ON DARKNESS AND SUPERHEROES (An Editorial by a true Superman fan)

ON DARKNESS AND SUPERHEROES  (An Editorial by a true Superman fan)

An editorial on Superheroes, Tone and Film

Editorial Opinion
By SpideySupes94 - Mar 26, 2016 08:03 AM EST
Filed Under: Superman

 

So, I just had one of the worst cinema-going experiences in my life this year, as I walked out of “Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice”;a film as overblown, bloated and downright stupid as it’s overblown, bloated and downright stupid title would suggest.                                                                                                              
(You can catch my review for the film here: https://theacutecinephile.wordpress.com/2016/03/24/batman-v-superman-dawn-of-justice-spoiler-free-movie-review/)


This film hurt me. It hurt me very deeply; and the more I thought about it, It hurt me even more.

See, when I was a little kid, Superman: The Movie, with Christopher Reeve playing the iconic, titular character, was one of the first movies that I’d ever witnessed; and I remember being enthralled with what I’d seen. I remember being inspired by the hope that this man in blue tights with an ‘S’ on his chest  and a bright red cape imparted, I remember being felled by his charm and wit, I remember rooting for him to win against the bad guys, I remember wanting to read more and more stories about him, which I did through the comics. Reading those comics allowed me to improve my English. I remember wanting to create my own stories of this character through drawing. Drawing this character instilled a love of art in me, and writing those stories instilled a love for storytelling that has gradually evolved into a love for filmmaking.

In short, Superman has inspired and molded my life in more ways than I can even count. This character, as you can see, means a lot to me; and growing up, I remember wanting to be like him.

Having seen Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice though, I’ll be surprised to see even a single kid who gets inspired by Superman. See, we live in such a cynical society where we feel that true-blue, positive and hopeful boy scout superheroes like Superman have no place in our world.
Ask most people out there (except me) who their favorite superhero is, and I can bet you a 1000 bucks that you’re going to get the reply “Batman” (A character that embodies darkness). The disturbing part is, even the filmmakers of this trainwreck have blatantly told us, through this film, and “Man of Steel”, that there’s no place for a hopeful, positive and actually FUN Superman in this world.

How do they impart this message to us?

They do this by making both movies as dull, dark and dreary as possible; in both, visual style and narrative. They make Superman do things that defy the very core of his character in both movies. They make him an object the people react to rather than an actual, well-defined character in both movies.    As a lifelong Superman fan, I can only stare in despair as they take one of my most beloved characters and grind him down in a potpourri of “grit”, “darkness” and “Cynicism”.

Enter Marvel Studios.

We all know what Marvel is now right? Now, here’s the thing, Marvel has their very own boy scout character. A character so inherently good, positive and hopeful, that he can pretty much be described as their Superman. Any specific name come to mind?

It’s Captain America.




I think at this point, it’s safe to say that some of Marvel’s best films to date have been either about Captain America or atleast involved him in some capacity (The Avengers 1&2). These movies have been successful and there are plenty of kids that I’ve personally met that actually WANT to be Captain America, although they aren’t Americans themselves. One of my cousins loves the character because he’s constantly inspired by Cap’s unrelenting patriotism and the hope that he imparts. People actually think Captain America is cool.

Why is that though?

Why is that, when there are two very similar character in terms of their ideology, one of them is deemed “Cool” and the other “Uncool”?

It’s pretty simple, actually. You just have to look at their respective movies.

“Man of Steel” which featured a serious, sullen, dull and dark Superman was a movie so inherently serious and grimy, that Superman was reduced to little more than a grunting, shouting and murderous thug in blue underpants; a far cry from who he actually is in the comics.

In Captain America: The First Avenger, We see a Captain America who is simply persistent in fighting for his country and overcomes plenty of obstacles to achieve his goals. We see a character that loses the love of his life and is displaced in time. We see a man who makes the ultimate sacrifice. This is exactly who Cap is in the comics.

“Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice” features a Superman who’s more of an object that characters react to rather than an actual character with a voice, opinion and personality of his own. We see a character that is time, and again, put onto the sidelines in favor of his darker colleague (Batman). We see a Superman that audiences have no problem in rooting against.

In Captain America: The Winter Soldier, We see a Captain America that’s trying his best to make a place for himself in the modern world, we see a man out of time and most of all, We see a man who’s tested and challenged for the utmost faith and patriotic fervor he shows to his government

Notice a pattern here?

 Marvel, while telling Cap’s story, doesn’t shy away from what made him popular in the original source material in the first place. They embrace his true character and try and use his ideals as a magnifying glass to look into the way society and the world works today.

