Official Release Date for "Transformers 3" From Michael Bay... Plus a P.S. to Megan Fox

Official Release Date for "Transformers 3" From Michael Bay... Plus a P.S. to Megan Fox

Michael Bay issues a statement about Megan Fox as well as Transformers 3...

News
By Whispers68 - Oct 01, 2009 11:10 AM EST
Source: ShootForTheEdit

With several rumors on the web stating the release date of "Transformers 3," Michael Bay officially announced this morning when we can expect a follow-up to "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen." He also felt obligated to address Megan Fox after her recent statements.

"Well its official: We have a great Transformers 3 story. The release date is now July 1st 2011. Not 2012.

Today is Day One. This morning started with an ILM meeting for five hours in San Francisco. Currently I'm flying with writer Ehren Kruger to Rhode Island to talk to Hasbro about new characters.

P.S. Megan Fox, welcome back. I promise no alien robots will harm you in any way during the production of this motion picture. Please consult your Physician when working under my direction because some side effects can occur, such as mild dizziness, intense nausea, suicidal tendencies, depression, minor chest hair growth, random internal hemorrhaging and inability to sleep. As some directors may be hazardous to your health, please consult your Doctor to determine if this is right for you.

Pain and Gain is right after shooting of Trans 3.

Michael."

Whispers68: I don't know about everyone else, but that P.S. was rather funny. Hopefully the third film will improve on what many fans disliked about part two. Is anyone else waiting for this sequel?

Related:

Everything Wrong With TRANSFORMERS: DARK OF THE MOON In 20 Minutes
Recommended For You:

Full Press Release For Transformers: Dark Of The Moon Blu-Ray
DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Do you have what it takes to write for us?
Want to contribute?
1 2 3
Phinehas
Phinehas - 10/1/2009, 11:52 AM
Correction Whisper68-

"Hopefully the third film will improve on what many fans disliked about part three."
I think you mean, "part two".
Phinehas
Phinehas - 10/1/2009, 11:53 AM
Flippin UNICRON! YEAH! But they haven't even had the Autobots on Cybertron yet. It's like the Lizard on Spiderman. Tease tease tease
KeepItReal
KeepItReal - 10/1/2009, 11:54 AM
correct what they didnt like about part 2... so megan ISNT going to be in it?! =)
DarthKyrat1
DarthKyrat1 - 10/1/2009, 11:58 AM
I can't wait for the 3rd one bring it on the 2nd one wasn't great but still a good one the 3rd one defineltey has room for improvement thats for sure.

P.S. Megan Fox, welcome back. I promise no alien robots will harm you in any way during the production of this motion picture. Please consult your Physician when working under my direction because some side effects can occur, such as mild dizziness, intense nausea, suicidal tendencies, depression, minor chest hair growth, random internal hemorrhaging and inability to sleep. As some directors may be hazardous to your health, please consult your Doctor to determine if this is right for you. lol classic man classic a great action director and comedian nice
________________________________________________________________
Darth out
KeepItReal
KeepItReal - 10/1/2009, 12:07 PM
yeah... [frick]ers cant leave her alone... i dont know why... =P
Phinehas
Phinehas - 10/1/2009, 12:14 PM
Isn't she a piece of heaven? (sighs)
KeepItReal
KeepItReal - 10/1/2009, 12:16 PM
like gum drops and cotton candy on a beautiful clear blue day. **sigh**
Whispers68
Whispers68 - 10/1/2009, 12:17 PM
@Phinehas

I corrected the typo but I guess the error stemmed from the article being about part three, whereas the particular statement was dealing with part two.

@KeepItReal

Megan will definitely be in part three as it appears currently but the film is two years away, so who knows except her and Michael Bay. I didn't have an issue with her in the film because she does bring the "eye candy" appeal to the series. But her constant complaining has the potential to ostracize her from the other cast and mainly Bay
Phinehas
Phinehas - 10/1/2009, 12:30 PM
KIR-LOL!!!
KeepItReal
KeepItReal - 10/1/2009, 12:33 PM
whispers: "eye candy"...

lol... i hear you... but they could find other eye candy in her place... maybe with more substance. she didnt do anything really in part II. the other eye candy" robot did well AND had a purpose. at least if she has to be in it... give her something to do that is useful. if she were someone else with a thought in her head she would protest the lack of character her role is. she did so much better in part 1. when she was helping bumblebee in battle. you know. she could be pretty and handy too. =)

phin... hehehe =P
KeepItReal
KeepItReal - 10/1/2009, 12:53 PM
teabag... "wear a i love WW t-shirt for ya KIR :)"

!@#$@%$ whyioughta... man! troublemaker =P she is not worthy! as it is i want to whoop her ass with that WW belt she had the audacity to wear the other day! humph! lol!
Whispers68
Whispers68 - 10/1/2009, 12:59 PM
I think she knew her position in this action film when she was a "nobody" and signed on. Once celebrity-ism hit due to the box office smash of the first film, photo shoots in FHM and dozens of other magazines, interviews on television, etc...she entered the realm of the, "I'm more than a pretty face." She's exposed everywhere and perhaps she hasn't been grounded to know her acting isn't really "acting." It's really being on camera, having lines here and there and pouting her beautiful lips. It's about seeing her batting her eyes, not stimulating ones intellect by a portrayal on camera with the likes of Meryl Streep.

She's been typecasted in my opinion as the "it hot girl" and there's nothing wrong with that because not every musician is a great singer or instrument player, not every actor is an exceptional actor, not every artist is Leonardo...you guys get the point.

