No 3-D for Batman 3

No 3-D for Batman 3

The Dark Knight cinematographer Wally Pfister says that 3-D is a "fad" and that Batman 3 will be shot on film not digital video!

By bsprecher - Apr 21, 2010 05:04 AM EST
Filed Under: The Dark Knight Rises
Source: Cinematical















Even though Hollywood is currently infatuated with 3-D technology (higher ticket prices, anyone?), don't expect to see the exploits of your favorite caped crusader in 3-D. According to Wally Pfister, Christopher Nolan's cinematographer on such movies as Memento, The Prestige and The Dark Knight, 3-D is a fad that is likely to fade away by the time Batman 3 is in theaters.

"I did it for one shot of The Dark Knight because [Nolan] said, 'You have to say you did it,' and literally I had this strapped to my shoulder and I was carrying it. But I think Chris is game for doing something interesting like that, Lord knows that the 3-D fad might pass by the time that summer comes around."

However, Pfister said that Nolan is open to trying new things.

"What Chris and I have talked about is doing something cool and something interesting. [Director] Brad Bird was [saying], 'You've got to shoot the whole thing in IMAX!' I was like, 'Yeah, I've talked to Chris about that.'"

"But I know one thing about the film that Chris is adamant about is that he wants to shoot on film. He doesn't want to shoot on video, and I'm the same way."



In addition to Pfister's above comments to Cinematical, AICN recently posted this synopsis of statements Pfister made in Dallas where he was presented with the Star Award by the Dallas Film Society:

> Pfister, just like Nolan, does not like digital cameras: "The image quality of film" exceeds that of the high end digital cameras like "the Genesis camera and the Red camera." He said that he and "Chris [Nolan] are 'devotees' of film."

> Because of his and Nolan's feelings toward Digital Cinema, Pfister does not want to shoot [Batman 3] in 3-D. He actually had some pretty harsh things to say about the format, he says that, "It's great for like amusement park rides like the 'Honey I Shrunk The Kids' ride at Disneyland." He said that 3D is not realistic and "it's a distraction. Can you imagine Memento in 3D? With Joey Pantoliano's glasses sticking out 'a few feet' with his hair all the way back there?"

> Pfister said that he met with Brad Bird a few days ago and that Bird told him that his teenage sons thought that the IMAX used in The Dark Knight was more realistic than the 3D in these new movies.

> He loves the clarity and latitude that shooting in 65 mm and in IMAX gives him. He can "underexpose by as many as 5 F-stops and overexpose by two. The digital cameras can't do that."

> Although he loves the image and large frame provided by IMAX in The Dark Knight, he would much "prefer [everything] to be in 2.35:1"
THE DARK KNIGHT RISES Star Joseph Gordon-Levitt Reveals Whether There Was Ever Plans For A ROBIN Spin-Off
Related:

THE DARK KNIGHT RISES Star Joseph Gordon-Levitt Reveals Whether There Was Ever Plans For A ROBIN Spin-Off

TDKR And INTERSTELLAR Star Anne Hathaway Credits Christopher Nolan With Getting Her Career Back On Track
Recommended For You:

TDKR And INTERSTELLAR Star Anne Hathaway Credits Christopher Nolan With Getting Her Career Back On Track

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
bsprecher
bsprecher - 4/21/2010, 6:04 AM
Just found out I will be attending the Iron Man 2 premiere in L.A. on Thursday and the press junket on Friday! Stay tuned for more!
Shaman
Shaman - 4/21/2010, 6:06 AM
I'm as happy as a "Ron White" in Scotch!!! Goddamn i hate 3D for live action films, KEEP IT ANIMATED!!!

Multi- Yeah... i'll give you that one. It would make sense for Green Lantern to be shot in 3D. BUT THAT'S IT!!! :P
bsprecher
bsprecher - 4/21/2010, 6:07 AM
@Poni: I loved the 3-D in Avatar, but I agree that it was too obvious and pointless in Clash. It's a fad that Hollywood will ruin by overusing. I do agree with you about Green Lantern though; that should be in 3-D!
bsprecher
bsprecher - 4/21/2010, 6:07 AM
@Poni: Shit, he can afford to buy me one!
animeex
animeex - 4/21/2010, 6:09 AM
It seems all but Avatar really are not great in 3D. A friend who works the movie theater told me Clash of the Titans in 3D was a waste. It is just another thing Hollywood is doing for money. Not really worth the extra $$$.
Shaman
Shaman - 4/21/2010, 6:09 AM
Brent- Yeah but it's against Michey's morals. You need to get him a cheep one to bust his first nut and THEN he'll be more open to the idea of getting you one ;P
bsprecher
bsprecher - 4/21/2010, 6:13 AM
@Shaman: The master speaks! XP
supermarioworldE
supermarioworldE - 4/21/2010, 6:39 AM
Well, at least some directors still have their pride.

invalensname
invalensname - 4/21/2010, 7:19 AM
Good. Whatever about 3D, I hate digital. Film all the way. Thank you, Christopher Nolan. You are preserving an art form.
thegreek
thegreek - 4/21/2010, 7:28 AM
Thank God .. someone with some sense about the 3-D KAKA...

