LOTR Star Viggo Mortensen Explains Why He Turned Down The Role Of Wolverine In X-MEN

LOTR Star Viggo Mortensen Explains Why He Turned Down The Role Of Wolverine In X-MEN

Several actors were considered for the role of Wolverine in 2000's X-Men before Hugh Jackman laded the part, including Lord of the Rings star Viggo Mortensen. Here, the actor reveals why he passed...

By MarkCassidy - Feb 07, 2021 07:02 AM EST
Filed Under: Wolverine
Source: The Playlist

It's common knowledge that Hugh Jackman was not 20th Century Fox or director Bryan Singer's first choice for Wolverine in 2000's X-Men (he was actually recommended for the role by Russell Crowe after he passed), and one of the actors considered was Viggo Mortensen.

Despite being a fan-favourite choice for several different characters over the years, the Lord of the Rings star has yet to appear in a superhero movie (the closest he came was David Cronenberg's graphic novel adaptation, A History of Violence), but he did briefly consider suiting-up as Logan after being offered the part by Singer back in the day.

During an interview with the Happy Sad Confused podcast, Mortensen revealed that one of the reasons he decided to pass on the role was his son, who he brought with him to meet the director as a "good luck charm," pointing out how this movie version of Wolvie differed from the comics!

“The thing that bothered me at the time was just the commitment of endless movies of that same character over and over,” the actor recalls. “I was nervous about that. And also there were some things... I mean they straightened most of them out, but I did take Henry to the meeting I had with the director as my sort of good luck charm and guide. In the back of my mind I was thinking he could learn something, too, because I did let Henry read the script and he goes ‘This is wrong, that’s not how it is.'”

Mortensen went on to say that Singer then asked his son if he was familiar with the character.

“And he goes ‘yeah, but he doesn’t look like this,' And all of a sudden the director is falling all over himself and then the rest of the meeting was him explaining in detail to Henry why he was taking certain liberties. We walked out of there, and Henry asks if he will change the things he told him about, and I say I don’t think so. I’m not going to do it anyway, because i’m not sure I want to be doing this for years, and then a couple of years later I’m doing 3 Lord Of The Rings so who knows.”

Of course, Jackman ended up playing the iconic mutant, and the rest is history. “I think he did great," Mortensen says of the Aussie actor's take on Logan. "I’m sure no one could imagine anyone doing it better than he did anyway."

Mortensen probably would have made a terrific Wolverine, but the same could be said of any number of comic book characters. The chances of us seeing him play a prolific Marvel or DC superhero/villain in the future seem slim, however, as he recently stepped behind the camera for his directorial debut, Falling.

THE LORD OF THE RINGS: THE RINGS OF POWER Finale Teaser Unleashes The Balrog And Confirms [SPOILER]'s Fate
Related:

THE LORD OF THE RINGS: THE RINGS OF POWER Finale Teaser Unleashes The Balrog And Confirms [SPOILER]'s Fate

WOLVERINE: Taron Egerton Is The Favorite To Replace Hugh Jackman As Logan At The Bookies
Recommended For You:

WOLVERINE: Taron Egerton Is The Favorite To Replace Hugh Jackman As Logan At The Bookies

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3
MyCoolYoung
MyCoolYoung - 2/7/2021, 7:24 AM
That's pretty interesting. I still don't love Hugh Jackman as wolverine. I think the affinity for him comes from him playing him a bunch of times rather than him killing it a bunch of times, though that's not an indictment on Hugh I'm just not a fan of most movies that universe
Blergh
Blergh - 2/7/2021, 7:31 AM
@MyCoolYoung - I guess the love for Hugh comes from a mixture of nostalgia and not knowing better.
We haven't had proper X-Men content except the animated series and the movies blew up so much.
Hugh did great though IMO
BobGarlen
BobGarlen - 2/7/2021, 7:33 AM
@MyCoolYoung - they missed a golden opportunity by not casting Kiefer Sutherland, a 5'6" gruff voiced Canadian actor, to play the 5'3" gruff Canadian BMF.
MyCoolYoung
MyCoolYoung - 2/7/2021, 7:36 AM
@Blergh - I agree about Hugh doing great. He took the material he was given and elevated it for sure
MyCoolYoung
MyCoolYoung - 2/7/2021, 7:38 AM
@BobGarlen - I didn't know Keifer was that short. I think even if they had cast him, if wouldn't of mattered. Back then it seemed like they try to distance themselves from the more vibrant look of the xmen and comic world.

My guess is they didn't want things to be as cartoony after batman and Robin
Tpo81
Tpo81 - 2/7/2021, 7:46 AM
@BobGarlen - I can’t see that at all
AC1
AC1 - 2/7/2021, 10:51 AM
@MyCoolYoung - I think a lot of it comes from the fact that, regardless of whether or not the movies he was in were up to snuff (because let's face it, probably half of the X-Men movies were not good) Jackman ALWAYS gave it his all. Obviously there's nothing he could ever do to win over the people who wanted a more accurate portrayal of the character (which is perfectly valid) but everything that Jackman was able to have an effect over was something that he always made a huge effort to do to the best of his ability, and I think almost everyone can at least respect that.
AC1
AC1 - 2/7/2021, 11:11 AM
@MyCoolYoung - and you're right, there was definitely a conscious effort for them to distance themselves from the more colourful, comic-booky inspiration; between the massive failure of Batman and Robin (bright, colourful superhero movie), and the huge success of the first Matrix movie (sci-fi action movie where 90% of characters wore black leather) they must've felt that the was the safest play, and I can kind of understand and forgive them for taking that more cautious approach back then.

