EDITORIAL: Why Agents of SHIELD needs to go smaller

EDITORIAL: Why Agents of SHIELD needs to go smaller

And by smaller, we mean a more focused season with fewer episodes. Click inside as to why I think this is a good way to improve the overall quality of the series in a dramatic way.

Editorial Opinion
By clogan - May 09, 2015 09:05 AM EST
Filed Under: Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.

Ever since we've got our first look at Agents of SHIELD a couple years back, it feels like there's a strong sense of disappointment in the air. And this is not just because of the fact that show doesn't have any Superheroes in it. But because of the fact that, it is almost a very poorly thought out show with a quality that has only Visual Effects in it invested with. 

ABC Studios and Marvel Television's decision to put out a show that runs over the course of almost nine months was already a mess of an idea to begin with. While it is nice to be treated to a 24-episode adventure, a show tends to lose its track of time and effort after merely a couple episodes in. And of course, there’s a number of shows which have found success in this format (Flash for example, but even then it’s mostly with the genre fans) But having a shorter run doesn’t necessarily mean a bad run: let’s look at Game of Thrones, The Walking Dead, Breaking Bad, Daredevil and Mad Men. These are great shows which have the elements of condensed, overarching and more focused story with less filler stuff, while carefully developing the characters and utilizing their budget to their best. So why is it that Marvel Television can not approach this show with a similar mindset and develop a more critically more positive show just by condensing their content to maybe an 8-13 episode run?


One of the greatest things I personally love watching a story unfold is…watching that story unfold and I’m not alone in this matter. We are living in the golden age of television where the mode of Monster of the Week has gotten old and flew out of the window. We want more serialized content, we want more of a content that draws us to the screen to see what’s going to happen next? What will you be doing till the next episode? It is something that Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. has failed at from the get go. There was no real focus of the story nor the characters, which didn’t let the audience focus on the show as well. It’s alright, and it happens. But when you cut down most of your episodes to about its half, then your Showrunner will have the idea to develop something that’s more consistent with the initial vision rather than just giving you a half-assed, 24 episode run. And two of the other Marvel TV series have already benefitted from this idea: Agent Carter, which was critically more acclaimed and Daredevil, of which so many people believe to be one of best criminal thriller shows out there.

The examples of this can be seen in Breaking Bad which allowed the shows writers to fully flesh a whole ensemble of characters and have them develop over the course of only 62 episodes in its life-time. I’d like to remind you that AoS is already 42 episodes in. While it is true that the show’s recent season has been more condensed, but you can’t help but to see all the filler content that drags the audience away from the screen. But how do we fix this?


One of the ways can be by adopting an original outline from before the production of this new season starts and focusing on developing that aspect. We are aware that the show can’t do too many crazy things without consulting the Marvel Studios first, but there are a TON of things that can be done without interfering with the rest of the Marvel Universe. So first of all, see what your options are and try to focus on them without going too broad. Take a storyline from the comic books, there’s a whole world of stories within the comics and see what you can adapt for this show instead of freeballing your way in, trying to create something where there is not. While it may prove useful if you were thinking that you were “Christopher Nolan”ing the whole thing, you have to remember that even he took the original source material and built something on it or around it.

One thing is for certain, besides Fitz and Simmons, I am not invested in –any- of these characters both Hero and Villain. I don’t know if it’s producer meddling, poor acting, writing or direction… But there’s a lot of people who just don’t care about these characters, including Agent Coulson who’s meant to be the big leader of the organization, but I just can’t help but to not give a frick if he dies or not at this stage. He’s not as interesting as he was any longer, while he could have been.

A shorter season will allow you to develop and focus on these characters without any filler content which will detract this train from the tracks. I want to be more emotionally invested in them without worrying that “Ah, this week we get another character…great” or “Ah, another random villain we have to fight” and “So…where were we again? Oh shit we have 3 episodes left” These are things to be considered without jumping into this long adventure of a series.


And of course, with a shit ton of a budget a show like AoS has, this way you’ll be utilizing your budget in ways you can’t even phathom for the better. We’re talking about stuff ranging from transportation down to the VFX. A more clean focus will bring more than just an attractive plot and a cast and who knows, you might get to keep some in your pocket. But in the end, your budget will be better utilized to help the quality of the show and not on anything useless (like the filler episodes/content we talked about)
 
In the end, the show really feels like it could use more of this condensation / cut down method that some of the other shows have adopted. Feels like it is the right direction that a show like Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.'s magnitude could use to provide a better quality show for all of us around the world. Is it the only way it can get better? Definitely not, but to me it feels like a good start.

