Man of Steel Rocks But Could Use Some Heart

Man of Steel Rocks But Could Use Some Heart

Man of Steel looks great and delivers a fantastic viewing experience. So why do we expect so much more from Superman movies?

Review Opinion
By VanthDreadstar - Jun 19, 2013 11:06 AM EST
Filed Under: Superman
Source: Jon Norwood

***Spoiler Alert. Go See the Movie Then Read. I Ruin the Ending***


The Man of Steel is a very enjoyable movie, and if you are a comic book movie fan you might love it. The cast is great, the visuals are great, and the action scenes may very well become the gold standard by which future spectacle pieces are judged. The writing can be a slog at times when it is trying to beat into you that it is tough being different, it's even harder being the messiah, and humans can't be trusted. I get it. But if so much of this is good then why am I not buying into it as much as I want too (I love Superman)?

I think it might be because this movie is less a hero's journey and more Independence Day with one of the aliens being Superman. Even this approach would be interesting and certainly a very original take on the classic character, but just about the time I was being pulled into the story something would take me out. Not being a professional film critic I don't know exactly what it was that did that but the rhythm of the film would almost get me then switch it up and I'd have to adapt again. These jumps would be easier if I had a better understanding of the characters, which may be my biggest gripe. I know from other sources what these characters were all about in the past, but what is going on with this incarnation?

As a good movie progresses you begin to anticipate the character's reactions to certain situations and share their emotional state to a limited degree. If the movie is done well this is satisfying without being boring. Let me illustrate this by comparing two scenes, the first from Richard Donner's 1978 Superman and the second from Man of Steel.

Superman is standing over a car with the body of Lois Lane in it. She's been killed by a seismic event triggered by Lex Luthor's attack on California. Up to this point in the film Jor-El has made it clear that it is forbidden for him to interfere in human history or too use his powers to control mankind's destiny. He must use his power for good but limit the scope of his involvement. Jonathan Kent has been teaching Clark that he is here for a reason and he must discover this reason and be a force for good in the world.

Over the course of the movie it is clear Lois has fallen in love with Superman, and with good reason. He has saved her from certain death, spent time with her revealing who he is and what he's all about, flirted with her in a non-weird way and he looks like Christopher Reeve. Now she is dead. The movie slows down to a crawl, the music all but disappears. Superman carefully pulls out her body and kisses her. We now realize he loves her as well. There is silence. When Superman screams "NO!" and his voice echoes through the countryside we know what he's feeling. It's more than sadness and loss. Superman is being torn between what he has been told is right and what he really wants to do, which is say screw it too human history and turn back time to save a single person that he loves. The drama comes not only from the death of a primary character but from the internal struggle Superman is going through. We as the audience are pulled into the narrative and briefly feel what the character feels. And it's awesome. It doesn't even matter that he flies around the earth and instead of the planet breaking apart time is reversed. This ridiculous moment is so overshadowed by the emotions of the character it becomes forgivable somehow.

Now in Man of Steel Superman has General Zod in a headlock after a protracted battle that leveled Metropolis. Both characters are beat up and there is a family of four cowering in a corner trying to not get blown up by the aliens. Zod tells Superman that he is going to punish the humans for what he has done and activates his heat vision. Although Superman is trying to control Zod it is clear that eventually that family is going to die. He has a choice to make, let the family die or kill Zod. He kills Zod and screams in horror at what he had to do. We as an audience may know from other sources Superman doesn't run around killing people, but this movie hasn't revealed that. Sure Clark may have controlled himself in his youth to not knock a bully's head off but how he feels about life isn't a part of the narrative. His emotional outburst isn't shared by the audience because we are not allowed to share in his development of a messianic love for life of any kind. His internal struggle just isn't clear.

There is a scene where Clark lets Jonathan die in a tornado in order to protect his alien origin which does have some of these elements, but the scene really tells us more about Jonathan than Clark and Kevin Costner does a fantastic job here.

The reason this movie makes me a little mad is that it's so close to absolute greatness all it would take is a nudge to get there. Give me some set up on Superman's view of life, what he believes is right and how strongly he adheres to his philosophy. Then put him in the same position with Zod where he is forced to kill him. Now we have ourselves a scene.

Man of Steel does a remarkable job showing us what Superman can do, and does this better than any other source in my opinion. What it doesn't do as well is show me who Superman is.

I want to end with I enjoyed this movie. If this were about a lesser character I would probably be crazy about it. Its not fair but I expect more from my Superman movies.

