's school mates, Aunt May etc) will also be back. The villain is a mystery, but rumors suggest Kraven the Hunter could make his big-screen debut ahead of his own solo outing.

What do you guys make of this news? Drop us a comment in the usual place, and check out our ranking of all previous big-screen outings for the Webhead from worst to best below. Yes, TASM 2 is up first!
 
Simply click the next button below!
 

The Amazing Spider-Man 2

Image result for the amazing spider-man 2


Marc Webb's TASM sequel really is a mess. While the first movie definitely has its share of problems, the follow-up basically took all of the elements that didn't work - annoying, "cool" Peter, overstuffed plot, awful villains - and amplified them.

To be fair, leads Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone do their best with the material and Gwen's demise is well handled, but by that point we've already sat through over 2 hours of increasing silliness, cliched romance and Jamie Fox's Electro.

Spider-Man 3

Image result for spider man 3


Many of you were probably expecting this to take worst place, but Sam Raimi's Spider-Man 3 is not quite as bad as its reputation suggests.

Sure, it's tonally all over the place Topher Grace's Venom is... not very good, but Kirsten Dunst gives arguably her best performance of the trilogy as MJ, and there are some well executed action sequences.

Then there's the dancing. Okay, there's no defending the dancing.

The Amazing Spider-Man

Image result for the amazing spider man


Sony and Marc Webb's first Spider-Man reboot is technically a well made film and Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone make for likable enough leads, but it's basically a complete rehash of Raimi's first movie - and it falls way short.

Peter Parker being re-imagined as a cool skateboarder kid would have been forgivable if the script took a few chances and skipped over the origin story, but at the end of the day it's a copy-and-paste job with a subplot involving Peter's parents that goes nowhere, and a truly horrendous looking villain.

Not bad, but not quite good enough to justify its existence.

Spider-Man: Far From Home

Image result for spider man far from home


I know I'm going to be in the minority on this one, but I thought Far From Home was just okay, and I left the theater quite disappointed. It's a fun movie for the most part and Tom Holland once again does a stellar job as Peter Parker, but I was never fully engaged with the story.

It's basically a high-school romance with some superhero stuff thrown in, and that's fine... to an extent. A couple of scenes with Peter and MJ awkwardly flirting is endearing, but it soon becomes a little tedious - even if the actors do have strong chemistry.

Unfortunately, the action sequences are also very repetitive with continuous shots of Spidey swinging around giant CGI monsters as they destroy a few buildings. We're told that these Elementals represent a major threat to the world, but that never comes across and the movie, in general, lacks bite. The final set piece is undeniably impressive, however.

Perhaps my biggest gripe with the film is that it feels like a step backwards for Spider-Man. Or a step to the side, at least. After having fought alongside The Avengers, stopped The Vulture and helped defeat Thanos and reverse The Snap (sorry, "The Blip"), this movie takes a still ridiculously inept Parker right back to the beginning and basically repeats his Homecoming arc to the letter.

I'm a big Spider-Man fan, I guess I've just had enough of Spider-Boy at this stage.

Spider-Man: Homecoming

Image result for spider-man homecoming


This second reboot fully integrated Spider-Man into The MCU, taking the character back to basics for a light-hearted, John Hughes-inspired high-school adventure that doesn't quite reach the heights of Raimi's first two films, but comes pretty damn close.

Tom Holland is terrific as a younger take on Peter Parker, and he's bolstered by a strong supporting cast that includes Zendaya, Maria Tomei and Michael Keaton. Robert Downey Jr's extended cameo as Tony Stark came in for some backlash, but there's no denying that his presence gives this latest Spidey flick a much-needed injection of originality - as does the decision to dispense with Peter's origin story.

A little more edge wouldn't have been unwelcome, however.

Spider-Man

Image result for spider-man 2002


X-Men is widely credited with rejuvenating the CBM genre, but the success of Sam Raimi's Spider-Man most definitely ensured its longevity.

