Man of Steel Review (Minor Spoilers)

Man of Steel Review (Minor Spoilers)

The most anticipated summer blockbuster of 2013 Zach Snyder's "Man of Steel" has just been released. Is it a revival of a series or something far from super?

Review Opinion
By ikaikas3 - Sep 19, 2013 01:09 PM EST
Filed Under: Superman
Source: Flicks of fury

With the planet Krypton on the brink of destruction, Jor-El (Russell Crowe) has compiled a plan that will preserve the future of the Kryptonian race. By stealing the codex, a skull that holds the genetic code of Kryptonians, he infuses it with his new-born son Kal-El. Meanwhile the revolutionary General Zod (Michael Shannon) has become enraged of the imminent destruction and blames it on the ruling council. Zod then begins to attack the council, thereafter becomes aware that Jor-El has taken the codex. Before Zod can reach him, Jor-El has sent a spacecraft containing his son Kal-El to Earth. Moments after the departure of the ship, Zod is captured and sentenced to the Phantom Zone. Kal-El (Henry Cavill) is then raised and adopted by the Kents( Kevin Costner and Diane Lane) on earth taking the name Clark Kent. As Clark grows, it is apparent that he has development superhuman powers which results in confusion and alienation from others. As an adult he becomes a drifter in search for answers. Later he finds a buried Kryptonian ship where he discovers why he was sent to earth. Now with an understanding of who he is Clark must face General Zod, who is now free and knows the location of Kal-El, and save the world from doom.

The cast in this film was phenomenal. Henry Cavill, who portayed Superman/Clark Kent, was an excellent choice. Not only did he look and sound like Superman, but also displayed the emotions of confusion, ostracization, and longing for answers of who he was. As the film progressed, character development was definitely evident. Once he found his sense of belonging, Clark was more content with his life, compared to the prelude of the film. Jonathan Kent, played by Kevin Costner, is a compelling father that sets a foundation of moral choice for Clark. Some of the most touching scenes are between Pa Kent and Clark. Other pleasant scenes were between Martha Kent, portrayed by Diane Lane, and Clark. These two separate interactions are crucial to the film, for it explains how Clark controls his abilities. Michael Shannon also does a superb portrayal of General Zod. Not only does he depict a man determined to revive his race and world, but also the insanity and chaos that Zod brings. Overall, all cast members did an outstanding job with composing a believable story.



The most admired aspect of the film is the decision to be based in reality. Although the story of superman is uncanny, Zach Snyder and crew made it conceivable. Other than some banal humor, a downside of the film is the lack of the creativity, possibly due to the producers and Warner brothers, that Zach Snyder has proven to have with "300" and "Watchmen". The only unique Snyder scene was the dream sequence between Superman and General Zod, where Superman is slowly sinking into the skeletal remains of the human race. That scene was beautifully shot and my personal favorite. The film would have been improved if Snyder could have showcased his own creativity in the film. Hopefully in sequel, this will not be the case.

The special effects in Man of Steel are one of the best to ever projected on screen. The CGI did what was physically impossible. Viewers will feel like they were hurled into a comic book with front row seats to the spectacular action sequences that "Man of Steel" has to offer. Never before have we seen superman fight as showcased in this film. Besides the amiable special effects, Easter eggs were also present in the film. These subtle elements were a special treat for comic book fans.

In the end, Man of Steel was successful with its goals: making a realistic and believable, making superman relevant and a fan favorite again, and kick starting the Justice league franchise in film. I never really liked superman, but after watching this film I consider myself a fan.
4.5/5

SUPERMAN Artwork Reveals First Look At Anthony Carrigan's Metamorpho, Hawkgirl's Wings, And More
Related:

SUPERMAN Artwork Reveals First Look At Anthony Carrigan's Metamorpho, Hawkgirl's Wings, And More

SUPER/MAN: THE CHRISTOPHER REEVE STORY Takes Flight On Rotten Tomatoes With 100%
Recommended For You:

SUPER/MAN: THE CHRISTOPHER REEVE STORY Takes Flight On Rotten Tomatoes With 100%

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

KalEl26
KalEl26 - 9/19/2013, 1:44 PM
ummm...this is a pretty late review
NovaCorpsFan
NovaCorpsFan - 9/19/2013, 1:46 PM
Put this in reviews. The key part of the word news is the new bit.
TopCat89
TopCat89 - 9/19/2013, 1:52 PM
My time machine works...
TTT0809
TTT0809 - 9/19/2013, 1:58 PM
Yea, this review is quite late.
MDC
MDC - 9/19/2013, 2:44 PM
...are you frickin' kidding?!
IronSpider101
IronSpider101 - 9/19/2013, 5:12 PM
"This review is late"

One of the most retarded things to say.