SUPERMAN Artwork Reveals First Look At Anthony Carrigan's Metamorpho, Hawkgirl's Wings, And More
Related:

SUPERMAN Artwork Reveals First Look At Anthony Carrigan's Metamorpho, Hawkgirl's Wings, And More

SUPER/MAN: THE CHRISTOPHER REEVE STORY Takes Flight On Rotten Tomatoes With 100%
Recommended For You:

SUPER/MAN: THE CHRISTOPHER REEVE STORY Takes Flight On Rotten Tomatoes With 100%

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

DeathSeal
DeathSeal - 6/19/2013, 12:12 PM
I can't agree with you anymore. All the elements were there, And it's not like I feel I was robbed of my ticket money but it just needed a little more heart a little more of what it feels to be superman. I wanted the movie to give me hope not tell me I should have hope. If that makes any sense.
Jyelv833
Jyelv833 - 6/19/2013, 2:21 PM
This nails how I feel about this movie. I also felt that if there was a little more build up before he walked out wearing the suit then it would have had a much bigger impact on me. Just slight misses here and there that took away from any emotional involvement from me.
TerminalVoyd
TerminalVoyd - 6/19/2013, 11:08 PM
Agreed. We got the intellectual thought process and the criteria by which Clark weighed the pros and cons of his choices. And we got a decent spoonful of the fear and trepidation that Clark inherited, but we really could have felt a bit more of the love Clark might have developed for all of humanity, at least the idea of what it could be on the way to reaching the potential Jor-El spoke of.

It's one of the things that make Mark Waid's version of Clark's travels hit home and develop Clark as an emotional man of compassion. This Clark was maybe a bit too reclusive and "Bruce Banner" in his wandering. He could have connected just a bit more with others before making that click with Lois. They didn't need to hammer it home so much that she helps him come out of his shell. Cavill and Adams sold it on their own with their chemistry alone.

It would have been interesting if Clark was just a touch more enamored of humanity with an almost paternal concern over their flaws getting in the way of their virtues in terms of accepting an alien like himself amongst them. When Clark screams "Krypton had it's chance!", I wanted to feel it came as much from Clark feeling for his adopted world on a personal level rather than me knowing he understood the weight of one decision against the other and standing against the horror of an already living world and it's people dying in favor of resurrecting a dead one.

I get they were worried about the movie being too ponderous or sappy in a way that could smack of what came before, or undercut the idea that this Superman is both cool and a badass, but hopefully they'll pick up the slack on that one seemingly thin element in the follow up.
Twiztidjuggalo
Twiztidjuggalo - 6/20/2013, 12:47 AM
This movie had no heart. And I'm a huge superman fan that wanted to really like this movie but couldn't. I say reboot it in like 5 to 7 years. And find filmmakers that aren't gonna treat superman just as a cash cow. Find someone who's gonna remind us why superman stands for truth justice and the American way. Being on a 3 part trilogy like lord of the rings Star Wars etc etc
mcconnachie
mcconnachie - 6/20/2013, 4:54 AM
You're right.

It was a film with all the ingredients. Great cast. Lois and Clark were loveable with the limited screen time they had together. Cavill was iconic in the suit. The action was great.

However, there were problems. And they were ALL script based.

1) The greatest songs have periods of quiet. I found the films quietest moments were the most powerful. Twenty minutes of Metropolis getting destroyed was overkill. Subtle effects such as floating in the water listening to the whales were iconic. The Costner scenes had a stillness. I thought the tornado death would be a little hokey but it demonstrated his conviction.

2) The Zod murder presents issues. Firstly, if an all powerful being is prepared to kill he exercises ultimate authority. This issue may be addressed in the sequel but its uncomfortable for that character. He always steps back from being judge and jury. Read Kingdom Come. Hugely powerful content but explains why he always takes that step back...always. Secondly, his reluctance to do it is never addressed in Goyers script.

3) David Goyers script did alot....abit like Batman Begins, but was a little 'join the dots'. There wasn't an integrated feel. Films are becoming more extended trailers. You almost feel the editing and see where story has been cut out.

4) I'm not buying that Supes' presence would still not spread terror. He hasn't saved a cat or falling reporter. Just destroyed a city. After all he set of the beacon that attracted the psychopathic aliens.



AZSuperman
AZSuperman - 6/20/2013, 5:46 AM
Great article. I felt the same way. I just watched/listened to Superman I and you're right...we are emotionally vested in Clark when he looses Lois, in MOS we are not as much as we have been in past.
lucio7lopez
lucio7lopez - 6/21/2013, 1:25 AM
Very bad review. Really bad.Stop comparing with the Donner version for god sake, this is a brand new superman!
And other thing: MoS have too much heart! Ask for Kevin Costner!
VanthDreadstar
VanthDreadstar - 6/22/2013, 12:42 AM
@mcconnachie

Awesome point. We get a savior to lead us into the light that we wouldn't need if he didn't rain crap down on us to begin with.

Ha I can't believe I missed that. Well done.
View Recorder