But i agree shaman and mpp - Green Lantern makes sense for 3-D
comicb00kguy
comicb00kguy - 4/21/2010, 7:31 AM
I'm admittedly not the biggest Nolan fan out there, as you regulars here should know by now, but my respect for the man is greatly increased by this. I'm glad that someone is standing up to this 3D fad. Batman 3 is already a better film knowing that we won't be subjected to that 3D garbage in it.
statechamp00
statechamp00 - 4/21/2010, 7:39 AM
I'm reading that some people think the GL movie is OK for 3D but not TKD sequel.
I'm wondering 'why?' What is the basis for this line of thought?
thegreek
thegreek - 4/21/2010, 7:46 AM
Statechamp - I can only speak for myself... And knowing what GL can do with his ring and most likely will be CG it has potential to look really good on screen ... just like the glow around him ... It would be interesting to see a Green fist coming at you ... But for me I would prefer it without all the 3-D stuff... I'm just saying i would be fine with it
hippopotamusprime
hippopotamusprime - 4/21/2010, 7:48 AM
Maybe if they went back to the whole flashing words on the screen "put on glasses"; "take of glasses" thing . . .
;)
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 4/21/2010, 8:01 AM
LOL, why would anyone want 3D for BATMAN 3????!!

Just make the damn film lol! : P

3D only works for stuff like GREEN LANTERN!!!
airbeyonder18
airbeyonder18 - 4/21/2010, 8:22 AM
Thank You!!! NO 3-D for Batman!!
Shaman
Shaman - 4/21/2010, 8:41 AM
statechamp00- I'm with thegreek for that argument. I'm "fine" with GL being 3D because it has shitloads of "Animated" CG constructs but Batman doesn't. I LOVE 3D for animation but not live action. If a live action film has alot of animation in it, then i'm "fine" with the 3D for it. I hated the 3D in Avatar because the CG was to make it look realistic. There's nothing realistic with giant green fists coming out of rings so i'm "fine" with that.

BmanHall- GL will be in 3D. They already announced it didn't they? And 3D seemed awesome for A Christmas Carol and How to train your dragon. It really fits animation nicely i find. That 3D intro with the robot dog and his techno ball really kicked my ass :)
thegreek
thegreek - 4/21/2010, 9:02 AM
Shaman - Thanks for agreeing with my argument and being "fine" with the 3-D stuff... ;-)
Bandrews1
Bandrews1 - 4/21/2010, 9:52 AM
Thank god.
ATOMbomb
ATOMbomb - 4/21/2010, 10:34 AM
Thank god..it is pointless anyway. The tickets are already to high and it is a distraction. I want to sit and enjoy a film, not be messing with 3D glasses the whole time. I can't wait til BM3, everyone is on board and that is all I care about. Now, hopefully soon there is something released about what they are doin with film. I doubt it though.
Talontd
Talontd - 4/21/2010, 10:42 AM
Give me Batman 3 shot ENTIRELY in IMAX!!!!
Phinehas
Phinehas - 4/21/2010, 11:20 AM
""The image quality of film" exceeds that of the high end digital cameras" <----I would not have expected to hear (see) that from a cinemaphotographer.
Shaman
Shaman - 4/21/2010, 11:32 AM
thegreek- No problem bud, i'm still with you in saying that i'd rather them shitcan 3D all together for live action films.

BmanHall- You couldn't be more right dude! And out of all those options, i really hope #2 happens rather than the rest!

Kev- LOL Well maybe the "RealD" intro isn't the same for everyone worldwide LOL But here in Ottawa, we got the Dog and his ball. And it kicked ass LOL :P
InFamouslyCool
InFamouslyCool - 4/21/2010, 11:50 AM
a fad for little children.
1chris2
1chris2 - 4/21/2010, 11:52 AM
they said noland is up for doing new things,well 3d is old. the original creature from the black lagoon was 3d as were other films back then.also i hope riddler,harley quine and joker make the next batman film and cameos of other arkum inmates are in there as well to make a big film but do not over use them just give them the right amount of story and focus on story like before.bring on the bat.
SHAZAM171
SHAZAM171 - 4/21/2010, 12:41 PM
I'm fine with it, JUST GIVE US BATMAN 3 !!!!!!!
odie00
odie00 - 4/21/2010, 1:12 PM
i dont see why they would even say anything about the next batman being in 3d thats gay. nolan wont do that. he tries using little special effects as we can to make it real.
PS3geek1
PS3geek1 - 4/21/2010, 1:19 PM
3D is way too much... been used way too much and it gives me such a head-ache after... 3D is ok with some films, but not all of them.. Batman should be ONLY shot in IMAX...
Shaman
Shaman - 4/21/2010, 1:29 PM
Keven- HAHA!!! Yeah, i can imagine ;P For us here, it was the part right after the trailers to let us know that it was time to put on the glasses. It said "RealD" and showed a robot dog playing on the grass with a techno type ball (soccer size). It jumped right at us! It was brilliantly executed which is alot more than i can say about Avatar's 3D that came out looking way more fuzzy than it should (for moving parts anyway).
Aiiwolf
Aiiwolf - 4/21/2010, 2:39 PM
I agree, Batman should NOT be shot in 3D, but rather in IMAX. ITs just better off that way.

StephenStrange
StephenStrange - 4/21/2010, 3:53 PM
Chris.... Pfister. ahem
ngu13
ngu13 - 4/21/2010, 4:13 PM
thank fxxx for that i hate the 3d transfer it is shxx ruins a film .. apart from my bloody valantine .. that was good when the axe came out at you .... but dont mess the cb movies .... dont you dare fxxxing do that to batman the thought is makeing me angry .... clah ruined ..fd4 crap .... didnt see avatar tho .... did any1 see it in 3d ..but leave all marvel an dc films the fxxx alone
1 2
View Recorder