He's giving a film criticism. Not telling people whether they should go see it or not.

He could've waited 30 years to write and release this review and it would be just as valid.
IronSpider101
IronSpider101 - 9/19/2013, 5:13 PM
Even if he WAS telling people whether or not to see it, there's no such thing as being "too late".
IronSpider101
IronSpider101 - 9/19/2013, 5:14 PM
That said: I disagree with the review, myself. Didn't like the movie.
acheronmagnuz
acheronmagnuz - 9/19/2013, 7:03 PM
Nice review!! I really loved MOS despite what critics say about the film. IT IS A GOOD START!
aantny88
aantny88 - 9/20/2013, 5:39 AM
Nice review! I loved the film. Donner's films can suck it! It's funny that this review was posted yesterday, after I listened to an NPR segment about Man of Steel. They had about 4 people on practically bashing the film.
They said there was no humor...I didn't realize Superman needed to be Tony Stark. The campy humor that Gene Hackman brought to the originals was just sad. Even in the Justice League animated series, which is incredible BTW, Supes is a serious guy. I have no problem with that.
The reviewers also cited the whole over the top destruction issue and that Supes had little regard for saving human life. I vehemently disagree. He turned himself over to Zod in an attempt to shield humanity from harm, he destroyed the ship with all the unborn Kryptonians to save earth, flew halfway around the world to take out the world engine and then came back to stop Zod from destroying more of Metropolis and killing more people. Do these pathetic critics honestly think Supes should have said, "Hey Zod, follow me out to the middle of nowhere so we can fight and not hurt innocent people." Sorry but this isn't DragonBall Z!
I think the biggest problem I have with what the NPR critics and others have stated, is that Supes didn't inspire hope. How does a guy that risks his life for the sake of others without any regard to reward or personal accomplishment not inspire hope? What else is he supposed to do to inspire hope? Pull cats from trees and walk old ladies across the street?
Neek2086
Neek2086 - 9/20/2013, 6:18 AM
^^ completely agree.. Man of Steel was great people just love to hate on this movie.
TheTank
TheTank - 9/20/2013, 6:29 PM
LOL def a late review.

I have a mint copy of the movie on DVD and I gotta admit the more I watch it the more I dislike it which is the opposite of The Dark Knight for me and I'm a much bigger Superman fan than i am Batman. I also wasn't exactly thrilled when I saw it in theaters.

On a visual level the movie was cool, the FX looked great and I really thought everyone was perfectly cast. But I never felt like I was watching a Superman movie, maybe its just me but I feel like a Superman movie should evoke a sense of joy and excitement, I never felt that here. I dont think the movie was overly dark but I thought it was overly lacking in terms of heart. I also felt that anything that was done that was already done in the 78' movie, looked better and much more epic in 78' (the look of krypton, Zod's imprisonment and trial, etc). I was hoping for something a little more along the lines of Birthright.

I called the plot for this movie years before it came out, I always said if Superman existed in our world he would immediately be perceived as a threat by our government. I guess I really didnt like that he wasn't Superman prior to Zod's arrival. It would have had much more emotional weight had he been Superman and the govt didnt trust him and he's trying to convince the world that he's here to help and then bammm Zod comes and effs all that up. I also didnt like the mindless destruction of everything, to me Superman would have avoided crashing into buildings if he could help it, much like he did in Superman 2. Here, the city was a boxing ring.

They could have used the first 2 acts of birthright and then used Zod for the 3rd act instead of Luthor's faux Kryptonian invasion.

David Goyer is a hack, I've always said that, and this movie def confirmed everything i was worried about when I heard he was the sole writer. TDK was good because Jonathan Nolan is a great writer and Goyer only provided the story.

A huge plot hole i noticed when watching again and again was the whole Genesis chamber/ artificial birth stuff. Jor-el tells Clark that the reason the space exploration program ended was because artificial population control had now been established, and that kryptonians were now no longer conceived naturally. But every scout ship had a genesis chamber, which according to Jor-el wasn't even established until after the exploration program ended. Again...another fumble on the part of david goyer.
GenerationX
GenerationX - 9/23/2013, 3:33 PM
Little late aren't ya??
lucio7lopez
lucio7lopez - 9/24/2013, 6:45 PM
MoS is awesome!!!!
View Recorder