Warner Bros./DC on the other hand, by their own admission (or atleast by director Zack Snyder’s own admission) tried to “grow up” Superman, a character who is in no need of “growing up”. What DC didn’t understand was that people didn’t like Superman for being dull and dreary, they liked him for who he was as a character – an unstoppable force for good and positivity.

This brings me to my final point – Darkness in superhero films.

Now, there is this wild misconception that making a film “darker” and more “grittier” automatically makes it a good film. That it somehow transcends everything else in it’s genre and makes everything more complex.

I can tell you now, that it’s bullshit.

Don’t get me wrong, such a dark and gritty tone works for characters that call for it; and so far the only ones I can think of that actually deserve such a tone are Daredevil, Punisher, Batman and Ghost Rider.



So, when you take a hopeful character like Superman and try and make him as “grim/dark” as possible, it just negates what the character stands for and who that character is essentially. Superman needs to have levity to him, Superman needs to be fun, Superman needs to smile, Superman needs to save people; and that’s not going to happen when we’re left with a Superman that doesn’t save his own father, causes as much as destruction as possible and says lines like, “No one stays good anymore”.



I personally hate it when people (or atleast trolls) disregard Marvel completely, by calling their films “for kids” as though that’s some sort of insult. Marvels films may not be as downright obvious with their messages by making everything super serious and devoid of any fun, but the messages to be found in those film are, more often than not, profound, and imbibed with great meaning. Also, Guess what? Superheroes were originally FOR kids. We love these characters now because we grew up with them FROM CHILDHOOD. If a superhero film isn’t accessible to kids, you can be sure that as time goes by, that film, unless it’s another Dark Knight or Winter Soldier, is going to fade away into obscurity.

Kids are important, and what’s more? Kids need to be inspired by Superman again, not be terrified of him.


SUPERMAN Artwork Reveals First Look At Anthony Carrigan's Metamorpho, Hawkgirl's Wings, And More
Related:

SUPERMAN Artwork Reveals First Look At Anthony Carrigan's Metamorpho, Hawkgirl's Wings, And More

SUPER/MAN: THE CHRISTOPHER REEVE STORY Takes Flight On Rotten Tomatoes With 100%
Recommended For You:

SUPER/MAN: THE CHRISTOPHER REEVE STORY Takes Flight On Rotten Tomatoes With 100%

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

DannRamm113
DannRamm113 - 3/26/2016, 9:43 AM
yes, because if you were a man trying to be all good but constantly being put down, you would definitely spend half a movie smiling. Superman is one of the best writen characters in Batman v Superman because of his struggle. He goes through so much mental anguish, has to deal with being put down by society where all the news outlets talk about is how powerful he is, and when he finally does save people, such as the little girl from the burning building, the rocket ship, or the giant flood, all he deals with is criticism from people demanding him to accept responsibility for crimes he did not commit. and when he does oblige and humanize himself to the point to where he goes into the court room to face responsibility, it literally blows up in his face. Accept that this is a superman going through shit, as opposed to the comics where he is nothing but praised by the world. If this superman was faced with a suicidal teen, he would have saved her. but just because he didn't have to doesn't mean he won't

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/batman_vs_superman/dannramms-thoughts-and-discussion-on-batman-v-superman-dawn-of-a132623

there is all my thoughts. feel free to check them out to know my stance on the film.
SpideySupes94
SpideySupes94 - 3/26/2016, 9:45 AM
@dannramm113 - Sorry, but I vehemently disagree.You're free to have your opinion though.
DannRamm113
DannRamm113 - 3/26/2016, 9:47 AM
@SpideySupes94 - give me a valid reason why a man that tries so hard to please everyone but himself isn't a good character.
SpideySupes94
SpideySupes94 - 3/26/2016, 9:51 AM
@dannramm113 - That's not who the Superman in BvS was.
DannRamm113
DannRamm113 - 3/26/2016, 9:56 AM
@SpideySupes94 - ...YOU DIDN'T EVEN WATCH THE SAME [frick]ING MOVIE THEN YOU JACKASS!

sorry, let's try that again.

In Batman V Superman:

Superman has people on the news talking about how he is extremely powerful and a potential threat.

He is blamed for the act of terrorists that he did not commit.

He is blamed for Wallace losing his legs.

He is blamed for a majority of Metropolis being blown to shit by the World Engine.

He is blamed by Batman.

He is blamed for the bombing of a court house he couldn't stop.

His image is being burnt in hatred.

Despite doing everything in his power to show he is good, including saving a girl from a burning building in Mexico, the giant flood scene, the rocket take off, he is blamed.

And when he needs help saving his mother, the one man he needs to help him is preoccupied with trying to kill him.

But...maybe he should smile more?