So these were my thoughts about the show. While I’m aware that it has gotten better, it feels like we need more focus rather than hoping that the shit we throw at the wall sticks. Let me know of your thoughts in the comment section below, whether you agree with me or not!

Marvel Television Exec Plays Coy When Asked Whether AGENTS OF S.H.I.E.L.D. Should Be Considered MCU Canon
Related:

Marvel Television Exec Plays Coy When Asked Whether AGENTS OF S.H.I.E.L.D. Should Be Considered MCU Canon

AGENTS OF S.H.I.E.L.D. Star Ming-Na Wen Talks Marvel Studios/Television Division And Possible Return
Recommended For You:

AGENTS OF S.H.I.E.L.D. Star Ming-Na Wen Talks Marvel Studios/Television "Division" And Possible Return

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

NovaCorpsFan
NovaCorpsFan - 5/9/2015, 10:02 AM
I just want to know if the writers have forgotten about Graviton.
clogan
clogan - 5/9/2015, 10:14 AM
The show really just tries to freeball everything. They just need to focus to tell a very good story with great performance and characters you should care for (along with other elements such as music, sound and [not preferrably] vfx)
Superheromoviefan
Superheromoviefan - 5/9/2015, 10:29 AM
I agree
too much lame stuff like mugging villains(carl), lame characters(grant ward) etc
kong
kong - 5/9/2015, 10:32 AM
They need to get the people behind Daredevil on their side.

Also SHIELD needs to feel more like an intelligence agency not just "OH SHIT SUPERHEROES LET'S GO SEE WHAT'S GOING ON". More espionage than....whatever the hell they're doing.
homodrome
homodrome - 5/9/2015, 12:24 PM
season 2 was essentially 2 small seasons, 10 in the fall, 12 in the spring. It will not go to smaller seasons, there is a shit ton of money in syndication. The season 3 order guarantees a 4th season for syndication.
clogan
clogan - 5/9/2015, 5:54 PM
@InfiniteMonkey

From the getgo, I think marketing for Agents of SHIELD was a little off. A lot of people expected superheroes while the name of the show was Agents of "SHIELD"

But you see, even then, the characters weren't fully fleshed and that's why it was off putting the see the show. Honestly, if it was a great espionage show, you wouldn't give a damn if other costumed freaks showed up just like how you didn't give a damn about Elektra/Bullseye showing up in the first season of Daredevil.
sikwon
sikwon - 5/9/2015, 6:10 PM
AoS has basically been 4 seasons. The 1st half of season 1, the "villain of the week portion" was to introduce us to the characters and define their individual starting points. It was an origin for May, Ward, Fitzz, Simmons, Skye, Raina and Mike Peters. After Cap 2, when the show "gained direction and focus" we were able to watch the characters develop. Look at Simmons from episode 1 to now. Same basic character yet the events around her have clearly changed her. This is true for all of the characters on the show. The plots have been pretty well defined, Hydra has been ever present and they have been building the Inhuman story since the beginning (the 084 reference has been the alien undertone from the beginning). There has also (I'm surprised novacorpsfan hasn't hit on this a bit more) a very consistent and STRONG Kree presence on the show. All of the Colson resurection elements we're Kree based. The episode ware the Kree and Sif both appeared and now a Kree weapon has been introduced. Everything points to a larger Kree presence going forward and with the use of the word Quantum as an explination that could (should) lay the ground work for powered Kree. There is alot going on with this show but it is definitely focused. The Inhumans are definitely replacing Hydra as the main plot with Kree elements serving in the back round while gearing up for Civil War and post CW. And I think that Grant Ward has developed into one of the better Marvel villains. I truly don't understand all the complaints about this show, the development and plot focus has been consistent, the story hasn't been to jumbled and the reveals have been pretty am good for the most part. There are no easy payoffs with this show, it earns it's character development (May killing the little girl as reason for leaving the field and that girl being an Inhuman was a great payoff to a character and a good illustration of why the Inhuman group is as isolationist as they are.)
Haltiamieli
Haltiamieli - 5/9/2015, 6:49 PM
I've come to accept that there are quality series and there are quantity series. AoS, as entertaining as it is, is firmly in the latter category. To make a truly great quality series you'd be better off starting from the clean slate.