The Evil Dead director brings all of the requisite blockbuster thrills while maintaining some of the pulpy charm of his earlier films to deliver what is widely considered to be one of the best comic book adaptations of all time.

There are a few issues (as great as Willem Dafoe is, that Green Goblin suit just does not work), but for the most part, Spider-Man is about as great a big-screen debut for Marvel's web-slinging hero as one could have hoped for.

Spider-Man 2

Image result for spider-man 2 2004


What can be said about Raimi's Spidey sequel that hasn't been already? Some still believe the original to be superior, but for me Spider-Man 2 is smarter, funnier, more emotional, more exciting and features more nuanced performances from Tobey Maguire and Kirsten Dunst.

Alfred Molina also makes for a terrific Doc Ock, and is involved in two of the movies standout sequences: the deliriously dark operating table massacre, and that train fight people tend to bring up once in a while.

Flaws? Well, Maguire does pull that weird face while stopping the train...

Spider-Man: Into The Spider-Verse



When I first saw Sony's superb Into The Spider-Verse I placed it below Spider-Man 2 in my rankings, but after a second watch it just edges it out as the best Spidey flick yet.

This first big-screen outing for Miles Morales is not only a hugely entertaining and stunningly animated adventure, but it plays with the usual tropes associated with comic book movies in some surprising ways, and even succeeds in breathing new life into the well-worn superhero origin story. It's so damn good that any gripes I may have (okay, so it could have used a better villain) seem like minor, almost insignificant nitpicks.

Spectacular, amazing, astonishing - whatever Spidey-related adjective you choose, it'll fit.

Jeremy Renner Says Bond He Shares With AVENGERS Stars Is Not Just For Instagram; We F*ckin’ Hate That Sh*t”
Related:

Jeremy Renner Says Bond He Shares With AVENGERS Stars Is "Not Just For Instagram; We F*ckin’ Hate That Sh*t”

SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME Returned To Theaters Yesterday: Here's How Box Office Compared To Spidey's Past Movies
Recommended For You:

SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME Returned To Theaters Yesterday: Here's How Box Office Compared To Spidey's Past Movies

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3
tmp3
tmp3 - 3/30/2020, 4:48 PM
Avengers looked a little flat, but the rest of his work?
regularmovieguy
regularmovieguy - 3/30/2020, 5:05 PM
@tmp3

Avengers looked like a show brought to the big screen. It’s weird ...I like the movie, it’s probably one of my top 5 or 10 cbms, but it does look really flat haha
GhostDog
GhostDog - 3/30/2020, 5:21 PM
@tmp3 - apparently Whedon and McGarvey said one key reason they chose the flat ratio because of the Hulk.

Whedon is very much a TV director, and it somewhat worked at the time but looking back it’s weird. Maybe he thought it wouldn’t be much of an issue. You see The Russos, coming from tv, but they shoot a movie that looks like a proper movie. Thankfully Avengers is just a really good movie overall. Although, the look of that film pops like a comic book in a lot of ways and I like that.

Then you see Age of Ultron and it looks more like a proper film. Someone pulled Joss aside and said “never again” lol
tmp3
tmp3 - 3/30/2020, 5:28 PM
@BlackBeltJones - I've read that Hulk reasoning and it just sounds very strange to me. Just... make the framing of your scenes more efficient? It's got some of the best VFX that money can buy, but it's still shot like a network pilot blown up to the big screen at points, even beyond the weird aspect ratio choice. The scene of Black Widow's introduction is so awkwardly put together, haha.
GhostDog
GhostDog - 3/30/2020, 5:30 PM
@tmp3 - BW scene is the most TV SCENE in Avengers.