The thing I don't really get is why they didn't try to move on from that aesthetic in either of the sequels, seeing as movies like Spider-Man were proving people would embrace the colour and the costumes if the rest of the film was done well, and even when they started toying with the idea in First Class and Days of Future Past it still felt like they were reluctant (and I love those two movies). I'll admit the "no costumes" thing did work for things like The Wolverine and Logan, but we definitely should've gotten some of it earlier on in the franchise (besides Deadpool, which is a bit of an outlier anyway).

Like, even taking Logan as is, imagine how much more impactful those little details like the comic books featuring the X-Men in their costumes would have been if we'd ACTUALLY seen them in their costumes in some of the earlier movies. But hey, at least it gives Marvel a really good visual way of differentiating their take right from the get go.
Bluesman
Bluesman - 2/7/2021, 1:52 PM
@MyCoolYoung - correct me if I'm wrong but if Stan Lee hasn't interfered James Cameron about Spider-man while meeting with Chris Claremont, Bob Hoskins would've done a killer job as Wolverine, along with Angela Bassett as Storm.
B89
B89 - 2/7/2021, 5:59 PM
@MyCoolYoung - yeh about all the height problems, could say fox only made it worse for Jackman by casting a 5'10 Cyclops to stand next to
MyCoolYoung
MyCoolYoung - 2/7/2021, 6:46 PM
@AC1 - I agree. I still hope marvel won't shy away from those themes and racial undertones the mutants go through even though it was done in the fox-men universe
MyCoolYoung
MyCoolYoung - 2/7/2021, 6:46 PM
@Bluesman - that would've been an old cast but it would've been something to behold
MyCoolYoung
MyCoolYoung - 2/7/2021, 6:47 PM
@B89 - the height of him im not too mad at. If they could find a great actor that's shorter, fine, but if not best actor available. They shouldn't of ran from the scruffy look of wolvie. Even though they did it some
AC1
AC1 - 2/8/2021, 6:33 AM
@MyCoolYoung - 100% agree, it's kind of the soul of the X-Men as a property and it'd be cool to see Marvel touch on some issues in their movies, seeing as we don't always see much of that - they've touched on topics like "big tech" in the Iron Man movies, surveillance and fascism in Winter Soldier, race in Black Panther, etc. but most of the movies just focus on the central narrative without a lot of subtext so X-Men kinda needs that. Might also be good if they broadened it slightly like they've done over the years in the comics, so while X-Men started out as something of a direct parallel to the Civil Rights Movement, over the years it expanded to cover themes like religious persecution, gender equality, LGBTQ+ identities and rights, etc.

I wouldn't want it to be on the nose or preachy about any of it, but it's something that should inform the story as it develops, and I think it's something Kevin Feige and co are pretty aware of already based on some previous comments I vaguely remember.
MyCoolYoung
MyCoolYoung - 2/8/2021, 7:47 AM
@AC1 - paraphrase the comment if you can
Bluesman
Bluesman - 2/8/2021, 11:44 AM
@MyCoolYoung - Well I meant at the time during the late 80s. It probably would've been different then if James Cameron proceed to that project
MyCoolYoung
MyCoolYoung - 2/8/2021, 12:35 PM
@Bluesman - oh my mistake. I dont know why I thought that was like right before the foxmen universe launched. That would've been epic
AC1
AC1 - 2/8/2021, 1:20 PM
@MyCoolYoung - Kevin Feige's comments? Just in general I think he's said in the past that Marvel have plans to introduce more diverse heroes (different races, LGBTQ+, more female protagonists, etc.)

So based on that I think once they've established the X-Men within the MCU they'll probably recognise how the property lends itself so easily to those goals, although obviously that's just guesswork on my part.
Bluesman
Bluesman - 2/8/2021, 11:02 PM
@MyCoolYoung - No worries!
GhostDog
GhostDog - 2/7/2021, 7:26 AM
Viggo’s son calling out Singer on Wolverine’s look
Goldboink
Goldboink - 2/7/2021, 8:47 AM
@BlackBeltJones -
Yea, that is priceless. Little kid reads script and says, "no, that's all wrong" and Singer freaks out and tries to explain to the kid why he was going to take a dump on Cyclops, make Rogue something else entirely and then water down Wovlerine.
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 2/7/2021, 9:11 AM
@Goldboink - They didn't really make Rogue something else entirely. Her version in the original movies was very similar to her early appearances in the comics. A scared, impressionable teenager on the run after putting her boyfriend in a coma when her powers manifested.

Remember, she didn't start out with super strength and flight. That came later. The movie was pretty on point with her, with the exception of her not joining the Brotherhood before the X-Men.

It was just disappointing because that version of the character was pretty boring, in the comics and the movies. Everyone wants to see the super strong, flying version of her.
WaffeX
WaffeX - 2/7/2021, 3:12 PM
Doomsday8888
Doomsday8888 - 2/7/2021, 7:31 AM
No biggie.


Both did great in their role in the end.
OmegaDaGrodd
OmegaDaGrodd - 2/7/2021, 7:33 AM
Kid said:



I didn't know that I needed to know that Viggo Mortensen's son knew X-Men better than Brian Singer but I'm certainly glad that I now know that
inkniron
inkniron - 2/7/2021, 7:36 AM
Singer getting it stuck to him by a 10yr old. The irony.
Doomsday8888
Doomsday8888 - 2/7/2021, 7:37 AM
And here *they* come, they always do.

Time to hit play, i guess. :3


Sweet Dreams are maaade of thiiis!
Whaley87
Whaley87 - 2/7/2021, 8:49 AM
@Doomsday8888 - Come on, the kid jokes just make themselves. Lol.
1 2 3
View Recorder