Who knows, maybe over time, she'll grow into a more well rounded actress but then again, she's earning millions by being pretty, her publicist doesn't care about her going down in history as the best actress. There are "good" actresses sitting on the sidelines but Megan is getting gigs continuously.
Phinehas
Phinehas - 10/1/2009, 12:59 PM
Seeing how she's all toes, it makes me Wonder how she buckled that belt!
KeepItReal
KeepItReal - 10/1/2009, 1:16 PM
whispers... that is my point.. she doesnt mind just being the hot it girl. Thats enough for her. If she had more character and depth to her she would fight to be more than that and not just be only that. when she was a nobody she did good in part I and now that she is a household name look what she does with that in part II. This is the time she needed to establish herself as to what type of actress she wants to go down as.
Whispers68
Whispers68 - 10/1/2009, 1:33 PM
@Keepitreal

I definitely agree but some girls type-casted as the "hot girl" hate the title, so they try and move beyond the roles where their only direction is to keep teenage boys and men aroused. They try and hone their acting abilities and even when others label them as the hot girl, it isn't because her roles are dull/bland but it's because she is hot...but at the end of the day, she can still act. For others like Megan who are physically beautiful but don't like the "hot girl" label and yet each time we see them on film, it's representing another hot girl role, it's confusing to say the least.

I currently can't really think of someone who was labeled the "hot girl", hated the title and changed it by choosing her roles more wisely to eventually become an actress critics/fans can take seriously.

Maybe Angelina during her early career? Halle Berry?
Whispers68
Whispers68 - 10/1/2009, 1:44 PM
@MultiPurposePoni

Was she always labeled the hot girl? I'm asking because I didn't know hollywood/critics/fans slapped the label on her

It's feasible though because she is an attractive woman
Whispers68
Whispers68 - 10/1/2009, 2:02 PM
@MultiPurposePoni

I definitely understand the Twilight aspect of your message because like them, there are other young actresses in Hollywood who shy away from the limelight due to the damage/drama that comes along with it

As for Theron, Monster was an exceptional movie...I loved it. And Angelina embraced it with open arms and as you said, not only did it work but it continues working for her because people still consider her to be hot and yet she has roles in films like "Changeling," "The Good Shepherd," "A Mighty Heart," etc.
Instantclassic
Instantclassic - 10/1/2009, 2:17 PM
Ah wow kool, already starting on the 3rd, just taking it step by step, plus we get it a year earlier. The PS thing was pretty funny. I cant wait to see the new characters.
Phinehas
Phinehas - 10/1/2009, 2:39 PM
What's a palm tree again?
HelaGood
HelaGood - 10/1/2009, 3:12 PM
@Phinehas, LMAO!

megan fox is really 42 yrs old. yep. no lie. and you can quote me.
JonF
JonF - 10/1/2009, 3:19 PM
I want to see the Dinobots, Omega Supreme and maybe Shockwave, but I love the fact that Megan Fox is so hot that she's upstaging the actual Transformers! LOL!
JoshWilding
JoshWilding - 10/1/2009, 3:19 PM
I still havent seen the second movie yet (missed it when it came out in the cinema) but im looking forward to getting it on blu-ray!

Megan Fox is gonna look really foolish returning for the third movie after everthing she's said about Bay! I actually think that he's a decent director in the genre of films he does. Ok, they're not Oscar worthy maybe but who cares! His movies are pretty damned entertaining IMO!
dammitboomer
dammitboomer - 10/1/2009, 3:41 PM
i dont know if its been discussed or if anyone knows anything about that hyber human/robot chick? cause i would like some kinda inderstandin
Whispers68
Whispers68 - 10/1/2009, 3:47 PM
@MultiPurposePoni and Teabag

You Guys are silly...that girl in the picture is mighty tasty though.

I guess I'll assume when two people go "At it" on the site, they usually end up arguing, throwing feces on one another/computer screens and eventually blacklist one another as opposed to either seeing the viewpoint of the other person or simply agreeing to disagree?

@dammitboomer

On Bay's site, he didn't mention her. What do you want to understand about her?
bullsize
bullsize - 10/1/2009, 4:06 PM
July 2011!!,
2011 wud be rocking summer.Spidey 4+Thor+Cap+Gl+Trans 3+Hangover 2+Panda 2+Rango+Cars 2....pretty busy summer
awesome!!!!!!
Joe6Pack74
Joe6Pack74 - 10/1/2009, 4:25 PM
Omega Supreme, Shockwave and bring Soundwave to Earth to fight.
KeepItReal
KeepItReal - 10/1/2009, 4:31 PM
multi: "@Whispers68 Can it be? Two members of the CBM community having an educated discussion for the first time and.." so what type of discussion was I having with him? btw.. agree with Charlize Theron. Scarlett JO also mentioned the same thing to the effect of how she wanted to be more than just a pretty girl in movies. And Natalie Portman and some others that i cant name just now. Its the level of quality of a woman that determines if they will use their looks to achieve their goals or strive to be something more than just another pretty face.
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 10/1/2009, 4:39 PM
i'm looking forward to tf3. whatever, i enjoyed the first two.

and before i forget...doesn't megan fox have webbed feet? lol
antz1104
antz1104 - 10/1/2009, 4:42 PM
I know I'm late on this thread, but: "Ha ha Megan, you just got served!" That's why Bay's in charge. Bring on the Dinobots!
1 2 3
Related Headlines
Latest Headlines

Hot Headlines Hot Headlines

Sci-Fi & Fantasy

Anime & Manga

Gaming

Horror

Cartoons & Animated Features

Action Movies & TV

Pro Wrestling & MMA News
View Recorder