It was well executed, choreographed, written...but the look was like an nbc femme Nikita pilot lol
MUTO123
MUTO123 - 3/30/2020, 5:30 PM
@BlackBeltJones - I went back and listened to both Whedon Avengers commentaries, and he said the biggest difference between the look of the two movies (aside from using different DPs) was that he shot the first movie with 3D in mind and went for very deliberate camera moves and compositions, and that with the second one he wanted to shoot it more like a documentary and used a lot more handheld cameras and shot scenes from multiple angles (which lead to headaches in editing because there were so many options but the first shot was always the best shot).
GhostDog
GhostDog - 3/30/2020, 5:35 PM
@MUTO123 - I love the look of AOU. It feels and looks compelling. I like AOU more than Avengers.
regularmovieguy
regularmovieguy - 3/30/2020, 5:40 PM
@BlackBeltJones

Ah man...AOU would be so much better for me if Ultron worked. I like most of the heroes stories in that movie, and it definitely looks good.

I just hated how Ultron was written.
GhostDog
GhostDog - 3/30/2020, 6:01 PM
@regularmovieguy - Ultron worked for me mostly, it’s his ending that sucked for me and lack of interaction with Stark. His death was well written and actually the best dialogue and scene of the film is that, but I think he should’ve survived. He is Ultron he always survives, re-uploads. Only issue there. He was born of Stark’s fear. Ultron based his entire existence on Tony, modeling his personality and his fears. But we never see father and son share more than a mere moment together. Spader is charismatic and gives Ultron great personality.

I hate Thor in that movie though. After TDW he should’ve been treated better.

He was just around. I thought something that was wasted was how quick his anger towards Stark for meddling with the stone and scepter passed. He choked Tony (completely understandable) and then it’s over. That’s something that would’ve presented some good drama and material for Thor.

He’s a god watching mortals meddle in something they shouldn’t be. And the team is still relatively new, still wary in their relationships so a little more contention would’ve been interesting.
regularmovieguy
regularmovieguy - 3/30/2020, 6:37 PM
@BlackBeltJones

His first scene and his last scene are great, no doubt about it.

His interaction with Jarvis in the beginning was cool, too.

Just really didn’t care for his interactions with the Twins and Klaue for the most part. Also...his design 😢 feel like his final form should’ve been so much cooler.

regularmovieguy
regularmovieguy - 3/30/2020, 6:37 PM
More interactions with Tony would’ve gone a long way, too.
GhostDog
GhostDog - 3/30/2020, 6:45 PM
@regularmovieguy - loved the look on that mag cover
cubrn
cubrn - 3/30/2020, 11:27 PM
I hated that they gave him a moving jaw when speaking so much.
kylo0607
kylo0607 - 3/31/2020, 3:42 AM
@regularmovieguy - I remember seeing this cover (July 2014) and thinking this was Ultron on the cover. Such a cool look.

Then it turns out this was just one of his drones. They should've used that design for Ultron. His main form was good, but the Ultimate one looked really puffy and chubby and not intimidating at all.
CurlyBill
CurlyBill - 3/30/2020, 4:50 PM
Whatever helps, god I hated Far From Home.
MosquitoFarmer
MosquitoFarmer - 3/30/2020, 4:50 PM
No worries, sir. You've got plenty of time to prepare.

MasterMix
MasterMix - 3/30/2020, 4:54 PM
Spider-Man: Home is Where the Heart is
Spider-Man: Home Run
Spider-Man: Home Sweet Home
Spider-Man: There's No Place Like Home
Spider-Man: Home and Away
Spider-Man: I'm Coming Home
Spider-Man: Screw You Guys, I'm Going Home
tmp3
tmp3 - 3/30/2020, 4:56 PM
@MasterMix - Spider-Man Homeward Bound...
KWilly
KWilly - 3/30/2020, 5:04 PM
@MasterMix - If he's going to go against Kraven, and the city hates him... Spider-Man Homerun makes perfect sense for the third one.
Origame
Origame - 3/30/2020, 5:12 PM
@MasterMix - spiderman: clever "home" pun.
Odin
Odin - 3/30/2020, 5:25 PM
@MasterMix -
1 2 3
View Recorder