SpideySupes94
SpideySupes94 - 3/26/2016, 10:00 AM
@dannramm113 - You expect me to take your opinion seriously when you insult me for mine? Sorry, but I'm blocking you now.
DannRamm113
DannRamm113 - 3/26/2016, 10:02 AM
@SpideySupes94 - boo [frick]ity hoo, you just don't have a response and we both know that. but, you're blocking me because you don't have a good counter arguement, so you'll probably end up not responding or posting a picture of the blocked comment with a "what did you say, couldn't hear you". you are a pussy, good job.
GarthRanzz
GarthRanzz - 3/26/2016, 9:45 AM
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/e9/6f/f4/e96ff4f4cb9268ceeb2bbf250d718b11.jpg
SpideySupes94
SpideySupes94 - 3/26/2016, 9:46 AM
@GarthRanzz - That picture makes no sense in context with my article.
GarthRanzz
GarthRanzz - 3/26/2016, 9:51 AM
@SpideySupes94 - google search Superman is a jerk to get a classic look at the character and not the guy who will time travel to save one human instead of everyone else, or the Superman your article demonstrates who will give up being a Superman to get laid this saying screw the world. Superman is nothing like Captain America.
GarthRanzz
GarthRanzz - 3/26/2016, 9:53 AM
@GarthRanzz - If DC has a Captain America it would be General Glory, Shazam, or Barry Allen Flash.
GarthRanzz
GarthRanzz - 3/26/2016, 9:48 AM
https://images.sobadsogood.com/15-surprising-examples-of-superman-the-man-of-steel-being-a-dickhead/2.jpg
GarthRanzz
GarthRanzz - 3/26/2016, 9:56 AM
Further more the Christopher Reeve Superman banged Lois, then memory wipes her, which is extremely bogus and dark if you go with the Singer version that she got pregnant.
Dersgnar
Dersgnar - 3/26/2016, 11:25 AM
I am always shocked when people speak to each other like that about a movie. If somebody doesn't like something, just move on. Don't waste time and energy trying to bring somebody else down. Great article man.
SpideySupes94
SpideySupes94 - 3/26/2016, 11:30 AM
@Dersgnar - Thanks a lot man. Much appreciated :)
AgentZero
AgentZero - 3/26/2016, 4:46 PM
GREAT article bro
AgentZero
AgentZero - 3/26/2016, 4:56 PM
And about that whole darkness and grittiness in these last two movies. First I'll say that a Superman movie shouldn't have such a tone. With that being said people need to understand that you can do a dark and gritty movie and it will be accepted as long as its not DEPRESSING, DULL OR BLEAK.

The Winter Soldier was a very serious movie. Both Daredevil seasons and even Jessica Jones are pretty dark. But these movies and series work perfectly fine and there's no complaint because they're not DEPRESSING !!!