I just appreciate that I'm getting a weekly dose of MCU from September all the way to May (with some few breaks). I'm not sure if I would want to sacrifice that for a shorter season and a questionable rise in quality.
Reasonnnn
Reasonnnn - 5/9/2015, 7:10 PM
I agree, but Walking Dead shouldn't be in the same conversation of those other shows.
RynerLute
RynerLute - 5/10/2015, 10:36 AM
Half the stuff you're suggesting happened in the first season and people torpedoed it at every turn.

Smaller? check, was about a tight knit group of agents lead by Coulson and 50% of what they were doing was espionage and fringe science. People hated it , they wanted heroes and more enhanced abilities.

More focused on the characters? Again look no further than the first few episode which were centered the most on the characters. People hated it.


It's just funny to me how this show has improved so much and people still find something to complain about. People knit pick AoS and that's the truth.
RynerLute
RynerLute - 5/10/2015, 10:39 AM
Only thing I can agree on is the amount of filler. But there's no way around that in a 22 episode season.

If anything they need shorter seasons like Agent Carter and Daredevil, but I doubt it since AoS is the flagship show, they're more beholden to the movies than any of the other shows.
clogan
clogan - 5/10/2015, 11:53 AM
When I said smaller, I meant the focus. Game of Thrones focus is small but there's a massive cast of characters you care for.

This show could've been a great showcase of Spy/Espionage Thriller, but it ended up being a half-assed show.
sikwon
sikwon - 5/10/2015, 1:40 PM
@clogan... half assed how? What is lacking?
Trickwil
Trickwil - 5/11/2015, 11:16 AM
I like AOS for what it is. I like Daredevil for what it is, and I like Arrow and Flash for what they are (this season though Arrow has been awful)

AOS is telling a television serial about spies in a sci fi world that has super heroes. Daredevil is a character study about a world that has super heroes and has some elements of sci fi. Arrow and Flash are costume super hero serials. All are very f'ing different don't compare them.
MercwithMouth
MercwithMouth - 5/11/2015, 7:16 PM
This article reads as a well researched, intelligently written study of a show if you watched the first 7 episodes and stopped there. AoS has extremely right writing, every storyline has been intertwined with another, and usually has a seamless segue between storylines.

Centipede - Raina - Mike Peterson - Hydra - Deathlok - Scorch - Quinn - Graviton - Blizzard - Calvin Zabo - Inhumans - Diviners - Kree - GH325 - Alien writings - "Real SHIELD"....

Everyone of those things is connected to another by at least two others.

Centipede had an advanced Extremis serum, Raina worked for Centipede, she recruited Scorch and Deathlok, who was upgraded by Quinn, who helped create Graviton and Blizzard, both former SHIELD agents or assets. Cal - Skye's dad, who worked with Raina, had knowledge of the Diviner, married an Inhuman, who was torn apart by Hydra, who was experimenting on people trying to understand the Inhumans, Whitehall searching for Diviners, Coulson's resurrection using Kree blood leading to alien writings, which Garrett began after injecting a synthesized version, which led to SHIELD knowing of the writings, which led to Gonzalez hiding the other side of SHIELD, fearing that Couldon had lost it, recruiting powered people , including Deathlok. Grant Ward, connective tissue between Hydra and Agent 33 and Cal Zabo.

AoS is very connected within every storyline. The writers have shown a unique ability to interweave storylines beautifully without major retcons, continuity problems, or having things seem forced. They used a small amount of the villain of the week tripe during the first season because their major focus was on world building. But they still managed to have an overarching plot that was built upon in almost every episode.

The one gripe I could see would be the underutilization of Graviton, but he's a shitty villain to begin with, and the focus was more on Quinn from the get go. Quinn became a very important villain throughout season 1. Then Garrett took over as the big bad, and he was phenomenal, and had close connections with the Deathlok program, being he was the first subject.

The connective tissue is what makes AoS so much better than some generic spy show. And it's a big part of why AoS is the best CBTV show on network TV. I even like it better than Daredevil (but Daredevil is incredible).
Trickwil
Trickwil - 5/12/2015, 10:05 AM
@ Merwithamouth- I can't disagree with anything you said except I think Daredevil is a better show, mostly because I think it has broader appeal.
View Recorder