Serious movies can work as long as the filmmakers don't go overboard with it. Hope they learn from their mistakes and start tweaking the Justice League script
HankPymp
HankPymp - 3/26/2016, 9:15 PM
Loved this article. Very concise, and I definitely agree with your points.
GoldenMan
GoldenMan - 3/27/2016, 1:56 AM
A well-thought out article here - it really is surprising to consider the now-stark perceptions of character between Captain America and Superman.
It would seem people are destined to have more conflict over this film than Batman and Superman ever had within it. Regarding the 'character' of Superman in the movie, you cannot deny that Terrio/Snyder/Goyer or whoever originally set out the basis for his characterisation was certainly ambitious and undeniably striving for 'realism' in the depiction of Kal-El's psyche. The moral complexities and issues involved with being an almost omnipotent being are definitely grappled with (if not slightly lost in translation). The problem for me lies within the fact that when looking at Cap and Kal, it is obvious one is the more suited to a modern adaptation. As opposed to Superman, the seemingly constantly benevolent alien-slash-farmer boy from Kansas, Captain America surely has the easier path to being comprehended by audiences in a 21st century setting. The soldier, the American citizen, fighting for what's right because, as a soldier, that's all he knows.
When it comes to giving depth yet remaining tonally intact with source material to Superman, not only must you amply portray the contrasting tones of all 3 of the personalities on show (Kal-El, Superman, and Clark, the latter of which this movie arguably fails to grasp), you have to also ensure that Superman remains the lighter character to Batman's dark knight. In a film revolving around the complexities of these two characters, I feel this contrast is perhaps the most central issue. 'Batman v Superman' bitters me in particular in this respect as the could easily have been accomplished even within the film we saw. But Superman is given so little to do, so little say as an independent man, that he nor Cavill is simply not allowed the space to form his own morals on screen. Take the courtroom scene for instance. By simply having Superman walk in and, despite his obvious internal conflict, attempt to crack a comforting smile to the petrified people surrounding him would at least display some of the humanity that Clark possesses. When addressed by Senator Finch, Superman simply stares back, glassy-eyed and confrontational to her remarks. When she seems to be distressed, in my honest opinion the 'true' Superman would instinctively use his X-ray vision to check her vitals, and at least vocalise some of his concerns. But no, Snyder has him almost-cockily turn his head to the side, like a small boy regarding an ant. For me, here lies the crux of the issue with the writing of this movie. Superman is portrayed a God struggling to be a man, and this is undoubtedly physically true of the character. Yet when regarding moral and internal dilemmas, which this film does indeed attempt to grapple, we should still see Clark at the core, the boy raised in Kansas, a man in turmoil with the issues of being a God. Call me pedantic or overly-critical, but for me, despite the discussion undoubtedly raised of Clark's humanity, this film tries yet struggles to show it. It brings to mind the words of Max Landis in his video put out in the wake of 'Man of Steel', called 'Regarding Clark'; "Put the hero back in the Superhero movies, because I think the Super might have taken over".
eopnalla
eopnalla - 3/28/2016, 12:08 PM
I agree with some of the points in your article. I think either 1) the creative team behind BVS doesn’t completely understand the character of Superman or 2) just tried too hard to make him relatable or grounded.
Background on myself: I am first and foremost a Superman fan more than I am a Batman fan. I always will be. While imbued with god-like powers, Superman decides to use those powers to help those in need rather than to control or dominate.
I concede your point that in MOS, Clark failing to save his father was a deviation from his character. This is the one point that I think the filmmakers truly failed on in regards to his character. The scene would’ve made a little more sense if his dad made a quick decision to put himself in harm’s way (while telling Clark to protect his mom) and not given Clark the time to react and save him. However, I will provide some counter points to show that they didn’t complete sacrifice Superman’s character for darkness and that he was and is still an inspiration to us (the audience).
In MOS, Clark is shown to be scared of his powers and is confused about who he is and what he is meant to do. Both fathers (Pa and Jor-El) provide him a choice on what to do with his powers, especially Pa Kent. Pa doesn’t put additional pressure on him and force him to use his powers for good, he wants his son to decide what to do. In these scenes (especially when Pa first reveals to Clark where he came from) Pa shows Clark unconditional love and acceptance, which inevitably does impact his decision to use his powers to save people. The same is seen with Ma kent during the school seen. So, while Clark is scared and unsure of his future, he learns acceptance and love from humans, this is what grounds him and enables his decision to be a “force for good.” I thought this was a brilliant move by Zach and company to see this more “human” side of Superman.
Ultimately, when faced with the threat of General Zod, Superman knows he is now forced to make a decision even though he knew the world would probably not accept him and ostracize him as an “alien.” Once again, he is more human and unsure of what to do but, in the end, he makes a decision that Superman would do – and that’s to take on Zod by turning himself over to the military. His desire to just want to be human and seeing his powers as a curse since a young age lends even more weight to his decision to reveal himself to the world.
Now, we can argue all day long about the final sequence of MOS, but within the context of the story, Clark did what he thought was necessary to defeat the threat. In the end, he destroyed the world engine, killed zod, and saved humanity from global annihilation.
Fast forward to BVS. Superman is now even more insecure of his place in the world because he is constantly using his powers to help people but everything he does backfires on him and he is blamed regardless of how much good he does. I love the scene with Lois outside their apartment (shortly after the bombing at the courtroom), because he is in tears and feels that maybe he can’t do everything and save everyone, regardless of how hard he tries. This causes him to have a loss of faith in himself, which is extremely human of him. However, he sees that vision of his father and realizes that in the end, the even though he can’t save everyone, the nightmare and consequences of that will lessen over time. And then he comes back, just as Superman does. In the end he sacrifices his life to destroy the threat of doomsday (even after the U.S. government tried to NUKE him). That was epic Superman. And if you didn’t leave the theater inspired after that, then no version or depiction of Superman will inspire you.
I feel like Zach and crew learned their lesson and gave Superman greater character moments and room to grow in this second film, even though he had less screen time. I also want to point out that even though the original Superman on film (Chris Reeve) may have been more of an inspiration to some, it should be pointed out that Superman (in Superman II) decided to give up his role as savior and rescuer in the world in order to get laid with for the rest of his life by becoming human!!!! But no one bothers to point this out, critics included. Is that a good example to follow? I argue Superman was more heroic in the BVS movie to me.
Yes he may not have smiled a whole lot, but that is easily due to the massive burden he has of trying to fit in and grappling with his god-like powers. I do remember during the day of the dead scene where he does smile after returning the girl to her parents, but maybe you are right and we just needed to see a couple more scenes like that, but again, Superman is not always about smiles. He is about sacrificing himself though, which he did.
NotHardtoThink
NotHardtoThink - 3/29/2016, 5:16 PM
What a truly thoughtful and evocative article.
View Recorder